U.S cameraman has proof 9/11 was a lie

[someguy]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ma2l2km_WS8

[Tars]

If you have bandwidth constraints, I suggest you don't don't bother watching this video. I guess that comment makes me part of the big U.S. gov't conspiracy to cover up the "truth".

Video Synopsis: I am having "credible" experts view my video. The U.S Gov't is out to get me. Colorado sheriff: "he's under investigation for murdering his first wife". Current Argentinian wife: "I know my husband is a real good man, he wouldn't do that".

No "proof" was presented in this video. Actually, no assertions were made either, other than "anomalies may show the U.S. Gov't (did I tell you they're out to get me?) is trying to cover up the truth".

[sharingwisdom]

https://www.wanttoknow.info/911/9-11_news_summary

Excerpts:

"It's almost a culture of concealment, for lack of a better word. There were interviews made at the FAA's New York center the night of 9/11 and those tapes were destroyed. The CIA tapes of the interrogations were destroyed. The story of 9/11 itself, to put it mildly, was distorted and was completely different from the way things happened."
-- Time magazine article quoting John Farmer, Senior Council to the 9/11 Commission

Did you know that literally hundreds of respected government officials, professors, and 9/11 survivors and family members have stated there was a major cover-up around 9/11? Did you know that over 1,000 architects and engineers have signed a petition calling for a new investigation into the collapse of the buildings on 9/11? And did you know about the media articles? The below excerpts from eye-opening news articles published on highly respected major media websites raise serious questions about what those in key positions in the U.S. government really knew about 9/11 and who was behind the attacks.

[9/11] Hijack 'suspects' alive and well
2001-09-23, BBC News
https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/mi...st/1559151.stm

Another of the men named by the FBI as a hijacker in the suicide attacks on Washington and New York has turned up alive and well.

A New Look at the 9/11 Commission
2009-09-11, Time magazine
https://www.time.com/time/nation/art...921659,00.html

Former New Jersey attorney general John Farmer served as senior counsel to the 9/11 Commission, tasked with investigating the government response to the attacks. His new book, The Ground Truth, picks up where the commission left off — taking a deeper look at the government's ... response to the attacks and exposing officials determined to hide their failings from the inquiry.
There were interviews made at the FAA's New York center the night of 9/11 and those tapes were destroyed. The CIA tapes of the interrogations were destroyed. The story of 9/11 itself, to put it mildly, was distorted and was completely different from the way things happened.

9/11 third tower mystery 'solved'
2008-07-04, BBC News
https://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7485331.stm
However, a group of architects, engineers and scientists say the official explanation that fires caused the collapse is impossible. Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth argue there must have been a controlled demolition. The founder of the group, Richard Gage, says the collapse of the third tower is an obvious example of a controlled demolition using explosives. "Building Seven is the smoking gun of 9/11. A sixth grader can look at this building falling at virtually freefall speed, symmetrically and smoothly, and see that it is not a natural process. Buildings that fall in natural processes fall to the path of least resistance", says Gage, "they don't go straight down through themselves."

Why I Resigned From the CIA
2004-12-05, Los Angeles Times
https://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-oe-scheuer5dec05,1,471321...

https://www.wanttoknow.info/eliminatebinladen
Michael Scheuer, a 22-year veteran of the CIA, wrote "Imperial Hubris: Why the West is Losing the War on Terror." Between January 1996 and June 1999 I was in charge of running operations against Al Qaeda from Washington. When it comes to this small slice of the large U.S. national security pie, I speak with firsthand experience (and for several score of CIA officers) when I state categorically that during this time senior White House officials repeatedly refused to act on sound intelligence that provided multiple chances to eliminate Osama bin Laden — either by capture or by U.S. military attack.

Tenet told 9/11 panel that he warned Rice of Al Qaeda
2006-10-03, Boston Globe/Washington Post
https://www.boston.com/news/nation/w...e_of_al_qaeda/

Connections And Then Some

2003-03-14, Washington Post
https://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/w...5406-2003Mar14

The 9/11 Secret in the CIA's Back Pocket
2004-10-19, Los Angeles Times
https://articles.latimes.com/2004/oc...on/oe-scheer19

It is shocking: The Bush administration is suppressing a CIA report on 9/11 until after the election, and this one names names.

If you have bandwidth constraints, I suggest you don't don't bother watching this video. I guess that comment makes me part of the big U.S. gov't conspiracy to cover up the "truth".

Video Synopsis: I am having "credible" experts view my video. The U.S Gov't is out to get me. Colorado sheriff: "he's under investigation for murdering his first wife". Current Argentinian wife: "I know my husband is a real good man, he wouldn't do that".

No "proof" was presented in this video. Actually, no assertions were made either, other than "anomalies may show the U.S. Gov't (did I tell you they're out to get me?) is trying to cover up the truth".

[someguy]

9/11 third tower mystery 'solved'
2008-07-04, BBC News
https://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7485331.stm
However, a group of architects, engineers and scientists say the official explanation that fires caused the collapse is impossible. Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth argue there must have been a controlled demolition. The founder of the group, Richard Gage, says the collapse of the third tower is an obvious example of a controlled demolition using explosives. "Building Seven is the smoking gun of 9/11. A sixth grader can look at this building falling at virtually freefall speed, symmetrically and smoothly, and see that it is not a natural process. Buildings that fall in natural processes fall to the path of least resistance", says Gage, "they don't go straight down through themselves."

How about Larry Silverstein (the owner of the WTC buildings) saying on television "I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it. And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."

Problem is, it takes a long time to prep a building for demolition, and only a handful of skilled demolition companies can perform such a perfect "pulling down" of a building.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WYdAJQV100

Now remember the official explanation was the WTC7 fell due to fire.

Not to mention that the BBC and CNN reported the fall of WTC7 about 20 whole minutes before the actual plummet. In the case of the BBC, you can see the building towering behind the reporter who is announcing that the building has already fallen on live television.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNK1V6S2cbo

But I guess Im just a crazy right wing racist conspiracy theorist for pointing this out.......

[someguy]

I wonder why no one will take on the facts that were presented in this thread by myself and sharingwisdom..... facts that clearly contradict the official story of 9/11. To those of you who believe the official story, how do you explain the fact that two separate news stations on different parts of the planet clearly reported Building 7 falling before it fell? How do you explain Larry Silverstein's comment?

Seriously, I would like to know.

[ian-snazz]

Interesting, but the details of the footage would be nice.

[podfish]

I wonder why no one will take on the facts that were presented in this thread by myself and sharingwisdom..... facts that clearly contradict the official story of 9/11. To those of you who believe the official story, how do you explain the fact that two separate news stations on different parts of the planet clearly reported Building 7 falling before it fell? How do you explain Larry Silverstein's comment?

Just in the interest of participating in a dialogue, I may give in and watch it... but it's hard to devote some time to that given the poor history of 911-conspiracy claims.
But I can comment while still avoiding the trap so many fall into of objecting to what they've heard of but not seen! though I can't comment on Silverstein's comment without knowing what it was. However, I do fail to see how "separate news stations on different parts of the planet clearly report"ing anything can be used as evidence of anything. Are you implying they were given scripts of what to say by the conspirators?? Remember the Chinese state news agency re-ran a clip from the Onion as straight news.... the lazy media will gladly use each other as sources and do so without attribution all the time.
Every story outside of the demolition theory that sharingWisdom listed is essentially about the incompetence of Bush's (and Clinton's, for that matter) government, not about their cunning. The demolition theory and cruise-missile theory don't rise to the standard of extraordinary evidence required for extraordinary claims.