From:

https://www.commondreams.org/headline/2011/08/25-0

"A power play is underway in the foreclosure arena, according to the New York Times.
on the one side is Eric Schneiderman, the New York Attorney General, who is conducting his own investigation into the era of securitizations – the practice of chopping up assets like mortgages and converting them into saleable securities – that led up to the financial crisis of 2007-2008.
On the other side is the Obama administration, the banks, and all the other state attorneys general.
This second camp has cooked up a deal that would allow the banks to walk away with just a seriously discounted fine from a generation of fraud that led to millions of people losing their homes."

I'd like to know where California's Attorney General, Kamala D. Harris, stands on this proposed immunity from prosecution (in return for a token "bribe") for banks. The AG's of New York, Delaware, and Nevada want a full inquiry. The AG's of other states seem not to. Anyone know why? Here's an article on this story, from Time mag online:
https://swampland.time.com/2011/08/2...-schneiderman/

And one from the Daily KOS:
https://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/...rimes-Cover-up