My recommendations:
I will vote YES for:
Prop 30: Protects funding for schools and local public safety.
Prop 34: Repeals death penalty and replaces with life without parole.
Prop 36: Reforms “Three Strikes” law.
Prop 37: Requires labeling of genetically engineered foods.
Prop 39: Adjusts taxes for multi-state corporations to fund clean energy & energy efficiency programs.
Prop 40: Redistricting state senate districts.
I will vote NO on:
Prop 31: Locks California into permanent underfunding of education, health, & other services.
Prop 32: Exemptions for billionaires & Super PACs, allowing them to buy elections, while barring unions from donating to candidates.
Prop 33: Auto insurance rate hike.
Prop 35: Violates First Amendment & imposes substantial & unreasonable burdens.
Prop 38: Competes with Proposition 30, which is clearly the better bill. Whichever initiative has the higher vote total will become law!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Democratic Party recommendations on state initiatives November 2012.
https://www.cadem.org/news/press?id=0138
Yes on Prop. 30: Protects funding for schools and local public safety
No on Prop. 31: Locks California into permanent underfunding of education, health, & other services
No on Prop. 32: Creates special exemptions for billionaires & Super PACs allowing them to buy elections
No on Prop. 33: Auto insurance rate hike
Yes on Prop. 34: Repeals death penalty and replaces with life without parole
Yes on Prop. 35: Increases penalties for human trafficking
Yes on Prop. 36: Reforms “Three Strikes” law
Yes on Prop. 37: Labeling of genetically engineered foods
No on Prop. 38: Munger initiative
Neutral on Prop. 39: Adjusts taxes for multi-state corporations to fund clean energy programs
Yes on Prop. 40: Referendum on State Senate district boundaries
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Green Party Positions on Statewide Propositions - November 2012 General Election
https://www.cagreens.org/elections/propositions
Endorses:
Prop 30: Taxes to Fund Education and Local Public Safety. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.
Prop 34: Death Penalty. Initiative Statute.
Prop 36: Three Strikes Law. Repeat Felony Offenders. Penalties. Initiative Statute.
Prop 37: Genetically Engineered Foods. Labeling. Initiative Statute.
Prop 39: Tax Treatment for Multistate Businesses. Clean Energy and Energy Efficiency Funding. Initiative Statute.
Prop 40: Redistricting. State Senate Districts. Referendum.
Opposes:
Prop 31: State Budget. State and Local Government. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.
Prop 32: Political Contributions by Payroll Deduction. Contributions to Candidates. Initiative Statute.
Prop 33: Auto Insurance Companies. Prices Based on Driver's History of Insurance Coverage. Initiative Statute.
Prop 38: Tax to Fund Education and Early Childhood Programs. Initiative Statute.
No Position:
Prop 35: Human Trafficking. Penalties. Initiative Statute.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ACLU Norcal takes the following positions on ballot measures for November 2012 elections.
https://www.aclunc.org/legislation/ca_propositions/index.shtml
Prop. 30 - Support
Generates funding for education and provides a stable funding source for counties to pay for the new responsibilities they have acquired through criminal justice realignment. Amending the California Constitution to permanently dedicate revenues to local governments to pay for that realignment is crucial.
Prop. 31 - Oppose
Prop. 32 - Oppose
Prop. 34 - SUPPORT!
Replaces death penalty with life in prison without possibility of parole. Initiative would save $130 million a year. 140 people have been freed from death rows around U.S. after wrongful convictions. Hundreds of innocent people have been wrongfully convicted of serious crimes in California. Replacing death penalty is the only way to ensure that California never executes an innocent person. We know that 46% of murders go unsolved in California each year, with higher numbers in Latino and African American populations. Initiative also directs $100 million of the savings to local law enforcement for solving murder cases.
Prop. 35 - Oppose
Prop. 36 - Support
Prop. 38 - Support
Raises $10 billion annually to provide funding for education and early childhood programs and provides for higher levels of funding for low-income students.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
League of Women Voters of California
https://ca.lwv.org/action/prop1211/index.html
YES on Prop. 30:
Proposition 30 begins to move California toward financial stability and adequate funding for all the services we want from our government; we can’t continue to cut vital public services like schools and public safety. This measure will provide some much needed income from a temporary increase in income tax rates for the wealthy and a modest temporary sales tax increase. The plan is a part of a balanced approach to eliminating our deficit that includes $8 billion in cuts, $6 billion in new revenues, and $2.5 billion in loans, deferrals, etc., this year. Proposition 30 also guarantees a stable source of funding for counties to pay for their new public safety responsibilities such as housing low-level prisoners and providing substance abuse treatment.
YES on Prop. 34:
The SAFE California Act will replace the death penalty in California with a sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole. Convicted killers will stay in prison for the rest of their lives, eliminating the possibility of executing an innocent person in California. This will save over $100 million every year— because the court and incarceration costs are so much higher for prisoners at risk for a death penalty. $100 million of these savings will be allocated over the next four years to pay for increased investigation of unsolved rape and murder cases. Convicted killers will be required to work and pay restitution into a victims’ compensation fund.
YES on Prop. 40:
We strongly urge a “YES” vote on this referendum on the state Senate maps drawn by the independent Citizens Redistricting Commission. The question on a referendum is not intuitive; it asks if you want to retain the new law, or in this case, the maps drawn by the Citizens Redistricting Commission. So vote YES to affirm the maps drawn by the Citizens Redistricting Commission, YES—in support of the Commission, YES—to validate the open, transparent process, YES—to retain fair districts.
NO vote on Prop. 31:
Proposition 31 is based on good intentions and has some pieces that, taken alone, the League could support. However, Prop 31 has several significant flaws. There are questions about whether or not the provisions allow local governments to suspend state environmental requirements. What is clear is that there will be significant legal uncertainty, and years of litigation. In addition, the measure prescribes the specific manner of state and local government budgeting and puts this process into the state constitution. Prop 31 has other questionable provisions, such as establishing a significant shift of power over appropriations to the governor at times of fiscal emergency.
NO vote on Prop. 32:
This measure is not the campaign finance reform measure its proponents say it is. Proposition 32 promises “political reform” but is really designed by special interests to help themselves and harm their opponents. It looks like a campaign finance reform measure but unfairly targets one set of large campaign donors while giving other donors unlimited power. Its ban on payroll deductions for political giving will affect unions but not corporations, and even the restriction it places on contributions to candidates by corporations is full of loophole exemptions. It does not fix the problem of money in politics; Super PACs and independent expenditure committees will continue to spend without limitation.
The League is neutral on Propositions 38 and 39.
The League has not studied Prop. 33 (Auto Insurance Rates), Prop. 35 (Human Trafficking), Prop. 36 (Three Strikes Reform), and Prop. 37 (Genetically Engineered Foods).
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
California Republican Party positions:
Prop. 30: OPPOSE
Prop. 31: SUPPORT
Prop. 32: SUPPORT
Prop. 33: SUPPORT
Prop. 34: OPPOSE
Prop. 35: SUPPORT
Prop. 36: OPPOSE
Prop. 37: OPPOSE
Prop. 38: OPPOSE
Prop. 39: OPPOSE
Prop. 40: SUPPORT