Just under the surface of what has come to be called the Web, are many layers of free and open software that support the Internet infrastructure. Geek collectives, such as GNU fight to maintain the freedom of this system from commercial interests who seek opportunities to corral users and control access. The issues are often very technical, but given the Internet's global influence, the impact of little understood decisions can have massive implications.
The following struggle may seem too technical to be of interest, but to those who want a free (as in free speech), open, democratic, and inexpensive mobile communications system, this initiative could matter greatly.
-ron
===
Ubuntu is aiming to raise $32 million in crowdfunding to fund Ubuntu Edge, a mobile computer that can dual-boot between Android and Ubuntu GNU/Linux.
Will Ubuntu Edge commit to using only free software? If the project succeeds and has $32 million available to spend, this is surely possible, but there is no indication in any of the promotional materials that this is part of the plan.
Isn't Android already free software? In theory, yes, but in practice, no. To work on actual hardware, Android ends up relying on device drivers that are either outright proprietary or use proprietary firmware blobs. All commonly available Android devices also come with proprietary software applications installed.
This is why today we announced a fundraising partnership with the Replicant project, which produces a version of Android that runs on existing devices without proprietary system software.
Isn't Ubuntu already always committed to free software? No. Ubuntu's default GNU/Linux distribution includes nonfree drivers, and its software marketplace promotes proprietary programs.
But, we don't want to make assumptions about what Ubuntu Edge will or won't be. We and many other free software supporters excited about the possibility of a GNU/Linux mobile device would like to hear official confirmation:
Ubuntu in the past has said they are forced to make temporary compromises in software freedom in order to have their operating system work on the computers people own and speed adoption of free software. But in this case, Ubuntu would have the chance to dictate the design of the hardware themselves. Software freedom should be the foundation of that design. There is no reason for compromise.
- Will the Ubuntu Edge versions of both Android and Ubuntu contain or rely on any proprietary software or proprietary firmware?
- Will the Ubuntu Edge include any Digital Restrictions Management (DRM) software?
- Will the device's bootloader be free software?
- Will the device have Restricted Boot, or will users be able to replace the operating system with a free one of their choice?
- Will Ubuntu Edge include F-Droid, the free software Android application repository, as part of a commitment to promote and recommend only free software?
Conveniently, Canonical founder Mark Shuttleworth is doing an AMA on Reddit starting at 12:30 EDT, so maybe we will get some answers.
This post can be viewed online at https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/...-free-software
--
Follow us at https://status.fsf.org/fsf | Subscribe to our blogs via RSS at https://fsf.org/blogs/RSS
Join us as an associate member at https://fsf.org/jf
Sent from the Free Software Foundation,
51 Franklin Street
Fifth Floor
Boston, MA 02110-1335
United States