What pro- and anti-vax dichotomy leaves out... safe and unsafe vaccines
Video: The Well-Known Hazards of Coronavirus Vaccines. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Interviewed by Dr. J. Mercola
https://www.globalresearch.ca/well-known-hazards-coronavirus-vaccines/5712494
If anyone saw Plandemic part 1, a reason for the higher # of deaths in Italy, besides age, was because the 2019 flu vaccine had four different Coronaviruses from dogs' cell lines.. This interview discusses flu vaccine of prior years. It also shows how people can test positive for C-virus and be asymptomatic. Also discussed: "Children are being harmed by vaccines that have yet to be tested for safety, especially when given in combination with other vaccines." "How to Make a Safe Vaccine."
Quote:
...retroviruses, not coronaviruses, are what cause the characteristic cytokine storm signature observed in COVID-19. Mikovits suspects that in people who do not have retroviral infections, SARS-CoV-2 causes no or only mild symptoms. Like Mikovits, Kennedy cites a Pentagon study7 published in the January 10, 2020, issue of the Vaccine journal, which found you’re 36% more likely to get coronavirus infection if you got the influenza vaccine in 2017 or 2018. As noted in this study
Quote:
What’s more, Mikovits claims that anyone who has received a flu vaccine is likely to register as positive for SARS-Co-V-2 using a PCR test, for the fact that most flu vaccines in the U.S. are made in chicken cells or dog kidney cells, which her research shows are contaminated with coronaviruses.
Re: What pro- and anti-vax dichotomy leaves out... safe and unsafe vaccines
The Dengvaxia Disaster Was Twenty Years in the Making—What Will Happen With a Rushed COVID-19 Vaccine?
Quote:
Despite the fact that Sanofi tested Dengvaxia in several large clinical trials with more than 30,000 kids globally and
published the results in the prestigious
New England Journal of Medicine,
there were serious problems. ....
Buried in those clinical trials was a disease enhancement safety signal, but industry and the World Health Organization (WHO) turned a blind eye to the problem, calling it a "theoretical possibility." ...
What is also very concerning is that even after Dengvaxia led to tragic injuries and deaths in the Philippines, the FDA moved forward and licensed the vaccine in the U.S.
Questions about vaccine safety are critically important since past research has documented the same concerns with disease enhancement with coronavirus vaccines...
For several weeks, Dr. Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates have been beating the drum about a COVID-19 vaccine, seeking to keep the world's coronavirus optics focused on a medical intervention that Gates acknowledges to be risky enough to require
indemnification against lawsuits. ...The two opinion leaders' gambit seems to be backfiring among people savvy enough to understand that
Fauci's and
Gates' organizations, pocketbooks and agendas are driving the rush for an indemnified vaccine.
Americans would be well advised to revisit a virus-and-vaccine cautionary tale that briefly captured front-page attention a year ago. ....
Dengvaxia's fallout was so dramatic that it even overrode the U.S. media's customary whiteout of vaccine safety problems. As summarized by National Public Radio (NPR), the Philippines' mass dengue vaccination program —
implemented with "undue haste" — not only killed children but provoked protests, criminal investigations, indictments, revocation of the vaccine's license in that country and a plummeting of parental confidence in vaccine safety from 82% to 21%.
In 2018, the WHO's Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety reviewed some of the deaths associated with Dengvaxia but stated that it could not determine whether the vaccine was
causally related to the "vaccine-related immune enhancement." This
disingenuous conclusion flies in the face of decades of evidence showing some viral vaccines to be capable of "subverting" the immune system and provoking "exacerbated illness." It is doubtful that WHO or Sanofi are unaware of this
Re: What pro- and anti-vax dichotomy leaves out... safe and unsafe vaccines
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by M/M:
Video: The Well-Known Hazards of Coronavirus Vaccines. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Interviewed by Dr. J. Mercola
A safe adjuvant, and THE only one needed to stimulate immune response from vaccine, is mineral oil. Anything else is part of an agenda such as shown here:
“Tainted” Vaccines And The Population Control Agenda
http://www.oldthinkernews.com/2020/05/20/tainted-vaccines-and-the-population-control-agenda/
20% of Moderna's human test subjects sustained severe injuries from Gates-Fauci coronavirus vaccine
Unlike most of the media reports of phase 1 for this mRNA Moderna vaccine, Robert F Kennedy, Jr offers additional facts: of 15 people tested, 3 sustained severe injuries; AND only 8% developed antibodies; we don't know if antibodies will benefit person exposed to 'wild' virus - or - make their case MUCH worse. mRNA viruses are a big unknown.
Quote:
Dr. Fauci was so confident of his shot's safety that he waved ferret and primate studies (Moderna suspiciously reported no health data from its mouse studies). That appears to have been a mistake.
Re: What pro- and anti-vax dichotomy leaves out... safe and unsafe vaccines
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by M/M:
.... mRNA viruses are a big unknown.
should have said: mRNA vaccines are a big unknown.
Re: What pro- and anti-vax dichotomy leaves out... safe and unsafe vaccines
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by M/M:
should have said: mRNA vaccines are a big unknown.
Moderna: "NOT how you do science..." posting partial results w/simplified explanation, downplaying risks, downplaying cheaper natural alternatives, and presenting information in a polarizing manner, w/ results tied to finance.
"Eight people. That’s all it took to move the market on Monday."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/med...sm/ar-BB14koEV
Quote:
Within hours of issuing
a press release about this finding, Moderna, the Cambridge-based maker of the experimental vaccine, saw its stock price jump by 20 percent. By day’s end, Moderna was credited with helping drive a
4 percent rise in the stock market. ..... experts who found Moderna’s data insufficient,
was blamed for driving down Moderna’s stock by 10 percent by the end of trading on Tuesday — and the stock market fell with it.
Re: What pro- and anti-vax dichotomy leaves out... safe and unsafe vaccines
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by M/M:
Moderna: "NOT how you do science..." posting partial results w/simplified explanation, downplaying risks, downplaying cheaper natural alternatives, and presenting information in a polarizing manner, w/ results tied to finance.
more about Moderna ...
As Moderna's Covid-19 vaccine takes the lead, its Chief Medical Officer's recent promotion of 'gene-editing vaccines' comes to light
Quote:
Today, Moderna announced that its vaccine candidate, named mRNA-1273, "
appeared to produce an immune response in eight people who received it."
Moderna's response is odd given that the "study" in question is focused on safety and "is actually not designed to measure effectiveness of the vaccine" .. Notably, none of the study's findings on vaccine safety were reported aside from claims it was "
generally safe." It is also worth noting that this
"safety-focused" study only began in March and thus, to date, represents only an examination of the vaccine's effects in
the very short term. ...media reports failed to raise other simple yet necessary questions such as how a sample size of only eight people can translate into scientific findings of any real significance without further testing involving larger sample sizes. They also failed to note that the study in question is not even finished....
Moderna is a "strategic ally" of DARPA and has received millions from DARPA and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation several years prior to the current coronavirus crisis. DARPA's plans for nanoparticles and nanotechnology and their potentially Orwellian applications were the subject of a recent The Last American Vagabond report.
Gates' affinity for Moderna may owe to the fact that Moderna's co-founder, MIT's Robert Langer, is a Gates associate whose lab developed the Gates-funded "quantum dot 'tattoo'" vaccine identification marker that is "visible using a special smartphone camera app and filter" and was described by Science Alert as "a low-risk tracking system."
Another Langer-Gates partnership is a "birth control microchip" inserted to the body that releases contraceptives and
can be turned on and off wirelessly.
it is worth taking a closer look at the man who has overseen its development, Moderna's current Chief Medical Officer, Dr. Tal Zaks. ....In a 2017 TED Talk... Zaks states that Moderna and similar companies "are actually hacking the software of life and that it's changing the way we think of and treat disease."
...it is deeply concerning that this experimental vaccine with potentially far-reaching consequences is being rammed through thanks to fervent support from both the U.S. government and controversial philanthropists that apparently have little interest in studies examining the mRNA vaccine's long-term effects.
Given that the stage has already been set for mandatory vaccinations that will be "distributed" throughout the U.S. by the military, now is the time to vigorously raise awareness about the Moderna vaccine's gravely under-reported ability to "hack the software of life" in ways that could harm public health.
Re: What pro- and anti-vax dichotomy leaves out... safe and unsafe vaccines
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by M/M:
Amazing clips from film - clear talking points for Covid-19:
COVID-19 Coronavirus: Scripted by the CDC in 2003? Dead Zone Plague
https://www.globalresearch.ca/covid-...c-2003/5713718
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.: Moderna’s “Clinical Trial Results for Its Groundbreaking COVID Vaccine Could Not Be Much Worse”: https://www.globalresearch.ca/modern...trials/5713705
Genetic Code of The Planet Under Attack:
http://www.oldthinkernews.com/2020/0...-under-attack/
The Scientific Dictatorship Explained (2011)
http://www.oldthinkernews.com/2011/0...hip-explained/
Re: What pro- and anti-vax dichotomy leaves out... safe and unsafe vaccines
An arrogant scientific elite has divorced themselves from common sense, natural law, and the rest of the human species in their quest for full spectrum domination.
The very genetic code of the planet’s biosphere is being overwritten; The ultimate goal being the ability to manipulate, patent and program at will the biological processes of all life.
Tom Knight, professor at MIT’s Artificial Intelligence Lab, said in 2007 that “The genetic code is 3.6 billion years old. It’s time for a rewrite.”
In 2013, Fidelity Investments published a video outlining the future of synthetic biology:
Synthetic biology, according to a 2005 European Commission paper is “…the engineering of biology… the synthesis of complex, biologically based (or inspired) systems which display functions that do not exist in nature.”
Geneticist Craig Venter is a pioneer in the field of synthetic biology. In 2010 the media hailed his team’s success in creating “the first self-replicating species we’ve had on the planet whose parent is a computer.”
The Edge Billionare dinner – comparable to the secretive Bilderberg group – is an annual gathering of tech elites that has hosted Jeffery Epstein, Craig Venter, Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, Larry Page, Bill Joy and many others.
Physicist Freeman Dyson described the individuals leading this group as having god-like power to create entirely new species on earth in a “New Age of Wonder”. He describes them as:
“…a new generation of artists, writing genomes as fluently as Blake and Byron wrote verses, might create an abundance of new flowers and fruit and trees and birds to enrich the ecology of our planet.”
As revealed in the 2005 book “The Google Story“, Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin met with Craig Venter – credited with creating synthetic life – at the Edge Billionaires meeting.
Also present were representatives from the U.S. State department, Bill Gates, Anne Wojcicki, Bill Joy and dozens of other tech company CEO’s and scientists. The authors write, “Not long after the dinner in California, Brin and Page teamed up with Venter. The biologist gained access to Google’s immense computing power and personnel.”
Coronavirus vaccine to use synthetic DNA created by computers
The New York Times reported on the developing vaccine technology in 2015. As the Times reported, animal tests on the synthetic DNA vaccine “are essentially re-engineering the animals to resist disease.”
Now, research backed by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation will use genetic code created by computers in a potential coronavirus vaccine.
As reported, the Gates funded synthetic biologists believe that they can “do better” than nature with self-assembling nanoparticles that will be injected into your body:
“With all due respect to nature, synthetic biologists believe they can do better. Using computers, they are designing new, self-assembling protein nanoparticles studded with viral proteins, called antigens: these porcupine-like particles would be the guts of a vaccine.”
Another Gates funded Malaria vaccine technology from Inovio aims to use electrical current to open cells and deliver synthetic DNA:
Re: What pro- and anti-vax dichotomy leaves out... safe and unsafe vaccines
President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s legendary farewell speech is often cited in condemnation of the Military Industrial Complex, which is intimately connected to the subject at hand. However, there is another little discussed yet vital topic in the latter half of his speech. “The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded,” warned Eisenhower. “Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific technological elite.”
Who Are “They”?
I firmly believe that in the absence of historical background and full spectrum context, present day and future issues cannot be fully understood. This report will attempt to clarify the essence of the term “Scientific Dictatorship” by providing historical context and stories of the individuals involved in its modern manifestation.
The ideological roots of the Scientific Dictatorship can be traced to the works of Plato some 2,000 years ago. In truth, humanity has been battling the formation of this tyranny for much of known history. The formation of the United States Constitution created a barrier that H. G. Wells wrote in 1901, had “…to be modified or shelved at some stage…” The focus here is on the modern forms of scientific power that began in the 20th Century and are blossoming in the 21st Century. The Scientific Dictatorship is composed of unelected individuals that have access to the reigns of power. These individuals have access to undisclosed future technology, classified intelligence, and the ability to steer scientific research that impacts our entire society.
The works of Bertrand Russell, Julian Huxley, Aldous Huxley, Charles Galton Darwin, H.G. Wells and many others provide the mental framework from which this modern tyranny is based upon. The following are several examples of men who helped form the Scientific Dictatorship of the 21st Century. For readers who are new to this information, what you see here is a small portion of the full kaleidoscope of information available. This will give you a start for any in-depth research that you should decide to do.
Vannevar Bush: First Science Advisor, Founder of Raytheon
Born in 1890, Vannevar Bush would become the first Science Advisor to the United States government during World War II under President Franklin Roosevelt. Bush played a vital role in the creation of what we know today as the Military Industrial Complex. Specifically, the method of scientific research of this gargantuan organization – beginning with the Office of Scientific Research and Development – was devised by Vannevar.
The roots of the internet can be traced to Bush’s ideas in 1945. The forerunner to the computer itself can also be attributed to his early designs. With the help of the large foundations, Vennevar Bush pioneered many of the modern instruments of the Scientific Dictatorship. Bush’s most notable accomplishment was serving as the organizer of the Manhattan Project which produced the Atomic bomb.
MIT Tech TV
Bush’s work with the Manhattan Project helped to cement the centralization of scientific research under the U.S. Military. This combine of research and development has since then developed into a network of contractors and various agencies. One of the world’s largest defense contractors of today is the Raytheon Company, founded by Vannevar in 1922. Much of the technology that is initially developed by the military is inevitably released into society.
One such example is the internet. Vannevar Bush’s initial ideas are considered to be the ideological roots of the internet. In a 1945 paper titled “As We May Think” Bush writes on his “memex” concept,
“The owner of the memex, let us say, is interested in the origin and properties of the bow and arrow. He has dozens of possibly pertinent books and articles in his memex. First he runs through an encyclopedia, finds an interesting but sketchy article, leaves it projected on his screen… Occasionally he inserts a comment of his own, either linking it into the main trail or joining it by a side trail to a particular item… Thus he builds a trail of his interest through the maze of materials available to him.”
DARPA would eventually develop the internet and bring it to reality. While the internet is being used today as an unprecedented tool for surveillance, it is at the same time serving as an unmatched medium for activism.
https://i2.wp.com/www.oldthinkernews...size=270%2C212
Bush with his mechanical differential analyzer
From 1935 to 1946 the Rockefeller Foundation funded Vannevar Bush’s development of the mechanical differential analyzer at MIT for a total of $230,500. This device, along with the Hollerith machine, is considered to be one of the forerunners of the desktop computer that we all know and use today.
Bush also served as president of the Carnegie Institution from 1939 to 1955, where he helped shift the organization’s focus away from old-style eugenics to population control. In A social history of anthropology in the United States, Thomas Carl Patterson writes that as President, “…Vannevar… ended its support for Davenport’s projects [The Eugenics Records Office]. The eugenics movement was transformed with Rockefeller support as its focus shifted from heredity to population control and to birth-control experiments on an international scale.”
As G. Pascal Zachary documents in his book Endless Frontier, Bush gave lip service to the importance of the individual, but he was an advocate of a type of technocracy in which society is ruled “…by the well-to-do and highly educated.” He also saw “…populism and the widening participation of citizens in the machinery of government as a recipe for decline.” Zachary comments that “Bush’s fear of the ‘blind mass’ was widely shared in his circle of senior scientists and engineers.” Also documented in Endless Frontier,
“As the years went on, the prevailing respect for experts emboldened Bush to advocate technocracy even more unabashedly. In the mid 1950s, he made headlines by calling for a “natural aristocracy” that would govern “the climate of opinion” in the country out of which politics and values arise.”
Much of what Vannevar Bush set in motion led directly to the explosion of technological advancement that we are witnessing today. While technology itself is neutral, the elites that are directing its development are doing so with specific agendas in mind, and we are not being asked to debate it.
Herman Kahn: Father of Scenario Planning
“Herman Kahn has been a major figure in one of the most fascinating shifts of power in U.S. History: from identifiable public leaders to the ‘action intellectuals.’” – Life Magazine, December 6, 1968
Herman Kahn is known as one of the founding fathers of future studies. After working for the RAND Corporation, Kahn founded the Hudson Institute in 1961. The satirical film Dr. Strangelove is largely based on real documents and ideas that came from RAND. The December 6, 1968 edition of Life Magazine details Kahn’s career, and the larger implications of an unprecedented shift of power to unelected “action intellectuals.” As Life Magainze reports,
“…Herman Kahn has been a major figure in one of the most fascinating shifts of power in U.S. History: from identifiable public leaders to the ‘action intellectuals.’ As counselors to the decision-makers, men such as Kahn often have access to future technology (what is known, but not yet disclosed) and official intelligence (what is known, but not yet revealed, about the capacities and plans of other nations).
Thus, decisions – based on private knowledge, analyzed by private consultants and debated in private – can become public policy. This is a process of invisible power. At its extreme this influence can commit a nation to social programs and military actions which have neither been fully explained nor publicly debated. One day, as that power pervades and grows more sophisticated, it may so affect the course of government that any nation’s policies may be locked in, as if by automatic pilot, years before the men who are elected to govern ever take office.”
This process of invisible power is further enabled by the annual secret gatherings of the Bilderberg Group – founded in 1954 – which consist of international bankers, CEO’s of major tech corporations, editors of major news outlets, and other power brokers.
An historical example of this process in action is the formation of the European Union’s common market, which was developed behind closed doors at a 1955 Bilderberg conference in Germany.
Ivy Lee and Edward Bernays: Modern public relations and perception management
Ivy Lee is considered to be the first public relations man. Lee was hired by John D. Rockefeller Jr. to recast the family’s image after the infamous Ludlow massacre. A more widely recognized figure in PR is Edward L. Bernays, the nephew of Sigmund Freud, who helped to significantly advance the study of propaganda into the 20th Century.
In his 1928 book Propaganda, Bernays informs readers about the true ruling class in our society.
“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.
We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of.”
In 1953 Bernays aided the United States government in its overthrow of Guatemala. As Mark Crispin Miller notes in the introduction of Propaganda, “Bernays was… employed by the United Fruit Company, at whose behest the Eisenhower administration used the CIA to overthrow the democratically elected government of Jacobo Arbenz.”
This clip form the documentary Century of the Self details the incident:
Water Fluoridation was also sold to America with the help of Bernays. As detailed in The Fluoride Deception, Christopher Bryson explains Bernays’ connection with the National Institute of Dental Research.
The Fluoride Deception: An Interview with Christopher Bryson
The study of the mind of man has enabled advanced forms of subtle influence, of “manufacturing consent.” The U.S. Army War College noted in 1998 that the “Mind has no firewall,” and that “We are on the threshold of an era in which these data processors of the human body may be manipulated or debilitated.”
Much of the Scientific Dictatorship’s agenda would stop dead in its tracks in response to the simple act of the people becoming aware that there are attempts to manipulate our minds.
How does the Scientific Dictatorship operate?
Eisenhower’s warning is especially prescient here. “The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded,” he warned. Tax-exempt foundations have played a critical role in directing society and technological development. For example, as president of the Carnegie Institution, Vannevar Bush “…was able to influence research in the U.S. towards military objectives and could informally advise the government on scientific matters.”
As Dr. Lily E. Kay has documented in her book The Molecular Vision of Life: Caltech, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Rise of the New Biology, large foundations effectively set in motion the entire scientific technological agenda for the 20th Century. Under the “Science of Man” agenda, the physical makeup of human beings was studied, and methods to alter various biological processes were devised. This inertia rippled throughout society and impacted the minds of the intelligentsia that were totally unconnected to the core group responsible for organizing the central project.
The Scientific Dictatorship often operates under the cover of darkness, under national security, private contractors, and deep levels of government secrecy.
One area of operations for this group is in bio weapons laboratories across the globe. As revealed by The Age, Nobel prize winning Australian microbiologist Sir Macfarlane Burnet secretly urged the Australian government in 1947 to develop bio weapons for use against the “overpopulated countries of South-East Asia.” In a 1947 meeting with the New Weapons and Equipment Development Committee, the group recommended that “the possibilities of an attack on the food supplies of S-E Asia and Indonesia using B.W. agents should be considered by a small study group.”
The anthrax attacks that occurred shortly after 9/11 have exposed the underbelly of this system, along with the murder of Dr. David Kelly in 2003. Investigative journalist and film maker Bob Coen examined the anthrax case and concluded that an “international biological weapons mafia” is operating in total secrecy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaD0g2T3o-M
How can such a vast project go seemingly un-noticed? Why don’t I know about this?
The professional classes of society have largely been schooled and specialized to a degree that limits their perspective on the full spectrum view of society; That is, until they are “brought into the fold.” This is not by accident or happenstance. Just as Vannevar Bush desired rule by the “…well-to-do and highly educated,” Bertrand Russel, in his 1954 book The Scientific Outlook writes,
“…the scientific rulers will provide one kind of education for ordinary men and women, and another for those who are to become holders of scientific power. Ordinary men and women will be expected to be docile, industrious, punctual, thoughtless, and contented.”
To a great extent we are facing an open conspiracy, which H. G. Wells aptly named one of his many books. Herein lies one of our greatest challenges. We are not facing a clear and present danger that would normally trigger natural human instinct to fight back. It is a creeping death that is subtly eroding the human species.
Re: What pro- and anti-vax dichotomy leaves out... safe and unsafe vaccines
As Moderna’s Covid-19 Vaccine Takes The Lead, Its Chief Medical
Officer’s Recent Promotion of “Gene-Editing Vaccines” Comes to Light
Moderna’s chief medical officer has described the company’s products as “hacking the software of life” and permanently altering a person’s genetic code. If Moderna is poised to bring the first Covid-19 vaccine to market, a deeper look at his comments and his employer are warranted.
More and more frequently, government officials, political pundits and self-appointed “global health experts” like billionaire Bill Gates have been instructing the public that mass gatherings and any semblance of “normalcy” will not return until a vaccine for the novel coronavirus Covid-19 is created and subsequently distributed to the masses. In recent weeks, it has quickly become apparent that the leading Covid-19 vaccine candidate is the messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine being developed by Boston-based Moderna Inc.
Today, Moderna announced that its vaccine candidate, named mRNA-1273, “appeared to produce an immune response in eight people who received it.” Moderna’s response is odd given that the “study” in question is focused on safety and “is actually not designed to measure effectiveness of the vaccine,” according to a report in TIME.Notably, none of the study’s findings on vaccine safety were reported aside from claims it was “generally safe.” It is also worth noting that this “safety-focused” study only began in March and thus, to date, represents only an examination of the vaccine’s effects in the very short term.
Major media outlets in multiple countries ran with the headlines trumpeting that Moderna’s Covid-19 vaccine “shows promising early results” and has presented “encouraging early signs” because of its purported ability to produce Covid-19 antibodies in humans. In addition, these media reports failed to raise other simple yet necessary questions such as how a sample size of only eight people can translate into scientific findings of any real significance without further testing involving larger sample sizes. They also failed to note that the study in question is not even finished as a U.S. government press release noted that the findings in question are merely “interim results.” In addition, the study is being led by the U.S.’ National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), itself headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci, who is a key figure in the U.S. government’s coronavirus response.
Though it is unclear if these “encouraging early signs” will be replicated in future tests of larger samples that are actually designed to test the vaccine’s effectiveness, the news is surely welcome to Moderna, given that their past mRNA vaccines failed to produce hardly any immune response at all, explaining why the company has never brought an mRNA vaccine to market in its entire history as a company.
However, since at least last fall, Moderna has sought to resolve this issue by adding “nanoparticles” to its mRNA vaccine, a modification financed by the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). Moderna is a “strategic ally” of DARPA and has received millions from DARPA and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation several years prior to the current coronavirus crisis. DARPA’s plans for nanoparticles and nanotechnology and their potentially Orwellian applications were the subject of a recent The Last American Vagabond report.
Thanks to the “interim results” of this new study, Moderna is set to take the lead in the race to gain government approval for a Covid-19 vaccine. Moderna had already pulled ahead of other Covid-19 vaccine candidates in recent weeks, being the first vaccine in the U.S. to go the human trials (after it was allowed to skip animal trials) and also enjoying strong support from the U.S. government. For instance, Moderna’s Covid-19 vaccine recently received fast-track approval from the Food and Drug administration (FDA) after receiving the “green light” to proceed to Phase 2 testing prior to the results of Phase 1 being published. Moderna’s president, Dr. Stephen Hoge, recently said the company now expects to begin the final third phase of testing sometime this summer.
In addition to support from the FDA, Moderna has also received considerable U.S. government funding ($438 million) from the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), a division of HHS overseen by HHS’ Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR) Robert Kadlec. Moderna has also stated that it is directly collaborating with the U.S. government to bring its vaccine candidate to market.
Moderna’s considerable lead has also been the result of backing that it received in January from the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), which was founded in 2017 by the governments of Norway and India along with the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Moderna’s Covid-19 vaccine has also received additional millions from long-time Moderna backer Bill Gates. Gates recently authored an article where he described Moderna’s mRNA vaccine for Covid-19 as the “most exciting” and discussed it at length.
Re: What pro- and anti-vax dichotomy leaves out... safe and unsafe vaccines
COVID-19 Coronavirus: Scripted by the CDC in 2003? Dead Zone Plague
By Bill Sardi
Global Research, May 22, 2020
LewRockwell.com
Deadzone (2003, Screenplay Stephen King, Jeffrey Boam): When Johnny Smith (Christopher Walken) awakens from a coma caused by a car accident, he finds that years have passed, and he now has psychic abilities. Heartbroken that his girlfriend (Brooke Adams) has moved on with her life, Johnny also must contend with his unsettling powers, which allow him to see a person’s future with a mere touch.
Storyline
While at a school science fair, Johnny gets a disturbing vision of a group of children getting extremely ill. Johnny persuades Walt to quarantine the building and eventually the children begin to get sick. Johnny realizes that without his help the children will die, including JJ. With the assistance of Rev. Purdy, Johnny must help Walt and the local health inspector, Jim Pratt, try to identify as well as find the source of the mysterious virus before it kills off the entire town.
This is a clip summarizing a 2003 episode of a TV show called Dead Zone, the episode name is plague. During the episode, someone takes a flight in from China into the US and they come down with an unknown virus. After identifying the virus as a SARS related Coronavirus, one doctor figures out that they can stop the Coronavirus dead in its tracks using a malaria drug called Chloroquine. The writers have claimed that the information and research used to make this episode came directly from the CDC in 2003. Did the CDC know something in 2003 that they are not telling us now?
