Back to School Pesticide concerns
https://www.waccobb.net/forums/wacco...4_15-56-29.png
Close to Home: Back to school pesticide concerns
by MEGAN KAUN AND NICHOLE WARWICK
Megan Kaunis on the board of sonoma county conservation action.
Nichole Warwick is executive director of families advocating for chemical & toxic safety
September 2, 2018, Press Democrat
We live in a beautiful region with idyllic farms and open space. This is a right-to-farm county, so we accept the inconveniences from farm operations — strong smells, bright lights, loud noises, etc. It’s a small price to pay to live in a rural community. However, being exposed to toxic chemicals from pesticide drift is an entirely different matter.
New information about agricultural pesticide use near schools has been released by the state Department of Pesticide Regulation for about 100 public schools and preschools in Sonoma County. This data shows that many toxic pesticides are being used in close proximity to schools. It also provides us an opportunity to engage in an informed conversation with schools and farmers.
Vineyards dominate agriculture near schools, and the vast majority of Sonoma County vineyard land is managed using synthetic pesticides. Though the Sonoma County Winegrowers Association has a goal of certifying all vineyards “Sonoma Sustainable” by 2019, certification doesn’t require vineyards to reduce pesticide use.
Pesticides, including weedkillers, insecticides and fungicides are used commonly by farms in Sonoma County. Synthetic pesticides are long-lasting toxicants in the environment and are linked to many human health problems. Though the top five pesticides applied in Sonoma County are sulfur, mineral oil, adjuvants and surfactants, enough “bad actor” pesticides are being used to warrant concern. The Pesticide Action Network’s “bad actor” pesticides are known carcinogens, reproductive or developmental toxicants and neurotoxins — chemicals that should never be used near kids.
The most commonly used herbicide in Sonoma County is glyphosate, a synthetic weedkiller found in products like Roundup. The World Health Organization has said that glyphosate probably causes cancer in humans.
Children are particularly vulnerable to the impacts of toxic exposure, including lower IQs, birth defects, developmental delays, autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and cancer. Immediate effects of pesticide exposure can mimic allergies or infections and include headaches, difficulty breathing, dizziness or confusion, unusual behaviors and sensory sensitivities.
It’s worrisome that Sonoma County has the third-highest childhood cancer rate among California’s 58 counties, according to the Lucile Packard Foundation for Children’s Health. (Humboldt is first, Solano is second, and Sonoma is tied with Napa for third.)
New state regulations protect children by prohibiting fumigants and sprayed pesticides within a quarter-mile of a school during school hours. Farmers must also disclose to schools which pesticides may be used during the year. These rules fall short in protecting children from exposures outside of school hours and from pesticide drift beyond a quarter-mile.
Pesticides applied to crops, especially sprayed pesticides can drift a mile or more. Research has shown that 95 percent to 98 percent of applied pesticides can miss their intended mark. Drifting pesticides are often invisible and odorless, and they can be present for weeks or months.
Though farms and schools aren’t required to tell families what pesticides may be used nearby, we think you have a right to know. The data has been made available at conservationaction.org/schoolbuffer.
Sonoma County Conservation Action launched its campaign for a toxic-free future last year to get pesticides out of public spaces. Since then, Santa Rosa City Schools and the city of Santa Rosa have stopped using synthetic weedkillers, and Sonoma County agencies have made strides to decrease pesticide use. With new school buffer- zone rules and increased awareness around the dangers of pesticide drift, it’s time to start reducing pesticide use around schools where our children may be exposed.
Megan Kaun, an environmental engineer, is on the board of Sonoma County Conservation Action. Nichole Warwick is executive director of Families Advocating for Chemical & Toxic Safety and an expressive arts educator at the Reach Charter School in Sebastopol.
Re: Back to School Pesticide concerns
While children have not fully developed their detox genes and are "the canaries in the mine", I want to remind everyone that the adult cancer and all leukemia rates are much higher than the national average as well. The greenwashing PR campaign that the wine industry has done the last few years has been so successful that we are actually losing acreage of organic & biodynamic wines grapes.
Pam Strayer has recently written an expose on some of the offenders: "The Dark Side of Sonoma's Sustainability Movement: No to Organics, Deep Deception…".
Link to expose article
Re: Back to School Pesticide concerns
" the adult cancer and all leukemia rates are much higher than the national average,,, " This is dynamite information for use in the organic viticulture campaign! Can you link to the source of the info - so that it can be used in getting the word out?
Thanks for your work.
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by O.W.:
While children have not fully developed their detox genes and are "the canaries in the mine", I want to remind everyone that the adult cancer and all leukemia rates are much higher than the national average as well. ...
Re: Back to School Pesticide concerns
Luke 32, I heard this at a recent lecture at Copperfield's a few weeks ago when the book, "What's making our Children Sick" by Dr. Michele Perro and Dr. Vincanne Adams was being promoted. There were also several medical professionals in the audience. I went and did alittle research and found plenty of articles on death rates but not cancer diagnosis rates which were stated at the lecture. More cancers are being "cured" now.
I highly suggest you go to the states pesticide mapping tool and see the carcinogens used in all areas of Sonoma County, very easy to use. You'll be surprised at areas you thought were fairly untouched are doused in pesticides and follow the vineyards.
I've asked around to others at the lecture if they know where that statement came from so will try to answer your question. The authors of the book call our industrial food system slow genocide and claim the new normal is sick. As I read the book I will be on the look out for that statement! Fabulous book by the way and has solutions for the toxics we are being dosed with daily. Some of their stories about children in Sonoma County were tear jerkers. "Sustainable Sonoma" is nothing more than a very sad, calloused greenwashing PR slogan and we all pay the price for their more than 2 million pounds of chemicals that are used in the vineyards yearly.
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by luke32:
" the adult cancer and all leukemia rates are much higher than the national average,,, " This is dynamite information for use in the organic viticulture campaign! Can you link to the source of the info - so that it can be used in getting the word out?
Thanks for your work.
Re: Back to School Pesticide concerns
To someone "in the middle" re pesticide dangers, not totally convinced, throwing out unsubstantiated statements like " want to remind everyone that the adult cancer and all leukemia rates are much higher than the national average as well. ..." does more harm than good. We (I'm all in favor of much less pesticide use) need to be careful of how we throw around data and charges. To those looking for ammunition to label those in favor of more restricted use of pesticides as "whacko lefties", or similar, statements that can't be substantiated are great ammunition.
End of lecture.
