Re: Is Food for Thought in Forestville approching Scam Charity territory?
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by hari:
. Barry, saying you only want 'positive' comments takes away from the possibility of having an actual discussion, along with the critical thinking that may entail. Is that what you meant?
I think you misunderstood me. What I said was that I accept anonymous positive comments from people that I knew weren't otherwise participating in the discussion.
I most welcome "actual discussion", and especially and "critical thinking", from members that have registered their real names, and thus take personal responsibility, on their WaccoBB profiles.
I, and I think the community at large, have a limited capacity for negativity and attacking. My hope is that having the person's real name attached to their comments will help mitigate the negative volume. I reserve the right ask (or force, if need be) someone to stop posting, especially after they have stated their case and it just becomes more of the same.
Maybe if we change the thread title...
Agreed, Barry. The fact that the thread title was negative, and a judgement (there is no absolute definition of 'scam', after all).....would make any comment after that sound negative, when maybe it was just critical. So maybe just changing the title would help....
Is this even about FFT at this point though? (Again, rhetorical)
Not-hiding-Hari
Re: Maybe if we change the thread title...
the very first and most important step would be to review the spelling of APPROACHING...:heart: [Fixed! Thanks! - Barry]
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by hari:
Agreed, Barry. The fact that the thread title was negative, and a judgement (there is no absolute definition of 'scam', after all).....would make any comment after that sound negative, when maybe it was just critical. So maybe just changing the title would help....
Is this even about FFT at this point though? (Again, rhetorical)
Not-hiding-Hari
