The fix is in: Republicans make sure Obama serves second term because two parties are same

[ubaru]

If you are scanning this article, make sure to read the last four paragraphs.

To the Democrats who are against the agenda of the ruling elite, Ron Paul is the only candidate in alignment with you. O'bomba certainly is not. Let go of party lines. See the graphic below. Vote for the man, not the party.

Vote in the Republican primary in May 2012. Change parties to Republican by the end of January to play the game. Do it as a Revolutionary Act. Let's make it such a landslide win for Ron Paul, that even the black boxes can't manipulate the vote to serve the means of the elite. And let's make this headline untrue.
Liz

The fix is in: Republicans make sure Obama serves second term

November 19, 2011 by ppjg


John Boering /PPJ contributor November 19, 2011
________________________________________

I have concluded that we may as well dispense with the coming media circus surrounding the 2012 presidential election. Think of it: no phony “debates”, no stage shows, no mud slinging ads, no having to hear the same lame lies and

statements as one candidate after another tries to convince us that he/she will reverse the terrible destructive course the US is on. We don’t need to subject ourselves to any of it; the fix is in and Obama wins hands down, no competition……or at least none that the Republican party will acknowledge. Why upset the status quo?

How do I know this?

The Republican party could easily sweep the elections and retake the White House simply by running Ron Paul (R) TX. Poll after poll shows Paul garnering 25% with GOP voters and as much as 70% or more with the public from BOTH sides of the political spectrum.

During the GOP debate, CBS twice removed a candidate poll because the support for Ron Paul showed that he was far and away the leading choice for Republican voters and that was not supposed to happen!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...&v=-wwbrihlXts

So why wouldn’t the Republican party run what is clearly a winning candidate? Hmmmmm. Because Ron Paul would put an end to much of the power Republicans and Democrats enjoy as a result of their own self-pandering, power grabbing and unconstitutional activity.

Instead they are offering the sorriest collection of non-starters most likely ever assembled for a presidential race and are actively blacking out and refusing to acknowledge the popularity of Paul with the voters and what would be a sure-fire land-slide election.

When I see politicians such as Newt "I just can’t keep my pants on" Gingrich being paraded out for the umpteenth time and treated as if he is actually a viable and desirable candidate for the country’s highest office, knowing this man’s proclivity for mistresses and philandering, for abusing position and power, I tend to think the Republican party has bottomed out.
The remaining candidates are so lack luster, so unqualified, so entrenched in neo-conservative ideology that these pseudo debates are actually tedious to listen to. The canned questions with the corresponding canned and scripted answers are an insult to the viewers.

As a last ditch effort to throw a clinker into the mix, Herman Cain appeared on the Republican bandwagon. For cripes sake, from where did the Republicans dig this man up? Every time Cain appears on camera, viewers begin cringing as they wait for the next fabulously idiotic statement emanating from this man’s mouth. Of course Faux News just loves him……that should be a tip off right there that something is wrong.

So the question remains: Why would the Republican party shun a candidate who can obviously win against all comers, and instead support candidates they know have no chance of winning anything unless the electronic voting machines are rigged yet again?

The Answer: Obama is their candidate also. As president he has been far more effective at dismantling the Constitution, passing oppressive legislation, issuing unlawful and unconstitutional Executive Orders, and expanding the death grip of the federal government on the states than Bush2 and his neo-conservative collection of psychopaths’, ideologues’, new world order, corporate pandering and UN suck-ups than any of these supposed candidates now offered for consideration.

Make no mistake, the Republicans want Obama re-elected just as much as the Democrats do, after all there really is only one party in the District of Criminals and all concerned are quite happy with Obama. There is no way the Republican party is going to run a sure fire winner whose intentions are to reign in the federal corporation when they already have the perfect man in office who has done more to deconstruct the US than even Bush 2 did.

I guess I just answered my own question.

Why vote? With the exception of Ron Paul, they are all selling the same product; it's just which sales pitch are you going to buy?

[Hotspring 44]

Poll after poll shows Paul garnering 25% with GOP voters and as much as 70% or more with the public from BOTH sides of the political spectrum.

If that is so across the country; the question is: will Ron Paul run as a 3rd party candidate in 2012?

[ubaru]

If that is so across the country; the question is: will Ron Paul run as a 3rd party candidate in 2012?

No, I don't think so. If he doesn't win the primary, everyone who wants him will write him in. Ron's a Libertarian running as a Republican because, for now, that's the only way to play the game if you're serious about winning. Same goes for us. We need to see the game, look beyond the party labels, and vote for the one who stands for bringing down the whole corrupt system.

Liz

[ubaru]

In 2008 the Republican party played to lose by putting Sarah Palin in at the last moment. This year same thing. The people's will that Ron Paul be president won't, however, disappear. This will be interesting.

Liz

[zenekar]

In 2008 the Republican party played to lose by putting Sarah Palin in at the last moment. This year same thing. The people's will that Ron Paul be president won't, however, disappear. This will be interesting.

Liz

Obama serves the corporatocracy well - he's their man. Ron Paul does not represent the will of the majority of people who believe in a woman's right to choose, maintaining the social safety net -- Social Security and Medicare, and regulating banks and corporations. Be careful Liz, if you get too far out on the fringe you may fall over the edge.

[theindependenteye]

I believe this understanding of the Conspiracy doesn't go far enough. It gives the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers top billing, with some from the Inscrutable East, but totally ignores the crucial role of the Illuminati, the Rosicrucians, International Communism, Radical Islam and the Elders of Zion. The fact that Ron Paul has not been endorsed by any of these might be seen as evidence of his independence, except that he's been curiously noncommittal about the Roswell Incident.

Seriously, though, I'm curious to know, if he's totally independent of all outside ties but is still elected President, how he's going to be able to govern within a government that's otherwise in the pockets of international conspiracies? By dictatorial powers reinforced by private militias? By making post-election deals with the Senator from Exxon-Mobil, the Senator from GE, the Senator from Monsanto, the Senator from GE, the Senator from Goldman Sachs, etc. etc. etc.?

-Conrad

[someguy]

I believe this understanding of the Conspiracy doesn't go far enough. It gives the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers top billing, with some from the Inscrutable East, but totally ignores the crucial role of the Illuminati, the Rosicrucians, International Communism, Radical Islam and the Elders of Zion. The fact that Ron Paul has not been endorsed by any of these might be seen as evidence of his independence, except that he's been curiously noncommittal about the Roswell Incident.

Seriously, though, I'm curious to know, if he's totally independent of all outside ties but is still elected President, how he's going to be able to govern within a government that's otherwise in the pockets of international conspiracies? By dictatorial powers reinforced by private militias? By making post-election deals with the Senator from Exxon-Mobil, the Senator from GE, the Senator from Monsanto, the Senator from GE, the Senator from Goldman Sachs, etc. etc. etc.?

-Conrad

If anyone can do it, it's Ron Paul. He has consistently been the man who has stood by his principals in congress and among the private corporate vultures that have infiltrated congress, as you allude to. He is so principled and so not 'bought out' that someone like Ralph Nader supports Ron Paul, even though they can disagree on many important issues. Ralph recognizes who Ron Paul represents, and it is not the corporate vultures, the 1%, or the NWO. Ron might represent a slightly different demographic than that of Ralph Nader, but he represents a genuine movement of very concerned and peaceful people. People such as farmers, doctors, small business owners, marijuana reformers, anti-war hippies(: free speech lovers, anti-fascist funketeers, anti-NWOers, pro-republic chumans, and so on....