Click Banner For More Info See All Sponsors

So Long and Thanks for All the Fish!

This site is now closed permanently to new posts.
We recommend you use the new Townsy Cafe!

Click anywhere but the link to dismiss overlay!

Results 1 to 1 of 1

Thread: No war here
  • Share this thread on:
  • Follow: No Email   
  • Thread Tools
  1. TopTop #1
    Sara S's Avatar
    Sara S
    Auntie Wacco

    No war here

    from delanceyplace.com:

    William Penn's colony of Pennsylvania was the only colony in
    the New World which did not have a militia. Penn felt no need for a militia, since
    he alone among the colonizers put in place a system to provide justice to Indians
    at parity with the justice provided to colonists. In fact, it was by his design
    that the Indians were better-armed and militarily more competent than the colonists.
    The result was that "of all the places one could live in the Atlantic world, Pennsylvania
    was the one least likely to suffer the horrors of war." In no small part because
    of this peace, Europeans flocked to Philadelphia causing it to quickly surpassed
    Boston as the largest colonial city, and the population of Pennsylvania grew from
    18,000 in 1700 to 120,000 by the end of 1750:
    "Penn's extraordinary intention to deal with Indians fairly, generously, and - uniquely
    - to refrain from coercion by arms or the threat of violence reflected his distinctive
    combination of idealism and pragmatism. Without Indian cooperation, he had no hope
    of acquiring enough territory to produce the capital he needed to support his 'holy
    experiment.' Since he had begun selling lots to the First Purchasers in July 1681,
    before a formal treaty had been made with the Indians, it was imperative that he
    put Indian relations on a stable footing as soon as possible. Above all, he knew
    that he had to keep the natives from misconstruing the intentions of the colonists
    who would soon begin flooding into southeastern Pennsylvania. ...
    "He assured them, he was 'not such a Man' as those who had [Indians] done harm;
    rather, 'I desire to Winn and gain your Love & freindship by a kind, just and peaceable
    life; and the People I send are of the same mind, & shall in all things behave themselv[e]s
    accordingly; and if in any thing any shall offend you or your People, you shall
    have full and Speedy Satisfaction for the same by an equall number of honest men
    on both sides that by no means you may have just Occasion of being offended against
    them.' ...
    "As a kind of first installment on his promises, Penn had already set out
    twenty conditions, or 'Concessions,' by which those who purchased property
    from him were expected to abide. Five of these pertained to colonists' conduct
    toward Indians, stressing equality of treatment and the protection of native interests.
    All commercial transactions, including those between Indians and
    planters, were to take place in the public market, where inspectors could certify
    weights and measures to prevent fraud, so 'that the natives may not be
    abused or provoked.' If any colonist should 'affront or wrong' an Indian, the
    same penalties and laws would apply as if the affronted or wronged party had
    been a planter. If on the other hand an Indian wronged a colonist, the injured
    party had no right to take the law into his own hands; he could only make a complaint
    to the governor or his deputy. The governor in turn would negotiate a settlement
    'With the king of the said Indian, that all reasonable satisfaction
    be made to the said injured planter.' Indians were to have the same rights 'to
    the improvement of their ground and providing sustenance for their families'
    as the planters. Most unusual of all was the provision Penn mentioned in his
    letter to the Indians: disputes between natives and colonists were to be settled
    by arbitration - 'ended,' as he put it, 'by twelve men, that is, by six planters
    and six natives; that so we may live friendly together and, as much as in us lies,
    prevent all occasions of heart burnings and mischiefs.'
    "No other colonial proprietor in America took so much care to establish
    standards for the fair treatment of natives, but of course no other proprietor
    had tried to create a colony without a militia, either. Penn's province, by design,
    would be a place in which the Indians were better-armed and militarily more competent
    than the colonists. In such a circumstance, equality, equity, and justice formed
    the only reasonable, prudent basis for Anglo-Indian relations."
    Author: Fred Anderson and Andrew Clayton
    Title: The Dominion of War
    Publisher: Penguin
    Date: Copyright 2005 by Fred Anderson and Andrew Clayton
    Pages: 66-68
    The Dominion of War: Empire and Liberty in North America, 1500-2000
    by Fred Anderson by Penguin (Non-Classics)
    Paperback
    | Login or Register (free) to reply publicly or privately   Email

  2. Gratitude expressed by:

Similar Threads

  1. Afghanistan is Not the Right War
    By someguy in forum WaccoTalk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-16-2010, 07:33 PM
  2. more war?
    By handy in forum WaccoReader
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-13-2008, 08:37 AM
  3. Are you against the War in Iraq?
    By OrchardDweller in forum WaccoTalk
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 07-21-2007, 09:44 PM
  4. How You -- Yes You -- Can End the War
    By Karen in forum WaccoReader
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-17-2006, 12:44 AM

Bookmarks