Click Banner For More Info See All Sponsors

So Long and Thanks for All the Fish!

This site is now closed permanently to new posts.
We recommend you use the new Townsy Cafe!

Click anywhere but the link to dismiss overlay!

Results 1 to 4 of 4

  • Share this thread on:
  • Follow: No Email   
  • Thread Tools
  1. TopTop #1
    phooph's Avatar

    From someone who knows Sarah Palin

    This seems to be making the rounds:

    Dear friends,

    So many people have asked me about what I know about Sarah Palin in the
    last 2 days that I decided to write something up . . .

    Basically, Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton have only 2 things in
    common: their gender and their good looks. :)

    You have my permission to forward this to your friends/email contacts
    with my name and email address attached, but please do not post it on
    any websites, as there are too many kooks out there . . .



    I am a resident of Wasilla, Alaska. I have known Sarah since 1992.
    Everyone here knows Sarah, so it is nothing special to say we are on a
    first-name basis. Our children have attended the same schools. Her
    father was my child's favorite substitute teacher. I also am on a
    first name basis with her parents and mother-in-law. I attended more
    City Council meetings during her administration than about 99% of the
    residents of the city.

    She is enormously popular; in every way she’s like the most popular
    girl in middle school. Even men who think she is a poor choice and
    won't vote for her can't quit smiling when talking about her because
    she is a "babe".

    It is astonishing and almost scary how well she can keep a secret. She
    kept her most recent pregnancy a secret from her children and parents
    for seven months.

    She is "pro-life". She recently gave birth to a Down's syndrome baby.
    There is no cover-up involved, here; Trig is her baby.

    She is energetic and hardworking. She regularly worked out at the gym.

    She is savvy. She doesn't take positions; she just "puts things out
    there" and if they prove to be popular, then she takes credit.

    Her husband works a union job on the North Slope for BP and is a
    champion snowmobile racer. Todd Palin’s kind of job is highly
    sought-after because of the schedule and high pay. He arranges his
    work schedule so he can fish for salmon in Bristol Bay for a month or
    so in summer, but by no stretch of the imagination is fishing their
    major source of income. Nor has her life-style ever been anything
    like that of native Alaskans.

    Sarah and her whole family are avid hunters.

    She's smart.

    Her experience is as mayor of a city with a population of about 5,000
    (at the time), and less than 2 years as governor of a state with about
    670,000 residents.

    During her mayoral administration most of the actual work of running
    this small city was turned over to an administrator. She had been
    pushed to hire this administrator by party power-brokers after she had
    gotten herself into some trouble over precipitous firings which had
    given rise to a recall campaign.

    Sarah campaigned in Wasilla as a “fiscal conservative”. During her 6
    years as Mayor, she increased general government expenditures by over
    33%. During those same 6 years the amount of taxes collected by the
    City increased by 38%. This was during a period of low inflation
    (1996-2002). She reduced progressive property taxes and increased a
    regressive sales tax which taxed even food. The tax cuts that she
    promoted benefited large corporate property owners way more than they
    benefited residents.

    The huge increases in tax revenues during her mayoral administration
    weren’t enough to fund everything on her wish list though, borrowed
    money was needed, too. She inherited a city with zero debt, but left it
    with indebtedness of over $22 million. What did Mayor Palin encourage
    the voters to borrow money for? Was it the infrastructure that she said
    she supported? The sewage treatment plant that the city lacked? or a
    new library? No. $1m for a park. $15m-plus for construction of a
    multi-use sports complex which she rushed through to build on a piece
    of property that the City didn’t even have clear title to, that was
    still in litigation 7 yrs later--to the delight of the lawyers
    involved! The sports complex itself is a nice addition to the
    community but a huge money pit, not the profit-generator she claimed it
    would be. She also supported bonds for $5.5m for road projects that
    could have been done in 5-7 yrs without any borrowing.

    While Mayor, City Hall was extensively remodeled and her office
    redecorated more than once.

    These are small numbers, but Wasilla is a very small city.

    As an oil producer, the high price of oil has created a budget surplus
    in Alaska. Rather than invest this surplus in technology that will
    make us energy independent and increase efficiency, as Governor she
    proposed distribution of this surplus to every individual in the state.

    In this time of record state revenues and budget surpluses, she
    recommended that the state borrow/bond for road projects, even while
    she proposed distribution of surplus state revenues: spend today's
    surplus, borrow for needs.

    She’s not very tolerant of divergent opinions or open to outside ideas
    or compromise. As Mayor, she fought ideas that weren’t generated by
    her or her staff. Ideas weren’t evaluated on their merits, but on the
    basis of who proposed them.

    While Sarah was Mayor of Wasilla she tried to fire our highly respected
    City Librarian because the Librarian refused to consider removing from
    the library some books that Sarah wanted removed. City residents
    rallied to the defense of the City Librarian and against Palin's
    attempt at out-and-out censorship, so Palin backed down and withdrew
    her termination letter. People who fought her attempt to oust the
    Librarian are on her enemies list to this day.

    Sarah complained about the “old boy’s club” when she first ran for
    Mayor, so what did she bring Wasilla? A new set of "old boys". Palin
    fired most of the experienced staff she inherited. At the City and as
    Governor she hired or elevated new, inexperienced, obscure people,
    creating a staff totally dependent on her for their jobs and eternally
    grateful and fiercely loyal--loyal to the point of abusing their power
    to further her personal agenda, as she has acknowledged happened in the
    case of pressuring the State’s top cop (see below).

    As Mayor, Sarah fired Wasilla’s Police Chief because he “intimidated”
    her, she told the press. As Governor, her recent firing of Alaska's top
    cop has the ring of familiarity about it. He served at her pleasure
    and she had every legal right to fire him, but it's pretty clear that
    an important factor in her decision to fire him was because he wouldn't
    fire her sister's ex-husband, a State Trooper. Under investigation
    for abuse of power, she has had to admit that more than 2 dozen
    contacts were made between her staff and family to the person that she
    later fired, pressuring him to fire her ex-brother-in-law. She tried to
    replace the man she fired with a man who she knew had been reprimanded
    for sexual harassment; when this caused a public furor, she withdrew
    her support.

    She has bitten the hand of every person who extended theirs to her in
    help. The City Council person who personally escorted her around town
    introducing her to voters when she first ran for Wasilla City Council
    became one of her first targets when she was later elected Mayor. She
    abruptly fired her loyal City Administrator; even people who didn’t
    like the guy were stunned by this ruthlessness.

    Fear of retribution has kept all of these people from saying anything
    publicly about her.

    When then-Governor Murkowski was handing out political plums, Sarah got
    the best, Chair of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission: one
    of the few jobs not in Juneau and one of the best paid. She had no
    background in oil & gas issues. Within months of scoring this great
    job which paid $122,400/yr, she was complaining in the press about the
    high salary. I was told that she hated that job: the commute, the
    structured hours, the work. Sarah became aware that a member of this
    Commission (who was also the State Chair of the Republican Party)
    engaged in unethical behavior on the job. In a gutsy move which some
    undoubtedly cautioned her could be political suicide, Sarah solved all
    her problems in one fell swoop: got out of the job she hated and
    garnered gobs of media attention as the patron saint of ethics and as a
    gutsy fighter against the “old boys’ club” when she dramatically quit,
    exposing this man’s ethics violations (for which he was fined).

    As Mayor, she had her hand stuck out as far as anyone for pork from
    Senator Ted Stevens. Lately, she has castigated his pork-barrel
    politics and publicly humiliated him. She only opposed the “bridge to
    nowhere” after it became clear that it would be unwise not to.

    As Governor, she gave the Legislature no direction and budget
    guidelines, then made a big grandstand display of line-item vetoing
    projects, calling them pork. Public outcry and further legislative
    action restored most of these projects--which had been vetoed simply
    because she was not aware of their importance--but with the unobservant
    she had gained a reputation as “anti-pork”.

    She is solidly Republican: no political maverick. The State party
    leaders hate her because she has bit them in the back and humiliated
    them. Other members of the party object to her self-description as a
    fiscal conservative.

    Around Wasilla there are people who went to high school with Sarah.
    They call her “Sarah Barracuda” because of her unbridled ambition and
    predatory ruthlessness. Before she became so powerful, very ugly
    stories circulated around town about shenanigans she pulled to be made
    point guard on the high school basketball team. When Sarah's
    mother-in-law, a highly respected member of the community and
    experienced manager, ran for Mayor, Sarah refused to endorse her.

    As Governor, she stepped outside of the box and put together of package
    of legislation known as “AGIA” that forced the oil companies to march
    to the beat of her drum.

    Like most Alaskans, she favors drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife
    Refuge. She has questioned if the loss of sea ice is linked to
    global warming. She campaigned “as a private citizen” against a state
    initiaitive that would have either a) protected salmon streams from
    pollution from mines, or b) tied up in the courts all mining in the
    state (depending on who you listen to). She has pushed the State’s
    lawsuit against the Dept. of the Interior’s decision to list polar
    bears as threatened species.

    McCain is the oldest person to ever run for President; Sarah will be a
    heartbeat away from being President.

    There has to be literally millions of Americans who are more
    knowledgeable and experienced than she.

    However, there’s a lot of people who have underestimated her and are
    regretting it.

    •“Hockey mom”: true for a few years
    •“PTA mom”: true years ago when her first-born was in elementary
    school, not since
    •“NRA supporter”: absolutely true
    •social conservative: mixed. Opposes gay marriage, BUT vetoed a bill
    that would have denied benefits to employees in same-sex relationships
    (said she did this because it was unconsitutional).
    •pro-creationism: mixed. Supports it, BUT did nothing as Governor to
    promote it.
    •“Pro-life”: mixed. Knowingly gave birth to a Down’s syndrome baby
    BUT declined to call a special legislative session on some pro-life
    •“Experienced”: Some high schools have more students than Wasilla has
    residents. Many cities have more residents than the state of Alaska.
    No legislative experience other than City Council. Little hands-on
    supervisory or managerial experience; needed help of a city
    administrator to run town of about 5,000.
    •political maverick: not at all
    •gutsy: absolutely!
    •open & transparent: ??? Good at keeping secrets. Not good at
    explaining actions.
    •has a developed philosophy of public policy: no
    •”a Greenie”: no. Turned Wasilla into a wasteland of big box stores
    and disconnected parking lots. Is pro-drilling off-shore and in ANWR.
    •fiscal conservative: not by my definition!
    •pro-infrastructure: No. Promoted a sports complex and park in a city
    without a sewage treatment plant or storm drainage system. Built
    streets to early 20th century standards.
    •pro-tax relief: Lowered taxes for businesses, increased tax burden on
    •pro-small government: No. Oversaw greatest expansion of city
    government in Wasilla’s history.
    •pro-labor/pro-union. No. Just because her husband works union
    doesn’t make her pro-labor. I have seen nothing to support any claim
    that she is pro-labor/pro-union.


    First, I have long believed in the importance of being an informed
    voter. I am a voter registrar. For 10 years I put on student voting
    programs in the schools. If you google my name (Anne Kilkenny +
    Alaska), you will find references to my participation in local
    government, education, and PTA/parent organizations.

    Secondly, I've always operated in the belief that "Bad things happen
    when good people stay silent". Few people know as much as I do because
    few have gone to as many City Council meetings.

    Third, I am just a housewife. I don't have a job she can bump me out
    of. I don't belong to any organization that she can hurt. But, I am no
    fool; she is immensely popular here, and it is likely that this will
    cost me somehow in the future: that’s life.

    Fourth, she has hated me since back in 1996, when I was one of the 100
    or so people who rallied to support the City Librarian against Sarah's
    attempt at censorship.

    Fifth, I looked around and realized that everybody else was afraid to
    say anything because they were somehow vulnerable.

    I am not a statistician. I developed the numbers for the increase in
    spending & taxation 2 years ago (when Palin was running for Governor)
    from information supplied to me by the Finance Director of the City of
    Wasilla, and I can't recall exactly what I adjusted for: did I adjust
    for inflation? for population increases? Right now, it is impossible
    for a private person to get any info out of City Hall--they are
    swamped. So I can't verify my numbers.

    You may have noticed that there are various numbers circulating for the
    population of Wasilla, ranging from my "about 5,000", up to 9,000. The
    day Palin’s selection was announced a city official told me that the
    current population is about 7,000. The official 2000 census count was
    5,460. I have used about 5,000 because Palin was Mayor from 1996 to
    2002, and the city was growing rapidly in the mid-90’s.

    Anne Kilkenny
    [email protected]
    August 31, 200
    | Login or Register (free) to reply publicly or privately   Email

  2. TopTop #2
    "Mad" Miles

    Re: From someone who knows Sarah Palin

    Hey pexpert6,

    Why don't you email Anne Kilkenny and ask her yourself?

    (I imagine something along the lines of, "Are you for real?")

    Her email is at the end of the forwarded statement. It was in the copy I received by email from a separate source.

    As far as I can tell, nothing in it contradicts what is already being reported in the MainStream Media.

    "Mad" Miles

    P.S. I've been on the internet more than usual in the last three days. Partly because I have the week off. Mostly because I've been monitoring the anti-RNC protests in Minneapolis and the massive police brutality in response.

    I'm very upset, mostly because of the lack of attention being paid to storm troopers gassing (launched projectile CS canisters, Pepper Spray Foggers), bombing (flash bang launched projectile grenades) and summarily arresting protesters outside the convention.

    Yes, a few windows were broken on Monday and delegates delayed (as intended by the direct actionists), but preemptive raids and arrests, trumped up charges, sweeps that take in everyone, protesters, press, bystanders, denial of medication, food and medical care in jail, beatings in jail, it's not new, but it's happening on a larger scale than before.

    It really, really, really PISSES me off!

    And it's not less than extremely scary.

    These are the young people using their right to assemble, speak out and oppose entrenched, excessive, truly evil power. And they're doing it while most of us ignore their brutalization.

    What kind of country do you want to live in?

    What kind of country do you think you really live in?

    Sarah Palin is a sideshow. Reality is being made in the streets of Minneapolis, and it's not a desirable one.

    Oh and to answer Zeno's question from another thread. The Green Party of the United States of America has a presidential candidate, Cynthia McKinney. Check out our platform:

    This isn't the place to discuss the viability of the GPUS, but keep in mind that since Obama is a lock to carry the majority of votes in California, you don't have to worry about voting for McKinney/Clemente on November 3 in California.

    If you were voting in a state that might go for McCain, well that's a whole different discussion.

    | Login or Register (free) to reply publicly or privately   Email

  3. TopTop #3
    "Mad" Miles

    Re: From someone who knows Sarah Palin

    Jeeze Ric!

    Can't you hear a facetious question when it's asked?

    As for the veracity of police abuse in Minneopolis, just watch the videos and read the first hand accounts like I have been doing:

    etc. There are many on youtube as well.

    "Mad" Miles

    | Login or Register (free) to reply publicly or privately   Email

  4. TopTop #4
    phooph's Avatar

    Re: From someone who knows Sarah Palin

    Here's another. The person who passed this along did not include the email of the author but a search in Alaska turned up one individual in Alaska with that name (not a real common name) in Cantwell. Since the author speaks as if he is involved with education I looked up the school there. The Cantwell School has a grand total of 21 students, (K - 12) 16 of which are native American. Peter Hauschka is the principal.


    Good evening, lots of friends and relatives have been asking me (as an Alaskan) what I think of Sarah Palin, our Governor, and new choice for McCain as a VP candidate.

    Here it goes:

    This pick floored me. Sarah Palin is a nice person. I've met her, I've even talked to her for a few minutes at a principal's conference a couple of years ago. She has lots going for her superficially. She speaks from the heart, like a spitfire mother; she can even be sort of funny sometimes. She is quite beautiful; athletic, and has that radiant glow of someone who actually spends time doing things outside. Unlike many politicians, she has lived a "real life" and done things that few living and working in DC could ever dipnettin' fish, shootin' stuff and eating it out on the tundra, and havin' 5 kids.

    Personally, I'd never vote for her. She has an extremely simple view of the world. I don't even think she has ever been abroad. As governor she has repeatedly shown us that she is unable to grasp the demands of leadership. She is very prone to cronyism of the worst kind. Every cabinet level political appointment she has made she has over-ridden suggestions of our state advisory boards, and instead promoted those who had granted her direct political favors. Not that other politicians don't do this, they do, but most of them are able to balance their appointments to ensure that at least a few people with real skill and experience are running big state agencies.

    She also has been unable to pay attention to her Alaskan constituency. Personally, I've written several of our previous gov's and been asked to comment publicly on education policy. All the previous gov's have always acknowledged that contribution, criticism or comment; sometimes by direct reply, or at least by that of a staff member. Palin's office has been a zone of silence. Not I, nor one person I know commenting has ever gotten any sort of reply. Her claim of running an open or transparent government is totally false; the public simply has no role in her administration.

    Her previous claim to fame was being mayor of Wasilla, a growing town about 40 minutes from Anchorage of about 15,000 people. Wasilla is a hellhole, even by Alaskan standards, where there are plenty of hellhole towns and villages. Wasilla is an ugly place that shows a complete absence of planning, design, or sense of public vision.

    Gov't agencies and services are completely overrun in this town; things are so bad that they can't even track their population or build schools in the right place, because most parts of the town don't require building permits, so the only clue about where people are settling are utility receipts. Imagine trying to be an emergency responder in this kind of place: Houses don't just catch on fire in Wasilla, they burn to the ground, because by the time the fire department has figured out which road to take (no signs) or whose house it is (no directory), the place is done for. Palin was mayor this town for at least 2 terms before being elected gov. a year and a half ago.

    Her moral sense is simplistic and not inclusive. She is the sort of person who is used to using their "faith" to divide and isolate minority groups of human beings instead of uniting them. To her credit as Gov. she has kept out of this arena pretty well, but when in comfortable company (i.e the Matanuska Valley Republican Women's Club), she lets her moral cat out of the bag. I will do what I can to ensure her defeat and that of her running mate as well. :)

    Please share this information with those who can use it well.


    Pete Hauschka

    Quote Posted in reply to the post by pexpert6: View Post
    Miles, you miss the rigorous journalistic concept of checking facts. Just because I contact Anne K, and she verifies that she wrote all this doesn't make all the information Truth. Journalists would also check with at least one other official source. Until then, what's been posted MIGHT be no more than hearsay. *I* don't have the time to check all the facts, thus my post.

    There are many claims in her email that are NOT in agreement with what I've heard on otherwise reputable reports, such as (MS)NBC, CNN, etc., which is NOT to say that her claims are false or that the MSM reports are accurate.

    You might have a personal relationship with Anne K, and consider her to be unimpeachable, but that doesn't rise to the level of journalistic integrity. As I said, *IF* the info can be validated, then it's very damaging for McCain and the GOP. (And I wouldn't be surprised if it is true.)

    The same is true of your reports of abuses at the GOP convention. IF they are true, and IF they are not just isolated incidents, then it's obviously a bad thing, and I certainly understand your anger. Yes, there are times that the media ignores such things, but there are also times when such things are trumped up (Republican demonstrators in Fla. after the contested vote), times when they're isolated but reported as if widespread, and times when such things are ignored, and the media should do a better job. And we should encourage them to do so.

    But to go off on a tear about something that pushes your buttons or fits your views of the world, and fomenting righteous anger and action in others, without getting the facts straight can come back to damage YOU (or your cause).

    I'm really not that concerned about Palin, particularly since I don't expect McCain to win. But I AM interested in getting the complete, balanced and accurate background on her as it reflects the choice within the McCain Campaign and GOP: if all the info in Anne's email can be validated by OTHER sources, and this gets out in the media, it will be hard for much of the public (including many reasonable Republicans) to ignore and not judge harshly because of it.

    I think this is a good thing, not solely to insure Obama's win, but more importantly to provide the momentum to wrest control of the GOP from the ideological extremists, and bring the Party back to being a viable and honorable alternative viewpoint for government policy. We are blessed to have a form of government that allows diversity, free press and well considered choices.

    We are cursed when EITHER side misrepresents or games the system(s) to get its way. Our Founders didn't anticipate parties, but they did try to create a government that insured such widespread participation in our policies and choice of leaders, AND the mechanisms to change them if it's determined not to be working. That foundation is FAR more important to *me* than which candidate wins, or what specific agendas they are for. (Although, I weigh candidates, agendas and parties for their likelyhood to further or impede the vision of the Founders.)

    Just to set the record straight, with VERY little information on Palin and McCain's apparently impulsive, transparent choice, it finally pushed me solidly into being for Obama. Each new development makes it more and more clear TO ME that McCain/Palin would be a bad choice. While I'm not a flaming liberal like probably most people in this e-community, I AM on your side, just not automatically and always.

    | Login or Register (free) to reply publicly or privately   Email

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 78
    Last Post: 09-11-2008, 08:57 PM
  2. Don’t Like Palin’s Wikipedia Story? Change It
    By Zeno Swijtink in forum WaccoReader
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-01-2008, 07:50 AM
    By helenscott08 in forum General Community
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-04-2006, 12:26 PM