Tell the FAA: Don't let aerial drones spy on Americans

[ubaru]

Clicking here will automatically add your name to this petition to the FAA: "Don't issue regulations that allow aerial drones to spy on Americans. There's a dangerous potential for misuse of these sophisticated surveillance devices and the public must be allowed to weigh in on the privacy implications before any regulations are issued." Automatically add your name: Learn more about this campaign

Tell the FAA: Don't let aerial drones spy on Americans.

Dear Waccobians,

Congress and President Obama recently enacted a law directing the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to issue regulations that will open up the sky to the domestic use of unmanned aerial drones.

Yet Congress failed to establish any rules to ensure that drones won't be used to spy on Americans.

That's why CREDO is joining with our friends at Demand Progress to create a critical mass of public pressure to tell the FAA: Don't let aerial drones spy on Americans.

Click here to automatically sign the petition.

Disconcertingly, a drone industry trade group that deemed "civil liberties" a barrier to their growth also boasted that Congress adopted their suggested changes to this legislation "word for word."¹
We can't let the drone industry dictate how the FAA writes the final regulations. But that's exactly what will happen if they're the only ones who weigh in.

Already groups such as the ACLU and the Electronic Frontier Foundation have spoken out to ask the FAA to specifically consider, and let the public weigh in on, the privacy implications of the regulations they issue.² And we need to build a critical mass to make sure the public — not just drone manufacturers — have a chance to weigh in.

Tell the FAA: Don't let aerial drones spy on Americans. Click here to automatically sign the petition.

In their letter to the FAA, the coalition of groups that included the ACLU and the EFF outlined why drones represent such a potential threat to our civil liberties, saying:

Drones greatly increase the capacity for domestic surveillance. Gigapixel cameras used to outfit drones are among the highest definition cameras available, and can "provide real-time video streams at a rate of 10 frames a second." On some drones, operators can track up to 65 different targets across a distance of 65 square miles. Drones may also carry infrared cameras, heat sensors, GPS, sensors that detect movement, and automated license plate readers. In the near future these camera may include facial recognition technology that would make it possible to remotely identify individuals in parks, schools, and at political gatherings.³

In sum, drones have the capacity to capture huge amounts of information in a way that's relatively cheaper and easier (not to mention, more detailed and more discreet) than what can be done by, for example, someone flying in a helicopter.
The privacy implications of unleashing thousands of these sophisticated surveillance devices into American airspace must factor into any regulations that govern their use.

Tell the FAA: Don't let aerial drones spy on Americans. Click the link below to automatically sign the petition:
https://act.credoaction.com/r/?r=553...2-gCkdAsx&t=10

Thank you for speaking out.

Matt Lockshin, Campaign Manager
CREDO Action from Working Assets

P.S. Domestic surveillance isn't the only way drones can be misused. Our government's use of drones overseas has been deeply troubling, and we strongly oppose their use in extrajudicial killings.

But while the FAA has no authority to regulate drone use overseas, we must speak out at this critical time to prevent what amounts to a significant escalation of their use domestically.

That is why it is so important to speak out now and tell the FAA not to let drones spy on Americans. Click here to automatically sign the petition.

1. "Exclusive: PowerPoint Shows Drone Industry's Lobbying Plan To Expand Over Domestic, Law Enforcement Markets," Lee Fang, Republic Report, 2-15-12
2. Letter to Michael P. Huerta, Acting Administrator, United States Federal Aviation Administration, dated 2-24-12
3. Ibid.