1 Attachment(s)
Another Peer Reviewed Study claims virus was a creation.
This flu has much to it, many many facets of information and sublime subtleties, The narrative thus far is that the viral flu came from someone in Wuhan China who ate bat soup and caused this virus a pandemic across all the world. Thus far in my need to find out more about this flu I have discovered over and over that scientists of high respect have said that it was a creation. More than one team of scientists know for certain that this virus was created by other people not by eating bat soup. SO here is a study done in Norway it is peer reviewed I am sure it was not reviewed by YOUR peers but it was reviewed by peers in Cambridge. I have attached the article in which I found the information and then the actual abstract . Do follow along. See PDF of study here.
Re: Another Peer Reviewed Study claims virus was a creation.
Of course, things change all the time... Here's your guy David N. again:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidni.../#32d492aa68f6
Do keep up with the latest news.
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by Chauncey Gardner:
This flu has much to it, many many facets of information and sublime subtleties, The narrative thus far is that the viral flu came from someone in Wuhan China who ate bat soup and caused this virus a pandemic across all the world. Thus far in my need to find out more about this flu I have discovered over and over that scientists of high respect have said that it was a creation. More than one team of scientists know for certain that this virus was created by other people not by eating bat soup. SO here is a study done in Norway it is peer reviewed I am sure it was not reviewed by YOUR peers but it was reviewed by peers in Cambridge. I have attached the article in which I found the information and then the actual abstract . Do follow along.
See PDF of study here.
Re: Another Peer Reviewed Study claims virus was a creation.
Why do we have to review another study? I really like the bat soup theory. As a bat lover, the idea that fellow humans buy wild caught bats to chop up live into soup for health is understandable. But to lab alter harvested bat virus for human need? Crazy! Does anyone know anything about bats??? Bats are amazing creatures of many species and habitats with immune systems surpassing any other mammals. And I know nothing!
Re: Another Peer Reviewed Study claims virus was a creation.
Forbes? Oh my, I do trust them.
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by carpet crawler:
Re: Another Peer Reviewed Study claims virus was a creation.
The Abstract and conclusion say nothing about human creations of the virus.
BTW Chauncey, you could gain some credibility on this list if you admitted it when you make a mistake (hint *polio vaccine* hint)
ABSTRACT
This study presents the background, rationale and Method of Action of Biovacc-19, a candidate vaccine for Covid-19, now in advanced pre-clinical development, which has already passed the first acute toxicity testing. Unlike conventionally developed vaccines, Biovacc-19's Method of Operation is upon non human-like (NHL) epitopes in 21.6% of the composition of SARS-CoV-2's Spike protein, which displays distinct distributed charge including the presence of a charged furin-like cleavage site. The logic of the design of the vaccine is explained, which starts with empirical analysis of the aetiology of SARS-CoV-2. Mistaken assumptions about SARS-CoV-2's aetiology risk creating ineffective or actively harmful vaccines, including the risk of Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE). Such problems in vaccine design are illustrated from past experience in the HIV domain. We propose that the dual effect general method of action of this chimeric virus’s spike, including receptor binding domain, includes membrane components other than the ACE2 receptor, which explains clinical evidence of its infectivity and pathogenicity. We show the non-receptor dependent phagocytic general method of action to be specifically related to cumulative charge from inserted sections placed on the SARS-CoV-2 Spike surface in positions to bind efficiently by salt bridge formations; and from blasting the Spike we display the non human-like epitopes from which Biovacc-19 has been down-selected.
Conclusion
We have offered a rationale for the design methodology and the necessary design parameters of a successful and safe vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. It is not included in any of the eight vaccine design routes identified in a recent Nature summary graphic. (Callaway, 2020) We have shown in this paper why a comprehensive analysis of the aetiology of the target virus is prerequisite, not optional. From the HIV experience, we have illustrated the risks of not so doing.
Next, we explained why, unlike in conventional vaccine design procedures, the choice of adjuvant is not to be seen as an afterthought but as integral from the beginning. We have deliberately chosen an adjuvant which has been shown to activate the innate and cell-mediated immune responses which are crucial to the successful presentation of the relevant epitopes. We have shown how Biovacc-19 has employed our understanding of the general method of action for infectivity and pathogenicity of the target virus to optimise action and to minimise risk, especially Antibody Dependent Enhancement; and we have presented the Non Human-Like epitopes in the SARS-CoV-2 Spike from which Biovacc-19 has been down-selected.
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by Chauncey Gardner:
This flu has much to it, many many facets of information and sublime subtleties, The narrative thus far is that the viral flu came from someone in Wuhan China who ate bat soup and caused this virus a pandemic across all the world. Thus far in my need to find out more about this flu I have discovered over and over that scientists of high respect have said that it was a creation. More than one team of scientists know for certain that this virus was created by other people not by eating bat soup. SO here is a study done in Norway it is peer reviewed I am sure it was not reviewed by YOUR peers but it was reviewed by peers in Cambridge. I have attached the article in which I found the information and then the actual abstract . Do follow along.
See PDF of study here.
