2015 Interview: Plans to burn Northern California

[Jude Iam]

Let us know your thoughts. I've known Deborah for years - tireless activist. Jude

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGcvkAGCwFM

Deborah Tavares' interview with Jeff Rense in 2015 conclusively provides documented proof of premeditation of fire destruction of Sonoma and Mendocino Counties, in Northern California using microwave weaponry.Additionally, RFID trackers are being used to locate victims in the vaporized rubble that is left of former residence's.Part II will cover the logging companies efforts to provide massive fuel for West Coast forest fires using the hackn' squirt tree destroying methods of the Fischer Brothers, of Levi Strauss Jeans and GAP Stores fame.This is all part of Agenda 21, which we will show is in full swing directly after the fires.2011 PG & E and Cal PUblic Utilities Email exchangehttps://www.stopthecrime.net/RF%20Beam%20at%20Sebastopol.pdfN. Ca Burning Tavareshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kb8eQ...Directed Energy Weapons or Just WILDFIRES https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_M3b...

[podfish]

Let us know your thoughts. ...

Deborah Tavares' interview with Jeff Rense in 2015 conclusively provides documented proof of premeditation of fire destruction of Sonoma and Mendocino Counties....

I doubt you meant me, but since you asked:

no interview ever 'conclusively provides documented proof'. A You-Tube video may be technically considered a document, but never can it be considered proof.

and Agenda 21?? I guess that's a document, not that it says what some people seem to think it does.
And even if it did, we can all see how effective agreements like that are, considering how well the Paris Climate Accord, among others, is being implemented.

[geomancer]

You have been duped by PG&E. I have learned from impeccable sources that it was PG&E that started the DEW conspiracy story in order to divert attention from their poorly maintained power lines, which thrashed around in the wind and started some of the fires.

Let us know your thoughts. I've known Deborah for years - tireless activist. Jude

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGcvkAGCwFM

Deborah Tavares' interview with Jeff Rense in 2015 conclusively provides documented proof of premeditation of fire destruction of Sonoma and Mendocino Counties, in Northern California using microwave weaponry.Additionally, RFID trackers are being used to locate victims in the vaporized rubble that is left of former residence's.Part II will cover the logging companies efforts to provide massive fuel for West Coast forest fires using the hackn' squirt tree destroying methods of the Fischer Brothers, of Levi Strauss Jeans and GAP Stores fame.This is all part of Agenda 21, which we will show is in full swing directly after the fires.2011 PG & E and Cal PUblic Utilities Email exchangehttps://www.stopthecrime.net/RF%20Beam%20at%20Sebastopol.pdfN. Ca Burning Tavareshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kb8eQ...Directed Energy Weapons or Just WILDFIRES https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_M3b...

[arthunter]

Because I have been on the
forefront of exposing electromagnetic weaponry, shortly after the firestorm I was sent many videos blaming directed energy weapons. My first reaction was to seriously question these theories because one does not need this weaponry to start fires.... a lit cigarette will do the job nicely. As time went on I actually asked people to stop sending me these videos because I realized that I was in mourning and the thought of this kind of attack was frankly unbearable to me ...

I did notice that these reports were coming from local activists and included some good research about the burning temperatures of certain materials which were completely destroyed, the wind speeds at the stated time of incidents, etc. These reports are all over the internet so, as always, do your own research. These videos are the latest from aplanetruth, who seems to be a local resident. He is bringing this information to the authorities, which is how it should be ...

https://youtu.be/Slg8p0zWJa8

https://youtu.be/ZWvuPcurB6Q

I should mention that when I went to this person's website it was all about the flat earth theory, which I absolutely do not endorse ...

As always, these theories must stand up against the facts, so I say let the officials do their jobs and hope that they are honest.

The idea that these fires were set is not ridiculous. Look around you folks ... we are living in a world of conflict and terrorism and, unfortunately, we are hated around the world.

I was very interested in the fires which were reported in Sebastopol, Marin, Santa Cruz and Dublin, when the wind was not an issue.

I do not think that Pge started the directed energy rumors because to blame classified military technology would not be in their best interests.

I also do not agree with the statement that Agenda 21 is just a document which is most likely benign. Once again, do your own research about the role that the UN plays in our County development.

I hope and pray that these fires were an act of God and not an act of war but, in my opinion, it's too soon to come to any conclusions. I have seen too many pets with their paws badly burnt trying to survive in the rubble... At some point my own cognitive dissonance kicks in ..

Peace and love to all ...

[Shandi]

This post didn't get much response, and I missed it completely, but it ties in with the more recent YouTube video with Deborah Tavares I tried to post recently.

Let us know your thoughts. I've known Deborah for years - tireless activist. Jude

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGcvkAGCwFM

Deborah Tavares' interview with Jeff Rense in 2015 conclusively provides documented proof of premeditation of fire destruction of Sonoma and Mendocino Counties, in Northern California using microwave weaponry.Additionally, RFID trackers are being used to locate victims in the vaporized rubble that is left of former residence's.Part II will cover the logging companies efforts to provide massive fuel for West Coast forest fires using the hackn' squirt tree destroying methods of the Fischer Brothers, of Levi Strauss Jeans and GAP Stores fame.This is all part of Agenda 21, which we will show is in full swing directly after the fires.2011 PG & E and Cal PUblic Utilities Email exchangehttps://www.stopthecrime.net/RF%20Beam%20at%20Sebastopol.pdfN. Ca Burning Tavareshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kb8eQ...Directed Energy Weapons or Just WILDFIRES https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_M3b...

[theindependenteye]

All things are possible with God or the World Wide Web. But I'm more than mildly dubious. If this is a conspiracy of the lumber companies to loosen forestry regulations, I'd think it'd cost them a humongous amount of money, more than they could possibly make, to finance deployment of weaponry that would dwarf the H-bomb—why not just assassinate environmentally-friendly Senators at a fraction of the price? Though I grant that the Pentagon may be rife with pro-logging generals.

But you finally lose me at the mention of Agenda 21. I've tried to wrap my brain around the idea that the world-wide Deep State would adopt the strategy of keeping their deep-secret plans secret by publishing them world-wide—though granted, it's suspicious that Agenda 21 is couched in perfectly sensible, rational language that would make everyone believe in its obvious intelligence, except those gifted with reading between the lines.

I'd be more concerned with the Book of Revelation, detailing God's plan for destroying the world. Not to mention that God was part Jewish.

(Pardon the irony: sometimes I just can't help it. I do appreciate the videos: they give me ideas for stories.)

Cheers—
Conrad

[snoop4truth]

DEBORAH TAVARES & THE AGENDA 21 HOAX (THE CALIFORNIA FIRES HOAX).

For all other Deborah Tavares hoaxes (NASA, Silent Weapons, Iron Mountain, Agenda 21, PG&E Fires, Genocide), click here. http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...eborah-Tavares

THE HOAX: In the "Agenda 21 Hoax", Deborah Tavares claims to have discovered another secret or leaked document which she fraudulently claims proves that the United Nations is using diabolical methods (like fires) to force us out or our rural and suburban homes and into increasingly-smaller, densely-packed, over-populated "Kill Cities" or "Smart Cities" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, her claims about this document are not so.

AGENDA 21 IS A 100 PAGE DOCUMENT. Agenda 21 was written by the world's leading environmental scientists (not by "PG&E", the "Rothschilds" or the "Rockefellers"). Agenda 21 was first presented to the public at the "EARTH SUMMIT" (an environmental conference) in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil in 1992.

According to the "Agenda 21" document itself (upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular claim), its purpose is to SLOW DOWN the rate at which the environment is destroyed. It would have PROTECTED MOST OF THE REMAINING FORESTS, REDUCED DROUGHT and INSURED AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF FRESH WATER not contaminated by SEWAGE.

According to the Agenda 21 DOCUMENT ITSELF, the purpose of Agenda 21 IS NOT to drive us out of our rural and suburban homes into tightly-packed, over-populated cities in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. Instead, according to the Agenda 21 DOCUMENT ITSELF, the REAL purpose of Agenda 21 is to PRESERVE MOST OF THE FORESTS THAT REMAIN, exactly the opposite to what Deborah Tavares claims in her hoax (to the effect that the United Nations destroyed the forests of California in furtherance of Agenda 21 WHICH WAS ACTUALLY INTENDED TO PRESERVE THOSE VERY FORESTS FROM DESTRUCTION IN THE FIRST PLACE).

Agenda 21 was only a SUGGESTION that member nations were permitted, BUT NOT REQUIRED TO ADOPT for themselves. Agenda 21 does not apply in the United States because it is not the law in the United States and therefore cannot be enforced anywhere in the United States. So, Agenda 21 is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT in the United States.

BELOW IS A SECTION OF THE ACTUAL "TABLE OF CONTENTS" OF "AGENDA 21" ON THE VERY FIRST PAGE OF "AGENDA 21".

SECTION II. CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES FOR DEVELOPMENT
9. Protection of the atmosphere 9.1 - 9.35
10. Integrated approach to the planning and management of land resources 10.1 - 10.18
11. COMBATING DEFORESTATION 11.1 - 11.40
12. MANAGING FRAGILE ECOSYSTEMS: COMBATING desertification and DROUGHT 12.1 - 12.63
13. Managing fragile ecosystems: sustainable mountain development 13.1 - 13.24
14. Promoting sustainable agriculture and rural development 14.1 - 14.104
15. CONSERVATION OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY15.1 - 15.11
16. Environmentally sound MANAGEMENT OF BIODIVERSITY 16.1 - 16.46
17. Protection of the oceans, all kinds of seas, including enclosed and semi-enclosed seas, and coastal areas and the protection, rational use and development of their living resources 17.1 - 17.136
18.PROTECTION OF THE QUALITY AND SUPPLY OF FRESHWATER RESOURCES: application of integrated approaches to the development, MANAGEMENT and use OF WATER RESOURCES 18.1 - 18.90
19. Environmentally sound management of toxic chemicals, including prevention of illegal international
traffic in toxic and dangerous products 19.1 - 19.76
20. Environmentally sound management of hazardous wastes, in hazardous wastes 20.1 - 20.46
21. Environmentally sound MANAGEMENT OF solid wastes and SEWAGE-RELATED ISSUES 21.1 - 21.49
22. Safe and environmentally sound management of radioactive wastes

AND, ALL OF THIS IS ON THE VERY FIRST PAGE OF AGENDA 21 HERE.
https://sustainabledevelopment.un.or...s/Agenda21.pdf

BELOW IS THE ACTUAL TEXT OF AGENDA 21.

https://sustainabledevelopment.un.or...s/Agenda21.pdf
(THIS IS A MUST READ.). BEGIN AT SECTION 11.1 AT ABOUT 25% THROUGH THE TEXT. THE ACTUAL TEXT OF AGENDA 21 READS AS FOLLOWS:

AGENDA 21 – CHAPTER 11

COMBATING DEFORESTATION

PROGRAMME AREAS

A. Sustaining the multiple roles and functions of all types of FORESTS, FOREST LANDS and WOODLANDS.

Basis for action

11.1. There are major weaknesses in the policies, methods and mechanisms adopted to support and develop the multiple ecological, economic, social and cultural roles of TREES, FORESTS, and FOREST LANDS. Many developed countries are confronted with the effects of air pollution and FIRE DAMAGE ON THEIR FORESTS. More effective measures and approaches are often required at the national level to improve and harmonize policy formulation, planning and programming; legislative measures and instruments; development patterns; participation of the general public, especially women and indigenous people; involvement of youth; roles of the private sector, local organizations, non-governmental organizations and cooperatives; development of technical and multidisciplinary skills and quality of human resources; FORESTRY extension and public education; research capability and support; administrative structures and mechanisms, including intersectoral coordination, decentralization and responsibility and incentive systems; and dissemination of information and public relations. This is especially important to ensure a rational and holistic approach to the sustainable and environmentally sound development of FORESTS. The need for securing the multiple roles of FORESTS and FOREST LANDS through adequate and appropriate institutional strengthening has been repeatedly emphasized in many of the reports, decisions and recommendations of FAO, ITTO, UNEP, the World Bank, IUCN and other organizations.

Objectives
11.2. The objectives of this programme area are as follows:
a. To STRENGTHEN FOREST-RELATED NATIONAL INSTITUTIONS, to enhance the scope and effectiveness of activities related to the management, CONSERVATION and sustainable development of FORESTS, and to effectively ensure the sustainable utilization and production of FORESTS' goods and services in both the developed and the developing countries; by the year 2000, to strengthen the capacities and capabilities of national institutions to enable them to acquire the necessary knowledge for the PROTECTION AND CONSERVATION OF FORESTS, as well as to expand their scope and, correspondingly, enhance the effectiveness of programmes and activities related to the management and development of FORESTS;
b. To strengthen and improve human, technical and professional skills, as well as expertise and capabilities to effectively formulate and implement policies, plans, programmes, research and projects on management, CONSERVATION and sustainable development of all types of FORESTS and FOREST-based resources, and FOREST LANDS inclusive, as well as other areas from which FORESTS BENEFITS CAN BE DERIVED.

AND, THIS IS ONLY THE FIRST TWO PARAGRAPHS OF SECTION 11 OF AGENDA 21!

IMPORTANT: You will note from the actual WRITTEN words of Agenda 21, that THERE IS NO PROVISION FOR INCREMENTALLY REDUCING THE AREAS ALREADY OCCUPIED BY PEOPLE (to systematically drive them from their rural and suburban homes and into tightly-packed, over-populated "KILL CITIES" or "SMART CITIES" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind). According to the actual WRITTEN words of Agenda 21 itself, its actual WRITTEN purpose is to keep things FROM GETTING EVEN WORSE THAN THEY ALREADY ARE (IN TERMS OF DEFORESTATION). See Post #166 in the link at the very top of this thread for an excellent discussion of this.

THE AGENDA 21 MAP: CLICK ON THE THIS LINK. ONCE THERE, CLICK ON THE TWO (2) YELLOW, ORANGE AND RED MAPS.

https://www.google.com/search?source...30.Fm6zNgdf57I

The Agenda 21 MAP of the United States is self-explanatory. It VISUALLY indicates that the purpose of Agenda 21 is TO LIMIT FURTHER DEFORESTATION, as described in the Agenda 21 document above. Note that the Agenda 21 map was made in or before 1992. Note that at the time it was made (in or before 1992), the remaining forests on the map that were to be off-limits to FURTHER (ADDITIONAL) DEFORESTATION were the FORESTS and WILDERNESS AREAS that remained undeveloped at that time (in or before 1992). Note also that those making the Agenda 21 map often tried to "CONNECT" isolated wilderness areas with one another using narrow (very thin) "migration trails" so that animals might find mates outside their tiny wilderness "reservations" so as to ensure "BIO-DIVERSITY" (also a stated goal of Agenda 21).

IMPORTANT: You will note by looking at the Agenda 21 map, that THERE IS NO AREA OF THE MAP OCCUPIED BY PEOPLE THAT HAS BEEN REDUCED IN SIZE (OR MADE SMALLER) THAN THE AREAS THAT WERE ALREADY OCCUPIED BY PEOPLE AT THE TIME THE MAP WAS MADE IN 1992. So, there is likewise nothing about the Agenda 21 map which suggests that people will occupy less of an area than they occupy now (or that might suggest that people will be systematically driven from their rural and suburban homes into tightly-packed, over-populated "KILL CITIES" or "SMART CITIES" in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind). According to areas on the Agenda 21 map for which FURTHER (ADDITIONAL) development would be off-limits, it is perfectly obvious (when looking at the map) that the actual purpose of Agenda 21 was to keep things FROM GETTING EVEN WORSE THAN THEY ALREADY ARE (IN TERMS OF DEFORESTATION). No other conclusion is logically possible by looking at the Agenda 21 map.

LOGICAL CONCLUSION:
Unless the forgoing official documents taken from the ACTUAL PAGES of Agenda 21 are forgeries, THE RECENT CALIFORNIA FIRES DID NOT ADVANCE THE PURPOSE OF AGENDA 21 (TO PREVENT FURTHER DEFORESTATION). INDEED, THEY ACTUALLY UNDERMINED THE PURPOSE OF AGENDA 21 (BY DESTROYING THE VERY FORESTS THAT AGENDA 21 WAS INTENDED TO PROTECT)!

AS A RESULT, THE RECENT CALIFORNIA FIRES WERE NOT AGENDA 21 FIRES, EVEN IF THEY WERE THE RESULT OF SOME OTHER CONSPIRACY, unrelated to Agenda 21.

APPLICATION:
If I were a charlatan, and if I wanted to create a BETTER version of the Agenda 21 Hoax, this is how I would do it.

1. I would create videos and I would show the REAL, ACTUAL "AGENDA 21" DOCUMENT (unmodified) showing the Agenda 21 "agenda" AS IT IS ACTUALLY WRITTEN in the official document (showing that its purpose is to PROTECT THE REMAINING FORESTS, PREVENT DROUGHT AND ENSURE AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF FRESH WATER UNCONTAMINATED BY SEWAGE (all of which is verifiably true).

2. Then, in my videos, I would show written proof that "Agenda 21" was EFFECTIVELY REJECTED by the U.S. Government as a whole AND THAT IT IS NOT THE LAW, AND THEREFORE NOT ENFORCEABLE ANYWHERE IN THE UNITED STATES (all of which is verifiably true).

3. Then, in my videos, I would show ALL OF THE ENVIROMENTAL CALAMITIES SUFFERED BY CALIFORNIANS SINCE 1992, when Agenda 21 was first proposed and effectively rejected by the U.S. Government (DESTRUCTION OF THE REMAINING FORESTS, INCREASED DROUGHT, ABSENCE OF FRESH WATER UNCONTAMINATED BY SEWAGE, PEOPLE RENDERED HOMELESS AND DISPLACED BY FOREST FIRES).

4. Then, in my videos, I would claim that "THE REFUSAL" (ITSELF) of U.S. Government to adopt "Agenda 21" in I992, and every year since then, constitutes conclusive "PROOF" that the U.S. Government ACTUALLY WANTED TO PURPOSELY DESTROY ALL THE REMAINING FORESTS IN CALIFORNIA, PURPOSELY INCREASE DROUGHTS IN CALIFORNIA AND PURPOSELY DESTROY ALL SUPPLIES OF FRESH WATER IN CALIFORNIA to drive Californians out of their rural and suburban homes and into cities away from the forests and wilderness areas.

That would make a much BETTER "Agenda 21 Hoax", BECAUSE (except for the nefarious intentions of the U.S. Government part) IT IS ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY, VERIFIABLY AND FACTUALLY TRUE IN EVERY SINGLE RESPECT! That would make for a much more LOGICAL explanation of the ENVIRONMENTAL CATASTROPHIES IN CALIFORNIA than the story that Deborah Tavares peddles now (which actually CONTRADICTS Agenda 21).

FACT: When corporate interests are threatened by proposed laws that would reduce their profits, they launch a public relations campaign against those proposed laws. But, they do not admit that they actually oppose the proposed laws for reasons of their own selfish interests. Instead, they pretend that they oppose the proposed laws to protect the interests of society in general (out of the goodness of their own hearts).

EXAMPLE: CONSIDER THIS HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE AS IT RELATES TO AGENDA 21 (THIS MAY NOT HAVE EVER OCCURRED. IT IS ONLY AN EXAMPLE TO ILLUSTRATE THIS PRINCIPLE OF CORPORATE P.R WARS.). If made into law, Agenda 21 (a proposed law) would slow the rate at which logging corporations and land developers, like Deborah Tavares, could destroy the remaining forests (and thereby slow the rate at which they generate profits).

So, these corporate interests launch a public relations campaign against Agenda 21. But, they do not admit that they actually oppose Agenda 21 to protect their own profits. Instead, they pretend to oppose Agenda 21 to protect the rest of society (out of the goodness of their own hearts).

So, they come up with a CAREFULLY-CRAFTED LIE intended to get the rest of society to oppose Agenda 21 as much as they do. Instead of admitting that Agenda 21 would only slow down the rate at which logging corporations and land developers, like Deborah Tavares, could destroy the remaining forests, they falsely claim that Agenda 21 WOULD ACTUALLY WORK IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION! They falsely claim that Agenda 21 WOULD ACTUALLY EXPAND THE FORESTS INTO AREAS THAT WERE ALREADY DEVELOPED AND ALREADY OCCUPIED BY HUMANS, thereby systematically driving homeowners out of their rural and suburban homes and into increasingly-smaller, tightly packed, over-populated cities (something that the REAL Agenda 21 would not actually do).

This FRAUDULENT characterization of Agenda 21 would serve to make ALL THE REST OF SOCIETY join with those who profit by destroying the forests. The rest of society would OPPOSE "AGENDA 21" in the mistaken belief THAT THEY WERE SAVING THEIR OWN HOMES IN THE PROCESS. Now, THAT is a brilliant lie. But, it gets even better.

By telling such a lie, logging corporations and real estate developers, like Deborah Tavares, could continue DESTROYING THE FORESTS and continue to cash in without any opposition from the rest of society WHILE SIMULATANEOUSLY BLAMING AGENDA 21 (WHICH NEVER BECAME LAW IN THE FIRST PLACE) FOR THE HARDSHIPS THAT THEY THEMSELVES KNOWINGLY INFLICT ON THE REST OF SOCIETY IN THE PURSUIT OF THEIR PROFITS (increased droughts and therefore increased forest fires, decreased fresh water supplies uncontaminated by sewage, etc.). Now, THAT is a TRULY brilliant lie, blaming a SUGGESTION that never became law, for the hardships suffered by Californians, when the SUGGESTION that never became law WAS ACTUALLY DESIGNED TO PREVENT THOSE VERY HARDSHIPS IN THE FIRST PLACE!

Remember, the foregoing is only an ILLUSTRATION of how corporate interests engage in disinformation campaigns in order to get society to oppose proposed laws that would reduce their profits. This is an example only. This may have never occurred. That is not the point.

The point is simply that Deborah Tavares lied to us about what the what Agenda 21 says in the same way she lied to us about every other document she has ever used in support of her claims about the planned extinction of mankind.

I do not know if Deborah Tavares lied to us about the Agenda 21 document for same reasons of the type suggested in the hypothetical illustration above. As far as I am concerned, the reason she lied to us is irrelevant. All that really matters is that she lied to us AGAIN about what a document says is support of her claims of a planned extinction of mankind.

So, whether or not there is a "planned extinction of mankind", this Agenda 21 document provides no support for that proposition.

ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Deborah Tavares. Instead, Snoop4truth revealed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such intentional fraud inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Deborah Tavares' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have revealed this information here.

The message to all charlatans and hoaxers? Just tell the truth. The truth does not fear investigation. Only lies fear investigation. The truth can be supported by using the truth. Only lies must be supported by using hoaxes (other lies). There is no such thing as a "good reason" to intentionally defraud the American people, not even to make a popular (and sensational) conspiracy theory appear to be true.

[snoop4truth]

DEBORAH TAVARES & THE FORGED PG&E EMAIL HOAX (THE CALIFORNIA FIRES HOAX).

For all other Deborah Tavares hoaxes (NASA, Silent Weapons, Iron Mountain, Agenda 21, California Fires, Genocide), click here. http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...eborah-Tavares

THE HOAX: In the FORGED PG&E Email Hoax, Deborah Tavares claims to have obtained emails which effectively prove that PG&E (which she claims is owned by "The Rothschilds") caused the recent fires in California by beaming directed energy beams from satellites in space at Sebastopol, California. But, her claims about these emails are lies. They are FORGERIES.

VIDEOS OF DEBORAH TAVARES ENGAGED IN THE HOAX (Jeff Rense is not involved in the hoax)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHJJFZKADuk (at 11:10-20:00)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3fb--FC_oQ (at 1:05-3:40)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7As3d9NgDyk (at 27:20-30:10)

Pacific Gas & Electric ("PG&E") is a California electrical utility company. Over the next few years, PG&E is required by law to generate an increasingly higher and higher percentage of its electrical power without producing any carbon emissions. So, PG&E has increasingly resorted to wind, solar and thermal technology to generate electrical power.

But, PG&E's conventional, ground-based, solar panels can only collect energy from the Sun during the middle of daylight hours in good weather. So, in 2009, PG&E announced that in the future, solar panels on satellites in space might be used to generate energy from the Sun 24 hours a day. These satellites might then beam the power to Earth in the form of laser beams or radio frequency beams. The power might then be received by rectennas at receptor stations on Earth and then converted to electricity for use by its customers.

WHAT PG&E ANNOUNCED IN 2009:
www.pge.com/en_US/small-medium-business/business-resource-center/energy-management-articles/energy-management-articles/past-articles/energy-from-outerspace.page?WT.mc_id=SMBNewsletter_email_20160811_phase_link-energy

Solaren is a private California company which has patented the technology described above. In 2009, PG&E entered into a contract with Solaren to buy finished electricity from Solaren if Solaren is ever successful in generating electrical power using this technology. Under the contract, Solaren would own, operate and control all its satellites, rectennas and all the receiver stations. Originally, Solaren promised to provide PG&E with finished electricity by 2016. But, it ran into financial problems and still has not provided any electricity to PG&E, even at this late date. The California Public Utilities Commission ("CPUC") approved the contract on the condition that no money from PG&E customers ever be used to develop this technology.

THE CONTRACT:
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/30198977/n.../#.XJUcxVKFPIU
(at paragraphs 1-5)

https://www.afcea.org/content/space-...closer-reality
(at paragraphs 8, 9 & 10)

https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...-light-of-day/
(at the final two paragraphs)

https://www.businessinsider.com/spac...r-earth-2014-7
(at the final two paragraphs)

Deborah Tavares lives in Sebastopol and has waged war against PG&E because of its "smart meters". So, when the recent forest fires burned northern California, Deborah Tavares wanted to blame PG&E and the technology described above for starting those fires. But, there was a problem. The scientific and economic literature indicated that this technology did not yet exist to blame.

CURRENT SCIENTIFIC & ECONOMIC LITERATURE ON THIS TECHNOLOGY:
This technology will not be in use until the end of the decade. See the last 3 paragraphs and the final sentence here.
https://www.businessinsider.com/spac...r-earth-2014-7

This technology did not exist in 2017. Beginning at the bottom of page 16 here.
https://space.nss.org/media/NSS-JOUR...olar-Power.pdf

This technology is not in use in 2019. See the last paragraph. https://www.electricityforum.com/new...ospaceforpower

This technology did not exist in 2018. See the FIRST and LAST paragraph here.
https://earthsky.org/earth/space-bas...ser-to-reality

This technology will not be in use until at least 2019. See page 62.
http://fiso.spiritastro.net/telecon/...e_12-14-16.pdf

This technology did not exist in 2018. See the final paragraph.
http://www.alternative-energy-news.i...ls-into-orbit/

SO, TO REBUT ALL THOSE FACTS, Deborah Tavares FORGED a series of FAKE emails (some purportedly between the CPUC and PG&E) indicating that this directed energy beam technology already existed, that it was already in use and that it could be used to kill us all.

THE FORGERIES:

1. PUBLISHED EMAIL FORGERIES:
http://stopthecrime.net/wp/2018/08/2...rn-california/

Afterwards, Deborah Tavares created more FORGED emails reflecting imaginary responses from imaginary experts to which Deborah Tavares allegedly forwarded her FORGED emails above. Not surprisingly, these imaginary experts agreed with Deborah Tavares that this beam technology already existed, that it has long been in use and that it could be used to kill us all.

2. TWO UNPUBLISHED, BUT PUBLICLY QUOTED, FORGERIES AT ABOUT 20% THROUGH THE TEXT HERE: http://smartmetersmurder.com/

3. THE FINAL TWO UNPUBLISHED, BUT PUBLICLY QUOTED, FORGERIES
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHJJFZKADuk (at 17:25-18:40)

Thus, Deborah Tavares herself actually created the very FORGERIES which she fraudulently claims CONSTITUTE "PROOF" that PG&E used this future energy beam technology to start the recent fires in California to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind.

THE REASONS WHY WE KNOW THESE PUBLISHED EMAILS ARE FORGERIES:

1. Tavares did not know what "space weather" actually was (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). "Solar flares" on the surface of the Sun erupt about every 11 years or so. These solar flares extend millions of miles into space and emit extremely high amounts of radiation into space. This radiation is called "space weather" (like a "rain" or "storm" OF RADIATION in space). (It is the Earth's atmosphere which protects all life on Earth from this radiation.). The radiation emitted during such "space weather" is so powerful that it can damage or destroy electrical power transformers here on Earth if they are linked to earth-based solar panels. Such damage can result in power outages. That is why "space weather" would be of concern to PG&E. During "damaging space weather", PG&E has to protect its transformers linked to earth-based solar panels because some such transformers provide electrical power to nuclear power plants and to hospitals which cannot afford power outages for obvious reasons.

DEBORAH TAVARES' MISTAKE:

But, Deborah Tavares did not know any of this. She mistakenly believed that "space weather" was WEATHER HERE ON EARTH (like drought and fire) which was artificially created and controlled by lasers, radio frequencies or microwaves beamed at the Earth from satellites IN SPACE (a stupid mistake that a REAL PG&E executive WOULD NOT MAKE).

HOW THIS MISTAKE SHOWS UP IN THE FORGERIES:

In FORGING the phrase "...then have its lawyers BLAME ITS CUSTOMERS, AKA EARTHLINGS, FOR ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENSES RESULTING [FROM DAMAGING SPACE WEATHER]" in the 9:50 email above, Deborah Tavares was referring to the adverse consequences of FIRES WHICH PG&E CAN BLAME ON ITS CUSTOMERS (not realizing that "damaging space weather" is actually radiation in outer space caused by solar flares on the surface of the Sun every 11 years). Unknown to Deborah Tavares, the consequences resulting from "damaging space weather" is actually power outages, NOT FIRES! AND, PG&E CANNOT POSSIBLY BLAME ITS CUSTOMERS FOR ITS OWN POWER OUTAGES CAUSED BY RADIATION FROM SOLAR FLARES ON THE SURFACE OF THE SUN EVERY 11 YEARS. So, in creating this FORGERY, Deborah Tavares did not know that PG&E customers can NEVER be "blamed" for the "consequences" of "damaging space weather", WHICH IS ONLY POWER OUTAGES (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). This stupid mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.

2. Likewise, Deborah Tavares did not know the terms of PG&E's contract with Solaren (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). So, Deborah Tavares did not know that PG&E would never own, operate, manage or control any of Solaren's satellites, rectennas, receiving stations or have any say in how, when or where energy from Solaren's satellites in space would be directed. Instead, Solaren would be solely responsible for all of that. Under the contract, the only thing PG&E would ever do would be to buy finished electricity from Solaren if Solaren was ever successful in generating electricity using this technology. Under the contract, PG&E is simply a potential, future customer of Solaren. Nothing more. But, Deborah Tavares did not know any of this.

HOW THIS MISTAKE SHOWS UP IN THE FORGERIES:

So, in FORGING the sentence, "WE [referring to PG&E] have changed OUR receptor site from the Mojave desert (sic) to Sebastopol" in the 10:03 email above, Deborah Tavares sought to create the illusion that she was so important to PG&E that it actually "targeted" her in Sebastopol with radio frequency waves beamed from satellites in space in retaliation for her opposition to PG&E "smart meters". See PROOF here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHJJFZKADuk (at 18:40-19:20). Are you kidding me?! What a narcissist!

Regardless, Deborah Tavares did not know that PG&E will never have any ability to aim Solaren's energy beams or to move Solaren's receptor stations from one place to another (something a REAL PG&E executive would know). This stupid mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.

Further, Deborah Tavares did not know that Solaren's actual rectennas or receptor site is in Fresno, hundreds of miles away from the Mojave Desert (something a REAL PG&E executive would know).

PROOF THAT FRESNO (NOT SEBASTOPOL) IS THE REAL RECEPTOR SITE:

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/30198977/n...XIlKNlKFPIU(at
the 3rd paragraph)

https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...-light-of-day/
(at end of 2nd paragraph)

https://www.electricityforum.com/new...ospaceforpower
(at the 16th paragraph)

Moreover, Deborah Tavares did not know that such receiver rectennas at such receiver stations are up to six miles in diameter (which would make it obvious to every person living in Sebastopol if it had actually had been relocated there as Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims).

Finally, a REAL PG&E executive would not refer to Solaren's receptor site as "OUR" receptor site, would know that Solaren's receptor station was in Fresno (not in the Mojave Desert) and would know that PG&E had no power or ability to change Solaren's receptor site. The foregoing stupid mistakes prove that this email is a forgery.

3. Use your own common sense. As to the 10:03 email above, how likely is it that a PG&E executive would open an email to the CPUC with a "reminder" of the ACTUAL INTERNAL MECHANICS of exactly how Solaren's technology worked? The CPUC had just approved of PG&E's use of Solaren's technology provided that PG&E never invested any of its customer's money to finance the project. The CPUC did not need a "reminder" of the ACTUAL INTERNAL MECHANICS of Solaren's technology in which PG&E played no part and could claim no credit. This "reminder" serves NO PURPOSE except to defraud and to set up the sentence that follows.

4. Use your own common sense. How likely is it that the CPUC would refer to PG&E's customers as "EARTHLINGS" in connection with an email about a "COVER UP" of "damaging space weather" which can cause nothing but power outages? How is it even possible for PG&E to cover up a power outage?

5. Use your own common sense. How likely is it that the CPUC would tell PG&E to have its lawyers BLAME ITS CUSTOMERS "AKA EARTHLINGS" FOR THE CONSEQUENCES OF "DAMAGING SPACE WEATHER", WHICH IS ONLY POWER OUTAGES CAUSED BY RADIATION FROM SOLAR FLARES WHICH CANNOT POSSIBLY BE BLAMED ON PG&E CUSTOMERS? This stupid mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.

THE REASONS WHY WE KNOW THE UNPUBLISHED, BUT PUBLICLY QUOTED, EMAILS ARE FORGERIES:

1. The sentence, "You as a California resident have every right to know what your 'public utilities' are doing with their (sic) 'RATE DOLLARS'", was not written by an expert, as Deborah Tavares fraudulently claims. Unknown to Deborah Tavares, no "rate dollars" from any PG&E customer has or will ever be used to finance the research and development of Solaren's technology (which will be financed, owned and operated solely by Solaren). Under the contract, PG&E would merely be a potential, future customer of Solaren and buy finished electricity from Solaren if Solaren is ever successful in generating electricity using this technology. Again, no PG&E customer money will ever be used to develop Solaren's technology. But, Deborah Tavares did not know this when writing this FORGERY. That stupid mistake proves that this email is a FORGERY.

2. The term, "EARTH, INC." in "comment ONE:" is a "signature" term ACTUALLY CREATED, COINED and REPEATEDLY USED BY Deborah Tavares.
https://www.google.com/search?ei=4uy...60.uVtaFybaRXU

3. The phrase, "very disturbing" in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares phrase.
https://www.google.com/search?ei=BO2...71.i3pL90_8tdA

4. The term, "FOIA", in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares term.
https://www.google.com/search?ei=eO2...99.ntDizkRvUdQ

5. The term, "iceberg", in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares term.
https://www.google.com/search?ei=0O2...99.RDgj6KM5rHk

6. The term, "footprints", in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares term.
https://www.google.com/search?ei=Du6...99.UcKcf4ptzag

7. The term, "assessment", in "comment TWO:" is a "signature" Deborah Tavares term.
https://www.google.com/search?ei=Se6...99.qaTj4TY5zhg

8. BOTH "comment ONE:" and "comment TWO:" contain hyphenated terms (" - "), a writing custom rare in today's world, suggesting that BOTH comment ONE and comment TWO were written by the same person, which of course, they were.

PG&E may actually be using laser or radio frequencies beamed from satellites in space to kill us all in furtherance of the planned extinction of mankind. But, THESE PARTICULAR FORGED EMAILS THEMSELVES (upon which Deborah Tavares HERSELF says she bases this particular claim) provide no support for that proposition, because they are FORGERIES!

ACTUAL CAUSE OF FIRES IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...acy-aficionado
https://newrepublic.com/minutes/150605/alleged-southern-california-arsonist-conspiracy-theorist
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/cali...other-conspiracies_n_5b6dc69de4b0ae32af97e953
https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-holy-fire-arson-suspsect-20180810-story.html

ACTUAL CAUSE OF FIRES IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA AND ELSEWHERE
https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/20...a-trail-fires/
https://www.chicoer.com/2018/09/27/2-arrested-for-allegedly-setting-northern-california-fires/
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...wildfire-in-northern-california-idUSKCN1BA0VL
https://www.kion546.com/news/2-arrested-for-allegedly-setting-northern-california-fires/799909817
http://www.capradio.org/articles/2018/08/23/san-francisco-man-arrested-for-deadly-klamathon-fire/
https://www.foxnews.com/us/arson-suspect-linked-to-5-of-californias-fires-officials-say
https://www.foxnews.com/us/the-latest-arrest-made-in-growing-california-wildfire
https://www.redding.com/story/news/...ted-friday-connection-arson-fires/1780261002/
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/10/17/cal...be-deadly-wildfires-despite-arson-arrest.html
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-st...r-allegedly-setting-northern-california-fires
https://www.sbsun.com/2017/08/24/ma...fires-in-highland-san-bernardino-is-arrested/
https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/Arson-Arrest-Charges-San-Bernardino-439032663.html
https://wtop.com/national/2018/07/the-latest-more-evacuations-as-fire-rages-near-yosemite/
https://www.ksbw.com/article/battling-18-blazes-california-may-face-worst-fire-season/22677894
https://people.com/crime/calif-man-sentenced-to-12-years-for-starting-wildfire/
https://abcnews.go.com/US/police-arrest-man-connection-california-wildfires/story?id=56830037
https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/...ange-Cleveland-National-Forest-490374161.html
https://wildfiretoday.com/2019/02/1...ance-before-arrest-for-starting-clayton-fire/
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/26/us/cranston-fire-california-arson-arrest.html


OTHER FACTORS
https://www.vox.com/energy-and-envi...e-change-california-san-francisco-los-angeles
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2018/08/news-california-wildfire-arson-human-cause/
https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea...lifornia-s-worst-wildfires-power-12294852.php
https://www.vox.com/2018/7/20/17582...rr-fire-california-cranston-ferguson-Colorado


FACT: Importantly, not a single arsonist above used a smart meter or a Directed Energy Beam from a satellite in space to commit his/her crime.


ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not reveal this information to harm Deborah Tavares. Instead, Snoop4truth revealed this information solely to reduce the CATASTROPHIC DAMAGE that such intentional fraud inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Deborah Tavares' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have revealed this information here.

The message to all charlatans and hoaxers? Just tell the truth. The truth does not fear investigation. Only lies fear investigation. The truth can be supported by using the truth. Only lies must be supported by using hoaxes (other lies). There is no such thing as a "good reason" to intentionally defraud the American people, not even to make a popular (and sensational) conspiracy theory appear to be true.

[snoop4truth]

Let us know your thoughts. I've known Deborah for years - tireless activist. Jude

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGcvkAGCwFM

Deborah Tavares' interview with Jeff Rense in 2015 conclusively provides documented proof of premeditation of fire destruction of Sonoma and Mendocino Counties, in Northern California using microwave weaponry.Additionally, RFID trackers are being used to locate victims in the vaporized rubble that is left of former residence's.Part II will cover the logging companies efforts to provide massive fuel for West Coast forest fires using the hackn' squirt tree destroying methods of the Fischer Brothers, of Levi Strauss Jeans and GAP Stores fame.This is all part of Agenda 21, which we will show is in full swing directly after the fires.2011 PG & E and Cal PUblic Utilities Email exchangehttps://www.stopthecrime.net/RF%20Beam%20at%20Sebastopol.pdfN. Ca Burning Tavareshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kb8eQ...Directed Energy Weapons or Just WILDFIRES https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_M3b...

Hello Jude Iam,

Respectfully, this is not so.

Deborah Tavares is a serial hoaxer.

See proof here. http://www.oom2.com/t53764-a-summary-of-hoaxes-by-deborah-tavares-by-snoop4truth

Best Regards,

Snoop

[snoop4truth]

Hello Jude Iam,

See proof here that Deborah Tavares is a serial hoaxer.

NEW VIDEO ABOUT DEBORAH TAVARES AND THE "NASA WAR DOCUMENT HOAX". CLICK HERE. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQZmq_vMcSQ.

FOR MORE, CLICK HERE

[snoop4truth]

Hello Jude Iam,

See proof here that Deborah Tavares is a serial hoaxer.

NEW VIDEO ABOUT DEBORAH TAVARES AND THE "NASA WAR DOCUMENT HOAX". CLICK HERE. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQZmq_vMcSQ.

FOR MORE, CLICK HERE

ABOUT THE DOCUMENTS USED BY DEBORAH TAVARES


(NASA Was Document, Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars, The Report From Iron Mountain, Agenda 21, Genocide Agreement, PG&E Email, 5G, Depopulation, Weaponized Weather, Chemtrails, Rothschilds, Rockefeller)


Deborah Tavares supports her claims with documents. But, what the public does not know is that she FORGES some of these documents herself. Other times, she ALTERS and CHANGES the words and images to make them fit her claims. Still other times, she INTENTIONALLY MISREPRESENTS what the documents really are or what they really say.


Every document that Deborah Tavares uses to support every one of her claims is explained below. Google "The Hoaxes Of Deborah Tavares" (in quotes), or click here. https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showt...DEPOPULATION)&.