Click Banner For More Info See All Sponsors

So Long and Thanks for All the Fish!

This site is now closed permanently to new posts.
We recommend you use the new Townsy Cafe!

Click anywhere but the link to dismiss overlay!

Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: The Vita Myth
  • Share this thread on:
  • Follow: No Email   
  • Thread Tools
  1. TopTop #1
    Tars's Avatar
    Tars
     

    The Vita Myth

    I'm not a homeopath or a nutritionist. But I trust Dr. Dean Edell's position: "if you want to take vitamins, go ahead, in moderation. But you should really depend on a good rounded diet to provide your body with the nutrients it needs".

    Now, I know I could find a zillion articles, books, youtube videos that extol the miraculous virtues of whatever vitamin, diet, supplement, regimen the author is trying to sell. For myself though, I tend to give more trust to an editorial from folks who don't have an immediate self-interest in selling me their particular product:

    From Slate.com:

    The Vita Myth

    Do supplements really do any good?

    Excerpt:

    "Individual vitamins and minerals haven't fared much better under scientific scrutiny, with research debunking some of the reputed benefits of vitamin B6, calcium, niacin, and others. In 2006, the National Institutes of Health convened an independent panel of experts to evaluate the evidence that vitamins could prevent chronic disease. The scientists ultimately issued a report stating that studies "do not provide strong evidence for beneficial health-related effects of supplements taken singly, in pairs, or in combinations."

    The news on antioxidants, the darlings of the vitamin menagerie, is even more troubling. These compounds, which include vitamins A, C, and E, selenium, beta carotene, and folate, fight free radicals, unstable compounds thought to damage cells and contribute to aging. But not only do antioxidant supplements fail to protect against heart disease, stroke, and cancer; they actually increase the risk of death, according to a 2007 analysis of research on more than 232,000 people, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, as well as other studies."
    | Login or Register (free) to reply publicly or privately   Email

  2. TopTop #2
    notsomuch
    Guest

    Re: The Vita Myth

    Yeah, the only thing is that advice doesn't take a doctor - it's common sense.

    If we want to go beyond common sense, though we simply have to have the knowledge rather than make blanket statements dismissing an entire class of things without qualifying the situations under which some may be useful. (there are clearly conditions which make people deficient in certain nutrients and they would need to supplement those, aren't there?) Anyone who knows a little about supplements would quickly recognize the point made by the 2007 study because they're talking about fat soluble vitamins like A and E as opposed to water soluble ones like C, that has been known for quite some time way before 2007.

    I understand there has been meta-analyses done on the use of supplements, which of course is a mixed bag, and of course you'll have others who deconstruct the methodology they use.

    I will admit, though that after having taken many and sold supplements myself, and then later gaining some perspective I can see the consumer behavior that basically amounts to a "more is better" mentality, and of course that's not necessarily so. But the very fact that these medical professionals tries to debunk supplements across the board should tell you something. Even if it isn't in the naturally occurring form from food, the nature of the thing being a nutrient should tell you something about whether it has a role in your dietary intake at all. As it is now, I think I'm not taking quite enough - or more accurately I'm probably not taking the specific ones I need after going to the other extreme, which in my case is just not paying attention.

    In a nutshell, both positions are too black and white, gross generalizations and unreasonable - and actually overly simplistic. When it comes to supplements, the myth is probably that it is that simple.
    | Login or Register (free) to reply publicly or privately   Email

  3. TopTop #3
    notsomuch
    Guest

    Re: The Vita Myth

    By the way, in terms of self interest discouraging the competition is not immediate, but is conceivably part of the picture isn't it? After all the supplement industry is a big enough force to be reckoned with right?
    | Login or Register (free) to reply publicly or privately   Email

Similar Threads

  1. Perpetuating the al-Qaeda-Iraq Myth
    By Zeno Swijtink in forum WaccoReader
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-03-2008, 10:27 PM
  2. Myth and Reality of Tibet
    By Zeno Swijtink in forum WaccoReader
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-20-2008, 07:06 PM
  3. Healthcare: The Myth of 'Best In The World'
    By Zeno Swijtink in forum WaccoReader
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-24-2008, 11:34 AM
  4. The Thanksgiving Myth
    By hopes fire in forum WaccoReader
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-20-2007, 11:05 AM

Bookmarks