From the Pacific Sun:
Yes - It's not often a state ballot opposition is written by an "erotic service provider," but Maxine Doogan seems to be one of the few people coming out against Prop. 35, which would establish longer prison sentences and larger fines for people convicted of human trafficking crimes, and require them to register as sex offenders. Sex industry spokespeople, such as Doogan, argue that it also broadens the definition of human trafficking—it appears to be aimed at both larger networks of human trafficking, online child pornographers, as well as the common street pimp—which could suddenly make legal sex workers, and those they may support financially, guilty of human trafficking.
There may be some gray areas regarding whether certain erotic services cross the line but, as the initiative's supporters write, this is about "preventing the sexual exploitation of children," not about harassing sensual masseuses.
CA Democratic Party: Yes - Increases penalties for human trafficking
CA Green Party: No position - Read about about why they are conflicted about it here.
What do you think?