I have a Dr. friend picking through the proposed Health Care bill. Sure wish others would do the same. Here is some food for thought:
Obamacare - are you paying attention? The communists have landed...
FINALLY someone is reading it!! Make sure your reps are too. This person
has been reading the 1000 page house bill and posting it at Twitter..the
bill is worse than you thought
Peter Fleckstein (aka Fleckman) is reading it and has been posting on
Twitter his findings.
This is from his postings (Note: All comments are Fleckman's)
Pg 22 of the HC Bill MANDATES the Govt will audit books of ALL EMPLOYERS that self insure!!
Pg 30 Sec 123 of HC bill - THERE WILL BE A GOVT COMMITTEE that decides what treatments and benefits you get
Pg 29 lines 4-16 in the HC bill - YOUR HEALTHCARE IS RATIONED!!!
Pg 42 of HC Bill - The Health Choices Commissioner will choose your HC
benefits for you. You have no choice!
PG 50 Section 152 in HC bill - HC will be provided to ALL non US citizens,
illegal or otherwise
Pg 58HC Bill - Govt will have real-time access to individuals' finances and
a National ID Healthcard will be issued!
Pg 59 HC Bill lines 21-24 Govt will have direct access to your banks'
accounts for election funds transfer
PG 65 Sec 164 is a payoff subsidized plan for retirees and their families in
unions & community orgs (ACORN).
Pg 72 Lines 8-14 Govt is creating a HC Exchange to bring private HC plans under Govt control
PG 84 Sec 203 HC bill - Govt mandates ALL benefit pkgs for private HC plans in the Exchange
PG 85 Line 7 HC Bill - Specs for Benefit Levels for Plans = The Govt will
ration your Healthcare!
PG 91 Lines 4-7 HC Bill - Govt mandates linguistic-appropriate services.
Example: Translation for illegal aliens
Pg 95 HC Bill Lines 8-18 The Govt will use groups (I.e., ACORN & Americorps) to sign up individuals for Govt HC plan
PG 85 Line 7 HC Bill - Specs of Ben Levels for Plans. #AARP members - your health care will be rationed.
PG 102 Lines 12-18 HC Bill - Medicaid-eligible individuals will be
automatically enrolled in Medicaid. No choice.
pg 124 lines 24-25 HC No company can sue GOVT on price fixing. No "judicial review" against Govt Monopoly.
pg 127 Lines 1-16 HC Bill - Doctors/ #AMA - The Govt will tell YOU what you can make.
Pg 145 Line 15-17 An Employer MUST automatically enroll employees into pub opt plan. NO CHOICE
Pg 126 Lines 22-25 Employers MUST pay for health care for part-time
employees AND their families.
Pg 149 Lines 16-24 ANY employer with a payroll of $400k and above who does not provide pub opt. Pays 8% tax on all payroll
pg 150 Lines 9-13 Businesses with payroll between $251k & 400k who don't provide pub. Opt pays 2-6% tax on all payroll
Pg 167 Lines 18-23 ANY individual who doesn't have acceptable HC according to Govt will be taxed 2.5% of income
Pg 170 Lines 1-3 HC Bill Any NONRESIDENT Alien is exempt from individual taxes. (Americans will pay)
Pg 195 HC Bill - Officers and employees of HC Admin (GOVT) will have access to ALL Americans' financial and personal records.
PG 203 Line 14-15 HC - "The tax imposed under this section shall not be
treated as tax" Yes, it says that.
Pg 239 Line 14-24 HC Bill Govt will reduce physician services for
Medicaid. Seniors, low income, poor affected
Pg 241 Line 6-8 HC Bill - Doctors will all be paid the same, regardless of
what specialty you have.
PG 253 Line 10-18 Govt sets value of doctor's time, professional judgment, etc. Literally value of humans.
PG 265 Sec 1131 Govt mandates and controls productivity for private HC
industries
PG 268 Sec 1141 Fed Govt regulates rental and purchase of power driven
wheelchairs
PG 272 SEC. 1145. Treatment of certain cancer hospitals. Cancer patients:
welcome to rationing!
Page 280 Sec 1151 The Govt will penalize hospitals for what it deems
preventable re-admissions.
Pg 298 Lines 9-11 Doctors who treat a patient during initial admission that results in a readmission will be penalized by the Govt.
Pg 317 L 13-20 PROHIBITION on ownership/investment. Govt tells doctors
what/how much they can own.
Pg 317-318 lines 21-25,1-3 PROHIBITION on expansion- Govt is mandating hospitals cannot expand
pg 321 2-13 Hospitals have opportunity to apply for exception BUT community input required . Can you say ACORN?!!
Pg335 16-25 Pg 336-339 - Govt mandates establishment of outcome-based measures. HC the way they want. Rationing
Pg 341 Lines 3-9 Govt has authority to disqualify Medicare Adv Plans, HMOs, etc. Forcing peeps into Govt plan
Pg 354 Sec 1177 - Govt will RESTRICT enrollment of special needs people.!
WTF. My sis has down syndrome!!
Pg 379 Sec 1191 Govt creates more bureaucracy - Telehealth Advisory
Committee. Can you say HC by phone?
PG 425 Lines 4-12 Govt mandates Advance Care Planning Consult. Think
Senior Citizens end of life
Pg 425 Lines 17-19 Govt will instruct and consult regarding living wills,
durable powers of atty. Mandatory!
PG 425 Lines 22-25, 426 Lines 1-3 Govt provides approved list of end of
life resources, guiding you in death. Excuse me???!?!?!?
PG 427 Lines 15-24 Govt mandates program for orders for end of life. The
Govt has a say in how your life ends
Pg 429 Lines 1-9 An "advance care planning consult" will be used frequently
as patient's health deteriorates
PG 429 Lines 10-12 "Advance care consultation" may include an ORDER for
end of life plans. AN ORDER from GOV
Pg 429 Lines 13-25 - The govt will specify which Doctors can write an end
of life order.
PG 430 Lines 11-15 The Govt will decide what level of treatment you will
have at end of life
Pg 469 - Community Based Home Medical Services=Non profit orgs. Hello,
ACORN Medical Svcs here!!?
Page 472 Lines 14-17 PAYMENT TO COMMUNITY-BASED ORG. One monthly payment to a community-based org. Like ACORN?
PG 489 Sec 1308 The Govt will cover Marriage & Family therapy. Which means they will insert Govt into your marriage
Pg 494-498 Govt will cover Mental Health Services including defining,
creating, rationing those same services
I can't wait to see what's in the last half.
Buy guns, buy gold
07-27-2009, 07:41 PM
Barrie
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Please pay no attention to paranoid rants like this. Barrie
07-28-2009, 07:38 AM
alanora
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
How can it be a paranoid rant if it is being read from the document itself?
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by Barrie:
Please pay no attention to paranoid rants like this. Barrie
07-28-2009, 08:37 AM
Clancy
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by alanora:
How can it be a paranoid rant if it is being read from the document itself?
It's not quoting the document, somebody out to protect the insurance industry is paraphrasing, with absurd distortion, the document.
07-28-2009, 08:45 AM
podfish
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Here's what makes this a "paranoid rant". The indicators are in the capitalized words.
My god, "A GOVT COMMITTEE" will be involved! Obviously nothing could be worse; I guess just by definition. And we do have long precedent of the government being allowed to audit business records (for taxes among other reasons), but I suppose some people really think that's an intrusion too.
But the resistance to rationing particularly bothers me. I'm afraid that's a fear that too many people buy into without thinking it through. Currently we also have rationing. There's always rationing unless there's unlimited supply. One of the claims for the superiority of "the market" is that by attaching monetary value to things the rationing is efficiently done - the price rises until those who don't value the thing enough drop out. 'Course that presumes that those without the money to compete for the service don't get to have the service. A good principal for allocating health care resources, don't you think?
(Yeah, I know that the rising price is supposed to bring new resources... for a variety of reasons I don't think that's working real well here).
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by BizWrangler:
I have a Dr. friend picking through the proposed Health Care bill. Sure wish others would do the same. Here is some food for thought:
Obamacare - are you paying attention? The communists have landed...
FINALLY someone is reading it!! Make sure your reps are too. This person
has been reading the 1000 page house bill and posting it at Twitter..the
bill is worse than you thought
Peter Fleckstein (aka Fleckman) is reading it and has been posting on
Twitter his findings.
This is from his postings (Note: All comments are Fleckman's)
Pg 22 of the HC Bill MANDATES the Govt will audit books of ALL EMPLOYERS that self insure!!
Pg 30 Sec 123 of HC bill - THERE WILL BE A GOVT COMMITTEE that decides what treatments and benefits you get
Pg 29 lines 4-16 in the HC bill - YOUR HEALTHCARE IS RATIONED!!!
07-28-2009, 08:51 AM
Barrie
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by Clancy:
It's not quoting the document, somebody out to protect the insurance industry is paraphrasing, with absurd distortion, the document.
For instance, THERE IS NOTHING IN THE OBAMA PLAN ABOUT RATIONING, this idea is 100% insurance company propaganda. All the other countries that offer some form of government sponsored health care or health insurance spend less per capita on health and have better out comes. We are near the bottom on infant mortality and other measures of effective health care amongst industrialized nations. Cuba does much better than we do.
Health insurance companies spend 20-30% of what we pay them on their wages, advertising, profit for share holders, etc. This has been much less in the past and would be reduced with COMPETITION from a government plan. Free market needs competition, the current chokehold by a few large insurance companies is not competition, it is a cartel.
What Obama is proposing is paying doctors and hospitals for out come more than procedure. This will prevent them from doing and repeating costly and unnessecary procedures that run up the cost of medicare. Also, they want to pay general practioners more and reduce the pay of specialists to be more in line with what procedures actually cost. I work in a health clinic and think these are excellent ideas.
Barrie :yinyang:
07-28-2009, 09:10 AM
RichBodyJuicer
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Obamacare? 'The communists have landed'? What is this nonsense?
What is the purpose of this but to create more fear based propaganda to confuse and scatter supporting the creation of a comprehensive national health care plan, one that every major nation enjoys, but for the the good ol' US of A.
A 'Dr. friend picking through' Obama's plan? If that Dr. even did exist, what special interests might he be representing? Perhaps the insurance companies'? Obama's plan is to create an alternative to the insurance company's lock on medical care and spiraling costs in a system that is not sustainable.
This posting uses the same fear tactics of the Bush administration to create a frozen 'Let's stay the course' directive. Look to whom that benefits.
Ironically, in the end, even the insurance companies will go broke.
Warmly,
Rich
07-28-2009, 09:11 AM
kpage9
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Exactly!!!! If you saw Rachel Maddow (and you still can if you go on msnbc.com and dig the show out of the archives) Monday night, you saw lots of damning and specific evidence against those opposing the plan. The main point was that all the nay-sayers are quoting "The Lewin Group" as experts--when this group is OWNED by one of the biggest insurance co.s around!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by Barrie:
For instance, THERE IS NOTHING IN THE OBAMA PLAN ABOUT RATIONING, this idea is 100% insurance company propaganda. All the other countries that offer some form of government sponsored health care or health insurance spend less per capita on health and have better out comes. We are near the bottom on infant mortality and other measures of effective health care amongst industrialized nations. Cuba does much better than we do.
Health insurance companies spend 20-30% of what we pay them on their wages, advertising, profit for share holders, etc. This has been much less in the past and would be reduced with COMPETITION from a government plan. Free market needs competition, the current chokehold by a few large insurance companies is not competition, it is a cartel.
What Obama is proposing is paying doctors and hospitals for out come more than procedure. This will prevent them from doing and repeating costly and unnessecary procedures that run up the cost of medicare. Also, they want to pay general practioners more and reduce the pay of specialists to be more in line with what procedures actually cost. I work in a health clinic and think these are excellent ideas.
Barrie :yinyang:
07-28-2009, 09:23 AM
Gayla
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Please watch the movie, SICKO, again. Obama is a highly intelligent man, working diligently to make our country a better place. He's not, however a magician and there's no magic solution to our problems, most of which have been caused by past and present good ol' boy power mongers, who would love to "bring down Obama!", so they can get on with business as usual. Obama is not perfect, but he is doing his best, against great odds. I think, the least we can do, is not fall for (inaccurate!) fear mongering, like what is written in this rant, on wacco. When you read the actual facts for yourself, it's a totally different story:
BARACK OBAMA’S PLAN FOR A HEALTHY AMERICA
Lowering health care costs and ensuring affordable, high-quality health care for all
The U.S. spends over $2 trillion on health care every year, and offers the best medical technology and scientific
research in the world. Yet, the benefits of the American health care system come at a price that an increasing
number of individuals and families, employers and employees, and public and private providers cannot afford.
Millions of Americans are uninsured or underinsured because of rising medical costs. Nearly 45 million
Americans—including 9 million children—lack health insurance.
Health care costs are skyrocketing.Health insurance premiums have risen 4 times faster than wages over the
past 6 years. Lack of affordable health care is compounded by serious flaws in our health care delivery system.
About 100,000 Americans die from medical errors in hospitals every year.
Too little is spent on prevention and public health. The nation faces epidemics of obesity and chronic
diseases as well as new threats of pandemic flu and bioterrorism. Yet despite all of this less than 4 cents of
every health care dollar is spent on prevention and public health.
Obama’s plan will provide affordable, comprehensive and portable health coverage for all Americans by:
• Making available a new national health program that will allow individuals and small businesses to buy
affordable health care similar to that available to federal employees. No one will be turned away or
charged more due to illness, and everyone who needs it will receive a subsidy for their premiums.
• Making available a National Health Insurance Exchange to reform the private insurance market. Any
American could enroll in participating private plans, which would have to provide comprehensive
benefits, issue every applicant a policy, and charge fair and stable premiums.
• Ensuring all of the 9 million currently uninsured children have affordable, high-quality health coverage
• Expanding Medicaid and SCHIP and ensuring they continue to serve their critical safety net function.
• Requiring employers to make a meani
• Requiring that insurance plans accept all applicants and do not charge different prices based on
pre-existing conditions.
ngful contribution to the health coverage of their employees.
Obama’s plan will reduce costs and save a typical American family up to $2,500 each year:
• Driving adoption of state-of-the-art health information technology systems
• Improving access to preventive care and chronic disease management programs
• Requiring hospitals to collect and report health care cost and quality data
• Reforming our market structure to increase competition in the insurance and drug markets
• Reducing the costs of catastrophic illnesses for employers and their employees
• Lowering drug costs by allowing importation of safe medicines from other developed countries and
increasing use of generics in public programs
Obama’s plan will promote public health by:
• Requiring coverage of preventive services
• Increasing state and local preparedness for terrorist attacks and natural disasters.
07-29-2009, 02:54 AM
DancingDeva
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by Gayla:
Please watch the movie, SICKO, again. Obama is a highly intelligent man, working diligently to make our country a better place. He's not, however a magician and there's no magic solution to our problems, most of which have been caused by past and present good ol' boy power mongers, who would love to "bring down Obama!", so they can get on with business as usual. Obama is not perfect, but he is doing his best, against great odds. I think, the least we can do, is not fall for (inaccurate!) fear mongering, like what is written in this rant, on wacco. When you read the actual facts for yourself, it's a totally different story:
BARACK OBAMA’S PLAN FOR A HEALTHY AMERICA
Lowering health care costs and ensuring affordable, high-quality health care for all
The U.S. spends over $2 trillion on health care every year, and offers the best medical technology and scientific
research in the world. Yet, the benefits of the American health care system come at a price that an increasing
number of individuals and families, employers and employees, and public and private providers cannot afford.
Millions of Americans are uninsured or underinsured because of rising medical costs. Nearly 45 million
Americans—including 9 million children—lack health insurance.
Health care costs are skyrocketing.Health insurance premiums have risen 4 times faster than wages over the
past 6 years. Lack of affordable health care is compounded by serious flaws in our health care delivery system.
About 100,000 Americans die from medical errors in hospitals every year.
Too little is spent on prevention and public health. The nation faces epidemics of obesity and chronic
diseases as well as new threats of pandemic flu and bioterrorism. Yet despite all of this less than 4 cents of
every health care dollar is spent on prevention and public health.
Obama’s plan will provide affordable, comprehensive and portable health coverage for all Americans by:
• Making available a new national health program that will allow individuals and small businesses to buy
affordable health care similar to that available to federal employees. No one will be turned away or
charged more due to illness, and everyone who needs it will receive a subsidy for their premiums.
• Making available a National Health Insurance Exchange to reform the private insurance market. Any
American could enroll in participating private plans, which would have to provide comprehensive
benefits, issue every applicant a policy, and charge fair and stable premiums.
• Ensuring all of the 9 million currently uninsured children have affordable, high-quality health coverage
• Expanding Medicaid and SCHIP and ensuring they continue to serve their critical safety net function.
• Requiring employers to make a meani
• Requiring that insurance plans accept all applicants and do not charge different prices based on
pre-existing conditions.
ngful contribution to the health coverage of their employees.
Obama’s plan will reduce costs and save a typical American family up to $2,500 each year:
• Driving adoption of state-of-the-art health information technology systems
• Improving access to preventive care and chronic disease management programs
• Requiring hospitals to collect and report health care cost and quality data
• Reforming our market structure to increase competition in the insurance and drug markets
• Reducing the costs of catastrophic illnesses for employers and their employees
• Lowering drug costs by allowing importation of safe medicines from other developed countries and
increasing use of generics in public programs
Obama’s plan will promote public health by:
• Requiring coverage of preventive services
• Increasing state and local preparedness for terrorist attacks and natural disasters.
Some of the above sounds great but it reads like a sales pitch for the bill...
So what does the bill actually say? does anyone in this discussion actually know? Who has read it?
It's supposed to be 1000 pages. Anyone have a link for it?
I wonder how all this government intervention will be paid for? Raising taxes most likely. Germans may have a great health care system but they pay 60% or more in income taxes (have heard from German friends who live there). With our government trillions of dollars in debt how is all this government oversight going to be paid for?
Personally, I don't want to have to pay into a sick care industry/big pharma that I don't want to have anything to do with unless I need emergency care. I don't hear anything in this that is promoting prevention, education and focusing on improving the health of Americans.
Mike Adams, "the Health Ranger" has 2 articles worth reading:
He sites some interesting points and facts near the end of the article about increases of government ownership of things in recent times which we should keep in mind. Bigger government with more government control is where we are still headed and it doesn't look appealing from where I sit!
If you only have time to read one article on this then
I encourage everyone interested in this topic to go to this link:
and listen to Rep. Dr. Ron Paul's analysis about health care in the U.S. - how we got to where we are today, what could work and what probably won't, and then read the article that follows it by Dr. Mercola which in his usual style is quite level headed and well thought out.
I think we all need to understand more about this plan and not just approve on the basis of some of the assumptions I have heard in this discussion. This is an important topic and we can participate in the shaping of health care reform so we can end up with something everyone will be happier with rather than simply approve of what our government hands us without really looking at what it is.
Thanks for considering my views.
07-29-2009, 04:21 AM
Clancy
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Don't worry, the insurance industry's grip on our nation's health care is in no danger. They will continue to gouge the American public, continue to provide pathetically poor health care, and corporate shills will continue their downright evil disinformation campaign.
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by DancingDeva:
Some of the above sounds great but it reads like a sales pitch for the bill...
So what does the bill actually say? does anyone in this discussion actually know? Who has read it?
It's supposed to be 1000 pages. Anyone have a link for it?
I wonder how all this government intervention will be paid for? Raising taxes most likely. Germans may have a great health care system but they pay 60% or more in income taxes (have heard from German friends who live there). With our government trillions of dollars in debt how is all this government oversight going to be paid for?
Personally, I don't want to have to pay into a sick care industry/big pharma that I don't want to have anything to do with unless I need emergency care. I don't hear anything in this that is promoting prevention, education and focusing on improving the health of Americans.
Mike Adams, "the Health Ranger" has 2 articles worth reading:
He sites some interesting points and facts near the end of the article about increases of government ownership of things in recent times which we should keep in mind. Bigger government with more government control is where we are still headed and it doesn't look appealing from where I sit!
If you only have time to read one article on this then
I encourage everyone interested in this topic to go to this link:
and listen to Rep. Dr. Ron Paul's analysis about health care in the U.S. - how we got to where we are today, what could work and what probably won't, and then read the article that follows it by Dr. Mercola which in his usual style is quite level headed and well thought out.
I think we all need to understand more about this plan and not just approve on the basis of some of the assumptions I have heard in this discussion. This is an important topic and we can participate in the shaping of health care reform so we can end up with something everyone will be happier with rather than simply approve of what our government hands us without really looking at what it is.
Thanks for considering my views.
07-30-2009, 10:44 AM
RexCasteel
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
I believe the HR3200 doc can be downloaded in its entire form at:
A random check of more than 30 of the pages referenced in the original post, were found exactly as quoted.
07-30-2009, 12:35 PM
Clancy
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by dandss1:
A random check of more than 30 of the pages referenced in the original post, were found exactly as quoted.
That's funny, the very first one I checked, at random, wasn't a quote at all.
The OP's version:
"PG 268 Sec 1141 Fed Govt regulates rental and purchase of power driven
wheelchairs"
The actual page;
268
PART 3—OTHER PROVISIONS
1
SEC. 1141. RENTAL AND PURCHASE OF POWER-DRIVEN
2
WHEELCHAIRS.
3
(a) INGENERAL.—Section 1834(a)(7)(A)(iii) of the
4
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395m(a)(7)(A)(iii)) is
5
amended—
6
(1) in the heading, by inserting ‘‘CERTAINCOM-
7
PLEXREHABILITATIVE’’ after ‘‘OPTIONFOR’’; and
8
(2) by striking ‘‘power-driven wheelchair’’ and
9
inserting ‘‘complex rehabilitative power-driven wheel-
10
chair recognized by the Secretary as classified within
11
group 3 or higher’’.
12
(b) EFFECTIVEDATE.—The amendments made by
13
subsection (a) shall take effect on January 1, 2011, and
14
shall apply to power-driven wheelchairs furnished on or
15
after such date. Such amendments shall not apply to con-
16
tracts entered into under section 1847 of the Social Secu-
17
rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–3) pursuant to a bid submitted
18
under such section before October 1, 2010, under sub-
19
section (a)(1)(B)(i)(I) of such section.
20
07-30-2009, 11:27 PM
Hotspring 44
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by BizWrangler:
I have a Dr. friend picking through the proposed Health Care bill. Sure wish others would do the same. Here is some food for thought:
Spin doctor.:Yinyangv:
07-31-2009, 12:55 PM
Hotspring 44
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
:hello: I'm not so sure exactly how to state this, but I will try to be as concise as I can: 1; I received what looks to be a private e-mail from: "Judith N", that stated this:
“No, actually he is a brain surgeon in Berkeley. His name is Dr. Robert Fink.
"What we see depends mainly on what we look for."”
…in regards to my spin doctor comment. 2; as far as I can tell, the original post had nothing to do with Dr. Robert Fink. 3; I am perplexed why I got that as a private e-mail instead of it being a post on the topic; or why it is not on the bulletin board or somewhere in this topic thread, publicly.:hmmm: 4; I did another Internet search with this title: Obamacare-Are you paying attention? And did come up with the exact text, which was the original post on this topic thread: https://www.rememberourconstitution....ing-attention/ 5; sometimes I do miss things, and sometimes I do forget things, and sometimes I overlook things; so I spent quite a bit of time today trying to figure out if I overlooked, missed, or forgotten anything here. I have come to the conclusion that I am not the one that is off base here.:idea: 6; maybe this was edited out of the “reply publicly”, and I did not see it before it was removed? 7; I did an Internet search for: Robert A. Fink, M. D. and I found a web page with some writing that the Dr. wrote specifically in regards to the so-called health care reform.
The web page, I found did not have the high “spin” level that was in the original post of this topic. Actually, none, no “spin” whatsoever.:yinyang:
The article was copyright, so I only copied a couple of sentences from it and added a link so whoever wants to can go to the link and read the whole article. (Link is in the highlighted sentence of the text in the second table [box].).
I basically agree with what this doctor (Robert A. Fink, M. D.) in this article said.:wink:
BTW; the doctor that wrote this article (Robert A. Fink, M. D.) from what I can tell is very professional and he is not a “spin doctor”.:heart:
The way that original post topic was written, you wouldn't know it or, maybe it was a different doctor or a different web page than the one that I found, which I linked to. After searching the Internet, I can confirm that, yes it is a different person and a different URL altogether.:thumbsup: 8;
BizWrangler wrote, and or quoted:
“Peter Fleckstein (aka Fleckman) is reading it and has been posting on
Twitter his findings.
This is from his postings (Note: All comments are Fleckman's)”
Aha! Fleckman is the spin doctor; no?:nod: 9; I'm wondering how did “Dr. Robert Fink’s” name get into this conversation in the first place other than the private e-mail that I received in my inbox?:thinking: 10; :sorry:, I am not into twitter.
I (Hotspring 44) personally think “we the people” have to in essence, ramrod single-payer health care into the discussion, and then support it. Otherwise, like I said in a different post on a different topic; we “the people” are going to get “screwed”.:2cents:
I guess the other option is "business as usual". Meaning the private insurers will try their best to deny a claim and if they can't, they will cheat the provider as much as possible.
Wake up people!!!! Health Care is a right, not a benefit to be bestowed by those who do not care......:hmmm:
08-11-2009, 05:48 PM
Valley Oak
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Public health care does not scare me.
But people like you do scare me, and a lot. You also make me very angry.
Edward
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by BizWrangler:
I have a Dr. friend picking through the proposed Health Care bill. Sure wish others would do the same. Here is some food for thought:
Obamacare - are you paying attention? The communists have landed...
...
Buy guns, buy gold
08-12-2009, 08:27 PM
d-cat
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Drug Industry To Run Ads Favoring ObamaCare
WASHINGTON — The drug industry has authorized its lobbyists to spend as much as $150 million on television commercials supporting President Obama’s health care overhaul, beginning over the August Congressional recess, people briefed on the plans said Saturday.
The unusually large scale of the industry’s commitment to the cause helps explain some of a contentious back-and-forth playing out in recent days between the odd-couple allies over a deal that the White House struck with the industry in June to secure its support. The terms of the deal were not fully disclosed. Both sides had announced that the drug industry would contribute $80 billion over 10 years to the cost of the health care overhaul without spelling out the details...
Ho hum... same old rhetoric... I have a friend in Mauritius who is part of the "health care system"... They love it... Every citizen is given basic health care. And you know what? Prescriptions are on average, 25% of our (patient)cost. One entitiy buys the drugs for the whole country. Big discount when you buy direct in large quantities... By the way, prescriptions are sometimes not filled by patients because they cannot afford them here in the US...What a shame...
08-13-2009, 09:26 AM
d-cat
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by d-cat:
Drug Industry To Run Ads Favoring ObamaCare
WASHINGTON — The drug industry has authorized its lobbyists to spend as much as $150 million on television commercials supporting President Obama’s health care overhaul, beginning over the August Congressional recess, people briefed on the plans said Saturday.
The unusually large scale of the industry’s commitment to the cause helps explain some of a contentious back-and-forth playing out in recent days between the odd-couple allies over a deal that the White House struck with the industry in June to secure its support. The terms of the deal were not fully disclosed. Both sides had announced that the drug industry would contribute $80 billion over 10 years to the cost of the health care overhaul without spelling out the details...
and some articles about the industry that is pushing ObamaCare:
A New Low in Drug Research: 21 Fabricated Studies link
Merck Drew Up “Hit List” of Doctors to be “Neutralized”
AN international drug company made a hit list of doctors who had to be "neutralised" or discredited because they criticised the anti-arthritis drug the pharmaceutical giant produced. link
Drug Company Money is Top Factor in Publication of Vaccine Studies link
Harvard Medical School Professors are Paid Big Bucks by Big Pharma to Push Meds link
Lilly Sold Drug for Dementia Knowing It Didn’t Help link
A Possible Cure for Diabetes Ignored by Big Pharma link
Eli Lilly Pays $1.42 Billion for Illegal Marketing of Deadly Drug
Zyprexa causes severe neurological problems in children and can be deadly for the elderly, and it has no proven benefit for either -- but Eli Lilly marketed the antipsychotic to them anyway. link
Marketing Lilly's Phony 'Miracle' Drug Zyprexa
Created to treat schizophrenia, Zyprexa wound up being used on misbehaving kids. How the pharmaceutical industry turned a flawed and dangerous drug into a $16 billion bonanza link
Bayer Knowingly Sold HIV-Contaminated Vaccines, Say Internal Documents link
Nobel prize row over pharmaceuticals firm link link
Baxter, Supplier Say Heparin Taint Was Deliberate
April 29 (Bloomberg) -- Baxter International Inc. said its blood thinner heparin, linked to 81 deaths, appears to have been deliberately contaminated. The drug's main ingredient was contaminated before reaching the Chinese factory of Baxter's supplier... link
Government Swine Flu Advisor On Vaccine Maker Payroll link
Vaccine Doctor Given at Least $30 Million Dollars to Push Vaccines link
08-13-2009, 11:16 AM
Lorrie
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Here is a reality from a friend, she has sent this email to me during a discussion we were having about health care. It started like this: I wrote: Please click on the link below and sign up (type your first and last name and email address that’s all) if you think that the members of congress and other government officials and their families should be forced to participate in a government run health care plan themselves? www.fleming.house.gov/. (Go Ahead Waccos)
My friend wrote back:
I would have been very happy to have ANY health insurance during my recent hospital stay. Those who can afford to be choosy are fortunate. The surgeons and hospital saved my life but I will lose my home to pay them. My work doesn’t give us any insurance or sick leave. And Yes, It probably will be that bad, I just don’t have enough money and spent all my savings while I was out sick. I owe over 100k to about a dozen different organizations because of the surgery – some of the doctors I didn’t even know I’d seen! Crazy - The bills are coming in and they want paid NOW – they just don’t understand. Very frustrating – and then my work cut down our hours while I was in the hospital. But on the other hand at least I’m still here to complain about it:thumbsup: Take care, Friend Name Here
I wrote: We are a small operation compared. (Only three people working here) We have NO Coverage what-so-ever! Its scary! Wow! For people like you and me this healthcare issue is fraught with probs.
She wrote: 30 people working here and an office in Hong Kong – so size doesn’t matter! Yes – I am SO GRATEFUL everything came out ok – LITERALLY! I wrote: I am sorry for what you are going through. Thank you God that you ARE still here! Try to have a good day! This is sooooo ridiculous! Why does it have to be this way???? I am getting older now. 4 years from 50, I wonder what if anything will affect me in the future, or if I will have to have some major operation. I have no assets to lose really so, no turnip blood here. I have no regular doctor, I haven't been to a doctor, except the medical clinic in Guerneville…THANK GOD FOR THEM!!! I only have to pay a fraction of a regular doctor visit, because of what I make. But even then sometimes it is just out of my reach and I have to wait for a pay day to visit them. I hope something good happens, I know that there are a lot of people out there who are passionate about this debate, and with the reasons above I am not surprised. This has not hit that close to home for me YET, because I am basically healthy. But I bet there are millions of situation like what is mentioned here. :2cents:
08-13-2009, 12:10 PM
Clancy
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
I believe that members of congress and other government officials and their families are already on a government run health plan, one that most Americans would be very grateful to have.
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by Lorrie:
Here is a reality from a friend, she has sent this email to me during a discussion we were having about health care. It started like this: I wrote: Please click on the link below and sign up (type your first and last name and email address that’s all) if you think that the members of congress and other government officials and their families should be forced to participate in a government run health care plan themselves?
08-13-2009, 12:25 PM
theindependenteye
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
At age 65, I moved from a private insurance carrier that was bleeding us dry (premiums greater than our mortgage, with no options because of a pre-existing condition that had never cost a cent to the insurer) to a "government-run" plan, i.e. Medicare.
Oddly, I didn't feel any twinge of anti-Americanism or fascist oppression coming down on me. I experienced vastly lower premiums, a chance to afford a long-delayed colonoscopy and repair of an umbilical hernia without the vast deductibles that would have hit us pre-65.
And somehow I'm still under the naive illusion that whichever government bureaucrats are deciding which treatments will or will not be covered as I approach geezerhood, they're likely to be a bit more merciful than my previous Blue Cross "death panel."
Peace & joy—
Conrad B.
08-13-2009, 01:54 PM
d-cat
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by theindependenteye:
At age 65, I moved from a private insurance carrier that was bleeding us dry (premiums greater than our mortgage, with no options because of a pre-existing condition that had never cost a cent to the insurer) to a "government-run" plan, i.e. Medicare.
which I understand is broke
08-13-2009, 02:15 PM
Clancy
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by d-cat:
which I understand is broke
So are the schools and our highway system, due to corporate America sucking the lifeblood out of the system.
Shall we close the schools and shut down the freeways because we're broke?
08-13-2009, 02:21 PM
Lorrie
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by Clancy:
I believe that members of congress and other government officials and their families are already on a government run health plan, one that most Americans would be very grateful to have.
THIS JUST IN...my email...
YESTERDAY ON "ABC-TV" (BETTER KNOWN AS THE ALL BARRACK CHANNEL) DURING THE "NETWORK SPECIAL ON HEALTH CARE".... OBAMA WAS ASKED:
"MR. PRESIDENT WILL YOU AND YOUR FAMILY GIVE UP YOUR CURRENT HEALTH CARE PROGRAM AND JOIN THE NEW 'UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE PROGRAM' THAT THE REST OF US WILL BE ON ????"..... (BET YOU ALREADY KNOW THE ANSWER)...
THERE WAS A STONEY SILENCE AS OBAMA IGNORED THE QUESTION AND CHOSE NOT TO ANSWER IT !!!...
IN ADDITION, A NUMBER OF SENATORS WERE ASKED THE SAME QUESTION AND THERE RESPONSE WAS..."WE WILL THINK ABOUT IT."
AND THEY DID. IT WAS ANNOUNCED TODAY ON THE NEWS THAT THE "KENNEDY HEALTH CARE BILL" WAS WRITTEN INTO THE NEW HEALTH CARE REFORM INITIATIVE ENSURING THAT CONGRESS WILL BE 100% EXEMPT !
SO, THIS GREAT NEW HEALTH CARE PLAN THAT IS GOOD FOR YOU AND I... IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH FOR OBAMA, HIS FAMILY OR CONGRESS...?? WE (THE AMERICAN PUBLIC) NEED TO STOP THIS PROPOSED DEBACLE ASAP !!!!... THIS IS TOTALLY WRONG !!!!!
PERSONALLY, I CAN ONLY ACCEPT A UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE OVERHAUL THAT EXTENDS TO EVERYONE... NOT JUST US LOWLY CITIZENS... WHILE THE WASHINGTON "ELITE" KEEP RIGHT ON WITH THEIR GOLD-PLATED HEALTH CARE COVERAGES.
IF YOU AGREE PLEASE PASS THIS ON ....IF NOT PLAN TO SUFFER WITH THE OBAMA HEALTH CARE PLAN ....FOR FREE.... WHILE OUR SELF-SERVING POLITICIANS MAKE SURE THAT THEY TAKE CARE OF THEIR BUTTS AT OUR EXPENSE.
08-13-2009, 02:26 PM
lifequest
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Neither Social Security or Medicare would be nearing break even (they're not yet costing more than contributions) if all the funds contributed since inception had actually been put into a fund and earned interest. Government immediately spends what comes in every year on general operations and then prints those IOU's putting T-Bills in a drawer in West Virginia. Sort of like a Ponzi sceme. Take from current "investors" to pay the earlier ones off till the new funds dry up and its game over.
So its pay as you go every year and in about 8-10 years more or less it tips the other way when yearly costs exceed contributions.
If the last administration hadn't added the drug benefit paying retail cost for all prescription drugs the road to ruin would have taken a lot longer. Plus there's that outdated cap on social security earnings - somewhere around $120,000 when it should be unlimited. It would satisfy some public outrage if Wall Street mega-millionnaires paid soical security on all their salary and bonus.
08-13-2009, 02:39 PM
theindependenteye
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
>Which I understand is broke.
Not as broke as I'd be if I didn't have it.
The issue of funding is a different issue. As with Social Security, there are a number of proposals. Which of those you favor depends on your education, your income sources, and your social class. Personally, I'd favor payroll tax reform to remove the exemption of the vast proportion of the income of high wage-earners -- no question but that this is a highly regressive tax, and taxing only earned income and not investment income is equally so. However, I don't expect those proposals to fly, as most Americans think that (a) any tax increase will inevitably cost them another nickel, no matter how specifically it's targeted, and (b) they all think they're going to win the Lottery and would hate to lose that extra 2% of the $65 million they'll get shoved into their pocket. It's called "voting your aspirations."
But my post wasn't addressing the issue of financing (which is unquestionably a significant issue). It was addressing the RightWing/Libertarian bogeyman of "government control." A Libertarian will assume, I think, that Blue Cross has a stronger stake in my health, that I'd be better off in their hands, than a Medicare administrator. I don't buy it.
-Conrad
08-13-2009, 02:51 PM
theindependenteye
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
YESTERDAY ON "ABC-TV" ... OBAMA WAS ASKED: "MR. PRESIDENT WILL YOU AND YOUR FAMILY ... JOIN THE NEW 'UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE PROGRAM' THAT THE REST OF US WILL BE ON ????".....
This might be legit, but it sounds like the urgent news that I've won $60 million in the New Guinea Lottery. If Obama actually stumbled on that softball, he's working way too hard.
How do you "join the new Universal Health Care Program"? The bills in Congress mandate universal health care, under many options, one of which would be a public option. Is the writer objecting that this option isn't good enough and would prefer to have NO option?
This is on a par with Palin's Death Panel. A vast number of people are spreading lies faster than a speeding bullet, taller than the tallest building, able to leap cross-country at a single bound. It's a bird! It's a plane! It's ... ka-plop! ... a bull in the jet-stream.
Peace & joy—
Conrad
08-13-2009, 02:57 PM
Lorrie
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by theindependenteye:
YESTERDAY ON "ABC-TV" ... OBAMA WAS ASKED: "MR. PRESIDENT WILL YOU AND YOUR FAMILY ... JOIN THE NEW 'UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE PROGRAM' THAT THE REST OF US WILL BE ON ????".....
This might be legit, but it sounds like the urgent news that I've won $60 million in the New Guinea Lottery. If Obama actually stumbled on that softball, he's working way too hard.
How do you "join the new Universal Health Care Program"? The bills in Congress mandate universal health care, under many options, one of which would be a public option. Is the writer objecting that this option isn't good enough and would prefer to have NO option?
This is on a par with Palin's Death Panel. A vast number of people are spreading lies faster than a speeding bullet, taller than the tallest building, able to leap cross-country at a single bound. It's a bird! It's a plane! It's ... ka-plop! ... a bull in the jet-stream.
Peace & joy—
Conrad
:biglaugh:good one! :biglaugh: lol ha ha ha:biglaugh:
LONDON — Britain's health care service says it is sick of being lied about.
Pilloried by right-wing critics of President Barack Obama's health care plan, Britain's National Health Service, known here as the NHS, is fighting back.
"People have been saying some untruths in the States," a spokesman for Britain Department of Health said in a telephone interview. "There's been all these ridiculous claims made by the American health lobby about Obama's health care plan ... and they've used the NHS as an example. A lot of it has been untrue."
He spoke anonymously in line with department policy.
A particularly outlandish example of a U.S. editorial, printed in the Investor's Business Daily, claimed that renowned physicist Stephen Hawking, who is disabled, "wouldn't have a chance in the U.K., where the National Health Service would say the life of this brilliant man, because of his physical handicaps, is essentially worthless."
Hawking, who was born and lives in Britain, personally debunked the claim. "I wouldn't be here today if it were not for the NHS," he told The Guardian newspaper. Investor's Business Daily has since corrected the editorial.
As the debate over how best to look after American patients rages on, Britain's socialized health care system has increasingly found itself being drawn into the argument. Critics of the Obama administration's plan to overhaul US health care say the president is seeking to model the U.S. system on that of Britain or Canada – places they paint as countries where patients linger for months on waiting lists and are forbidden from paying for their own medication.
A Republican National Committee ad said that in the U.K. "individuals lose their right to make their own health care choices." Another ad launched earlier this month by the anti-tax group Club for Growth claimed that government bureaucrats in Britain had calculated six months of life to be worth $22,750. "Under their socialized system, if your treatment costs more, you're out of luck," the ad says, as footage of an elderly man weeping at a woman's bedside alternate with clips of the Union Jack and Big Ben.
The online attacks on Britain's health care system have been paired with strident criticism from Republican lawmakers
In an interview widely interpreted here as an attack on the U.K., Republican Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa told a local radio station last week that "countries that have government-run health care" would not have given Sen. Edward Kennedy, who suffers from a brain tumor, the same standard of care as in the U.S. because he is too old. Another Republican, Congressman Paul Broun of Georgia, said that the U.K. and Canada "don't have the appreciation of life as we do in our society, evidently.
The criticism, widely covered in the U.K. media, has clearly stung Britain's left-leaning Labour government. The Department of Health took the unusual step of contacting The Associated Press and e-mailing it a three-page rebuttal to what it said were misconceptions about the NHS being bandied about in the U.S. media – each one followed with the words: "Not true."
At the top of the list was the idea that a patient in his late 70s would not be treated for a brain tumor because he was too old – a transparent reference to Grassley's comments about Kennedy.
And what of Republicans' claim that British patients are robbed of their medical choices? Fal
"Everyone who is cared for by the NHS in England has formal rights to make choices about the service that they receive," it said in its rebuttal.
Then followed a fact sheet comparing selected statistics such as health spending per capita, infant mortality, life expectancy, and more. Each one showed England outperforming its trans-Atlantic counterpart.
The British government offers health care for free at the point of need, a service pioneered by Labour in 1948. In the six decades since, its promise of universal medical care, from cradle to grave, is taken for granted by Britons to such an extent that politicians – even fiscal conservatives – are loath to attack it.
But the NHS faces significant challenges, not least a multibillion pound (dollar) deficit predicted to open up over the next five years. It has its critics too, particularly cancer patients who complain that the government refuses to cover costlier drugs, leaving those who need expensive treatments to pay for them out of pocket.
Nevertheless, many in the British press bristled at the criticism from America's right wing.
"How dare the Republicans bad-mouth our free health care system?" Guardian columnist Michele Hanson wrote Wednesday. "If I'd been born in the U.S., I'd probably be dead by now."
08-13-2009, 03:28 PM
d-cat
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by Gayla:
Please watch the movie, SICKO, again.
and watch Fahrenheit 911 again to see what a whitewash that movie was, and then look into the subject of "controlled opposition".
I've lived in countries with govt health care... and HATED IT! You'd spend all day waiting in overcrowded waiting rooms (when healthcare is "free" people go for anything) and if you don't get to see the doctor that day, you have to come back the next day to do it all over again. In some countries, if you want to see an eye doctor for example, you first have to go see a GP who then will write something up so you can go to an eye doctor. I found it ridiculous. At hospitals, the doctors and nurses are overworked, and can spend very little time with you. I once needed an emergency operation (due to a misdiagnosis at another hospital) and had to wait a week for a hospital bed. But don't believe me - have a look at the what Canadians think of their system:
That is not to say that our current system (corporate health care) is much better. The care may be better but too many can't afford it. Congressman (and medical doctor) Ron Paul says that long ago before the govt got involved, no patient was turned away and patients were always charged the lowest price (compared to being charged the highest price today). Dr. Paul didn't charge his needy patients, but says free care was available to anyone via the church hospitals. In my opinion, I see big faults in both systems and neither system is what we should be striving for.
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by Gayla:
Obama is a highly intelligent man, working diligently to make our country a better place.
and this documentary if you have the time: documentary
It's currently the most viewed documentary on the web. Though it's not a left/right documentary and more about the powers behind the presidency, I never hold much hope for Obama supporters to watch it. I've noticed people don't like to see such things about their party or candidate, maybe because it makes it difficult to maintain their belief system that they are "working diligently to make our country a better place". Perhaps some here are more open-minded. I believe it's important to know that whether the oval office is occupied by the left or the right, we continue the wars, we continue to lose civil liberties, and continue to get taxed more and more (either by taxes or through inflation) to fund a government that's out of control. I believe the two party system is a duopoly that keeps other parties and any real, positive change out of the game. It's just a puppet show to make you believe you have a choice.
Another 45,000 US troops needed in Afghanistan link
Obama Demands Right to Recruit Minors for*Military link
Afghans riot over air-strike atrocity
Shouting "Death to America" and "Death to the Government", thousands of Afghan villagers hurled stones at police yesterday as they vented their fury at American air strikes that local officials claim killed 147 civilians. link
'US strike killed 95 children in Afghanistan' link
Obama's backsliding on torture
After the president's swift move to close Guantánamo, I thought Binyam Mohamed would soon be free. I fear we were deceived link
Obama Picks Bilderberger for Health Secretary link
After Obama praises torture ruling, civil liberties group appalled
"Hope is flickering," [ACLU's executive director] Romero said in a statement. "The Obama administration's position is not change. It is more of the same. This represents a complete turn-around and undermining of the restoration of the rule of law. The new American administration shouldn't be complicit in hiding the abuses of its predecessors." link
Ashcroft: Obama, Bush Detainee Policies Exactly The Same Only difference is how they spell their names link
Are running for any kind of public office so you can help change all the bad things you mention?
08-13-2009, 04:30 PM
Clancy
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by d-cat:
...I believe it's important to know that whether the oval office is occupied by the left or the right, we continue the wars, we continue to lose civil liberties, and continue to get taxed more and more (either by taxes or through inflation) to fund a government that's out of control. I believe the two party system is a duopoly that keeps other parties and any real, positive change out of the game. It's just a puppet show to make you believe you have a choice...
I am mostly in agreement with the above statement. There is some slight difference between the parties though - with the GOP in power Wall St's greed is completely unfettered, when the dems are in power, slightly more moderate forces are at play.
Left or right, people have a huge emotional investment in believing that the powers that be have our interests at heart, so, I suggest that if you actually want to make people aware that our two party system is an elaborate illusion, that you stop promoting alarming RW whacko causes, at least here on a predominately liberal website.
Choose your battles carefully, tone down your rhetoric and stop posting links that often don't work or that take us to some of the most politically extreme websites out there.
Like all of us, you too have an emotional investment in your world view. The more aware you become of it, the more effective you will be.
08-13-2009, 04:47 PM
justme
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Although I don't agree with most of d-cat's opinions, since when is the bulleting board being censored for only "liberal views" to be posted. I am liberal, and that means to me EVERYONES POV is allowed, whether I like it or not... For being a libersal, the last post has Bush era sounds too it.. "Either you are with us, or you are against us"... God, give it a rest for a bit and let Wacco be a sounding board for all.....
08-13-2009, 04:53 PM
Clancy
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by justme:
Although I don't agree with most of d-cat's opinions, since when is the bulleting board being censored for only "liberal views" to be posted. I am liberal, and that means to me EVERYONES POV is allowed, whether I like it or not... For being a libersal, the last post has Bush era sounds too it.. "Either you are with us, or you are against us"... God, give it a rest for a bit and let Wacco be a sounding board for all.....
What censorship are you referring to?
08-13-2009, 05:03 PM
justme
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Your post...
"Left or right, people have a huge emotional investment in believing that the powers that be have our interests at heart, so, I suggest that if you actually want to make people aware that our two party system is an elaborate illusion, that you stop promoting alarming RW whacko causes, at least here on a predominately liberal website.
Choose your battles carefully, tone down your rhetoric and stop posting links that often don't work or that take us to some of the most politically extreme websites out there."
Did I read this statement wrong? If so, what did you mean? :hmmm:
08-13-2009, 05:21 PM
Clancy
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
I don't know if you read it wrong or not, but I can't censor anyone here. It means what it says. I gave my opinion regarding how he could be more effective on a point with which we agree, and I thought I did it in a very friendly way too.
He is free to post RW whacko causes, and I am free to tell him I think it's counterproductive.
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by justme:
Your post...
"Left or right, people have a huge emotional investment in believing that the powers that be have our interests at heart, so, I suggest that if you actually want to make people aware that our two party system is an elaborate illusion, that you stop promoting alarming RW whacko causes, at least here on a predominately liberal website.
Choose your battles carefully, tone down your rhetoric and stop posting links that often don't work or that take us to some of the most politically extreme websites out there."
Did I read this statement wrong? If so, what did you mean? :hmmm:
08-13-2009, 06:13 PM
d-cat
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by Clancy:
So are the schools and our highway system, due to corporate America sucking the lifeblood out of the system.
Shall we close the schools and shut down the freeways because we're broke?
huh??? I just said I understand Medicare is broke. I didn't say it should be shut down. WTF!
08-13-2009, 06:25 PM
d-cat
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by justme:
So d-cat..
Are running for any kind of public office so you can help change all the bad things you mention?
No I'm not. There are those who have more interest in that and they are running. People in this movement do many different things besides running for office. Waking people up is a priority though. The better informed the public, the lesser chance they can be fooled.
08-13-2009, 06:32 PM
Barry
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by justme:
Although I don't agree with most of d-cat's opinions, since when is the bulleting board being censored for only "liberal views" to be posted. I am liberal, and that means to me EVERYONES POV is allowed, whether I like it or not... For being a libersal, the last post has Bush era sounds too it.. "Either you are with us, or you are against us"... God, give it a rest for a bit and let Wacco be a sounding board for all.....
I created WaccoBB.net as a way of connecting the conscious/progressive community. Other points of view are welcome if they are thoughtful, respectful and don't end up dominating or hijacking the conversation. I'm hoping the d-cat will leave room for other points of view...
Again, if you want to see what full "freedom of speech" will get you, check out the PD forums.
08-13-2009, 06:44 PM
d-cat
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by Clancy:
I am mostly in agreement with the above statement. There is some slight difference between the parties though - with the GOP in power Wall St's greed is completely unfettered, when the dems are in power, slightly more moderate forces are at play.
well of course there are differences, otherwise it wouldn't fool anybody.
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by Clancy:
Left or right, people have a huge emotional investment in believing that the powers that be have our interests at heart, so, I suggest that if you actually want to make people aware that our two party system is an elaborate illusion, that you stop promoting alarming RW whacko causes, at least here on a predominately liberal website.
Choose your battles carefully, tone down your rhetoric and stop posting links that often don't work or that take us to some of the most politically extreme websites out there.
Like all of us, you too have an emotional investment in your world view. The more aware you become of it, the more effective you will be.
OK I will try to be more like you want me to be.
The Obama documentary link didn't work because I left out the "http//". I'm so sorry that I made a mistake Clancy.
BTW I had been a lifelong Democrat from a Democrat family. It should be obvious that I no longer believe in the false left/right paradigm, though I'm often accused of being right wing or liberal, depending on what forum I might be on and how badly the people there are fooled by the false choice.
though it looks like you went back and deleted some of your responses. In post #6 I wrote the following,
"This exchange has been time consuming and confusing, with no new knowledge gained for me. So I hope you'll understand why I do not wish to continue this exchange any further."
I'm already feeling that again so please understand if I spend my time on something else and fail to respond to you.
08-13-2009, 06:58 PM
d-cat
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by Barry:
I'm hoping the d-cat will leave room for other points of view...
huh????
08-13-2009, 06:58 PM
Clancy
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by d-cat:
It should be obvious that I no longer believe in the false left/right paradigm, though I'm often accused of being right wing or liberal, depending on what forum I might be on and how badly the people there are fooled by the false choice...
There's plenty of left wing whacko issues too, I've only seen you promote those on the right.
08-13-2009, 08:45 PM
Hotspring 44
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
This is a bulk e-mail I received from:
David Axelrod
Senior Adviser to the President
“Dear Friend,
This is probably one of the longest emails I’ve ever sent, but it could be the most important.
Across the country we are seeing vigorous debate about health insurance reform. Unfortunately, some of the old tactics we know so well are back — even the viral emails that fly unchecked and under the radar, spreading all sorts of lies and distortions.
As President Obama said at the town hall in New Hampshire, “where we do disagree, let's disagree over things that are real, not these wild misrepresentations that bear no resemblance to anything that's actually been proposed.”
So let’s start a chain email of our own. At the end of my email, you’ll find a lot of information about health insurance reform, distilled into 8 ways reform provides security and stability to those with or without coverage, 8 common myths about reform and 8 reasons we need health insurance reform now.
Right now, someone you know probably has a question about reform that could be answered by what’s below. So what are you waiting for? Forward this email.
Thanks,
David
David Axelrod
Senior Adviser to the President
P.S. We launched www.WhiteHouse.gov/realitycheck this week to knock down the rumors and lies that are floating around the internet. You can find the information below, and much more, there. For example, we've just added a video of Nancy-Ann DeParle from our Health Reform Office tackling a viral email head on. Check it out:
8 ways reform provides security and stability to those with or without coverage
Ends Discrimination for Pre-Existing Conditions: Insurance companies will be prohibited from refusing you coverage because of your medical history.
Ends Exorbitant Out-of-Pocket Expenses, Deductibles or Co-Pays: Insurance companies will have to abide by yearly caps on how much they can charge for out-of-pocket expenses.
Ends Cost-Sharing for Preventive Care: Insurance companies must fully cover, without charge, regular checkups and tests that help you prevent illness, such as mammograms or eye and foot exams for diabetics.
Ends Dropping of Coverage for Seriously Ill: Insurance companies will be prohibited from dropping or watering down insurance coverage for those who become seriously ill.
Ends Gender Discrimination: Insurance companies will be prohibited from charging you more because of your gender.
Ends Annual or Lifetime Caps on Coverage: Insurance companies will be prevented from placing annual or lifetime caps on the coverage you receive.
Extends Coverage for Young Adults: Children would continue to be eligible for family coverage through the age of 26.
Guarantees Insurance Renewal: Insurance companies will be required to renew any policy as long as the policyholder pays their premium in full. Insurance companies won't be allowed to refuse renewal because someone became sick.
Reform will stop "rationing" - not increase it: It’s a myth that reform will mean a "government takeover" of health care or lead to "rationing." To the contrary, reform will forbid many forms of rationing that are currently being used by insurance companies.
We can’t afford reform: It's the status quo we can't afford. It’s a myth that reform will bust the budget. To the contrary, the President has identified ways to pay for the vast majority of the up-front costs by cutting waste, fraud, and abuse within existing government health programs; ending big subsidies to insurance companies; and increasing efficiency with such steps as coordinating care and streamlining paperwork. In the long term, reform can help bring down costs that will otherwise lead to a fiscal crisis.
Reform would encourage "euthanasia": It does not. It’s a malicious myth that reform would encourage or even require euthanasia for seniors. For seniors who want to consult with their family and physicians about end-of life decisions, reform will help to cover these voluntary, private consultations for those who want help with these personal and difficult family decisions.
Vets' health care is safe and sound: It’s a myth that health insurance reform will affect veterans' access to the care they get now. To the contrary, the President's budget significantly expands coverage under the VA, extending care to 500,000 more veterans who were previously excluded. The VA Healthcare system will continue to be available for all eligible veterans.
Reform will benefit small business - not burden it: It’s a myth that health insurance reform will hurt small businesses. To the contrary, reform will ease the burdens on small businesses, provide tax credits to help them pay for employee coverage and help level the playing field with big firms who pay much less to cover their employees on average.
Your Medicare is safe, and stronger with reform: It’s myth that Health Insurance Reform would be financed by cutting Medicare benefits. To the contrary, reform will improve the long-term financial health of Medicare, ensure better coordination, eliminate waste and unnecessary subsidies to insurance companies, and help to close the Medicare "doughnut" hole to make prescription drugs more affordable for seniors.
You can keep your own insurance: It’s myth that reform will force you out of your current insurance plan or force you to change doctors. To the contrary, reform will expand your choices, not eliminate them.
No, government will not do anything with your bank account: It is an absurd myth that government will be in charge of your bank accounts. Health insurance reform will simplify administration, making it easier and more convenient for you to pay bills in a method that you choose. Just like paying a phone bill or a utility bill, you can pay by traditional check, or by a direct electronic payment. And forms will be standardized so they will be easier to understand. The choice is up to you – and the same rules of privacy will apply as they do for all other electronic payments that people make.
Coverage Denied to Millions: A recent national survey estimated that 12.6 million non-elderly adults – 36 percent of those who tried to purchase health insurance directly from an insurance company in the individual insurance market – were in fact discriminated against because of a pre-existing condition in the previous three years or dropped from coverage when they became seriously ill. Learn more: https://www.healthreform.gov/reports/denied_coverage/index.html
Less Care for More Costs: With each passing year, Americans are paying more for health care coverage. Employer-sponsored health insurance premiums have nearly doubled since 2000, a rate three times faster than wages. In 2008, the average premium for a family plan purchased through an employer was $12,680, nearly the annual earnings of a full-time minimum wage job. Americans pay more than ever for health insurance, but get less coverage. Learn more: https://www.healthreform.gov/reports/hiddencosts/index.html
Roadblocks to Care for Women: Women’s reproductive health requires more regular contact with health care providers, including yearly pap smears, mammograms, and obstetric care. Women are also more likely to report fair or poor health than men (9.5% versus 9.0%). While rates of chronic conditions such as diabetes and high blood pressure are similar to men, women are twice as likely to suffer from headaches and are more likely to experience joint, back or neck pain. These chronic conditions often require regular and frequent treatment and follow-up care. Learn more: https://www.healthreform.gov/reports/women/index.html
Hard Times in the Heartland: Throughout rural America, there are nearly 50 million people who face challenges in accessing health care. The past several decades have consistently shown higher rates of poverty, mortality, uninsurance, and limited access to a primary health care provider in rural areas. With the recent economic downturn, there is potential for an increase in many of the health disparities and access concerns that are already elevated in rural communities. Learn more: https://www.healthreform.gov/reports/hardtimes
Small Businesses Struggle to Provide Health Coverage: Nearly one-third of the uninsured – 13 million people – are employees of firms with less than 100 workers. From 2000 to 2007, the proportion of non-elderly Americans covered by employer-based health insurance fell from 66% to 61%. Much of this decline stems from small business. The percentage of small businesses offering coverage dropped from 68% to 59%, while large firms held stable at 99%. About a third of such workers in firms with fewer than 50 employees obtain insurance through a spouse. Learn more: https://www.healthreform.gov/reports/helpbottomline
The Tragedies are Personal: Half of all personal bankruptcies are at least partly the result of medical expenses. The typical elderly couple may have to save nearly $300,000 to pay for health costs not covered by Medicare alone. Learn more: https://www.healthreform.gov/reports/inaction
Diminishing Access to Care: From 2000 to 2007, the proportion of non-elderly Americans covered by employer-based health insurance fell from 66% to 61%. An estimated 87 million people - one in every three Americans under the age of 65 - were uninsured at some point in 2007 and 2008. More than 80% of the uninsured are in working families. Learn more: https://www.healthreform.gov/reports/inaction/diminishing/index.html
The Trends are Troubling: Without reform, health care costs will continue to skyrocket unabated, putting unbearable strain on families, businesses, and state and federal government budgets. Perhaps the most visible sign of the need for health care reform is the 46 million Americans currently without health insurance - projections suggest that this number will rise to about 72 million in 2040 in the absence of reform. Learn more: https://www.WhiteHouse.gov/assets/documents/CEA_Health_Care_Report.pdf
In essence, I (Hotspring 44) made snippets of the above letter and interjected my comments below each.
I also wrote a few paragraphs of my own opinion beyond the comments on the specific snippets approximately 4 paragraphs after the last (Table) box.
“8 ways reform provides security and stability to those with or without”
“1. Ends Discrimination for Pre Existing Conditions: Insurance companies will be prohibited from refusing you coverage because of your medical history.”
I suspect that because of that, private insurance companies will still be ‘permitted’ to ‘gouge’ people that do have certain “Pre Existing Conditions”; in other words, the ‘bipartisan’ aspect of the “reform”.
“2. Ends Exorbitant Out of Pocket Expenses, Deductibles or Co Pays: Insurance companies will have to abide by yearly caps on how much they can charge for outof pocket expenses.”
This is why the private insurance companies are crying foul.
“Ends Cost Sharing for Preventive Care: Insurance companies must fully cover, without charge, regular checkups and tests that help you prevent illness, such as mammograms or eye and foot exams for diabetics.”
Just as I thought; no preventative dental or mental illness coverage!
“4. Ends Dropping of Coverage for Seriously Ill: Insurance companies will be prohibited from dropping or watering down insurance coverage for those who become seriously ill.
Another reason why the private insurance companies are crying foul.
“5. Ends Gender Discrimination: Insurance companies will be prohibited from charging you more because of your gender.”
Yet again another reason why the private insurance companies are crying foul.
“6. Ends Annual or Lifetime Caps on Coverage: Insurance companies will be prevented from placing annual or lifetime caps on the coverage you receive.”
Aha! A loophole for the insurance companies to gouge again! (In the spirit of ‘bipartisanship’).
“7. Extends Coverage for Young Adults: Children would continue to be eligible for family coverage through the age of 26.
The government really doesn't want you to be an “individual”… … ever!
“8. Guarantees Insurance Renewal: Insurance companies will be required to renew any policy as long as the policyholder pays their premium in full. Insurance companies won't be allowed to refuse renewal because someone became sick.
If that “someone” is a single individual, and is too sick to work, they won't be able to pay! So single-payer is the ultimate thing that we would end up with anyway. (I will follow up on that later at some point in the future.).
“8 common myths about health insurance reform”
“1. Reform will stop "rationing" not increase it: It’s a myth that reform will mean a "government takeover" of health care or lead to "rationing." To the contrary, reform will forbid many forms of rationing that are currently being used by insurance companies.”
My concern is that if “reform” does not include some kind of funding to increase the amount of actual healthcare workers, in other words; doctors, nurses and facilities, etc. then triage form of “rationing” would be inevitable; unfortunately.
“2. We can’t afford reform: It's the status quo we can't afford. It’s a myth that reform will bust the budget. To the contrary, the President has identified ways to pay for the vast majority of the up front costs by cutting waste, fraud, and abuse within existing government health programs; ending big subsidies to insurance companies; and increasing efficiency with such steps as coordinating care and streamlining paperwork. In the long term, reform can help bring down costs that will otherwise lead to a fiscal crisis.”
My concern about this is that the same kind of underestimation such as the recent bank bailout/s in regards to the true costs could cause a backlash and have the whole thing pulled out by its roots at a critical time in the future.
“3. Reform would encourage "euthanasia": It does not. It’s a malicious myth that reform would encourage or even require euthanasia for seniors. For seniors who want to consult with their family and physicians about end of life decisions, reform will help to cover these voluntary, private consultations for those who want help with these personal and difficult family decisions.”
I have issues with this kind of rhetoric. For instance, what about the right to die? Under certain specific conditions it is legal in some states. Just because one person's religion ‘believes’ in ‘miracles’ or what ever else, doesn't mean another person's right to have say so and put an end to their own suffering when in a terminal condition with assistance if necessary at the very end. Shouldn't that person have the right to make that decision for their own self? Does that mean if they (the family, the spouse, or that individual person) spent all their/his/her money and they/that person are/is too poor and in some kind of a “Public Option” plan, would that individual no longer be permitted where they otherwise would be? If not; why not? Wouldn't that be somebody else's religious, moral, or whatever interfering with that person's decision?
“4. Vets' health care is safe and sound: It’s a myth that health insurance reform will affect veterans' access to the care they get now. To the contrary the President's budget significantly expands coverage under the VA extending care to 500,000 more veterans who were previously excluded. The VA Healthcare system will continue to be available for all eligible veterans”
I could probably get sarcastic about this when considering the veterans hospital that was being overrun with rats at the time two or three years back when some of the Iraq war veterans came home, with serious wounds, and that particular hospital was in such a rundown deplorable condition. But at this point, I will leave it at that.
“5. Reform will benefit small business not burden it: It’s a myth that health insurance reform will hurt small businesses. To the contrary, reform will ease the burdens on small businesses, provide tax credits to help them pay for employee coverage and help level the playing field with big firms who pay much less to cover their employees on average.”
I don't see how that could possibly happen without raising taxes somewhere. I am not against raising taxes in certain places. But I still can't see how it could possibly happen without raising them at some point in time.
“6. Your Medicare is safe, and stronger with reform: It’s myth that Health Insurance Reform would be financed by cutting Medicare benefits. To the contrary, reform will improve the long term financial health of Medicare, ensure better coordination, eliminate waste and unnecessary subsidies to insurance companies, and help to close the Medicare "doughnut" hole to make prescription drugs more affordable for seniors.”
“Reform” without the proper tax increase is not so much as mentioned; is unlikely, if not impossible. The expense that it will take cannot come out of thin air!
“7. You can keep your own insurance: It’s myth that reform will force you out of your current insurance plan or force you to change doctors. To the contrary reform will expand your choices not eliminate them.”
Until those insurance companies’ executives or whatever; bleed the company into folding.
“8. No government will not do anything with your bank account: It is an absurd myth that government will be in charge of your bank accounts. Health insurance reform will simplify administration making it easier and more convenient for you to pay bills in a method that you choose. Just like paying a phone bill or a utility bill you can pay by traditional check or by a direct electronic payment. And forms will be standardized so they will be easier to understand. The choice is up to you – and the same rules of privacy will apply as they do for all other electronic payments that people make.”
So does that mean just like the Utility Company, Phone Company, Landlord, Mortgage Holder, etc. it can get shut off or you can get kicked out of healthcare? The way that is stated is so manipulative it stinks!
The way I see it is that it is not healthcare for all at all! It's just political grandstanding at its worst!
Or, what I really think is way worse than that; it's not an “option”; it'sa federally mandated legal requirement! You shall have no choice (“option”) in the matter. Note the verbiage: “… “you to pay”… …“you can pay by traditional check or by a direct electronic payment.” Notice the placement of the words: you and pay.
“You pay, you pay, you pay, you pay. :spentmoney::spentmoney::spentmoney::spentmoney:Where is the word we? :hmmm:
With Single-Payer health care coverage for everybody we will pay, but we will also be in more control.
How many of the people out there that have healthcare coverage now are also shareholders that have a vote in that health care insurance company? What's the percentage of people with coverage that own a stake other than the coverage they have? The answer is probably; very few, under 1% I would expect.
So therefore it's a case of: “I have mine” and even though I'm not going to say it to your face; if it's a choice between keeping the status quo and sharing “mine” with you; you can drop dead! “Don't F*** with me!... … syndrome. Then the red baiting starts; like name calling: “socialist”, “Communist”, “Welfare Queen” etc. etc..
Oh, and I shouldn't forget all the offensive lies and misinformation tactics.:film::hammer:
My whole issue at the beginning of this whole conversation (not necessarily this particular thread) is: why in the world aren't more people insisting on single-payer universal health care for everybody? :hmmm:
It's Canada Communist? Is the United Kingdom Communist? It's France Communist? Is West Germany, a communist country? No, no, no, and no; none of the above aforementioned are Communist Countries! And the red baiting still goes on.
I think the big question that people seem to be bringing up is: can we afford it? I say invert the question: can we afford being without it?
Obviously, the people that do have health insurance that they believe covers them adequately now have already answered the can we afford being without it question for themselves; that's why some of them are monkey wrenching it in those town hall meetings and elsewhere.
I think some are torn between thinking of themselves as “socialists” and not having adequate health care coverage. I think because of that, some are absolutely furious!
Hotspring 44.
08-13-2009, 08:53 PM
justme
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Seems to be plenty of "other points of view" here!!!!! Some I just get lost in all the lines of rhetoric so I eventually don't even know what they are trying to say!!!!
Also.......... regarding this comment....
Other points of view are welcome if they are thoughtful, respectful and don't end up dominating or hijacking the conversation.
Shouldn't this say All points of view...........................................? :hmmm:
08-14-2009, 09:30 AM
granna shaw
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by kpage9:
Exactly!!!! If you saw Rachel Maddow (and you still can if you go on msnbc.com and dig the show out of the archives) Monday night, you saw lots of damning and specific evidence against those opposing the plan. The main point was that all the nay-sayers are quoting "The Lewin Group" as experts--when this group is OWNED by one of the biggest insurance co.s around!
This whole ObamaCare thing terrifies me too. Seems a bit like sugarcoated communism. If any of you or your loved ones have ever had to go through the bureaucrisy of a VA hospital and the lower level of care our heroes get and the foul-ups on appointments that tax and try our ailing and elderly patients with limited time, energy, patience and money, then you have only a glimmer of how long and difficult it will be to actually get good care in a timely manner before it is too late for some. For one who cannot afford ANY care, this may be an attractive consolation prize, (better than nothing) but don't shove it down EVERYONE'S throat and ask them to pay for that too. That is dictatorship at it's worst. Don't take our choices and freedoms away Uncle Sam. One size does NOT fit ALL!!! This is not about partisanship, it is about our personal liberties, choices and fairness. Look at the financial crisis in California. It is wonderful to be dogooders if you can afford it, but some who don't qualify are jumping on the bandwagon for an easy ride without paying their own dues. Some people would rather spend their money on flashy cars and cell phones for their kids than they would to purchase health insurance. Prioritize people, and if you are truly down and out then we have charities for that. Big brother will not be there to take care of you when he becomes bankrupt or sold out to another country. Watch the California crisis play out. Soon you will see dangerous inmates roaming the streets and taking whatever they want from us all. If you have a higher power, Pray and Pray hard for divine guidance because Satan is hard at work here on our own soil.
08-14-2009, 10:02 AM
Clancy
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by granna shaw:
This whole ObamaCare thing terrifies me too. Seems a bit like sugarcoated communism...
You poor thing, you have so much to be afraid of. What with our socialized police and fire departments, socialized highways and schools the commies and Satan have got you surrounded!
08-14-2009, 01:20 PM
granna shaw
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
I have come to this forum to express concerns and my own personal views and feelings. I feel what I feel and my feelings have merit and validity just as your views you have expressed are your American right. If you have not checked out Page 59 lines 21-24 of the ObamaCare plan, maybe you should and you might rethink some of your sarcastic onesidedness. It gives direct access to (Your) bank accounts electronically to pay for out of pocket costs without your previous consent. Is this democracy and personal choice?
08-14-2009, 01:23 PM
Clancy
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by granna shaw:
I have come to this forum to express concerns and my own personal views and feelings. I feel what I feel and my feelings have merit and validity just as your views you have expressed are your American right. If you have not checked out Page 59 lines 21-24 of the ObamaCare plan, maybe you should and you might rethink some of your sarcastic onesidedness. It gives direct access to (Your) bank accounts electronically to pay for out of pocket costs without your previous consent. Is this democracy and personal choice?
Please link it here and I'll be happy to read it.
I wonder, if you're "terrified" that universal health care is a form of communism, how do you feel about our police and fire services, roads, schools, water etc which are similarly 'communistic'?
08-14-2009, 01:49 PM
Clancy
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by granna shaw:
If you have not checked out Page 59 lines 21-24 of the ObamaCare plan, maybe you should and you might rethink some of your sarcastic onesidedness. It gives direct access to (Your) bank accounts electronically to pay for out of pocket costs without your previous consent. Is this democracy and personal choice?
It says no such thing. Why would you make this up?
Here it is, verbatim;
‘‘(C) enable electronic funds transfers, in
21
order to allow automated reconciliation with the
22
related health care payment and remittance ad-
23
vice;
24
[quote=granna shaw;95427] “This whole ObamaCare thing terrifies me too. Seems a bit like sugarcoated communism. If any of you or your loved ones have ever had to go through the bureaucrisy of a VA hospital and the lower level of care our heroes get and the foul ups on appointments that tax and try our ailing and elderly patients with limited time, energy, patience and money, then you have only a glimmer of how long and difficult it will be to actually get good care in a timely manner before it is too late for some.”
What do you mean or think of when you say or hear the word communism?
I think that word is too commonly abused, and is more of a scare tactic, without further explanation.
I and both of my parents went through the bureaucracy of Medi-Cal. That is why I am absolutely certain that if it was equal for everybody, that situation including the one you mentioned about the VA hospitals would improve because it would get everybody involved instead of just letting the few impoverished folks with their dwindling lack of resources, try to fend for themselves.
In my mother's situation (Medi-Cal) it was not timely, and it was inadequate and too late.
That is exactly why I am an advocate of single-payer! Because when everybody is in the same boat, everybody pitches in what is necessary to bail the boat out. BTW, no special life rafts for the rich or members of Congress either!
[quote=granna shaw;95427] “For one who cannot afford ANY care this may be an attractive consolation prize (better than nothing) but don't shove it down EVERYONE'S throat and ask them to pay for that too. That is dictatorship at it's worst.”
The main problem is that the people on the higher end of the income scale are not paying their fair share! And haven't for much too long!
I am thinking that the fat cats paying their fair share is not “shove it down EVERYONE'S throat”!... … it's not communism or dictatorship either! The way it's been is one-way capitalism! Individuals that have too much money are a lot like dictators in Third World countries! But instead of using military force for the most part, they use their money and buy legislators with campaign funding of sorts, which then in some instances (because of certain legislation) use the police, which is like using the military in a Third World country.
Yes, I believe that some people have too much money!
You could jump up and down and have a fit and call me a “socialist” or “communist” ; but that would be more name-calling and red baiting than it would be having a real discussion about the dire situation of the health care situation in this country.
[quote=granna shaw;95427] “Don't take our choices and freedoms away Uncle Sam. One size does NOT fit ALL!!! This is not about partisanship it is about our personal liberties choices and fairness. Look at the financial crisis in California.”
Who do you mean by “our” when you say that?
I do agree with: “One size does NOT fit ALL!!!”. However, I think the buck probably stops there so to speak, because I believe in a progressive tax schedule; and I am guessing that you probably don't.
Yes, take a close look at the financial crisis in California; or the fact that ‘Reganomics’ still exists! People try to blame it on Jarvis Gann and the infamous Proposition 13; but it's not the whole Proposition 13 it's the part that lets certain business interests utilize private industry, so to speak to negotiate loans based on their real estate value, but not pay tax on that same real estate value; (that's just one example).
[quote=granna shaw;95427] “It is wonderful to be dogooders if you can afford it but some who don't qualify are jumping on the bandwagon for an easy ride without paying their own dues.”
Yes, like private health-care insurance company, AIG, and other banking executives!!!!... … etc.
[quote=granna shaw;95427] “Some people would rather spend their money on flashy cars and cell phones for their kids than they would to purchase health insurance.”
That comment buys into the sensationalism of the media!
A lot of the people that you're referring to could not pay the $5,000 or more deductible anyway!!!
[quote=granna shaw;95427] “Prioritize people and if you are truly down and out then we have charities for that.”
Didn't anybody see the news for the last two days? Did anyone see how many people were in line for free health care in Inglewood, California? (Hundreds Turn Out for Free Health Care at Forum - KTLA)
Just last night there were over a thousand people staying overnight so they could be there today because it's first-come first-served. There'll probably be the same amount or more because it's Friday tonight, they had to turn away Many of them today!
I'm sorry but I think you're uninformed about the severity of the situation here. Many charities, food banks have gone dry during the recent past holiday season (Food Banks Running Low During Recession | NewsHour Extra: Video ClipBoard | PBS) for example. Since then more people are out of work, and also at the end of their unemployment insurance. What happens when the charities go broke? Should the government subsidize charities? If those charities that you mention do go broke and the government does subsidize them, what's the difference?
Private health-care insurance company executives are not the only ones whom are not paying their own fair share; or doing right by their constituents; so also is the misinformed Citizenry, by way of withholding otherwise available financial recourses based on fear of “going broke”, “Socialism”, “Communism”, etc.
[quote=granna shaw;95427] “Big brother will not be there to take care of you when he becomes bankrupt or sold out to another country.”
Crapolla! “Big Brother” is not about to sellout his cash cow!!!
On the other hand if big Brother is allowed to get too big, he may want to eat more stakes!!! And who do you suppose big Brother is anyway? Is it the government officials whom are bought off by the extra-large size, multinational corporations that are “too big to fail”? Misinformed sheep-like citizens that act like Bulldogs? Or?
[quote=granna shaw;95427] “Watch the California crisis play out. Soon you will see dangerous inmates roaming the streets and taking whatever they want from us all. If you have a higher power, Pray and Pray hard for divine guidance because Satan is hard at work here on our own soil.
Now I know where you're coming from, because of the “Satan is hard at work here on our own soil” statement.
I guess it's much easier for some people to “believe” something rather than to really take a close look at and analyze the mechanics of the situation. So let's just “blame” it on something like “Satan”, “the devil”, “Communists” “Socialists”, “red herrings” (red colored fish), “welfare queens”, “Drug Addicts”, the 40% of California's prison population that have been incarcerated for drug possession or victimless crimes, etc. etc. etc.
Why shouldn't you/we blame it (“… dangerous inmates roaming the streets and taking whatever they want from us all.”) on people that voted for Arnold Schwarzenegger instead of leaving Gray Davis in there? Gray Davis was into building more prisons with more cells so that the thing that you're complaining about (dangerous inmates; and all that rhetoric) would not have been necessary because those prisons would not be unconstitutionally overcrowded.
Of course I do know that some people do believe that all drug addicts and people in jail for drugs and victimless crimes should be hung by their neck and kick in pain until they are dead, in a high branch of the nearest oak tree! Fortunately, the vast majority of us do not believe that!!!
Isn't it interesting that because a “Republican” Governor; won the election in a landslide recall, because of a financial crisis; which was in theory caused by a Democrat Governor, is now in the worst financial crisis in the state of California since the Great Depression.
It really amazes me that these ‘Reaganomics’ schemes (special tax breaks for the rich in lieu of upholding governmental responsibilities for those whom are not so rich/ Definition: Economic program utilized during the Reagan administration, which emphasized low taxes, low social services spending, and high military spending. Contributed to low interest rates, low inflation, and large budget deficits) aren't seen for what they are before they happen; or at least before it increases to a crisis level! (https://www.alternet.org/workplace/141523/our_economy_has_failed_--_it%27s_the_reaganomics,_stupid!/?page=entire).
BTW I did not like Gray Davis either! If I recollect correctly, Gray Davis was not into spending any money on rehabilitating nonviolent “criminals”. Maybe it is because he knew the state was going to go broke at some point in the near future, so maybe he thought that building more prisons for drug addicts and nonviolent criminals was going to be a necessity to maintain status quo. I don't know for sure about that, but it seems plausible.
Besides, what about the dangerous people that probably should be “inmates” like Madoff for example? There are many more of them out there. Their crimes are far from victimless! Because of the lack of the government's proper regulation of and, in large part because of the predatory practices of people like that, and also the fact that they essentially steal it away from everybody they possibly can; people end up not being able to afford health care and actually die as more of a direct result than you might think!!!
What about the tens of thousands of Swiss bank accounts that exist for the main purpose of tax evasions? I say let the nonviolent drug addicts out; subsidize rehabilitation, and put the real dangerous financial criminals behind bars and confiscate all that money and put it into the health-care system!!!
BTW, that's not communism or socialism. (Busting the tax evader's) That's good old-fashioned American justice!!! (“America Love it or leave it!”, “if you're not with us you're against us”); just relinquish all of that money in those tax evaded, Swiss bank accounts and go.
They should just enjoy their so-called freedom somewhere else!!.. .. like maybe the Congo or maybe Switzerland, if they let their broke asses in their countries after their Swiss bank accounts gets frozen. Or they could come ‘home’ from the Bahamas or wherever, to a nice, subsidized, ‘comfortable’, ‘constitutional’ American Prison!
So there, how do you hard-liners like that!? Is that hard-line enough for you? Or would you still call that communism or socialism?
BTW I don't think the past couple of paragraphs are off subject either because if it weren't for those massive rip-off’s the country wouldn't be broke in the first place! Then we could really get to the heart of what our fellow Americans really think about each other, instead of using fear tactics, red baiting and misinformation by way of mass media frenzy.
08-14-2009, 05:03 PM
justme
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by Clancy:
You poor thing, you have so much to be afraid of. What with our socialized police and fire departments, socialized highways and schools the commies and Satan have got you surrounded!
Don't forget this socialized bulletin board too!!!!!! :xtrmlaugh::xtrmlaugh:
08-14-2009, 05:14 PM
Barry
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by justme:
Don't forget this socialized bulletin board too!!!!!! :xtrmlaugh::xtrmlaugh:
That's right! And we're running a big deficit!
08-14-2009, 05:14 PM
Neshamah
Re: Congress continues the illusion of democracy
What happens when you depend on government run transportation and the bus driver skips your stop or the buses do not run when you need them? You cannot go to their competitors because there are none. Our government run highways tax everyone whether they drive on them or not and put the far more efficient railroads at a severe disadvantage. "No child left behind" pretty much assured that teachers teach what is tested and can be penalized if they spend time on anything else. Police cannot respond instantly and yet people wonder why people are concerned about keeping their second amendment rights. Lobbyists lobby Congress instead of the people because that's where our money is whether we want it there or not. We need to reform government before we can competently reform healthcare. Otherwise we will end up with more unintended consequences. (Never mind we cannot afford more spending after the bailout to pharmaceutical companies provided by the un-negotiated Medicare prescription drug benefit and the bailouts to the most incompetent of financial institutions and auto-makers.)
I agree that we need healthcare reform, and I am not automatically opposed to a public option much as we have in education, but Congress has attempted to rush through a massive bill without time for the public to understand or debate it. A panicked backlash was inevitable. Much of what is circulating about the bill is blown out of proportion or simply wrong, but given that it was written for lawyers rather than voters, it is hardly surprising. Bills that the majority of voters cannot understand is the antipathy of democracy and open-government.
Congress needs to step back, realize that we cannot borrow our way out of the last eight years, and start thinking about the long term. Rather than try to force through a massive bill and see what happens in the courts, we should start with smaller steps.
Freedom has risks. Government run healthcare, government run secret prisons, government surveillance, government regulations on cats, and so forth probably does make us all safer and live longer, but what sets the United States apart from the rest of the world is that most of us value our freedoms above all else and are willing to do without a little security in order to keep them.
~ Jessica
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by Clancy:
You poor thing, you have so much to be afraid of. What with our socialized police and fire departments, socialized highways and schools the commies and Satan have got you surrounded!
08-14-2009, 05:17 PM
Neshamah
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by justme:
Don't forget this socialized bulletin board too!!!!!! :xtrmlaugh::xtrmlaugh:
Wait, I thought Barry was a private citizen. There is nothing unconstitutional about private individuals voluntarily organizing, contributing to, or participating in anything they believe beneficial to society. I don't think WaccoBB would be improved by a government takeover.
08-14-2009, 05:23 PM
Clancy
Re: Congress continues the illusion of democracy
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by Neshamah:
What happens when you depend on government run transportation and the bus driver skips your stop or the buses do not run when you need them?
That's a valid question, and I am relieved to know that most western countries have socialized medicine, and that the service they get is superior to the awful mess we have here in the USA today.
Even Cuba's infant mortality rate is better than here in the USA according to the CIA's World FactBook.
08-14-2009, 05:37 PM
Neshamah
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
No doubt health care in the U.S. can and should be better than it is, but if we are to have socialized medicine, the social body running it should be independent of the government. It works for religion.
08-14-2009, 05:45 PM
theindependenteye
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
>>Wait, I thought Barry was a private citizen.
Well, that's what he says. But seems to me his attitudes are clearly quasi-socialistic, e.g. calls himself "progressive" and also looks kinda Jewish to me. It's a very short step from that to Stalinist dictatorship. Just listen to the fair & balanced commentators.
And our dependence on this relatively civic-minded person may, in the long run, undermine our self-reliance, break down that old American spirit of harnessing the horses to visit the neighbors, and set us up for Obama's plan to castrate all white men.
Is Bin Laden really sending his time with on-line forums? Barry is undermining our vigilance.
-Conrad
ps - Not responding to the post quoted - just letting my imagination run.
08-14-2009, 05:58 PM
Clancy
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by Neshamah:
No doubt health care in the U.S. can and should be better than it is, but if we are to have socialized medicine, the social body running it should be independent of the government. It works for religion.
Seems to work fine in most western nations, they're almost all getting better healthcare, far cheaper, and it's socialized.
08-14-2009, 10:34 PM
cotatikid
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
I am posting this as a "for your information" purpose. I am not attempting to drive the "birthers" and libertarians any more nuts. Really!
Here goes...
Our military are all institutional socialism. Pure socialism! Less than a whole step removed from the dreaded Commies!
Yes! Even the Marines, the whole Navy and Army, the whole shebang are manifestations of socialism in action. Even the Coast Guard...
Come to think about it, so is the CIA.
08-14-2009, 10:44 PM
Clancy
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by cotatikid:
I am posting this as a "for your information" purpose. I am not attempting to drive the "birthers" and libertarians any more nuts. Really!
Here goes...
Our military are all institutional socialism. Pure socialism! Less than a whole step removed from the dreaded Commies!
Yes! Even the Marines, the whole Navy and Army, the whole shebang are manifestations of socialism in action. Even the Coast Guard...
Awesome video... Still pertinent 48 years later...Thx
08-15-2009, 11:06 AM
Clancy
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by justme:
Awesome video... Still pertinent 48 years later...Thx
I was in second grade when JFK was shot. I still remember clearly my teacher bursting into tears as she received the news and the shock she conveyed to us as she told us the president had been assassinated.
Speaking of bizarre secretive government... Amazingly, George Bush Sr, then director of the CIA, claimed for years that he didn't remember where he was the day Kennedy was shot. After proof surfaced, he admitted he was in Dallas, Texas.
He is the brother of White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. You should look into their father sometime...
08-16-2009, 04:21 PM
granna shaw
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by Clancy:
Seems to work fine in most western nations, they're almost all getting better healthcare, far cheaper, and it's socialized.
AMEN!! Too much control comes with wanting to be taken care of. We can't have it both ways. Governments' nose is already WAY too big in our business.
08-16-2009, 04:51 PM
granna shaw
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
[quote=Hotspring 44;95447]
[quote=granna shaw;95427] “This whole ObamaCare thing terrifies me too. Seems a bit like sugarcoated communism. If any of you or your loved ones have ever had to go through the bureaucrisy of a VA hospital and the lower level of care our heroes get and the foul ups on appointments that tax and try our ailing and elderly patients with limited time, energy, patience and money, then you have only a glimmer of how long and difficult it will be to actually get good care in a timely manner before it is too late for some.”
What do you mean or think of when you say or hear the word communism?
I think that word is too commonly abused, and is more of a scare tactic, without further explanation.
I and both of my parents went through the bureaucracy of Medi-Cal. That is why I am absolutely certain that if it was equal for everybody, that situation including the one you mentioned about the VA hospitals would improve because it would get everybody involved instead of just letting the few impoverished folks with their dwindling lack of resources, try to fend for themselves.
In my mother's situation (Medi-Cal) it was not timely, and it was inadequate and too late.
That is exactly why I am an advocate of single-payer! Because when everybody is in the same boat, everybody pitches in what is necessary to bail the boat out. BTW, no special life rafts for the rich or members of Congress either!
[quote=granna shaw;95427] “For one who cannot afford ANY care this may be an attractive consolation prize (better than nothing) but don't shove it down EVERYONE'S throat and ask them to pay for that too. That is dictatorship at it's worst.”
The main problem is that the people on the higher end of the income scale are not paying their fair share! And haven't for much too long!
I am thinking that the fat cats paying their fair share is not “shove it down EVERYONE'S throat”!... … it's not communism or dictatorship either! The way it's been is one-way capitalism! Individuals that have too much money are a lot like dictators in Third World countries! But instead of using military force for the most part, they use their money and buy legislators with campaign funding of sorts, which then in some instances (because of certain legislation) use the police, which is like using the military in a Third World country.
Yes, I believe that some people have too much money!
You could jump up and down and have a fit and call me a “socialist” or “communist” ; but that would be more name-calling and red baiting than it would be having a real discussion about the dire situation of the health care situation in this country.
[quote=granna shaw;95427] “Don't take our choices and freedoms away Uncle Sam. One size does NOT fit ALL!!! This is not about partisanship it is about our personal liberties choices and fairness. Look at the financial crisis in California.”
Who do you mean by “our” when you say that?
I do agree with: “One size does NOT fit ALL!!!”. However, I think the buck probably stops there so to speak, because I believe in a progressive tax schedule; and I am guessing that you probably don't.
Yes, take a close look at the financial crisis in California; or the fact that ‘Reganomics’ still exists! People try to blame it on Jarvis Gann and the infamous Proposition 13; but it's not the whole Proposition 13 it's the part that lets certain business interests utilize private industry, so to speak to negotiate loans based on their real estate value, but not pay tax on that same real estate value; (that's just one example).
[quote=granna shaw;95427] “It is wonderful to be dogooders if you can afford it but some who don't qualify are jumping on the bandwagon for an easy ride without paying their own dues.”
Yes, like private health-care insurance company, AIG, and other banking executives!!!!... … etc.
[quote=granna shaw;95427] “Some people would rather spend their money on flashy cars and cell phones for their kids than they would to purchase health insurance.”
That comment buys into the sensationalism of the media!
A lot of the people that you're referring to could not pay the $5,000 or more deductible anyway!!!
[quote=granna shaw;95427] “Prioritize people and if you are truly down and out then we have charities for that.”
Didn't anybody see the news for the last two days? Did anyone see how many people were in line for free health care in Inglewood, California? (Hundreds Turn Out for Free Health Care at Forum - KTLA)
Just last night there were over a thousand people staying overnight so they could be there today because it's first-come first-served. There'll probably be the same amount or more because it's Friday tonight, they had to turn away Many of them today!
I'm sorry but I think you're uninformed about the severity of the situation here. Many charities, food banks have gone dry during the recent past holiday season (Food Banks Running Low During Recession | NewsHour Extra: Video ClipBoard | PBS) for example. Since then more people are out of work, and also at the end of their unemployment insurance. What happens when the charities go broke? Should the government subsidize charities? If those charities that you mention do go broke and the government does subsidize them, what's the difference?
Private health-care insurance company executives are not the only ones whom are not paying their own fair share; or doing right by their constituents; so also is the misinformed Citizenry, by way of withholding otherwise available financial recourses based on fear of “going broke”, “Socialism”, “Communism”, etc.
[quote=granna shaw;95427] “Big brother will not be there to take care of you when he becomes bankrupt or sold out to another country.”
Crapolla! “Big Brother” is not about to sellout his cash cow!!!
On the other hand if big Brother is allowed to get too big, he may want to eat more stakes!!! And who do you suppose big Brother is anyway? Is it the government officials whom are bought off by the extra-large size, multinational corporations that are “too big to fail”? Misinformed sheep-like citizens that act like Bulldogs? Or?
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by granna shaw:
“Watch the California crisis play out. Soon you will see dangerous inmates roaming the streets and taking whatever they want from us all. If you have a higher power, Pray and Pray hard for divine guidance because Satan is hard at work here on our own soil.
Now I know where you're coming from, because of the “Satan is hard at work here on our own soil” statement.
I guess it's much easier for some people to “believe” something rather than to really take a close look at and analyze the mechanics of the situation. So let's just “blame” it on something like “Satan”, “the devil”, “Communists” “Socialists”, “red herrings” (red colored fish), “welfare queens”, “Drug Addicts”, the 40% of California's prison population that have been incarcerated for drug possession or victimless crimes, etc. etc. etc.
Why shouldn't you/we blame it (“… dangerous inmates roaming the streets and taking whatever they want from us all.”) on people that voted for Arnold Schwarzenegger instead of leaving Gray Davis in there? Gray Davis was into building more prisons with more cells so that the thing that you're complaining about (dangerous inmates; and all that rhetoric) would not have been necessary because those prisons would not be unconstitutionally overcrowded.
Of course I do know that some people do believe that all drug addicts and people in jail for drugs and victimless crimes should be hung by their neck and kick in pain until they are dead, in a high branch of the nearest oak tree! Fortunately, the vast majority of us do not believe that!!!
Isn't it interesting that because a “Republican” Governor; won the election in a landslide recall, because of a financial crisis; which was in theory caused by a Democrat Governor, is now in the worst financial crisis in the state of California since the Great Depression.
It really amazes me that these ‘Reaganomics’ schemes (special tax breaks for the rich in lieu of upholding governmental responsibilities for those whom are not so rich/ Definition: Economic program utilized during the Reagan administration, which emphasized low taxes, low social services spending, and high military spending. Contributed to low interest rates, low inflation, and large budget deficits) aren't seen for what they are before they happen; or at least before it increases to a crisis level! (https://www.alternet.org/workplace/141523/our_economy_has_failed_--_it%27s_the_reaganomics,_stupid!/?page=entire).
BTW I did not like Gray Davis either! If I recollect correctly, Gray Davis was not into spending any money on rehabilitating nonviolent “criminals”. Maybe it is because he knew the state was going to go broke at some point in the near future, so maybe he thought that building more prisons for drug addicts and nonviolent criminals was going to be a necessity to maintain status quo. I don't know for sure about that, but it seems plausible.
Besides, what about the dangerous people that probably should be “inmates” like Madoff for example? There are many more of them out there. Their crimes are far from victimless! Because of the lack of the government's proper regulation of and, in large part because of the predatory practices of people like that, and also the fact that they essentially steal it away from everybody they possibly can; people end up not being able to afford health care and actually die as more of a direct result than you might think!!!
What about the tens of thousands of Swiss bank accounts that exist for the main purpose of tax evasions? I say let the nonviolent drug addicts out; subsidize rehabilitation, and put the real dangerous financial criminals behind bars and confiscate all that money and put it into the health-care system!!!
BTW, that's not communism or socialism. (Busting the tax evader's) That's good old-fashioned American justice!!! (“America Love it or leave it!”, “if you're not with us you're against us”); just relinquish all of that money in those tax evaded, Swiss bank accounts and go.
They should just enjoy their so-called freedom somewhere else!!.. .. like maybe the Congo or maybe Switzerland, if they let their broke asses in their countries after their Swiss bank accounts gets frozen. Or they could come ‘home’ from the Bahamas or wherever, to a nice, subsidized, ‘comfortable’, ‘constitutional’ American Prison!
So there, how do you hard-liners like that!? Is that hard-line enough for you? Or would you still call that communism or socialism?
BTW I don't think the past couple of paragraphs are off subject either because if it weren't for those massive rip-off’s the country wouldn't be broke in the first place! Then we could really get to the heart of what our fellow Americans really think about each other, instead of using fear tactics, red baiting and misinformation by way of mass media frenzy.
Hotspring 44 you have some good ideas and some of what you say makes good sense, but you need to realize that you are leaving out an awful lot of us people in the middle class, who are hard working Americans busting our butts to put food on the table and buy health insurance, AND auto insurance so that when we get clobbered by those uninsured motorists, many of whom can't even speak the Queens English, we are not wealthy or special but we are doing our best to be responsible for ourselves and our deductible is not $5000. Some of us middle class citizens have offspring who struggle with addictions and mental health issues that don't belong in prison. This is another deficiency of our health care system and State governments irresponsibility. I propose that you are an angry hothead that has diarreha of the mouth and can't take a breath long enough to get the beans out of your ears to consider what someonelse feels, thinks or views may have some merit. If you don't have a healthy outlet for ALL of that anger, you may want to look for a higher power too. It works, and I am angry too but I'm not about to go postal, like you seem to be considering. Attacks, attract attacks but rationality and peace work better in most situations. I will pray for your peace and your sanity.
08-16-2009, 06:08 PM
theindependenteye
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
>>AMEN!! Too much control comes with wanting to be taken care of. We can't have it both ways. Governments' nose is already WAY too big in our business.
Exactly what kind of "control" are you afraid of? At the present time, your insurance company decides what treatments will not be covered, what your premiums will be, how high your deductibles will be, and whether or not they'll continue to cover you. Certainly you have the freedom to go to another insurer, if they'll take you, and get the same treatment. Under the proposed plans, you'd have the same freedom. So what's the beef?
Of course if you're wealthy enough to afford gold-plated plans, I can understand that you'd object to be taxed more to pay for other people's survival.
Your comment on VA hospitals ignores two facts. First, that none of the proposals have anything to do with setting up a National Health Service on the model of Great Britain. This is about insurance, not about the Feds running hospitals. Second, that a huge number of the vets covered by VA wouldn't have ANY DAMNED HEALTH CARE if it weren't for VA — even if the Bush Administration did its best to destroy it.
Peace & joy--
Conrad
08-16-2009, 06:14 PM
justme
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
:kidfight:
08-16-2009, 06:53 PM
Braggi
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by Lorrie:
THIS JUST IN...my email...
Lorrie, how about you do something besides post right wing hit pieces here and so some research yourself. Do you know everything in that "email" is true or are you just assuming again?
Love,
-Jeff
08-16-2009, 07:51 PM
Braggi
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by d-cat:
... and some articles about the industry that is pushing ...
d-cat, have you read any of the articles you've linked to here? It's my experience that you post a lot of links that you haven't checked out yourself and then you expect us to read the articles (which are nearly always a waste of time) and then try to argue with you about how stupid they are, to which you reply that you haven't read them.
This time? I won't read any link unless you make a single link, put in some quotes from the article, and add your own opinion about the article including a reason why we should bother to read it.
Your sources have always been either utter rubbish or highly suspect and I hope you'll do your due diligence in the future for us, your community.
Hint: develop some reasonable sources of information, actually read the articles, and then link us to a single article so we can have a reasonable conversation about it.
LONDON — Britain's health care service says it is sick of being lied about.
Check out this FAQ page from a UK website regarding hip replacement:
How long will I have to wait?
The Government says no one should wait more than six months for any operation. Although orthopaedic surgeons are still the ones with the longest lists, the situation has vastly improved in the past three years.
The latest figures show that of the 197,492 people waiting for an orthopaedic operation (not all of these will be hips), just under half will have waited up to two months and only 10,797 will have waited five months or more.
d-cat, have you read any of the articles you've linked to here? It's my experience that you post a lot of links that you haven't checked out yourself and then you expect us to read the articles (which are nearly always a waste of time) and then try to argue with you about how stupid they are, to which you reply that you haven't read them.
This time? I won't read any link unless you make a single link, put in some quotes from the article, and add your own opinion about the article including a reason why we should bother to read it.
Your sources have always been either utter rubbish or highly suspect and I hope you'll do your due diligence in the future for us, your community.
Hint: develop some reasonable sources of information, actually read the articles, and then link us to a single article so we can have a reasonable conversation about it.
Sincerely,
-Jeff
Ok, so d-cat posts alot of links... I checked out about 6 on the mentioned post, looked at the articles. So what is the big deal? Not mainstream publications? I guess if d-cat linked to FOX News that would be a "reasonable" source...:hmmm:
Anyway Jeff, I find posts that I have to scroll 3 pages to get through (with many articles referenced), that ramble on and on, repeating itself to be more of a pain in the ass...
Keep going d-cat and express your view as you see fit, even if it does irritate some. Actually that's better... Makes them think!
08-17-2009, 08:41 AM
Neshamah
Re: Congressional bills no one fully understands scare the daylights out of me
I confess I come here to read what people here have to say. I almost never click on links to what other people have said elsewhere.
~ Jessica
08-17-2009, 09:09 AM
d-cat
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
One doesn't really need to click the links (unless they wish to read the article or verify the story). Just the sheer number of crimes by pharmaceutical companies that's being reported should convince anyone that the drug industry is not your friend. And they are promoting ObamaCare.
08-17-2009, 09:16 AM
d-cat
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by justme:
Keep going d-cat and express your view as you see fit, even if it does irritate some. Actually that's better... Makes them think!
will do! :):
though actually I post information more than my views. But I hope it keeps us thinking all the same
08-17-2009, 12:44 PM
Lorrie
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by Braggi:
Lorrie, how about you do something besides post right wing hit pieces here and so some research yourself. Do you know everything in that "email" is true or are you just assuming again?
Love,
-Jeff
What does this mean? I posted something that came in my email that applied to this thread. I do not know if it is fact or fiction. It is an email that pertains to this thread. AND....if you look through you will see that I post all kinds of different things...Mostly Jokes though!!! lLOL
08-17-2009, 01:10 PM
Braggi
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by d-cat:
... The latest figures show that of the 197,492 people waiting for an orthopaedic operation (not all of these will be hips), just under half will have waited up to two months and only 10,797 will have waited five months or more. [snip]
sounds great...
Actually, that does sound pretty good. I'll bet most people in the US trying to get an orthopedic operation approved by their insurance company, assuming they even have insurance, wait far more than two months.
Another argument for "socialized" medicine. Thanks.
-Jeff
08-17-2009, 02:00 PM
Lorrie
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Canadian Health Officials: Our Universal Health Care Is 'Sick,' Private Insurance Should Be Welcomed
Monday, August 17, 2009 Dr. Anne Doig, the incoming president of the Canadian Medical Association, said her country’s health care system is “sick” and “imploding,” the Canadian Press reported. “We know there must be change,” Doig said in a recent interview. “We’re all running flat out, we’re all just trying to stay ahead of the immediate day-to-day demands.” Canada’s universal health care system is not giving patients optimal care, Doig added. When her colleagues from across the country gather at the CMA conference in Saskatoon Sunday, they will discuss changes that need to be made, she said. “We all agree the system is imploding, we all agree that things are more precarious than perhaps Canadians realize,” she said. Current president of the CMA, Dr. Robert Ouellet, will make a presentation at the conference about his findings when he toured Europe in January, and met with health groups in several countries. Ouellet has said that “competition should be welcomed, not feared,” meaning private health insurance should have a role in the public health system. Doig said she isn’t sure what kind of changes will be proposed when the conference wraps up, but she does know that changes have to come – and fast. She said she understands that universal health care, while good in some ways, has not always been helpful for sick people or their families. "(Canadians) have to understand that the system that we have right now — if it keeps on going without change — is not sustainable," Doig said. Click here to read more about this story from the Canadian Press.
08-17-2009, 02:17 PM
d-cat
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by d-cat:
Check out this FAQ page from a UK website regarding hip replacement:
How long will I have to wait?
The Government says no one should wait more than six months for any operation. Although orthopaedic surgeons are still the ones with the longest lists, the situation has vastly improved in the past three years.
The latest figures show that of the 197,492 people waiting for an orthopaedic operation (not all of these will be hips), just under half will have waited up to two months and only 10,797 will have waited five months or more.
Now look what happens when people have to wait a long time for treatment:
* Breast cancer kills 25 percent of its American victims. In Great Britain, the Vatican of single-payer medicine, breast cancer extinguishes 46 percent of its targets.
* Prostate cancer is fatal to 19 percent of its American patients. The National Center for Policy Analysis reports that it kills 57 percent of Britons it strikes.
here's another news story and a report from Canada:
Fraser Health Authority confirms cutbacks to surgeries, services
'Sorry is not good enough,' says senior facing cuts
The Fraser Health Authority confirmed Thursday it intends to cut surgeries, seniors' programs and services for the mentally ill to help deal with a budget shortfall of up to $160 million... MRIs will be limited to the same number done last year, and programs for seniors, the mentally ill and people suffering domestic violence will be cut...
Waiting Your Turn
Hospital Waiting Lists in Canada 2008 Report (pdf)
The Fraser Institute’s eighteenth annual waiting list survey found that Canada-wide waiting times for surgical and other therapeutic treatments decreased in 2008. Total waiting time between referral from a general practitioner and treatment, averaged across all 12 specialties and 10 provinces surveyed, fell from 18.3 weeks in 2007 to 17.3 weeks in 2008. This nationwide improvement in access reflects waiting-time decreases in 7 provinces, while concealing increases in waiting times in Saskatchewan, Nova Scotia, and Newfoundland & Labrador.
Among the provinces, Ontario achieved the shortest total wait in 2008, 13.3 weeks, with British Columbia (17.0 weeks), and Manitoba (17.2 weeks), next shortest. Saskatchewan exhibited the longest total wait at 28.8 weeks; the next longest waits were found in Nova Scotia (27.6 weeks) and Newfoundland & Labrador (24.4 weeks).
The fall in waiting time between 2007 and 2008 results from a decrease both in the first wait—the wait between visiting a general practitioner and attending a consultation with a specialist—and in the second wait—from the time that a specialist decides that treatment is required to treatment...
“The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out
of other people’s money.” —Margaret Thatcher
With a projected $1.8 trillion deficit for 2009, several trillions more in deficits projected over the next decade, and with both Medicare and Social Security entitlement spending about to ratchet up several notches over the next 15 years as Baby Boomers become eligible for both, we are rapidly running out of other people’s money. These deficits are simply not sustainable. They are either going to result in unprecedented new taxes and inflation, or they will bankrupt us.
While we clearly need health-care reform, the last thing our country needs is a massive new health-care entitlement that will create hundreds of billions of dollars of new unfunded deficits and move us much closer to a government takeover of our health-care system. Instead, we should be trying to achieve reforms by moving in the opposite direction—toward less government control and more individual empowerment.
Here are eight reforms that would greatly lower the cost of health care for everyone:
•Remove the legal obstacles that slow the creation of high-deductible health insurance plans and health savings accounts (HSAs). The combination of high-deductible health insurance and HSAs is one solution that could solve many of our health-care problems. For example, Whole Foods Market pays 100% of the premiums for all our team members who work 30 hours or more per week (about 89% of all team members) for our high-deductible health-insurance plan. We also provide up to $1,800 per year in additional health-care dollars through deposits into employees’ Personal Wellness Accounts to spend as they choose on their own health and wellness.
Money not spent in one year rolls over to the next and grows over time. Our team members therefore spend their own health-care dollars until the annual deductible is covered (about $2,500) and the insurance plan kicks in. This creates incentives to spend the first $2,500 more carefully. Our plan’s costs are much lower than typical health insurance, while providing a very high degree of worker satisfaction.
•Equalize the tax laws so that that employer-provided health insurance and individually owned health insurance have the same tax benefits. Now employer health insurance benefits are fully tax deductible, but individual health insurance is not. This is unfair.
•Repeal all state laws which prevent insurance companies from competing across state lines. We should all have the legal right to purchase health insurance from any insurance company in any state and we should be able use that insurance wherever we live. Health insurance should be portable.
•Repeal government mandates regarding what insurance companies must cover. These mandates have increased the cost of health insurance by billions of dollars. What is insured and what is not insured should be determined by individual customer preferences and not through special-interest lobbying.
•Enact tort reform to end the ruinous lawsuits that force doctors to pay insurance costs of hundreds of thousands of dollars per year. These costs are passed back to us through much higher prices for health care.
•Make costs transparent so that consumers understand what health-care treatments cost. How many people know the total cost of their last doctor’s visit and how that total breaks down? What other goods or services do we buy without knowing how much they will cost us?
•Enact Medicare reform. We need to face up to the actuarial fact that Medicare is heading towards bankruptcy and enact reforms that create greater patient empowerment, choice and responsibility.
•Finally, revise tax forms to make it easier for individuals to make a voluntary, tax-deductible donation to help the millions of people who have no insurance and aren’t covered by Medicare, Medicaid or the State Children’s Health Insurance Program.
Many promoters of health-care reform believe that people have an intrinsic ethical right to health care—to equal access to doctors, medicines and hospitals. While all of us empathize with those who are sick, how can we say that all people have more of an intrinsic right to health care than they have to food or shelter?
Health care is a service that we all need, but just like food and shelter it is best provided through voluntary and mutually beneficial market exchanges. A careful reading of both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution will not reveal any intrinsic right to health care, food or shelter. That’s because there isn’t any. This “right” has never existed in America.
Even in countries like Canada and the U.K., there is no intrinsic right to health care. Rather, citizens in these countries are told by government bureaucrats what health-care treatments they are eligible to receive and when they can receive them. All countries with socialized medicine ration health care by forcing their citizens to wait in lines to receive scarce treatments.
Although Canada has a population smaller than California, 830,000 Canadians are currently waiting to be admitted to a hospital or to get treatment, according to a report last month in Investor’s Business Daily. In England, the waiting list is 1.8 million.
At Whole Foods we allow our team members to vote on what benefits they most want the company to fund. Our Canadian and British employees express their benefit preferences very clearly—they want supplemental health-care dollars that they can control and spend themselves without permission from their governments. Why would they want such additional health-care benefit dollars if they already have an “intrinsic right to health care”?The answer is clear—no such right truly exists in either Canada or the U.K.—or in any other country.
Rather than increase government spending and control, we need to address the root causes of poor health. This begins with the realization that every American adult is responsible for his or her own health.
Unfortunately many of our health-care problems are self-inflicted: two-thirds of Americans are now overweight and one-third are obese. Most of the diseases that kill us and account for about 70% of all health-care spending—heart disease, cancer, stroke, diabetes and obesity—are mostly preventable through proper diet, exercise, not smoking, minimal alcohol consumption and other healthy lifestyle choices.
Recent scientific and medical evidence shows that a diet consisting of foods that are plant-based, nutrient dense and low-fat will help prevent and often reverse most degenerative diseases that kill us and are expensive to treat. We should be able to live largely disease-free lives until we are well into our 90s and even past 100 years of age.
Health-care reform is very important. Whatever reforms are enacted it is essential that they be financially responsible, and that we have the freedom to choose doctors and the health-care services that best suit our own unique set of lifestyle choices. We are all responsible for our own lives and our own health. We should take that responsibility very seriously and use our freedom to make wise lifestyle choices that will protect our health. Doing so will enrich our lives and will help create a vibrant and sustainable American society.
—Mr. Mackey is co-founder and CEO of Whole Foods Market Inc.
Printed in The Wall Street Journal, page A15
08-17-2009, 02:26 PM
Hotspring 44
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
[quote=granna shaw;95427]… “AND auto insurance so that when we get clobbered by those uninsured motorists many of whom can't even speak the Queens English we are not wealthy or special but we are doing our best to be responsible for ourselves and our deductible is not $5000.”
Well, if you want to be that way about it you can, that's your right. But the way I see it healthcare, particularly the preventative measures is a right and not a privilege. You seem to be implying that it's a privilege, because you're lucky enough to have enough employment to be in the middle income class bracket in the first place.
I may not be middle-class like you claim to be, but I also pay auto insurance.
I can not afford health care insurance; even if I qualify because of the “pre-existing conditions” have maintenance and rehabilitation costs.
A lot of people that have less than what would be considered middle-class income worked their butts off too! The way you said that sounds to me that you may be a middle-class supremacist or something like that.
Where did you ever see me say anything about undocumented and illegal aliens should have the right to drive cars here in California or anywhere else in the States’ for that matter? I think if you're barking at me in that regard specifically to that, then you're barking up the wrong tree.
[quote=granna shaw;95427] “Some of us middle class citizens have offspring who struggle with addictions and mental health issues that don't belong in prison. This is another deficiency of our health care system and State governments irresponsibility.”
Honestly, I'm not so sure exactly what you mean by that, could you clarify?
[quote=granna shaw;95427] “I propose that you are an angry hothead that has diarreha of the mouth and can't take a breath long enough to get the beans out of your ears to consider what someonelse feels thinks or views may have! some merit. If you don't have a healthy outlet for ALL of that anger you may want to look for a higher power too.”
There you go “saying higher power”, what about inner power? This conversation sounds to me like when sometimes people ask for a “higher power”, they’re really looking for an inner power, but they don't have enough's confidence in themselves; so that they look for a higher power or blame other people for their own inner anger.
Just because I have strong opinions doesn't mean I'm particularly angry a particular individual.
Besides this forum and others that I have participated in are a form of “higher power” than just my individual self is. :thumbsup:
And I do as best I can with my imagination to put myself in other people's shoes. Sorry if my imagination isn't good enough for you to realize that.
Diarrhea of the mouth? Hotheaded? Besides, you don't know me and what I've been through. Of course everybody's views and feelings have some merit.
I think you should consider your own inner anger before your righteousness accuses others of being so “hot Headed” and angry with “ears full of beans” as you state.
Here's one for you; imagine yourself coming from a family that has never had enough money to be middle-class; your child gets ill, and you go to the doctor's office then they tell you that you can't be seen there because you have no insurance (because you couldn't afford in the first place) so you have to go to the emergency room instead.
That scenario in the first place, should be unnecessary, but the way things are now that happens all too often.
Second of all imagine getting that hospital bill, when it could've just been a doctor's bill. And then you're second child, two days later gets ill with something else. What would you do, take that child directly to the emergency room? Or try another doctor's office and get refused again, just like last time? If you have the slightest bit of imagination, you would already know that those are heart wrenching things to consider, but they happen every day; (I'm guessing that you do already know those things), but if you don't please try to imagine them for a moment.
[quote=granna shaw;95427]… “but I'm not about to go postal like you seem to be considering. Attacks attract attacks but rationality and peace work better in most situations. I will pray for your peace and your sanity.”
FYI I have never considered going “postal” about anything. Have you?
How do you define the difference between rational action and prayer? I don't like to be the only one with the pick and shovel digging us out of a deep hole simply because other people insist on praying instead when in actuality, I need help taking a us out of the hole; sorry but I'm not into being the only labor!
I think that we both (and others) sense, a certain amount of mean-spiritedness in this healthcare discussion. I hope you and others can understand that my intention is not to be mean-spirited. But sometimes when I get in the face argument aimed at me or my principles and (I'm not saying you, but just in general), I will put it right back in that proverbial face; the same kind of logic (unless it's too ridiculously violent or vulgar) only in an inverted form of the same argument. That seems to put things more in balance.
Media and much of government as far as I can tell is bought and paid for by multibillion dollar private interests rather than the middle-class. So in that sense, yes I am angry about that (but not going to go postal). Also, I am angry that the middle-class falls for it so much (but once again, not going to go postal). Stating something like that about me like you did is over sensationalizing my point of view to say the least. Making a statement like that is like tagging somebody. You are 100% entitled to your viewpoint; but when it's wrong and about me than I am 100% entitled to correct it.
I believe praying and meditating and things like that do have their place. But I also think it's irresponsible for somebody to pray or meditate in lieu of taking some kind of a peaceful action to make changes; particularly when it's somewhat obvious that those changes won't happen until enough people peacefully get together and organize for those changes.
A friend of mine was going to get her legs amputated; and my aunt told me to pray, because she said, if I did, her legs might grow back. That was obviously not going to happen. But I did meditate and did do what I could do to support my friend.
All I'm saying is that is, if all you can do to help correct the health-care crisis situation is pray; then please by all means pray.
But I know that careful considerate, peaceful, organized action is what's needed here, to actually make the changes that are needed in regards to healthcare.
I get the strong sense that there is a lot of middle-class people that have been working very hard for a very long time (actually, I believe that the vast majority of the middle-class people are overworked) so they have a strong belief that their private healthcare is some sort of a class privilege; (and) that they misguidedly believe it is a right of special entitlement that they are somehow for the most part immune to losing, because they work so hard, have families to support, mortgages to pay, car payments to pay, etc. etc.. I think I have made my viewpoint, very clear that I believe that basic preventative and catastrophic health care is a human right and not just a privilege for the working class or the ultra rich; it is for everybody to have and everybody to pay for somehow in one way or another.
Not all disabled people can work to earn enough wages to become “middle-class”. Should they be denied health care? Should they be denied having children, because it would “theoretically” burden society?
I could go on and on with questions and examples but I think you're capable of getting the basic gist of what I'm saying.
Hotspring 44.
08-17-2009, 02:27 PM
Braggi
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by Lorrie:
... Ouellet has said that “competition should be welcomed, not feared,” meaning private health insurance should have a role in the public health system. ...
Sounds great. Let's do it that way here.
-Jeff
08-17-2009, 02:33 PM
Braggi
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by d-cat:
... * Breast cancer kills 25 percent of its American victims. In Great Britain, the Vatican of single-payer medicine, breast cancer extinguishes 46 percent of its targets.
* Prostate cancer is fatal to 19 percent of its American patients. The National Center for Policy Analysis reports that it kills 57 percent of Britons it strikes.
...
Prostate cancer rarely kills anyone compared to other factors. Probably the best treatment for most prostate cancers is to stay away from doctors and hospitals, i.e., the best treatment is no treatment. How your source came up with those numbers is anyone's guess, but I think they are best ignored.
The breast cancer numbers are more interesting and the whys should be investigated if true (though, checking out your sources in the past, I have no confidence in anything you post d-cat). How about bringing up some validation of those numbers from peer reviewed journals so we actually have something to talk about.
-Jeff
08-17-2009, 02:37 PM
d-cat
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by Braggi:
Prostate cancer rarely kills anyone compared to other factors. Probably the best treatment for most prostate cancers is to stay away from doctors and hospitals, i.e., the best treatment is no treatment. How your source came up with those numbers is anyone's guess, but I think they are best ignored.
The breast cancer numbers are more interesting and the whys should be investigated if true (though, checking out your sources in the past, I have no confidence in anything you post d-cat). How about bringing up some validation of those numbers from peer reviewed journals so we actually have something to talk about.
-Jeff
I don't think you fool many people anymore
08-17-2009, 02:42 PM
d-cat
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
any Dr. Andrew Weil fans here? Here's an article by him:
Why I Am A Conservative On Health Care Reform
...Since when is it conservative to embrace new, overpriced, corrupt systems, like the health-destroying and ruinously expensive protocols of much of modern medicine? "Conservative" has several meanings, but two central ones are "favoring traditional views and values," and "avoiding excess."
I hold that nothing could be more wild, unconstrained, and downright liberal than the path medicine has taken in just the last 20 years -- an unprecedented bacchanalia of excess and contempt for traditional American values...
[quote=Lorrie;95699] “Unfortunately many of our health-care problems are self-inflicted: two-thirds of Americans are now overweight and one-third are obese. Most of the diseases that kill us and account for about 70% of all health-care spending—heart disease, cancer, stroke, diabetes and obesity—are mostly preventable through proper diet, exercise, not smoking, minimal alcohol consumption and other healthy lifestyle choices.
Recent scientific and medical evidence shows that a diet consisting of foods that are plant-based, nutrient dense and low-fat will help prevent and often reverse most degenerative diseases that kill us and are expensive to treat. We should be able to live largely disease-free lives until we are well into our 90s and even past 100 years of age.
Health-care reform is very important. Whatever reforms are enacted it is essential that they be financially responsible, and that we have the freedom to choose doctors and the health-care services that best suit our own unique set of lifestyle choices. We are all responsible for our own lives and our own health. We should take that responsibility very seriously and use our freedom to make wise lifestyle choices that will protect our health. Doing so will enrich our lives and will help create a vibrant and sustainable American society.”
I agree with the basic premise of good diet and exercise. But we have a dilemma here; how does one third, convince two thirds to stop being the way they are? Or how do you change the way people produce, store and ship food?
What about people that are not working for whole foods or anywhere else that pays as much?
What about part-time workers and people that got laid off?
What about the unfortunate people whom get too ill to work for long periods of time?
For another example of the existing dilemma: the 14,000 people a day we are supposedly experiencing that are losing their health care coverage now and the ones that already don't or didn't have it now or in the first place. Do we just kick them to the curb?
What about pre-existing conditions that are discovered later; like pollution caused illnesses, for example. Should people be allowed to sue for their medical conditions caused by big corporations? What if it would make those corporations go broke and we need those corporations to supply certain things like energy? What about a corporation that is no longer in existence?
I didn't see anything like that mentioned.
I'm not attacking anybody; I'm just noticing a lot of gaps that need to be filled for that to work in the whole country, not just one small company like, whole foods.
There's always going to be somebody that's unemployed. Should we discriminate against them? One example: if they don't have any children should we consider putting them last in line (eternally, if necessary)?
There are a lot of unanswered questions in the “The Whole Foods Alternative to ObamaCare” statements.
Financially responsible to whom? Monsanto? Wal-Mart? Government-subsidized industrial farms? Should government stop subsidizing farms, that can't make it without government subsidies? Would there be enough food, if that did happen?
I think other people have stated it in this thread before that, without certain governmental reform health care reform isn't really the biggest issue.
I think the single biggest issue is that companies are considered constitutionally to be individuals that can spend the company's money on politics: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpor...sonhood_debate
My guess is at the end of the day in the health-care debate; that until the corporate personhood is eliminated and personhood means person instead of a company that all kinds of corporate caused injustices will continue.
Hotspring 44.
08-17-2009, 04:12 PM
Hotspring 44
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Who owns more financial interest in the pharmaceutical companies’ liberals or conservatives?
Who stands to gain either politically or financially by denying health care to a particular class of people who cannot afford it themselves?
Who says that it is more conservative to deny somebody dental care until they end up going to the emergency room because of chronic condition that could have been prevented by maintenance?
Why do conservatives think that only people that experienced combat in the military deserve to be considered medically speaking, when it comes to PTSD?
Why do conservatives say that they are minimalist until it comes to warfare?
What are they conserving anyway? What they believe in only?
I read the article, but I think it's a little bit off base to blame the way things are totally on “liberals”.
Conservatives don't go with the program when it's a good program, particularly when the people that are accused of being “liberal” are responsible for its inception; instead, conservatives universally, monkey-wrench it; just like they are now by spreading fear and in regards to health-care debate. Example: what death panel? What denial of veterans’ administration health care benefits? It is mostly because of conservatives that health-care rationing is happening now!
If you're conservative, and it costs money and you don't like it; sensationalize it, in such a way to make people become afraid and think they'll go broke or lose their freedom by using political treachery and dishonesty. Those are tactics that work very well unfortunately.
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by d-cat:
any Dr. Andrew Weil fans here? Here's an article by him:
Why I Am A Conservative On Health Care Reform
...Since when is it conservative to embrace new, overpriced, corrupt systems, like the health-destroying and ruinously expensive protocols of much of modern medicine? "Conservative" has several meanings, but two central ones are "favoring traditional views and values," and "avoiding excess."
I hold that nothing could be more wild, unconstrained, and downright liberal than the path medicine has taken in just the last 20 years -- an unprecedented bacchanalia of excess and contempt for traditional American values...
[quote=granna shaw;95427]… “AND auto insurance so that when we get clobbered by those uninsured motorists many of whom can't even speak the Queens English we are not wealthy or special but we are doing our best to be responsible for ourselves and our deductible is not $5000.”
Well, if you want to be that way about it you can, that's your right. But the way I see it healthcare, particularly the preventative measures is a right and not a privilege. You seem to be implying that it's a privilege, because you're lucky enough to have enough employment to be in the middle income class bracket in the first place.
I may not be middle-class like you claim to be, but I also pay auto insurance.
I can not afford health care insurance; even if I qualify because of the “pre-existing conditions” have maintenance and rehabilitation costs.
A lot of people that have less than what would be considered middle-class income worked their butts off too! The way you said that sounds to me that you may be a middle-class supremacist or something like that.
Where did you ever see me say anything about undocumented and illegal aliens should have the right to drive cars here in California or anywhere else in the States’ for that matter? I think if you're barking at me in that regard specifically to that, then you're barking up the wrong tree.
[quote=granna shaw;95427] “Some of us middle class citizens have offspring who struggle with addictions and mental health issues that don't belong in prison. This is another deficiency of our health care system and State governments irresponsibility.”
Honestly, I'm not so sure exactly what you mean by that, could you clarify?
[quote=granna shaw;95427] “I propose that you are an angry hothead that has diarreha of the mouth and can't take a breath long enough to get the beans out of your ears to consider what someonelse feels thinks or views may have! some merit. If you don't have a healthy outlet for ALL of that anger you may want to look for a higher power too.”
There you go “saying higher power”, what about inner power? This conversation sounds to me like when sometimes people ask for a “higher power”, they’re really looking for an inner power, but they don't have enough's confidence in themselves; so that they look for a higher power or blame other people for their own inner anger.
Just because I have strong opinions doesn't mean I'm particularly angry a particular individual.
Besides this forum and others that I have participated in are a form of “higher power” than just my individual self is. :thumbsup:
And I do as best I can with my imagination to put myself in other people's shoes. Sorry if my imagination isn't good enough for you to realize that.
Diarrhea of the mouth? Hotheaded? Besides, you don't know me and what I've been through. Of course everybody's views and feelings have some merit.
I think you should consider your own inner anger before your righteousness accuses others of being so “hot Headed” and angry with “ears full of beans” as you state.
Here's one for you; imagine yourself coming from a family that has never had enough money to be middle-class; your child gets ill, and you go to the doctor's office then they tell you that you can't be seen there because you have no insurance (because you couldn't afford in the first place) so you have to go to the emergency room instead.
That scenario in the first place, should be unnecessary, but the way things are now that happens all too often.
Second of all imagine getting that hospital bill, when it could've just been a doctor's bill. And then you're second child, two days later gets ill with something else. What would you do, take that child directly to the emergency room? Or try another doctor's office and get refused again, just like last time? If you have the slightest bit of imagination, you would already know that those are heart wrenching things to consider, but they happen every day; (I'm guessing that you do already know those things), but if you don't please try to imagine them for a moment.
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by granna shaw:
… “but I'm not about to go postal like you seem to be considering. Attacks attract attacks but rationality and peace work better in most situations. I will pray for your peace and your sanity.”
FYI I have never considered going “postal” about anything. Have you?
How do you define the difference between rational action and prayer? I don't like to be the only one with the pick and shovel digging us out of a deep hole simply because other people insist on praying instead when in actuality, I need help taking a us out of the hole; sorry but I'm not into being the only labor!
I think that we both (and others) sense, a certain amount of mean-spiritedness in this healthcare discussion. I hope you and others can understand that my intention is not to be mean-spirited. But sometimes when I get in the face argument aimed at me or my principles and (I'm not saying you, but just in general), I will put it right back in that proverbial face; the same kind of logic (unless it's too ridiculously violent or vulgar) only in an inverted form of the same argument. That seems to put things more in balance.
Media and much of government as far as I can tell is bought and paid for by multibillion dollar private interests rather than the middle-class. So in that sense, yes I am angry about that (but not going to go postal). Also, I am angry that the middle-class falls for it so much (but once again, not going to go postal). Stating something like that about me like you did is over sensationalizing my point of view to say the least. Making a statement like that is like tagging somebody. You are 100% entitled to your viewpoint; but when it's wrong and about me than I am 100% entitled to correct it.
I believe praying and meditating and things like that do have their place. But I also think it's irresponsible for somebody to pray or meditate in lieu of taking some kind of a peaceful action to make changes; particularly when it's somewhat obvious that those changes won't happen until enough people peacefully get together and organize for those changes.
A friend of mine was going to get her legs amputated; and my aunt told me to pray, because she said, if I did, her legs might grow back. That was obviously not going to happen. But I did meditate and did do what I could do to support my friend.
All I'm saying is that is, if all you can do to help correct the health-care crisis situation is pray; then please by all means pray.
But I know that careful considerate, peaceful, organized action is what's needed here, to actually make the changes that are needed in regards to healthcare.
I get the strong sense that there is a lot of middle-class people that have been working very hard for a very long time (actually, I believe that the vast majority of the middle-class people are overworked) so they have a strong belief that their private healthcare is some sort of a class privilege; (and) that they misguidedly believe it is a right of special entitlement that they are somehow for the most part immune to losing, because they work so hard, have families to support, mortgages to pay, car payments to pay, etc. etc.. I think I have made my viewpoint, very clear that I believe that basic preventative and catastrophic health care is a human right and not just a privilege for the working class or the ultra rich; it is for everybody to have and everybody to pay for somehow in one way or another.
Not all disabled people can work to earn enough wages to become “middle-class”. Should they be denied health care? Should they be denied having children, because it would “theoretically” burden society?
I could go on and on with questions and examples but I think you're capable of getting the basic gist of what I'm saying.
Hotspring 44.
I think we probably agree on more than it seemed like however, when one feels attacked one gets defensive as I believe both of us felt. I AM compassionate to extreme and hopeless situations, as I myself have found myself in at certain times of my life and it HURTS ALOT. I have been lied to and betrayed by those who were supposed to love me and had my children abandonned emotionally and financially and used as pawns. Health care was a big part of that also and he didn't seem to give a SHIT! I have a daughter who gets financial assistance for ptsd and a son who is an alcoholic/addict as a result of ptsd from the violence and abuse in our family and the aftermath of that ending, who has been in and out of prison and will probably struggle the rest of his life. I know what it is like to feel stuck and feel guilty for staying in a bad situation for fear of those very things; ie no support, no insurance etc. I've been there. In a perfect world we should all be entitled to have ALL of our needs met, we just have to figure out how to pay for it without everyone getting so angry and defensive out of fear, resentment, entitlement or power struggles. The auto insurance issue of uninsured drivers spills over into our health care also and taxes our system with people who in many cases are not even legals. There will always be opportunists and takers who are out to get everything free they possibly can but we have to realize that we cannot save the whole world. Charity begins at home. We have to help ourselves before we can help others so that America can remain strong and not be sold down the river. When a plane is going down, there is a reason they have the parents put their oxygen masks on ahead of their children......it's the same principle.
08-17-2009, 08:59 PM
Hotspring 44
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
“I think we probably agree on more than it seemed like however when one feels attacked one gets defensive as I believe both of us felt.”
I essentially agree with that (and felt that way also).
“I AM compassionate to extreme and hopeless situations as I myself have found myself in at certain times of my life and it HURTS ALOT.”
I do empathize with that. I am single with no children so I can only imagine the extreme pain you have experienced.
“I have been lied to and betrayed by those who were supposed to love me and had my children abandonned emotionally and financially and used as pawns. Health care was a big part of that also and he didn't seem to give a SHIT! I have a daughter who gets financial assistance for ptsd and a son who is an alcoholic/addict as a result of ptsd from the violence and abuse in our family and the aftermath of that ending who has been in and out of prison and will probably struggle the rest of his life.”
I have a very close friend that had similar difficulties with spouse; some things worse than you described, and some not quite as harsh as you described.
I am so sorry you and your children have had it so hard; you and your children deserve better.
“I know what it is like to feel stuck and feel guilty for staying in a bad situation for fear of those very things; ie no support no insurance etc. I've been there. In a perfect world we should all be entitled to have ALL of our needs met we just have to figure out how to pay for it without everyone getting so angry and defensive out of fear resentment entitlement or power struggles.”
I pretty much agree with that statement. Unfortunately it's not a perfect world; is it?
I know that most Americans are probably not on the same page in the health care debate as it stands now, because of all the fear, misinformation, misunderstanding, and of course the biggest one of all that you mentioned; “power struggles”.
“The auto insurance issue of uninsured drivers spills over into our health care also and taxes our system with people who in many cases are not even legals.”
Yes it does but it is relatively small compared to the plethora of other issues.
But for the unfortunate individual or family that has had the experience of being in a traffic accident and seriously injured and or major property damage that wasn't covered because of an uninsured motorist regardless of legal or illegal alien does cost our society something. In the case of serious debilitating injuries particularly when it renders an otherwise working person to being permanently disabled or killed, is a serious tragedy that taxes our society as a whole; and is devastating to persons close to that/those victim/s.
“There will always be opportunists and takers who are out to get everything free they possibly can but we have to realize that we cannot save the whole world. Charity begins at home.”
Some of those opportunists are executives of HMOs, pharmaceutical companies and private health care insurance providers.
“We cannot save the whole world” I agree, but we can help each other on the financial and health care crisis, when we band together and do the right things to organize our thoughts and peaceful actions. It's worth a good try anyway. That's why I am spending so much time posting on wackobb.
“We have to help ourselves before we can help others so that America can remain strong and not be sold down the river.”
I personally believe that one of the best ways we can help ourselves is for America to formulate a very comprehensive, health care system that emphasizes healthy practices for individuals, preventative checkups and maintenance for every American citizen, and a reasonable amount of fiscal responsibility.
I believe that the way that the private for-profit healthcare organizations have acted; they should be replaced with a nonprofit, progressive tax based, government-funded, structure; that consists of a consortium of doctors and professionals in the health field Instead of huge government bureaucracy.
The only bureaucracy involved already exists, is called the IRS.
With the correct tax structure and a few adjustments we all have to personally take responsibility for as our own adult individuals; we can tame this beast.
As far as being sold down the river is concerned, I think that happened in the 1800s; and I do believe that, that needs to be corrected before we can really succeed.
“When a plane is going down there is a reason they have the parents put their oxygen masks on ahead of their children......it's the same principle.”
Wow! I didn't know that about the airplane protocol. But it sort of makes sense because if the adults pass-out because of the decompression the very young children wouldn't likely be able to understand or be able to deal with the air masks by themselves.
But the healthcare system isn't really an airplane, and it shouldn't be in a crashing situation in the first place. The financial system the way it shown in the mass media is a façade. If it's crashing it is because we have the wrong pilot. We can change the pilot before it crashes. I am thinking yes we can, instead of no we won't.
[quote=granna shaw;95427]… “AND auto insurance so that when we get clobbered by those uninsured motorists many of whom can't even speak the Queens English we are not wealthy or special but we are doing our best to be responsible for ourselves and our deductible is not $5000.”
Well, if you want to be that way about it you can, that's your right. But the way I see it healthcare, particularly the preventative measures is a right and not a privilege. You seem to be implying that it's a privilege, because you're lucky enough to have enough employment to be in the middle income class bracket in the first place.
I may not be middle-class like you claim to be, but I also pay auto insurance.
I can not afford health care insurance; even if I qualify because of the “pre-existing conditions” have maintenance and rehabilitation costs.
A lot of people that have less than what would be considered middle-class income worked their butts off too! The way you said that sounds to me that you may be a middle-class supremacist or something like that.
Where did you ever see me say anything about undocumented and illegal aliens should have the right to drive cars here in California or anywhere else in the States’ for that matter? I think if you're barking at me in that regard specifically to that, then you're barking up the wrong tree.
[quote=granna shaw;95427] “Some of us middle class citizens have offspring who struggle with addictions and mental health issues that don't belong in prison. This is another deficiency of our health care system and State governments irresponsibility.”
Honestly, I'm not so sure exactly what you mean by that, could you clarify?
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by granna shaw:
“I propose that you are an angry hothead that has diarreha of the mouth and can't take a breath long enough to get the beans out of your ears to consider what someonelse feels thinks or views may have! some merit. If you don't have a healthy outlet for ALL of that anger you may want to look for a higher power too.”
There you go “saying higher power”, what about inner power? This conversation sounds to me like when sometimes people ask for a “higher power”, they’re really looking for an inner power, but they don't have enough's confidence in themselves; so that they look for a higher power or blame other people for their own inner anger.
Just because I have strong opinions doesn't mean I'm particularly angry a particular individual.
Besides this forum and others that I have participated in are a form of “higher power” than just my individual self is. :thumbsup:
And I do as best I can with my imagination to put myself in other people's shoes. Sorry if my imagination isn't good enough for you to realize that.
Diarrhea of the mouth? Hotheaded? Besides, you don't know me and what I've been through. Of course everybody's views and feelings have some merit.
I think you should consider your own inner anger before your righteousness accuses others of being so “hot Headed” and angry with “ears full of beans” as you state.
Here's one for you; imagine yourself coming from a family that has never had enough money to be middle-class; your child gets ill, and you go to the doctor's office then they tell you that you can't be seen there because you have no insurance (because you couldn't afford in the first place) so you have to go to the emergency room instead.
That scenario in the first place, should be unnecessary, but the way things are now that happens all too often.
Second of all imagine getting that hospital bill, when it could've just been a doctor's bill. And then you're second child, two days later gets ill with something else. What would you do, take that child directly to the emergency room? Or try another doctor's office and get refused again, just like last time? If you have the slightest bit of imagination, you would already know that those are heart wrenching things to consider, but they happen every day; (I'm guessing that you do already know those things), but if you don't please try to imagine them for a moment.
I think we probably agree on more than it seemed like however, when one feels attacked one gets defensive as I believe both of us felt. I AM compassionate to extreme and hopeless situations, as I myself have found myself in at certain times of my life and it HURTS ALOT. I have been lied to and betrayed by those who were supposed to love me and had my children abandonned emotionally and financially and used as pawns. Health care was a big part of that also and he didn't seem to give a SHIT! I have a daughter who gets financial assistance for ptsd and a son who is an alcoholic/addict as a result of ptsd from the violence and abuse in our family and the aftermath of that ending, who has been in and out of prison and will probably struggle the rest of his life. I know what it is like to feel stuck and feel guilty for staying in a bad situation for fear of those very things; ie no support, no insurance etc. I've been there. In a perfect world we should all be entitled to have ALL of our needs met, we just have to figure out how to pay for it without everyone getting so angry and defensive out of fear, resentment, entitlement or power struggles. The auto insurance issue of uninsured drivers spills over into our health care also and taxes our system with people who in many cases are not even legals. There will always be opportunists and takers who are out to get everything free they possibly can but we have to realize that we cannot save the whole world. Charity begins at home. We have to help ourselves before we can help others so that America can remain strong and not be sold down the river. When a plane is going down, there is a reason they have the parents put their oxygen masks on ahead of their children......it's the same principle.
08-17-2009, 10:49 PM
OrchardDweller
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by Braggi:
How about bringing up some validation of those numbers from peer reviewed journals so we actually have something to talk about.
-Jeff
One doesn't have to be a genius to figure out that the longer you withhold healthcare from a person who needs it, the smaller their chances of overcoming their illness become.
08-18-2009, 07:11 AM
Braggi
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by OrchardDweller:
One doesn't have to be a genius to figure out that the longer you withhold healthcare from a person who needs it, the smaller their chances of overcoming their illness become.
In other words, d-cat can't support the very specific statistic he quoted, so we can ignore the post, but you're willing to believe it for some reason. You are correct in that it doesn't take a genius to think that way.
I'm not certain at all that the average US health care consumer waits longer for breast cancer treatment. I know a great many people who have "full" health care coverage die each year because their insurance companies delay or fail to approve treatments altogether. How does that work for the tens of millions of people in the US who have no coverage?
I'm not sure how that plays out in England, but I'd like to know. Of the people I hear interviewed on the radio, most are very happy with the national health care they are living with, and most of the people from the US are complaining about how badly the insurance companies treat them.
A national health care coverage would solve these problems, not create them. It doesn't take a genius to see that, but a genius certainly could.
-Jeff
08-18-2009, 08:07 AM
Braggi
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Has anybody here wondered, as I have, where "BizWrangler" came up with the original post that began this very active thread?
I did a google search on "Obamacare - are you paying attention?
The communists have landed..."
I propose each of you do that as well and see what kind of source BizWrangler depends on for his information.
And then I propose Barry remove this entire thread.
-Jeff
08-18-2009, 08:41 AM
Barry
Re: ObamaCare scares the daylights out of me!
Disturbing, but I'm not going to remove this. Carry on...
I'll post an NY Times editorial that is equally disturbing shortly.
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by Braggi:
Has anybody here wondered, as I have, where "BizWrangler" came up with the original post that began this very active thread?
I did a google search on "Obamacare - are you paying attention?
The communists have landed..."
I propose each of you do that as well and see what kind of source BizWrangler depends on for his information.
And then I propose Barry remove this entire thread.