Media Bias Factcheck and Fake News Codex

[wisewomn]

Here's a list of least-biased media:

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/center/

I also found this Fake News Codex interesting:

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-fake-news-codex/

Useful points of reference, IMO.

[Mayacaman]

wisewomn, Why o why can't you do your own thinking for yourself? Why o why o why must you always rely on centrist "Fact/Check" sites to do your thinking for you, and to serve as "food-tasters" in the Realm of Ideas?

"quackwatch" by the way, is a front for the American Medical Association. Everything that does not line up with F.D.A. - approved drugs, derived from petrochemical compounds & Pharmaceutical Cartel-derived Vaccines, is loudly pronounced "quackery" by them. Hardly an "objective" source to turn to as your food-tester, & to glean your opinions about all things medicinal.

[podfish]

"quackwatch" by the way, is a front for the American Medical Association. Everything that does not line up with F.D.A. - approved drugs, derived from petrochemical compounds & Pharmaceutical Cartel-derived Vaccines, is loudly pronounced "quackery" by them. Hardly an "objective" source to turn to as your food-tester, & to glean your opinions about all things medicinal.

or, to say it another way, is sponsored by the AMA. They rely on FDA approval, and no, they don't immediately go all the way to "quackery", there's a range including "pending approval", to "unproven", to "ineffective" and on to "harmful" with quackery along the way.

[rossmen]

And why is my response to you on another thread buried on wacco? Are you berry in disguise? Maybe biased in media is here?

Here's a list of least-biased media:

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/center/

I also found this Fake News Codex interesting:

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-fake-news-codex/

Useful points of reference, IMO.