It is an unfortunate fact that we evaluate the validity of new claims to truth in terms of what we already believe.
This makes us extremely resistant to changing our personal philosophy.
If as a child we accepted certain claims as true, and came to understand
that all our personal relationships depended on our continuing to avow those claims as true, then
any one who asserted a contrary philosophy was to be thought of as not understanding the "true" state of affairs.
How can we break through this barrier and really really communicate with each other?
In a science fiction story, Clifford Simak had mutant humans who were so very much more clever than ordinary humans, build a device that displayed
a particular light pattern such that when ordinary humans viewed that light
pattern it shocked their system into being able to consider contrary statements without those statements being filtered by their current belief system.
For over five hundred years now, science has progressed only because scientists were able to question their own collective beliefs.
That is why I and others recommend strongly that seekers of truth in religion also question their own collective beliefs. We adopt as a universal principle that this is the only way to discover reliable knowledge.
Perhaps one of the writers of Job in the old testament had this principle in mind when he wrote his "thought experiment".
Kermit Rose < [email protected] >