Question 4. What are your thoughts and ideas about citizen participation in overseeing law enforcement activities? (citizen review board)
Clearly, citizen participation should be a core element of overseeing all government activity – from public forums in City Council meetings to law enforcement.
Kathleen Shaffer - Did not participate
I don’t see it as practical for a citizen’s review board to oversee all enforcement activities. I do think it’s reasonable to have citizens participate in review actions when there has been a controversial incident or death. It is hard to believe that one PD will review the actions of another PD objectively. The process could use more transparency. Something akin to the Grand Jury could be formed when extreme cases happen, and participate in the review.
I’ve lived in Sebastopol for over ten years, and I walk around town a lot. I have not seen the police here as “overly-aggressive”. If it can be demonstrated that there is a problem, then I will listen and act accordingly. Until then, it seems like this may be a solution is search of a problem.
I have been strongly encouraging a Citizen's Review Board; simular to the one San Francisco has. I have no faith in police departments to honestly review complaints against themselves, having experienced that first hand.
This review board may save the City money by resolving some conflicts without lawsuits. This may also ihelp generate more revenue for local businesses by helping to change the impression others have regarding law enforcement here, which keep them from visiting this area.
It may also help increase the public's safety by building a better sense of trust with the Police Department, which may help with solving and preventing crimes and assistance during emergencies.