So Long and Thanks for All the Fish!
This site is now closed permanently to new posts.Click anywhere but the link to dismiss overlay!
Real Name: (not displayed to guest users)
Join Date: Jul 29, 2011
Opt-out of having a smart meter whether you have one now or not, anytime. 1-866-743-0263 24/7 Spread the word. More info here.
Gratitude expressed by 2 members:
Real Name: (not displayed to guest users)
Join Date: Jun 8, 2005
Location: Forestville, California, United States
Last Online 11-05-2012
Whether you realize it or not, referring to the most powerful world bankers as Rothschild's, is code for Anti-Semitism. It's gratuitous and furthers the Racist stereotype.
I type this as a man fully in touch with his feminine side. And it's not an attack on your person. Even if a case could be made for such.
Heat.... Kitchen.
Gratitude expressed by:
Real Name: (not displayed to guest users)
Join Date: Jan 20, 2007
Last Online 03-27-2023
Ridiculous.
Mayer Amschel Bauer was a Khazar from the Russian Steppes.
He changed his name to Rothschild (red shield in OHG) in 1760.
No connection to Semitic tribes whatsoever.
The Rothschild family does have key positions in many of the world's central banks.
Rothschilds are arguably the wealthiest family on the planet.
Of course it is. The passive aggressive manner is specifically designed for deniability. Until you're called on it. Please exhibit enough courtesy and respect to own up to your accusations.
Did you bother to watch the clip? Do you disagree with what was said? Why?
Real Name: (not displayed to guest users)
Join Date: Jun 8, 2005
Location: Forestville, California, United States
Last Online 11-05-2012
Handy,
Your track record here is clear. I'll not contribute further to the partisan pissing match.
My remarks about Uburu were a reference to another recent thread, where the issues she raised about being uncomfortable with being criticized for the political views she espouses here, vociferously, were ably addressed by others. I was not being "passive aggressive". I was obliquely referring to that discussion.
As for the Khazar narrative, I'm fully versed. The jury is still out. The consensus among reputable historians is that Jews are Semites (along with most Arabs) no matter what an Israeli revisionist historian has written. And no matter how many in the Conspirosphere have taken up the idea.
Ducks, representative behavior. Metaphor for characteristic prejudice.
_
Real Name: (not displayed to guest users)
Join Date: Jan 20, 2007
Last Online 03-27-2023
Oh, Goody! I have a track record!? I agree about partisan pissing matches. Given the obamney twins, I will likely not bother to vote for the first time in my life.
No claim to being "fully versed" here. Also, the consensus line makes no sense to me, and seems blatantly false on the face of it. I know too many jews who make no claim to Semitic lines. Or are you saying that your "Israeli revisionist historian" is disreputable? Who is this? I might like to read him/her.
As for the Khazar narrative, I'm fully versed. The jury is still out. The consensus among reputable historians is that Jews are Semites (along with most Arabs) no matter what an Israeli revisionist historian has written. And no matter how many in the Conspirosphere have taken up the idea.
The questions remain:
Did you bother to watch the clip? Do you disagree with what was said? Why?
Real Name: (not displayed to guest users)
Join Date: Mar 13, 2006
Location: Cotati, CA/Saigon(HCMC), Vietnam
Last Online 02-08-2021
THE INVENTION OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE by Shlomo Sand
https://www.amazon.com/Invention-Jew...+Jewish+People
Zionists read this and weep...
Real Name: (not displayed to guest users)
Join Date: Aug 5, 2006
Last Online 02-07-2021
gee, the guy's a professor and it was published on real paper, NOT just the internet. Jews in Palestine, time to pack up and go back to Khazakstan where you came from.THE INVENTION OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE by Shlomo Sand
https://www.amazon.com/Invention-Jew...+Jewish+People
Zionists read this and weep...
Somehow I don't think the Zionists are all that impressed, given that his book isn't a definitive history. It's an interesting contribution to both history and political debate, and sure, if you're in the class of people whose philosophy is based solely on creation mythology it might be a threat. But probably not one strong enough to make them weep the way you seem to hope.