https://www.newyorker.com/reporting/..._Daily%20(123)
and we've heard NOTHING ABOUT THIS.
…?
jude
So Long and Thanks for All the Fish!
This site is now closed permanently to new posts.Click anywhere but the link to dismiss overlay!
Real Name: (not displayed to guest users)
Join Date: Aug 26, 2005
Location: sebastopol
Last Online 09-03-2022
https://www.newyorker.com/reporting/..._Daily%20(123)
and we've heard NOTHING ABOUT THIS.
…?
jude
Real Name: (not displayed to guest users)
Join Date: Jul 25, 2005
Location: Near Sebastopol & Cotati
Last Online 07-14-2018
Sounds like a new scale-up of nuclear fusion experimentation, which has been going on for years. Perhaps one reason we haven't heard much about it is because it's of such dubious value, given that distributed forms of energy generation (e.g., solar and wind) have become so competitive and are such an abundant resource (lacking only appropriate energy storage systems, which could probably be developed for far less cost).
Real Name: (not displayed to guest users)
Join Date: Aug 5, 2006
Last Online 02-07-2021
yeah, I'm confused as to what caught your eye about this? it's another big tokamak, which despite its name isn't being built by the Inuit, but by an international consortium. Fusion has a lot fewer inherent risks than fission, and is probably about five years away -- that's been true since the early 60's. So what's the news here?Sounds like a new scale-up of nuclear fusion experimentation, which has been going on for years.
Real Name: (not displayed to guest users)
Join Date: Aug 26, 2005
Location: sebastopol
Last Online 09-03-2022
hiya.
i was astounded cause this project is SO
complex
powerful
expensive
hopeful
unique
and i had the quote from the article to illustrate each of the above, ready to send, and wacco crashed and i don't feel like compiling again - sorry -
but that's why it 'caught my eye'. blest, jude
yeah, I'm confused as to what caught your eye about this? it's another big tokamak, which despite its name isn't being built by the Inuit, but by an international consortium. Fusion has a lot fewer inherent risks than fission, and is probably about five years away -- that's been true since the early 60's. So what's the news here?