Story at-a-glance  
  
-  PCR tests  cannot distinguish between “live” viruses and inactive (noninfectious)  viral particles and therefore cannot be used as a diagnostic tool. The  false appearance of a lethal pandemic has been manufactured using cycle  thresholds (CTs) that are too high
 -  The higher the  CT — i.e., the number of amplification cycles used to detect RNA  particles — the greater the chance of a false positive. Research shows  that to get 100% confirmed real positives, the PCR test must be run at  17 cycles. Above 17 cycles, accuracy drops dramatically
 -  The SARS-CoV-2  PCR test was developed based on a genetic sequence published by Chinese  scientists, not the viral isolate. Missing genetic code was simply made  up
 -  November 30,  2020, 22 international scientists published a review challenging the  scientific paper on PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 that was adopted as the  standard across the world. The scientists are calling for the so-called  Corman-Drosten paper to be retracted due to its numerous errors
 -  The flaws of  PCR testing have been capitalized upon to incite fear in order to  benefit the Great Reset agenda developed by a technocratic elite 
 
 The COVID-19  pandemic has brought us many harsh lessons. Importantly, it has shown us how  easy it is to manufacture panic and 
control entire populations through  deceptive means.  Topping the list of  deceptive strategies is the use of a test that  falsely labels healthy  individuals as sick and infectious. This allows  mass testing to drive the narrative that we're in  a lethal pandemic.
...
PCR  test is not designed to be  used as  a diagnostic tool as it cannot distinguish between inactive viruses and  "live" or reproductive ones.
1
This is a crucial point, since  inactive and reproductive viruses are  not interchangeable in terms of  infectivity. If you have a  nonreproductive virus in your body, you will not get  sick and you  cannot spread it to others. Secondly, many if not most laboratories   amplify the RNA collected far too many times, which results in healthy  people  testing "positive."
....
Many scientists  have noted that anything over 35 cycles is scientifically indefensible.
2,3,4 A September 28, 2020, study
5  in Clinical Infectious Diseases revealed that when you run a PCR test  at a CT  of 35 or higher, the accuracy drops to 3%, resulting in a 97%  false positive  rate.
Yet, a test  known as the Corman-Drosten paper and tests recommended by the World Health  Organization are set to 45 cycles,
6,7,8  and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and  the U.S. Centers for  Disease Control and Prevention recommend running PCR tests  at a CT of  40.
9
The  question is why.... When labs use  these excessive cycle  thresholds, you clearly end up with a grossly  overestimated number of  positive tests, so what we're really dealing with is a  "casedemic"
10,11 — an epidemic of false positives.
.....
Many are now  questioning whether this  was done on purpose to crash the global economy and  provide cover for  the implementation of what's known as the 
Great Reset, which is nothing less than a 
global totalitarian takeover by 
unelected technocrats who seek to gobble up all the world's  assets.
 Indeed, it  seems quite clear we're not dealing with a lethal  pandemic in any real sense.  Mortality statistics further prove this is  the case, as overall mortality  statistics have remained stable in 2020  and in line with previous years.
12,13,14
 .... Antibody Tests Are Equally Unreliable
(goes into why that is - however they did find some very good news)
The saving grace is that studies29,30,31  suggest antibodies produced following exposure to coronaviruses that  cause the  common cold also appear to provide some general and  long-lasting resistance  against SARS-CoV-2.
One  such study,32,33  published May 14, 2020, in the journal Cell,  found 70% of samples from  patients who had recovered from mild cases of  COVID-19 had resistance  to SARS-CoV-2 on the T-cell level, as did 40% to 60% of  people who had  not been exposed to SARS-CoV-2. ....this suggests there's "cross-reactive T cell recognition between circulating  'common cold' coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2."
High Time to End  Mass Testing Scam
If the vast  majority of people who test positive for COVID-19  infection have no symptoms,  don't feel sick and don't look sick, is  COVID-19 really a "deadly" disease? Or,  is it more like HPV — a viral  infection that most people have without knowing  it, and which 90% are  able to eliminate without treatment?
The primary  justification for the tyrannical governmental  interventions of COVID-19 was to  slow the spread of the infection so  that hospital resources would not be  overwhelmed, causing people to die  due to lack of medical care.
These  interventions were not about  stopping the spread altogether or even reducing  the number of people  that would eventually get infected. They certainly were  never meant to  prevent all death. Any rational analysis would rapidly conclude  that  this simply isn't possible, under any circumstance.
Short-term stay-at-home  orders and business closings were only  intended to slow down the spread so  that, eventually,  naturally-acquired herd immunity — the best kind — would  prevent it  from reemerging.