PDA

View Full Version : The Liberal Media Strikes Again



zenekar
03-02-2011, 09:35 AM
The Liberal Media Strikes Again

William Rivers Pitt | Tuesday 01 March 2011

If I hear one more person talk about the "liberal media" in America, I will probably vomit on them. It was a stupid and ridiculous thing to say last week - take a long look at which mega-corporations own which news networks (https://www.cjr.org/resources/index.php), and you won't find a "liberal" entity anywhere on the list - but the events in Wisconsin have further underscored the absurdity of the statement.

It started in Madison when Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker tried to erase the long and excellent legacy of collective bargaining in his state, and thousands of union and public-sector workers rose up righteous to stop him. Fourteen Democrats from the state senate lit out to destinations unknown in order to deny Walker and his congressional GOP allies a quorum. Tens upon tens of thousands of people poured into the capitol to shout down Walker's ham-fisted power play (https://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/2011/02/25/10-gop-disaster), braving freezing winds and snowstorms to do so. Each day, the protests grew; one evening, firefighters marched to the capitol to the peal of bagpipes in a show of support. This past Saturday, supporters of the Wisconsin protest staged rallies in all fifty states to stand with workers in Madison.

On Sunday, Governor Walker ordered the Wisconsin capitol building to be cleared of protesters and locked down. As the deadline for clearing the building drew near, live-feed broadcasts from inside the building were cut off. Police poured into the building...and refused to clear the protesters in the name of union solidarity. The deadline came and went, and finally the word came down: the protesters could stay. The building erupted in thunderous cheers, and the action to stop Walker's power play continued for another day...until Walker abruptly locked down the capitol building on Monday:

About 60 demonstrators who had slept in the statehouse overnight remained inside as of noon Monday, and they banged drums, sang and danced in the rotunda. They had access to restrooms and, given the dwindling size of the group, appeared to have a decent supply of food. There was no indication that the police were preparing to arrest or eject them, and several said in interviews that they had no intention of leaving.

The events that have been unfolding in Wisconsin, culminating in this past weekend's national displays of support and capitol showdown, stand tall among the most remarkable popular uprisings in modern American history. Millions around the country have been energized, especially in states where similar anti-union legislation is pending. In Wisconsin, the people continue to peacefully own the streets, and without a quorum in the senate, Walker can only bluster and bluff.

Big story, right? Huge, in fact. No comparable event has taken place in America for decades, and the outcome of this showdown is likely to determine the fate of worker's rights all across the country. Unions are working hand in hand with public employees, liberals, progressives and regular folks to fight an egregious wrong, and thanks to social media, bloggers, citizen journalists and organizations like Truthout, the movement is catching fire from sea to shining sea.

So, of course, the so-called liberal "news" media has taken a complete pass on covering these events. The sun came up on Monday morning to find every TV "news" network, as well as every newspaper outside of Madison, covering the Oscars wall to wall with nary a mention of the political action taking place in Wisconsin. The Russian media is covering the story with more alacrity than their American counterparts (https://www.buzzflash.net/story.php?id=1314172). Were it not for the alternative/online news media, the protests in Wisconsin would be taking place in a virtual information blackout (https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/02/27/that-iraq-feeling/).

Take a moment, please, and cast your mind back a year or so.

Remember the first stirrings of what came to be termed as the "Tea Party" uprising? Never mind that it was created by powerful conservative corporate entities like the Koch Brothers. Never mind that the "Tea Party" was nothing more or less than the GOP base with a new coat of paint. Never mind that virtually everything they were yelling about was based on lies and deliberate misinformation. Never mind that most of them really didn't know what they were talking about, and couldn't spell to save their lives.

Three blivets wreathed in American flags and automatic weapons could stand on a streetcorner with signs reading "Keep Your Damn Government Hands Off My Medicare," and they would find themselves surrounded by camera crews from CNN, MSNBC and, of course, Fox News. But put 50,000 people a day out on the streets of Madison, put tens of thousands more on the streets in every state in the union, and those same news cameras are suddenly too busy covering the Oscars and Lindsey Lohan's ongoing crime spree to make an effort at coverage.

Hm.

I wonder why this is? We have a huge story in the making here, rife with old and new politics that cuts across virtually every segment of American life - blue collar workers, unions, protests, Tea Party governors, fleeing Democratic senators, teachers, budget issues, new media, old media, and the power of simple shoe leather - and yet those who represent the protesters in Wisconsin had to fight like wolverines to get just one of their representatives onto the Sunday political talk shows. Just one. As far as the American "news" media is concerned, Wisconsin simply doesn't exist.

Know what I think?

I think they're scared.

I think the corporations behind the "news" media are conservatives down to their DNA, but understanding that is a matter of simple logic and observation. They made the "Tea Party" into a legitimate political phenomenon by dint of total-saturation coverage. But now, they are trying to disappear the Wisconsin protests by ignoring them entirely. Is it because they don't like the idea of workers having the right to collectively bargain? Definitely. Is it because this national action scares the ever-lovin' crap out of them?

I think absolutely yes.

Keep it up Wisconsin. Keep it up, alternative media. Keep it up, America.

They are scared down to their corporate-owned socks, and as this movement grows, it will be impossible to ignore.

Source URL: https://www.truth-out.org/the-liberal-media-strikes-again68115

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.

_

podfish
03-03-2011, 08:29 AM
The Liberal Media Strikes Again

William Rivers Pitt | Tuesday 01 March 2011

If I hear one more person talk about the "liberal media" in America, I will probably vomit on them......
So, of course, the so-called liberal "news" media has taken a complete pass on covering these events.
much as I agree with his sentiments, I don't like the play to a sense of victimization. There's plenty of mainstream media coverage. There should be more, it should be more substantive, etc. but let's stick to that. The Wisconsin story's getting almost as much play as Charlie Sheen, and it's actually being covered for a longer period than the Oscars.

Karen the KAT
03-03-2011, 12:26 PM
Oh Bullshit!!!

Karen the KAT
03-03-2011, 12:34 PM
The far left is as fucked up as the far right, neither represent the other 70% of us. Get a clue folks, find a balance, meet in the middle, standing on one side without any flexibility is simply stupid.....

Hotspring 44
03-03-2011, 07:51 PM
The far left is as fucked up as the far right, neither represent the other 70% of us. Get a clue folks, find a balance, meet in the middle, standing on one side without any flexibility is simply stupid.....
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:PunctuationKerning/> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SnapToGridInCell/> <w:WrapTextWithPunct/> <w:UseAsianBreakRules/> <w:DontGrowAutofit/> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156"> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} </style> <![endif]--> So... ...Who here doesn’t already know that?

Isn’t listening to all sides on a particular issue’s expressed concerns and considering them “all” and then having the actual information relating to each point made by “all” “sides” the real issue of concern here?

One of the main points that the author (William Rivers Pitt) has expressed is the fact that major corporate money interests have financially gotten into the actual influencing of the so-called “liberal media”. Those corporatists’ are not true “leftists”, so therefore the term “liberal media” as it is being so broadly used in America these days, is what is really stupefying and absurd!

Since when has just being on the fence (being in the “middle”) been so perfectly correct?

What do you mean by “balance?

Is it (the lack of balance) not what the author of the article (William Rivers Pitt) was expressing in the first place about the corporatization of the media and that it has skewed to show more of what the political “right” has to say as if they are paying for advertisement, and election campaigns rather than “balanced”, in depth, news, reporting of any specific topic enough to shine a spotlight on it?... .
..and also that the mega corporatists have used that term (the “liberal media”) that they have so endeared as a political bludgeoning baton to actually focus the blame onto the so-called; “liberal media”?... ...In other words: anyone that disagrees with them who has something substantive that could be in direct competition with their financial and/ or so-called "morality".

Of course most of the time the extremists on any side are usually out of touch with the majority of society and are incorrect about the changes needed to correct actual, mutually agreed upon by the majority, both, left and right; \so-called/, leaning politically speaking “centrists’ of which are so often said to be the "majority".

The "corporate media" is the real watery diarrhea syndrome that is being added to the the soup of information America is being virtually force-fed most of the time on the TV and radio stations.

Last but not least; the “majority” can also be monstrously cruel and inhumane.
That is why there needs to be a Constitution and in particular; a Bill Of Rights.