Click Banner For More Info See All Sponsors

So Long and Thanks for All the Fish!

This site is now closed permanently to new posts.
We recommend you use the new Townsy Cafe!

Click anywhere but the link to dismiss overlay!

Results 1 to 2 of 2

  • Share this thread on:
  • Follow: No Email   
  • Thread Tools
  1. TopTop #1
    podfish's Avatar
    podfish
     

    a few numbers behind the claims on demographic change

    I'm sure everyone's been hearing for years about the threat of changing demographics to Republicans. Somehow it hasn't seemed to impact anything. But I just saw this, which was much more dramatic than I'd expected (even if it's not wholly true.. I'm not sure I trust this as rigorously statistically valid - it seem cherry-pickish, and HuffPo isn't exactly a-partisan, but still!)
    Quote On the Democratic side, Sen. Sanders’ success among the youth vote has been a consistent part of the primary narrative. But a similar analysis of youth in GOP primaries isn’t even possible. That’s because Republican turnout among voters ages 17-24 has been too small to be measured in 20 of 25 state exit polls. Only the Texas and Ohio GOP state primaries had enough participation by voters age 25-29 to measure in the exits.

    Similarly, non-white voters have cast so few Republican ballots that they couldn’t be analyzed in 19 states, while non-white voters are represented in every Democratic primary exit poll. Geographically, fully half of this year’s GOP primary vote has come in counties Mitt Romney won by at least 10 points in 2012 (very unrepresentative regions of the national election he lost by 5 million votes).

    https://www.huffingtonpost.com/greg-...b_9808372.html
    | Login or Register (free) to reply publicly or privately   Email

  2. Gratitude expressed by:

  3. TopTop #2
    podfish's Avatar
    podfish
     

    Re: a few numbers behind the claims on demographic change

    and along similar lines:
    https://www.usnews.com/opinion/artic...ly-exaggerated

    Quote Let's begin with exit polling. In 18 states, so few Republican voters reported earning less than $30,000 per year that exit polls show "n/a" in that income column. There wasn't enough data. In six of those states no data exists on Republican voters earning less than $50,000 a year.

    In other words, virtually everyone who voted for a Republican in Illinois, Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, Vermont and Virginia reported earning more than $50,000 a year. These are Trump voters. Even if they never went to college, they earn more than the average wage, which was $44,569.20 in 2014, according to the Social Security Administration.
    | Login or Register (free) to reply publicly or privately   Email

  4. Gratitude expressed by:

Similar Threads

  1. For those who like numbers, 2 mysterious ones.
    By JimD in forum WaccoReader
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-05-2011, 08:11 AM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-21-2010, 12:41 PM
  3. Hungry by the Numbers
    By zenekar in forum WaccoReader
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-12-2010, 06:53 AM
  4. Demographic Info About Your Zip Code Area
    By Tars in forum WaccoReader
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-21-2007, 10:42 AM

Bookmarks