I was there, and I don't like the fact that police let us stay in a building under bomb threat by "animal rights activists." Employees later told me that the police we saw searching through baskets of clothing were looking for a BOMB.
Is this your idea of public safety, Chief Weaver? Letting customers and employees remain where they might be blown to bits? I'd like to be given the OPTION of evacuating a building under bomb threat.
This fiasco was hushed up by police, and I think I know why.
Terrorist activity in Sebastopol might cause investors to rethink the CVS/Chase project down the street. Drug stores sell products of animal testing, and Chase Banksters bid-rigging and mortgage fraud make them a natural target for terrorist activity.
But too much money is riding on this to bother with alerting people they might get blown up. Bad for business, what with lawsuits for bad faith negotiations, failure to perform, surety bonds and insurance.
I'm now wondering if the Barlow warehouse fire was accidental. Heaps and bales of clothing don't burn very well. Are these two events related?
Thanks.