to be vaccinated or not be vaccinated... upcoming series beginning WEDNESDAY

[Jude Iam]

Here's input, free and available for all. Best, Jude

If you listen to most pediatricians, you’ll quickly get the impression that vaccines are “the best thing since sliced bread” and that the chances of being harmed by a vaccine are infinitesimal.
However …

• Did you know that, according to the US Dept of Health & Human Services (DHHS) website, over the past 31 years (from 1989 to 2020), there has been over $4.4 BILLION in total outlays to families of persons who were damaged by vaccines?
• Did you know that when doctors bill insurance companies, they have diagnostic codes referred to as “ICD-10” codes for the most common symptoms, and there are almost 2 dozen ICD-10 codes to indicate vaccine injury and vaccine poisoning?

• Did you know that there are over a dozen “required” vaccines on the CDC schedule that were cultured in aborted fetal tissue?
• Did you know that almost every vaccine package insert states “this vaccine has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential”? In other words, the manufacturer does not know if it causes DNA damage or cancer!

In light of these FACTS, shouldn’t we have the freedom to say “NO” to vaccination?
Our nation was founded by rebels seeking freedom from tyranny. Those principles have guided our nation for almost 244 years, which is why we aren’t legally required to eat our vegetables, are permitted to smoke cigarettes and participate in activities that are detrimental to our health if we so choose, and we don’t have any mandatory exercise regimens.

However, there is an active propaganda machine working as a precursor to compulsory vaccination mandates around the world. We’ve seen this machinery kick into full gear over the past few weeks with the coronavirus lockdowns and panicked people everywhere. Fear is already being manufactured and opposition is already being silenced, and it’s very likely that we will see a push for “mandatory” vaccination for COVID-19 within the next year to 18 months...

It’s time to draw a line in the sand. It’s time to say “enough is enough.”
In order to make a stand, it’s imperative that we are all educated about vaccines, the theory of vaccination, and the “pros” and the “cons.”
That’s why we are excited to announce our groundbreaking 9 episode docu-series “The Truth About Vaccines 2020” which will premiere on April 22nd.
>>Get educated about vaccines! Click here to register <<
Even if you don’t have school aged children, this topic is of vital importance to you. More and more vaccines are added each year, and the CDC hasn’t been shy about their goal to “catch up” adults who have “fallen behind” on their vaccines.
You owe it to yourself and your family to learn the truth about vaccines.
It’s no exaggeration to say that your lives may one day depend upon it!
Yours in Health Freedom,

P.S.Be sure to grab your free “front row seat” here.

[SonomaPatientsCoop]

No, I did not know this. Probably because much of it is misrepresentation or outright BS...

I think 6-7 of the current childhood vaccines are cultured on aborted fetal tissue. So be it. I have no problem with this. Abortion is a woman's right- if some good- whether vaccines or stem cell research can come from that all the better.

As to the labeling on vaccines- standard legalize. I guess we are on the flibside here in CA- where every damn thing has to have a prob 65 warning- "this*could* cause cancer- to the point where it so ubiqutous it is meaningless and counter productive...

As to the payouts... again-largely meaningless. It's well known in both the legal and medical community the DHHS will settle rather then pay to litigate. Roughly 2/3rds of the cases are generally considered to be baseless. The rest comprise allergic reactions, malpractice, immune-compromised children, and unknowns. And a huge portion of that total- over 31 years- is legal fees- not what is considered actual harm to children.

And ICD-10 codes... just do your own research on what that coding actually means...

I have many, many friends who are Naturopaths. MD's too. There are only a few real concerns I hear about with childhood vaccines. One Being their schedule increases risks for the immune compromised and allergic kids- they should be more spread out. And second- there are a couple- of the more minor vaccines, whose effectiveness is questioned.

I don't know a single ND or MD who thinks vaccines are bad- nor that their risks to a few outweigh the benefit to the many. That's not to say that there shouldn't be discussion about the current mandated schedule or about the worth of a couple of the vaccines.

[OldGranddad]

I don't know how old you are, but when I was a child the president of the United States was in a wheel chair because of Polio. My Grandfather used to show me houses when we took walks and tell me how many caskets were stacked on them during the1918 Flu epidemic because folks couldn't be buried fast enough. In 83 years I never encountered anyone who was hurt by a vaccination. I know it can happen, but... Unfortunately I no longer trust anything I see, hear or read in the news. Needless to say, I also feel that way about our present government. Anyone can make any subject come across as God's own truth to suit their needs. Since the citizens of this country, in general, are poorly educated and not taught to think in our school system, controversies such as this proliferate.

My children were vaccinated and, if I had more - God forbid - I would have them vaccinated also.

It's never to late to start thinking.

Old Granddad

[Jude Iam]

so granddad, you have a few years on me. i wasn't around just then.

but i've never had a flu shot - and never had the flu either.

an anecdote: i had a friend (my senior by about 20 years) who'd had throat cancer in his thirties that was cured by a doctor in the Mid West who treated him with herbs, and also helped many others, before being harassed and stopped from practising by the AMA. he was one of MANY who didn't toe their line and was stopped cold.

here's one history of the American Medical Association https://www.ama-assn.org/about/ama-history/ama-history

here's another https://www.cancertruth.net/ama-history/ - quite different.

all the doctors currently working in the US must offer ONLY cut/burn/poison (surgery/radiation/chemotherapy) for cancer or face heavy fines and loss of their license - if i was dealing with that, i would prefer other options, but i'd need to leave the country to get those. we all know this. This also pertains to all other illnesses, completely tying the hands of healers and posing an untenable situation for both patients and providers.

yes, my dear, for decades i have been thinking - as well as reading, watching, considering.
My conclusion is that i most certainly want medical freedom, and will choose what i feel is right for me, usually the least pharmaceutical /allopathic intervention possible, but when that seems best, then sure. I believe everyone ought to have that right.

yours truly, jude

I don't know how old you are, but when I was a child the president of the United States was in a wheel chair because of Polio. ...

[podfish]

an anecdote: i had a friend (my senior by about 20 years) who'd had throat cancer in his thirties that was cured by a doctor in the Mid West who treated him with herbs,

or, to put it scientifically, "had throat cancer in his thirties but recovered.
He may have been treated by herbs, or eaten a lot of ice cream, or slept 20 hours a day. Attributing a recovery from a disease to any specific cause is extremely difficult, even with a lot of statistically-valid data (meaning lots and lots of people in similar circumstances, with a variety of 'treatments' or even behaviors, and strong correlation between only a few of those). It really is that simple, and that's why it's so baffling that people keep seeing cures when there are such small numbers of cases to draw such a conclusion from.

[Jude Iam]

so we're back to the crux: MONEY and a "health care system" that runs on it. LOADS. the MOST expensive system in the world while ranking way low on efficacy.

there's not a lot in herbs or vitamin/supplements, therefore few studies.

how's that gonna be overcome exactly?

...Attributing a recovery from a disease to any specific cause is extremely difficult, even with a lot of statistically-valid data (meaning lots and lots of people in similar circumstances, with a variety of 'treatments' or even behaviors, and strong correlation between only a few of those). ....

[podfish]

so we're back to the crux: MONEY and a "health care system" that runs on it. LOADS. the MOST expensive system in the world while ranking way low on efficacy.

there's not a lot in herbs or vitamin/supplements, therefore few studies.

how's that gonna be overcome exactly?

that's the right way to look at it. There's no question that fitting this into a capitalistic system distorts everything, tainting peoples' motivations in a way that leads to the kind of doubts you express about science-driven medicine, and to underdevelopment of modes of treatment that don't fit into the capitalistic model. Absolutely true. This is where I differ from the right and libertarian points of view.

The invention of money and development of a capital-based system of control was a really cunning insight. But like the truism that when you have a hammer, every problem is treated as if it were a nail, once you have created a capitalistic system every human endeavor gets sucked into it. No other life form works that way. Not that nature's a great example, it's a little competition-heavy for my taste as well. But putting food/water/housing/healthcare into a money-based system is beating a square peg into a round hole (to continue construction-based analogies). Now that we're reaching a pinnacle of technology and enlightenment we should address that problem. The UBI is nice, but why make people handle cash? Reward those who want to research herb-based treatments as well as those who manufacture proteins, but feed and house those who don't do either -- just because they're human too.