Can't disagree with this; though I would have preferred Bernie to either Hillary or Donald. That's just me expressing my preference. The problem with the so-called "left" Democrats of the present, is that from Bernie on down they refuse to address the issue of nationalizing Credit (i.e., the Federal Reserve Bank) & holding a Year of Jubilee in which the national debts of all nations are wiped clean.Today's Democratic party is not the party of old. Heck, it isn't even the party of Clinton and Obama. The days of Mediterraneum Cafe are long gone and so it is with the old Democrats. Are there any Democratic moderates left? Very few I believe.
That is the only way they could facilitate all of the Socialist programs that they advocate. It can not be done on the permanent war economy - or with the burden of Debt that currently saddles the nation and the world. Ironically, it is in the camp of the pro-Trump folks that you will find cadre like Robert David Steele who understand that the Federal Reserve Bank should be nationalized.
That was pure old-left doctrine: A plank to nationalize the Fed was in the Progressive Party Platform of 1924; the Socialist Party Platform of 1932; & the Farmer-Labor Party platforms of 1932 & 1934. -But no more. Bernie shies away from the issue; big-time. -Perhaps because he knows that Kennedy's foray into issuing non-interest-bearing T-Bills was one of the factors that led to Dealy Plaza.
CNN is an exception. It does have a distinct Democrat Party bias. -Though once again, I would not call that a "left" bias; it depends on how one defines the term. But look at ABC - the host of your beloved Coast-to-Coast. Their programming is pretty evenly balanced between right-wing talk jocks & your so-called "leftist progressives." That is the balancing act that all of the major media cartels perform.I disagree with you about the bias of the mainstream media. In fact I disagree so strongly that I won't bother to debate you on the subject.