Log In

View Full Version : India’s polio eradication campaign caused 47,500 cases of vaccine-induced polio paralysis



CSummer
08-31-2012, 11:09 PM
Perhaps those parents who refuse to allow their children to be vaccinated have good reason to do so!
"The principle of primum-non-nocere [First, do no harm] was violated.” Many of us would ask: So what's new?
(Ethics be damned, there's money to be made!)


By Dr. Mercola
Mercola.com
August 28 2012

Click for here for Source page (https://nhne-pulse.org/indias-2011-polio-eradication-campaign-caused-47500-cases-of-vaccine-induced-polio-paralysis/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+nhnepulse+%28NHNE+Pulse%29).

If you listen to mainstream media news, you’ll be told that polio has now been eradicated in India — an accomplishment the Polio Global Eradication Initiative (PGEI), founded in 1988 by the World Health Organization (WHO), Rotary International, UNICEF, and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), are attributing to the intense polio vaccination campaign.

The Indian government reportedly had 2.3 million vaccine administrators visit over 200 million households, with oral polio vaccinations given to nearly 170 million children 5 years of age and younger; health officials are now doubling their efforts to conquer polio in Pakistan as well.

What you’re NOT learning from the mainstream media, however, is that there’s a growing public movement fighting the profound misinformation about the vaccine, mainly because VACCINE-CAUSED polio is maiming and even killing a growing number of children every day, far outstripping the damage done by the wild-type polio that has been supplanted by the manmade form found within the vaccine.

The Polio Vaccine is Causing a Deadly Polio-Like Disease in Children

A paper published earlier this year in the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics should have made headlines around the globe, as it estimated there were 47,500 cases of a polio-like condition linked to the oral polio vaccine in 2011 alone.

Researchers reported:

“…while India has been polio-free for a year, there has been a huge increase in non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP). In 2011, there were an extra 47,500 new cases of NPAFP. Clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly, the incidence of NPAFP was directly proportional to doses of oral polio received. Though this data was collected within the polio surveillance system, it was not investigated. The principle of primum-non-nocere [First, do no harm] was violated.”

Another way the public is being misled about India’s claims to be polio-free is that this is only referring to “wild” polio cases — not vaccine-caused polio, which is occurring on a massive scale every year.

The problem is that while the oral vaccine has reined in wild polio, the wild virus is being replaced by vaccine-derived polio virus (VDPV), which causes the same symptoms of acute flaccid paralysis associated with classically-defined polio. (Health officials don’t call it polio because it isn’t “wild.”)

Environmental surveillance for VDPV is now being conducted in a number of countries, including Australia, Egypt, Haiti, and Indonesia. In essence, this much-heralded vaccine strategy has replaced one infectious disease with another, more virulent strain… What kind of success is that, really?


Third World Countries Using Dangerous and Dated Vaccines

While most affluent nations now rely on inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV), many third-world countries still use an oral polio vaccine as it’s far less expensive and simpler to administer. However, the oral polio vaccine is made from a live polio virus, which carries a risk of causing polio in populations who may not normally even be at risk of infection. The virus in the vaccine can also mutate into a deadlier version, igniting new outbreaks.

Genetic analysis has proven that such mutated viruses have caused at least seven separate outbreaks in Nigeria. Polio outbreaks in Haiti and the Dominican Republic in 2002 were also traced to an “attenuated” strain of oral polio vaccine (OPV) that mutated back to even greater virulence than wild polio.

According to a 2010 article in the New England Journal of Medicine, outbreaks of vaccine-derived polioviruses (VDPVs) have been occurring at a rate of once or twice per year, since the year 2000. And it’s estimated that up to 180 Indian children develop vaccine-associated polio paralysis (VAPP) each year.

The live polio virus from the vaccine can remain in your throat for one to two weeks, and in your feces for up to two months. So not only is the vaccine recipient at risk, but he or she can potentially spread the disease as long as the virus remains in feces — which, incidentally, turns on its head the age-old pro-vaccination dogma that the non-vaccinated represent an infection risk to the vaccinated.

. . . . Continues at source page (https://nhne-pulse.org/indias-2011-polio-eradication-campaign-caused-47500-cases-of-vaccine-induced-polio-paralysis/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+nhnepulse+%28NHNE+Pulse%29)

"Mad" Miles
09-01-2012, 02:43 PM
Consider the source (https://www.quackwatch.com/11Ind/mercola.html).

https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/joe-mercola-quackery-pays/

sharingwisdom
09-01-2012, 09:15 PM
Yes...about Dr. Gorski...https://www.whale.to/vaccine/orac.html...he's against all kinds and any kinds of alternatives and bashes other MD's who are into integrative alternatives...science based, no...ego based... And his ties to the vaccine/Big pharm industry...https://unmaskingorac.blogspot.com/2012_02_01_archive.html



Consider the source (https://www.quackwatch.com/11Ind/mercola.html).

https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/joe-mercola-quackery-pays/

rossmen
09-01-2012, 09:15 PM
actually the source for mercola's report seems quite legit. anybody, especially an md, who challenges the medical establishment will get slammed by medical skeptic sites at least, likely will also be subject to legal action. mercola seems to have taken the oath seriously, and is good at making money helping people heal themselves through supplements and healthy lifestyle choices. he is now targeted for elimination.



Consider the source (https://www.quackwatch.com/11Ind/mercola.html).

https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/joe-mercola-quackery-pays/

sharingwisdom
09-01-2012, 09:35 PM
For extra support , some other sources... https://www.deccanchronicle.com/channels/cities/thiruvananthapuram/rise-paralysis-cases-after-polio-vaccine-234
https://www.sfgate.com/health/article/New-documents-show-the-monkey-virus-is-present-in-2897194.php

podfish
09-05-2012, 04:48 PM
actually the source for mercola's report seems quite legit. anybody, especially an md, who challenges the medical establishment will get slammed by medical skeptic sites at least, likely will also be subject to legal action. mercola seems to have taken the oath seriously, and is good at making money helping people heal themselves through supplements and healthy lifestyle choices. he is now targeted for elimination. so by definition the "medical skeptic sites" are less trustworthy than someone who's making money selling his advice? I suppose that the World Health Organization's equally suspect, but here's their take: https://www.who.int/features/qa/64/en/index.html
The spread of a cVDPV shows that too many children remain under-immunized. A fully-immunized population will be protected from all strains of poliovirus, whether wild or vaccine-derived. From 2000 to 2010, more than 10 billion doses of OPV were administered to over 2.5 billion children. As a result more than 3.5 million polio cases were prevented. During that time, 18 outbreaks of cVDPVs occurred in 16 countries, resulting in 510 VDPV cases.

CSummer
09-06-2012, 02:34 AM
Don't most all MDs make money by providing advice? My impression of Dr. Mercola is that he gives away lots of free advice. And the WHO: seems I recall they were involved in promoting the vaccination program. Can one expect an objective, honest report from them if the program caused thousands of cases of vaccine-derived polio?



so by definition the "medical skeptic sites" are less trustworthy than someone who's making money selling his advice? I suppose that the World Health Organization's equally suspect, but here's their take: https://www.who.int/features/qa/64/en/index.html

sharingwisdom
09-06-2012, 10:45 PM
Yep, WHO is supported by Vaccine promotion industry...
https://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2007/feb/16/health.healthandwellbeing1
https://www.drbriffa.com/2007/02/19/world-health-organisation-accused-of-improper-soliciting-of-funds-from-the-pharmaceutical-industry/
(https://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2007/feb/16/health.healthandwellbeing1)
besides their other supporters like the Gates and their vaccine promotion propaganda.
https://www.newmediaexplorer.org/ivaningrilli/2003/09/22/bill_gates_and_big_pharma.htm


Don't most all MDs make money by providing advice? My impression of Dr. Mercola is that he gives away lots of free advice. And the WHO: seems I recall they were involved in promoting the vaccination program. Can one expect an objective, honest report from them if the program caused thousands of cases of vaccine-derived polio?

rossmen
09-06-2012, 11:32 PM
i don't distrust science based medicine and i think money is the base for most medicine. i found the critiques of mercola on the science based medicine skeptic sites vague and mostly name calling. vaccine public health policy is based on cost benefit analysis which while informed by science, is about money. i know many md's who are vaccine selective for their own children. while it is rare to find an md like mercola who recommends caution it is easy to find a doctor who, after brief mention of the standard, accepts the parents judgement. small pox has been the only disease eliminated by vaccine. polio was supposed to be next (and the only other possibility since humans are believed to be the only host), this has not happened. mabe the research from india mercola was reporting on gives a clue why.


so by definition the "medical skeptic sites" are less trustworthy than someone who's making money selling his advice? I suppose that the World Health Organization's equally suspect, but here's their take: https://www.who.int/features/qa/64/en/index.html