Star Man wrote:
Hoaxers gonna hoax. And hoax exposers gonna post and post and post and post and post some more.
...and post and post and post and post and post some more...
I will re-iterate: Back in 2011, when I attended four of the Saturday Night "Conspiracy Video" Soirees that Deborah Tavares held at the Office of her Chiropractor son-in-law in downtown Santa Rosa, she was so new to the field of alternative politics, and all the attendant pitfalls, that she was incapable of co-creating one tenth of the material that you, Snoop attribute to her.
She was a mere babe in the woods at the time, who had become aware first, of Smart Meters and then, of Chemtrails. That was about the extent of her activism and "awareness" at the time. She and her husband had begun attending "Conspiracy Conferences" where all manner of charlatans peddle their wares. I do not doubt that she could have picked up a few bogus goods at those conferences, and run with them. That is the nature of disinformation - it gets taken in by the gullible.
-And a great deal of what is called "conspiracy theory" is classical, bona fide, "black propaganda." This has been the case for decades & decades. Certainly the C.I.A. was manufacturing bogus stories well before they began their cottage industry turning out dozens of paperbacks on who killed Kennedy. And the spooks at British Intelligence were old hands at disinformation long before the O.S.S. or C.I.A. ever cut their teeth in it.
My read on the "Judge Dale" phenomenon is that the powers-that-be may have invented a fictitious person, and written various books & articles to be attributed to him, in order to discredit a certain line of thought. I say this because "his" body of work contains a certain amount of historical and legal truth - some of which can be documented...
But if "Judge Dale" himself is not a real person, his very non-existence then becomes the means of discrediting the entire message. In other words, the man serves as a "straw man" [not to be confused with "STRAW MAN"] whose demolition also serves the elegant solution of discrediting the various people who went for the bait.
The Jim Traficant speech falls into the same category. The Substance of the speech - that the United States went into Bankruptcy & Receivership back in 1933 is true - whether or not the Congressman made that speech in 1993 on the Floor of the House. Folks that went for the bait get discredited.
Then comes the "clean-up" crew...