Please read the letter below from Efren Carrillo which several people received in response to requesting he support a county wide moratorium on Smart Meters in Sonoma County and follow suit by joining courageous Santa Cruz, Marin counties, and also Mendocino County, who voted yesterday to unanimously adopt a county wide moratorium!
Please write Efren today (or your own supe) and encourage him to rethink his position. Symbolic or not, he has the duty to represent and protect the 1000's of ratepayers opposed to PG&E's unruly Smart Meter deployment and help avoid a continuring and escalating public relations and public health disaster.
The www.emfsafetynetwork.org shows reports of many, many people who have become sick after installation of smart meters, others have reported fires or explosions or interference with electronics or other wireless devices, most are still concerned about billing accuracy and privacy/security issues. The CPUC had received over 8000 complaints in Oct, over 2000 on health impacts alone and many more since then.
As more counties in CA adopt a moratorium, the more our state legislators will recognize the importance of supporting and/or co-sponsoring Assemblyman Member Jared Huffman's AB 37 bill requesting a suspension of deployment until ratepayers are allowed the option to opt-out and/or remove or replace their existing wireless meter with a safe alternative.
Again, please write or call your own supe or Efren at 565-2241, [email protected] and encourage him to support a county-wide moratorium.
Thanks, Melissa Weaver
From: Efren Carrillo
Date: Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 5:54 PM
Subject: SmartMeter Ordinance
Dear _________:
Thank you for writing to our office regarding the Marin County Ordinance, and your request that Sonoma County adopt a similar ordinance. The Marin Board of Supervisors elected to put through an ordinance which they acknowledge is symbolic. The Ordinance that was passed in Marin has had no effect on the installation program, because the oversight on the program is through the CPUC on the State level. The initiative sponsored by Assemblyman Huffman would regulate PG&E through the CPUC. Our County does not have that authority. I'm sure that you've seen the below article about Marin's Ordinance and the response by local law enforcement.
Ordinances that are put before the Board of Supervisors require costly staff time, research along with a thorough vetting by the County's legal team. Even if we use the Marin ordinance as a model, the staff report and legal review would consume resources that the County must be very vigilant with during the current economic slump.
Our general fund is expected to have a substantial shortfall for the next few years, and vital services are in peril.
With this in mind, I must tell you that I cannot support putting a symbolic ordinance before the Board of Supervisors. I appreciate your concerns, and have spent staff time and resources this past year both on research and public meetings. I hope that your efforts with the state will result in a measure which will make a difference for those who wish to opt out of the SmartMeter program.
Kindly,
Efren Carrillo
Supervisor, Fifth District
Chair, Board of Supervisors
County of Sonoma
575 Administration Drive Room 100a
Santa Rosa, CA 95403
District Aide: Susan Upchurch
phone: (707)565-2241
fax: (707)565-3778
District attorney backs sheriff's refusal to enforce Marin SmartMeter moratorium
By Nels Johnson
Marin Independent Journal
Posted: 01/21/2011 08:32:19 AM PST
Marin County's effort to impose a moratorium on the installation of SmartMeters died on the vine this week as District Attorney Edward Berberian declared there is no way to enforce the "political statement" by county supervisors.
Berberian, backing a stand taken by Sheriff Bob Doyle, noted the California Public Utilities Commission, and not the Marin County Board of Supervisors, has authority to regulate meter installation.
Doyle last week refused to make an arrest under the county meter moratorium, saying it was not enforceable, and Berberian said he reached the same conclusion, adding that even if an arrest were made, he would not file charges to prosecute.
"Bob is correct," Berberian said of the sheriff's analysis, saying the county is pre-empted by the state from asserting jurisdiction over SmartMeters. "The Public Utilities Commission has in fact pre-empted the enforceability of the ordinance recently passed not only by the Board of Supervisors, but the town of Fairfax as well," the district attorney said.
Thus, there is no moratorium on meter installation anywhere in the county, despite contrary philosophical statements "with regard to the whole issue of meter installation and appropriateness," he said. "They have every right to make a political statement" despite the lack of legal teeth, he added.
Pacific Gas and Electric Co. representatives have said they would ignore the supervisors' ordinance in any event.
The county board imposed the moratorium two weeks ago, bowing to a crowd of meter foes, although several officials conceded they were making a political statement in light of the state commission's oversight of PG&E. The issue of enforcement was left hanging, but many in the crowd left thinking they had won a battle with the utility.
Doyle said he was not informed supervisors expected him to enforce the ban, and he said he was swamped by requests from residents to block meter installations. Residents concerned that meters affect their health, Doyle said, should "direct their attention to appropriate health agencies," not the sheriff's office.
A clash between the sheriff and the county board on meter policy erupted behind closed doors last week, with Doyle and Supervisor Steve Kinsey trading pointed commentary in a session advertised as "conference with legal counsel regarding anticipated litigation." Berberian was not invited to the session, which supervisors held after County Counsel Patrick Faulkner cited a loophole in the Ralph M. Brown Act, the state's anti-secrecy law.
The county agenda made no mention of SmartMeters or enforcement or a public policy discussion. Doyle said the session should have been held in public. Berberian said he would have to study the issue before determining whether the closed session on meter policy was appropriate.
During the session, Kinsey urged Doyle to issue a single citation against a meter installer in the expectation of prompting a lawsuit allowing "the court to make that determination" about jurisdiction. Kinsey said he regrets Doyle's "lack of collaboration with our board on a matter that many in our community are concerned about," but Doyle said supervisors need to collaborate with him about matters that require enforcement by sheriff's deputies. Doyle, saying meter foes have been misinformed that he has some sort of jurisdiction, criticized supervisors for playing politics and "hiding from the press" on the issue.
Supervisor Judy Arnold said she isn't hiding from anyone, noting she called the moratorium "a political statement, not a legal declaration" when supervisors approved it two weeks ago.
Kinsey, noting it was no secret the board was considering a meter crackdown, wondered why Doyle and Berberian didn't advise supervisors of their enforcement beliefs.
And board president Supervisor Susan Adams said that in light of the stand by top law officers, the next step may be "a civil action filed by members of the community."
In any event, Adams said, PG&E should take "another look at the public relations disaster" it has created and said she will press the issue when she next meets with utility executives.