Reuters on "Water Wars in California's Coastal Wine Industry
I received the following link from Bryan Cooper, who is a wine industry insider at the Sonoma Wine Shop, which has 4,500+ members.
He is one of the increasing number of people within the industry who feels a need to question its over-expansion as event centers in rural areas, especially with respect to the huge Dairyman Winery proposed for Highway 12. The link is to an article from Reuters, an international news agency. The article itself also follows at the bottom. The water hoarding by California's Big Wine is now an international story. We intend to make what is currently happening on the North Coast into an international story, unless Big Wine backs off.
In 2001 Big Wine threatened our homes and farms with spraying deadly pesticides on us, without our permission, in fear of the arrival of the glassy-winged sharpshooter pest attacking their mono-crop. We attracted CBS TV's "60 Minutes" here. We eventually sat down with wine industry representatives and came to a compromise, which included their agreement not to spray.
Shepherd Bliss
--
Bryan Cooper - https://www.sonomawineshop.com
https://www.waccobb.net/forums/wacco...9_12-07-15.png
US | Fri Jun 19, 2015
Water wars in California's coastal wine country
PASO ROBLES, CA | BY LISA BAERTLEIN
By most measures, California's Central Coast wine industry is thriving.
Between 1990 and 2014, harvested wine grape acreage in the growing region around Paso Robles nearly quintupled to 37,408 acres, as vintners discovered that the area's rolling hills, rocky soil and mild climate were perfect for coaxing rich, sultry flavors from red wine grapes.
Wines from the region, located midway between San Francisco and Los Angeles, have won the kind of international acclaim once reserved for California's more famous growing areas of Napa and Sonoma. And in 2010, a red blend from Paso Robles' Saxum Vineyards was awarded one of winemaking’s highest honors when Wine Spectator magazine named it the worldwide "wine of the year."
But in the last few years, California's ongoing drought has hit the region hard, reducing grape yields and depleting the vast aquifer that most of the area’s vineyards and rural residents rely on as their sole source of water other than rain. Across the region, residential and vineyard wells have gone dry. Those who can afford to – including a number of large wineries and growers – have drilled ever-deeper wells, igniting tensions and leading some to question whether Paso Robles' burgeoning wine industry is sustainable.
"All of our water is being turned purple and shipped out of here in green glass," said Cam Berlogar, who delivers water, cuts custom lumber and sells classic truck parts in the Paso Robles-area community of Creston.
Unlike other states that treat groundwater as a shared resource subject to regulation and monitoring, California's Gold Rush-era rules have generally allowed property owners to drill wells on their land and suck out as much water as they want.
"It's a matter of who has the longest straw at the bottom of the bucket," said Berlogar. The water level in his own 57-foot well has dropped 40 feet over the last six to seven years.
In August 2013, in response to the crisis, San Luis Obispo County supervisors passed a moratorium on new vineyards and other water-dependent projects. But the two-year ban, which will expire this summer, did not apply to projects already in the works, and so grape acreage has continued to expand.
Richard Sauret, a longtime resident who grows award-winning Zinfandel grapes, has a reputation for conserving water in his hilltop Paso Robles vineyards. Still, he relies on water pumped from the aquifer when he needs to irrigate, and he worries about that resource running out.
"There is way too much demand. I blame a lot of vineyards like other people do," said Sauret. "There are a lot of farmers who are going to have to farm with a hell of a lot less water."
CHANGE IS COMING
Spurred by the drought, California Governor Jerry Brown last year signed a package of bills requiring groundwater-dependent areas to establish local water sustainability agencies by 2017. The agencies will then have between three and five years to adopt water management plans, and then another two decades to implement those plans.
Some residents worry that Paso Robles can't wait that long.
Aquifer depletion is difficult to model, but one report for the county of San Luis Obispo projected that, even with no additional growth, the water drawn from the basin would exceed that going in by 1.8 billion gallons annually between 2012 and 2040.
"If it goes on unmanaged for another 10 years, it could reach a point where we couldn't correct it," said Hilary Graves, who makes wine under the Mighty Nimble brand.
Graves is a fourth-generation farmer whose ancestors came to California as migrant workers after losing everything during the Dust Bowl.
"I would like to not have to retrace my family's footsteps back to Oklahoma and Arkansas," said Graves.
WATER FIGHT
If most residents agree that there is a crisis, they are far from agreeing on how to address it.
In a divisive 3-to-2 vote, county supervisors recently decided to move forward on creating a new water district that will be governed by an elected nine-member board.
But many long-time residents and some of the region’s winemakers worry that large, well-funded newcomers will spend freely to get sympathetic board members elected and then stick local landowners with huge bills for infrastructure projects that disproportionately benefit the larger players.
Susan Harvey, a rural homeowner and president of the non-profit North County Watch, called the model for the proposed district "we pay, they pump."
The residents are particularly concerned about politically connected and deep-pocketed new arrivals, including Harvard University, which has invested more than $60 million of endowment funds in the purchase of about 10,000 acres in Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo counties, and Stewart and Lynda Resnick, the Beverly Hills billionaires behind FIJI Water and the Wonderful brand of pomegranate, citrus and nut products.
The Resnicks’ company bought Paso Robles' Justin Vineyards & Winery in 2010 and two years later purchased a 740-acre ranch that had been dry-farmed before it was converted to irrigated vineyards.
Jennifer George, a spokeswoman for Justin's parent company, Wonderful, said the winery's new vineyards have been planted with grapes that take less water, and that the company will eventually transition to dry farming the land. Harvard declined to comment for this story.
'PICK YOUR POISON'
Fifth-generation farmer Cindy Steinbeck, of Steinbeck Vineyards & Winery, helped found Protect Our Water Rights (POWR), one of several groups that have sprung up around the region’s water issues, and is deeply skeptical about a new water agency. Her group is urging land-owners to join a quiet title action to protect their water rights, and would rather see the courts oversee any plan to manage the basin’s water.
"We are fighting the big boys," said Steinbeck, who says her goal is to prevent family farmers from being pushed out of Paso Robles.
The region will be "an important test case for how other highly-stressed groundwater basins might introduce new regional oversight," said Jay Famiglietti, senior water scientist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
The Paso Robles Agricultural Alliance for Groundwater Solutions (PRAAGS) has been the driving force behind the district. Its board includes a representative from J. Lohr Vineyards & Wines, and at least one director affiliated with Harvard's property interests in the area.
Other district supporters include Justin Vineyards and County Supervisor Frank Mecham, who voted to establish the new agency.
Mecham says he understands residents’ concerns about it, but he also understands the need for water management. Mecham’s great, great grandfather lost his cattle ranch in the area to a drought.
"This is the cold, hard reality: You will be managed one way or another. You’ve got to pick your poison," he said.
(Reporting by Lisa Baertlein; Additional reporting by Richard Valdmanis in Boston; Editing by Sue Horton)
Re: Reuters on "Water Wars in California's Coastal Wine Industry
There is a lot going on in this county where big business is 'investing' in larger and larger facilities to gain some sort of upper hand in the distribution game. I am again offering Joe Wagner and his family to sit down to discuss how they can redo their Dairyman application. I believe a much smaller winery on site is appropriate, and would help Joe look for a larger industrial site, with Water Agency supplied water and sewer.
This approach would allow for in-county processing of the 300,000 cases of Sonoma County wine ALREADY being produced for their various labels, give us a winery with appropriate visual scaling on Hwy 12, and provide for water management without draining the Laguna aquifer. I would also like to connect their business with other wineries who have done major work on reducing winery water usage.
There is alot more on my mind about the county zoning and do not feel the current Ag Land Intensive zoning is appropriate for industrial sized processing. There are dozens of similar properties in the county, with many adjoining this specific parcel. The county cannot allow Dairyman to start a process which will turn the Laguna into a giant grape processing zone, let alone an entertainment zone. The casino is one example of oversized building that is now here to stay. Dairyman could open the door to dozens of similar large scale plants.
But if Dairyman was resized to 10-20,000 cases (as is the norm for many country side wineries), and put the bulk of its (290,000 cases of other labels) wine production into an industrial park, I believe the west county would welcome the new neighbor. Limited events and safe access would complete the picture. Dairyman could be an example of working together to right size the industry and keep the work of processing these additional Sonoma County grapes here in county. An industrial version could be granted with a much larger case load, allowing business growth if water and sewer capacity is available.
J winery was just purchased for maybe $90 million, $60 million of which is due to the facility, existing brand, AND its underutilized 500,000 case permit. I believe Dairyman's 'cost' to be very low compared to this potential upside of production. Yet the cost of creating an industrial version elsewhere would/could/should be much cheaper and obviate the need for most of the current EIR needs and their overpriced consultants.
What I feel Joe Wagner needs to understand is that there is an issue that people have to spend time and effort trying to influence the final decision, and we have limited time, effort and money to be used. We see the current Dairyman proposal as taking too much community effort and time and conflict in its current configuration.
We would MUCH see Joe rather restart with a small winery, large industrial building elsewhere in the county near other industrial buildings (ala 8th STreet in Sonoma), and not have this HUGE project forced on us every time we drive down Hwy 12. (Think of the golf driving ranges put up on Hwy 12 in Santa Rosa - which fortunately have now come down. ) Dairyman would be a massive visual statement vs the many see-through ag buildings/dairies/chicken coops normally 'blocking' our view.
Allowing Dairyman at anywhere near this scale on this parcel is, in short, a disservice to Bill Kortum who recently passed, and helped keep Sonoma rural with appropriate land use planning.
https://www.pressdemocrat.com/busine...j-gallo-buying
Re: Reuters on "Water Wars in California's Coastal Wine Industry
the problem with your suggestion is that hooking up to public sewer and water in sonoma county is very expensive, especially for a large water intensive production facility. santa rosa wanted 7mil for water from amys for their new plant. plan canceled. thats why dairyman wants to use undersite groundwater, the last cheap water available around here. there is still an argument to made that the santa rosa plain aquifer is not (drought excepted), being overdrafted. to the east the sonoma and napa watersheds clearly are. the water agency delivery capacity is over subscribed for the summer months, thats why they need the big bucks to hookup. its expensive figuring out how to get more water out of lake sonoma to sonoma and marin county.
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by Bryan:
...
But if Dairyman was resized to 10-20,000 cases (as is the norm for many country side wineries), and put the bulk of its (290,000 cases of other labels) wine production into an industrial park, I believe the west county would welcome the new neighbor. ...
