There seems to be a tendency to discredit anyone expressing an alternative point of view ... let's look at a more balanced description of this "bogus"
This discussion deserves a new Waccobb term:
A reaction commonly found among proponents
Once again, Rosanne, the website you cited, "whats up with that?," is yet another bogus website. It is NOT a science website. It is a commentary
I may be misreading either the British humour or what you think this implies, but it seems to me he's channeling the New Yorker's Andy Borowitz with this
No pressure...:-) I'm up to 5 or 6 readings, and will need another 20 to really absorb it all. I have been exposed to all the concepts, but am still
Thanks for the debate folks ... all very interesting ...
I'm interested in knowing the truth so I've done more research ... here's a page
There are links that show the Arctic sea ice mass as growing, but they are complete and utter bullshit. The satellite evidence of sea ice loss since