Some Call For End To Religious Circumcisions After Baby Injured During Bris

The good news: more and more people are asking this question.
The bad news: we are well into the 21st century and we still have not answered this simple, obvious question.

The baby was not merely "injured." His penis was severed and had to be re-attached. Story includes an interview with Dr. Reiss of Doctors Opposing Circumcision and a rep from Intact America.
https://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2013...d-during-bris/

More good news: another mother wises up and realizes that she got fooled, and her sons paid the price. Now she educates other parents-to-be to keep their children whole.

"It took me several months before I was able to address what had happened to my son. As soon as I started researching, it became clear to me that I had been lied to. I cried for days. The emotional pain and regret I felt was so overwhelming I had to stop reading about circumcision for awhile. I turned to friends I knew had chosen not to circumcise for support. My sadness and regret eventually turned into motivation to share what I had uncovered; I continued to inform myself and became active in online parenting groups so that I could learn more and also help make the truth about circumcision accessible to people who wanted it."

https://motherwiselife.org/2013/01/3...-circumcision/

To say that a baby was injured during circumcision is an odd way to put it, as circumcision itself is injury.