2 Attachment(s)
thinking about getting a flu shot? The CDC has now openly admitted this year's flu vaccin
https://www.naturalnews.com/047890_f...cal_fraud.html
(NaturalNews) The following video from Gary Franchi of NextNewsNetwork reveals the shocking admission by the CDC that this year's flu vaccine doesn't work.
From the video:
For the first time we can remember, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are going on the record, saying the flu vaccine won't work this year. The warning comes just before the busiest part of flu season, in January and February. Unfortunately, there won't be any refund for any of the patients or insurance companies who spent money on flu shots earlier this fall.
But don't worry. Just when you thought perhaps the CDC could boost their credibility, they found a way to put a sales pitch on the end of their warning. The CDC says if you do come down with the flu, there's a cure. It's just going to cost more money. Money that will end up profiting pharmaceutical giants, GlaxoSmithKline and Roche. CDC officials are urging doctors to prescribe two specific antiviral medications for any patients who come in with flu symptoms.
Just last week, the CDC issued a warning, prompting Americans to take the flu vaccine if they haven't already. Health officials said they had 160 million flu shots on the shelves and ready to go. But just earlier this week, Italy launched an official investigation after about a dozen people died within 48 hours of getting the flu shot. Their national health agency issued an immediate warning, saying DON'T take the vaccine. Here in America, the CDC isn't going that far. In fact, they found a way of turning this failed vaccine into a promotion for yet another big pharma drug.
Here's the news report viewo:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6cVeHUvlmY
And here's an original laboratory research report from Natural News earlier this year. I personally conducted the ICP-MS heavy metals analysis of these flu vaccines and have the raw count data to prove it. Mercury particle counts at atomic masses 200, 201 and 202 were through the roof on these laboratory tests.
Don't you find it astonishing that it takes a private ICP-MS laboratory with no ties to government funding, universities or the FDA to finally test flu vaccines and report the truth? (To my knowledge, Natural News is the only news organization in the world that owns a cutting-edge private mass spectrometry instrument and uses it for scientific research in the public interest...)
Flashback: Flu vaccines laboratory confirmed to contain crazy high concentrations of mercury
Mercury tests conducted on vaccines at the Natural News Forensic Food Lab have revealed a shockingly high level of toxic mercury in an influenza vaccine (flu shot) made by GlaxoSmithKline (lot #9H2GX). Tests conducted via ICP-MS document mercury in the Flulaval vaccine at a shocking 51 parts per million, or over 25,000 times higher than the maximum contaminant level of inorganic mercury in drinking water set by the EPA.(1)
The tests were conducted via ICP-MS using a 4-point mercury calibration curve for accuracy. Even then, the extremely high level of mercury found in this flu shot was higher than anything we've ever tested, including tuna and ocean fish which are known for high mercury contamination.
In fact, the concentration of mercury found in this GSK flu shot was 100 times higher than the highest level of mercury we've ever tested in contaminated fish. And yet vaccines are injected directly into the body, making them many times more toxic than anything ingested orally. As my previous research into foods has already documented, mercury consumed orally is easily blocked by eating common foods like strawberries or peanut butter, both of which bind with and capture about 90% of dietary mercury.
Here are the actual results of what we found in the influenza vaccine from GSK (lot #9H2GX):
Aluminum: 0.4 ppm
Arsenic: zero
Cadmium: zero
Lead: zero
Mercury: 51 ppm
All tests were conducted via calibrated, high-end ICP-MS instrumentation as shown in these lab videos.
Doctors, pharmacists and mainstream media continue to lie about mercury in vaccines
As you take in the scientifically-validated fact that mercury exists at very high concentrations in flu vaccines, keep in mind that most doctors, pharmacists and members of the mainstream media continue to stage an elaborate lie that claims mercury has "already been removed from vaccines."
Never mind the fact that the use of mercury is admitted right on the package containing the vaccine vial. And now, Natural News has scientifically confirmed the mercury content of flu vaccines using high-end laboratory instrumentation. The existence of high mercury in flu shots is irrefutable.
Anyone who claims mercury has been removed from all vaccines is either wildly ignorant or willfully lying. And anyone who would knowingly allow themselves to be injected with mercury is probably already a victim of the kind of brain damage well known to be caused by mercury.
Insert admits "no controlled trials"
Shockingly, the package insert for this flu shot readily admits the vaccine has never been subjected to scientific clinical trials:
"There have been no controlled trials adequately demonstrating a decrease in influenza disease after vaccination with Flulaval," the package insert claims in tiny text (that no one reads).
This is printed right on the insert, yet no one in the mainstream media will ever report this astonishing admission. This statement, all by itself, is a confession that flu shot marketing is a fraud.
Across the board, flu shots are heavily propagandized and promoted with the implication that they have zero risks while offering 100% protection. No one in the mainstream media ever questions this claim even though the package insert openly admits the claim is complete hokum and has never been subjected to scientific scrutiny.
No evidence of safety or effectiveness in pregnant women
But that's not all the insert admits. It also says:
"Safety and effectiveness of Flulaval have not been established in pregnant women, nursing mothers or children."
And yet everywhere you go in America, there's a Walgreens, CVS or Wal-Mart pharmacy promoting flu shots for pregnant women. Never mind the fact that flu shot safety has never been established in pregnant women, and never mind the obvious fact that you should never inject a pregnant women with mercury in the first place!
Who needs scientific proof when you've got the full propaganda of the media and the government to back you up? Anyone who dares question the scientific validity of flu shot safety for pregnant women is immediately attacked as being an opponent of all vaccines.
Apparently, the only requirement to be accepted by the vaccine community is to believe in medical fairy tales while abandoning all critical thinking and scientific skepticism. In the vaccine industry, genuine science is simply not allowed. No wonder two former Merck virologists filed a False Claims Act with the federal government, accusing the company of knowingly fabricating its vaccine efficacy data to trick the FDA.
Never proven safe or effective in children, either
Flu shots are heavily promoted for children, right alongside mumps and measles vaccines. But it turns out flu shots are never scientifically tested for safety or efficacy in children.
Check out what the insert for this vaccine directly admits:
"Safety and effectiveness of Flulaval in pediatric patients have not been established."
It's right there in black and white... an open admission. Yet flu shots are aggressively marketed to parents and children as if they were Tic-Tacs. The real beauty of the entire vaccine industry scam is that no scientific evidence is required! You don't have to have any proof, all you have to do is believe in vaccines as a matter of faith.
Never tested for cancer risk
Do flu shots cause cancer? The honest, scientific answer is that these shots are never tested for that. As the insert readily admits:
"Flulaval has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility."
Believe it or not, the Flulaval vaccine also warns that no one should be given this shot if they've already received another flu shot at some previous time:
"Do not administer Flulaval to anyone... following previous administration of any influenza vaccine."
And yet, amazingly, people are encouraged to get flu shots year after year, even though the package insert directly warns against anyone taking a series of influenza vaccines.
Admission that flu shots contain formaldehyde and sodium deoxycholate
The same insert that admits this vaccine has never been proven safe in children or pregnant women also openly admits that it contains neurotoxic chemicals.
Per the insert, each dose of Flulaval contains up to 25 mcg of formaldehyde (a neurotoxin) and up to 50 mcg of sodium deoxycholate.
This is on top of the 25 mcg of mercury you'll get in every dose. And remember, this is mercury that's injected directly into your body, so you absorb 100% of this mercury (unlike mercury you eat, where most of it sticks to food fibers and is transported out of your body).
Total admission that flu shots cause seizures, convulsions and Guillian-Barre syndrome
Ever wonder what all these toxic chemicals and heavy metals cause in humans? Flu shots vaccines, it turns out, are already known to cause a huge number of devastating health effects.
Predictably, there is a massive disinfo campaign across the mainstream media, Wikipedia, medical journals and government propaganda agencies (CDC, FDA, etc.) to pretend that flu shots have no risks whatsoever. Yet the insert that comes with the vaccine openly admits the flu shot has been linked with a long, frightening list of serious adverse effects. As this Flulaval insert says (see photo below):
"In addition to reports in clinical trials, the following adverse events have been identified during postapproval use of Flulaval...
vomiting
chest pain
allergic edema of the mouth
anaphylaxis
laryngitis
cullulitis
muscle weakness
arthritis
dizziness
paresthesia
tremor
somnolence
Guillian-Barre syndrome
convulsions / seizures
facial or cranial nerve paralysis
encephalopathy
limb paralysis
insomnia
dyspnea
sweating"
Here's a photo of this section of the package insert, complete with the GlaxoSmithKline toll-free phone number:
If you take flu shots, you are being poisoned by quacks
The upshot of all this is that flu shots utterly lack any scientific evidence of safety of efficacy. We don't know if they work at all, in other words, and neither does the vaccine manufacturer. Neither do the doctors or medical staff who administer them. Flu vaccines are injected into people purely as a matter of blind faith in the very same companies that have already been convicted of felony crimes.
GlaxoSmithKline, for example, not only manufacturers this Flulaval vaccine... the company also committed multiple felony crimes and got caught bribing doctors, ultimately agreeing to pay a multi-billion-dollar criminal settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice.
Trusting a flu shot made by a corporation of felons is a lot like trusting the purity of heroin you buy from a street dealer. Both flu shots and street heroin have at least one thing in common, by the way: neither has ever been tested for safety.
We also know that flu shots contain neurotoxic chemicals and heavy metals in alarming concentrations. This is irrefutable scientific fact. We also know that there is no "safe" form of mercury just like there is no safe form of heroin -- all forms of mercury are highly toxic when injected into the body (ethyl, methyl, organic, inorganic).
The only people who argue with this are those who are already mercury poisoned and thus incapable of rational thought. Mercury damages brain function, you see, which is exactly what causes some people to be tricked into thinking vaccines are safe and effective.
Technically, you'd have to be stupid to believe such a thing, as the vaccine insert directly tells you precisely the opposite.
Share this story, spread the truth
Share this story with everyone who needs to know the truth about flu vaccines. This message needs to get out. Every fact stated in this article is 100% true and verified. The quotes from the Flulaval package insert are on-the-record statements from GlaxoSmithKline.
And for the record, I am not an opponent of the theory of vaccination. What I'm against is the continued use of toxic heavy metals and chemicals in vaccines. I'm also opposed to the wildly fraudulent marketing of vaccines. If any other product were marketed with the same lies and deceptions as vaccines, they would be immediately charged with fraud and misrepresentation by the FTC. But somehow when the vaccine industry commits routine fraud, everybody pretends it isn't happening.
Even with all the marketing fraud taking place, if the vaccine manufacturers would stop poisoning the population with vaccine additives (by removing mercury, formaldehyde and other chemicals from their products), nearly all opposition to vaccines would rapidly disappear.
Sources for this story include:
(1) https://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basi...
(2) https://vaccines.naturalnews.com
Re: thinking about getting a flu shot? The CDC has now openly admitted this year's flu va
Thank you so much for sharing this information. I've never had a flu or pneumonia shot, based only on my intuition that it wasn't for me. Every time my doctor asks me about it, I smile, and say "You know it's against my religion."
During my entire lifetime, I've been fortunate to have had only a handful of colds, and even less with flu. The worst case I had was when I worked around small children in the early 90's. I ended up in emergency, and had to return due to my reaction to the sulfa drugs. It was a very memorable and expensive flu in many ways, since I didn't have insurance and lost a lot of time from work. In the wake of the typical ugly symptoms, I had a constant dry cough that erupted every other minute. It was pretty crazy, and lasted for weeks.
My last flu was about 4 years ago, and it lasted about 3 days. During the "flu season" when the weather tends to be cold, I always wear winter gloves when I go grocery shopping. It can be a nuisance because I have to remove them in the produce section to bag things, but it's worth it. I think they do protect me to a certain degree, in addition to having a strong immune system.
The tough thing about standing in line to check out, is when someone sneezes or coughs without covering their mouth. When they do cover their mouth with their hand, it makes me realize that those same people have been touching things all over the store with that hand. It really increases awareness of the invisible threats to our health to see stuff like that.
I shudder in disgust when they make no effort to cover their mouth at all, and subject anyone close by.... to those nasty little germs. My gloves won't help in that case, so my next trick might be to wear a mask to the grocery store. Maybe people will avoid me, thinking I might infect them. Recently I saw a woman wearing a mask at a large gathering, but she removed it about half way through the event, while she was talking with someone at a close distance. My imagination went wild when I saw that. Hey, a woman can change her mind, after all!
I'm emailing this information to my doctor, and wonder if she'll read it. Since she's at Kaiser, she may have to curtail her true response, but at least she'll have the information.
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by Jude Iam:
Re: thinking about getting a flu shot? The CDC has now openly admitted this year's flu va
In the interest of accurate reporting I believe the CDC said this years shot would be only 50% effective because one of the flu strains in the shot mutated. Flu shots are developed months ahead of time because it takes that long to get them to market in quantity. Flu annually kills 20,000 to 40,000 people in U.S. mostly children and the elderly.
The mercury levels need to be dealt with but lets compare it to fish. A one cc injection weighs about 1 gram. A half pound of fish is 227 grams and we are talking parts per million not total weight so a level 227 times higher in the injection would be the same as a half pound of contaminated fish. Now this is something I would still avoid but the shot is an annual event not like eating fish which we may do 50 to 100 times a year or more.
The Odds: If roughly 30,000 people die in a nation of lets say 300 million then the odds of one person dieing are 1 in 10,000. Now if you take that out over 50 years that brings the odds to 1 in 200 that you will die from the flu. And that,s not including the week or two of misery if you catch it but it's non life threatening. Truth is the flu is second only to driving as the most dangerous thing the average person experiences. So shot or not wash your hands often especially if you shake someones hand or are in out in public a lot. Hand cream disinfectants do nothing since flus and colds are virus. Disinfectants only work on bacteria. Good Luck to All no matter how you place your bet. Gene.
Re: thinking about getting a flu shot? The CDC has now openly admitted this year's flu va
Thank you also for this post. I never post here, but feel compelled to reply to this. As a part-time healthcare worker I have the right to refuse the vaccine, but if I do I must do so in writing stating my objection, and I am required to wear a mask when "in any patient area" during the entire flu season. This is law in Marin county, not sure about Sonoma but have been told this when interviewing with Sutter here in Santa Rosa. I am willing to do this (wear a mask), rather than allowing any kind of corporate entity injecting me with some unknown substance. And I dont believe it really does any good. People get sick anyway, flu shot or not.
In addition, I work in several different offices both here and in the bay area, and I have heard multiple reports from patients who have come in within 24 hours of receiving this year's flu shot who have gotten extremely ill from it, enough to seek a doctors visit.
Again, thanks for this post, if it does not deter people from getting the vaccine, it at least validates the concerns of those of us who refuse it.
Re: thinking about getting a flu shot? The CDC has now openly admitted this year's flu va
The former Chief Vaccine Office at the FDA, Dr. Anthony Morris states: “there is no evidence that any influenza vaccine thus far developed is effective in preventing or mitigating any attack of influenza.”
Dr. John Virapen (whistleblower and former manager of Eli Lilly and Company in Sweden) : The whole issue of clinical trials is a disgrace, riddled with corruption. The protocols are written by the pharmaceutical industry who manipulate so that results are favorable for themselves. Investigators are not required to register planned group and sub-group analyses. If a protocol is discontinued, the results don't have to be passed on to the regulatory authorities. But why are trials stopped? Because "there are difficulties”. One “difficulty” may be because some patients die.
Drug companies were not required to complete clinical trials before supplying new vaccines because there was not enough time between selecting new flu strains and manufacturing the vaccine. (Fluvax) https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/li...-1226625009991
Tamiflu Studies were ghostwritten
https://articles.latimes.com/2012/ja...miflu-20120115
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by Gene:
In the interest of accurate reporting I believe the CDC said this years shot would be only 50% effective because one of the flu strains in the shot mutated. Flu shots are developed months ahead of time because it takes that long to get them to market in quantity. Flu annually kills 20,000 to 40,000 people in U.S. mostly children and the elderly.
The mercury levels need to be dealt with but lets compare it to fish. A one cc injection weighs about 1 gram. A half pound of fish is 227 grams and we are talking parts per million not total weight so a level 227 times higher in the injection would be the same as a half pound of contaminated fish. Now this is something I would still avoid but the shot is an annual event not like eating fish which we may do 50 to 100 times a year or more.
The Odds: If roughly 30,000 people die in a nation of lets say 300 million then the odds of one person dieing are 1 in 10,000. Now if you take that out over 50 years that brings the odds to 1 in 200 that you will die from the flu. And that,s not including the week or two of misery if you catch it but it's non life threatening. Truth is the flu is second only to driving as the most dangerous thing the average person experiences. So shot or not wash your hands often especially if you shake someones hand or are in out in public a lot. Hand cream disinfectants do nothing since flus and colds are virus. Disinfectants only work on bacteria. Good Luck to All no matter how you place your bet. Gene.
Re: thinking about getting a flu shot? The CDC has now openly admitted this year's flu va
your stats are way out of line, for many reasons. here is just one from cdc itself;
(and only pharmaceutical lemmings believe the official drug pushers)
Does CDC think that influenza causes most P&I deaths?
No, only a small proportion of deaths in either of these two categories are estimated to be influenza-related. CDC estimated that only 8.5% of all pneumonia and influenza deaths and only 2.1% of all respiratory and circulatory deaths were influenza-related.
Re: thinking about getting a flu shot? The CDC has now openly admitted this year's flu va
Remember who is involved with company that makes Tamiflu? https://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/tamiflu.asp
Quote:
Posted in reply to the post by sharingwisdom:
The former Chief Vaccine Office at the FDA, Dr. Anthony Morris states: “there is no evidence that any influenza vaccine thus far developed is effective in preventing or mitigating any attack of influenza.”
Dr. John Virapen (whistleblower and former manager of Eli Lilly and Company in Sweden) : The whole issue of clinical trials is a disgrace, riddled with corruption. The protocols are written by the pharmaceutical industry who manipulate so that results are favorable for themselves. Investigators are not required to register planned group and sub-group analyses. If a protocol is discontinued, the results don't have to be passed on to the regulatory authorities. But why are trials stopped? Because "there are difficulties”. One “difficulty” may be because some patients die.
Drug companies were not required to complete clinical trials before supplying new vaccines because there was not enough time between selecting new flu strains and manufacturing the vaccine. (Fluvax) https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/li...-1226625009991
Tamiflu Studies were ghostwritten
https://articles.latimes.com/2012/ja...miflu-20120115
