PDA

View Full Version : What Progressives Don’t Understand About Obama



geomancer
12-12-2010, 07:10 AM
https://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/12/opinion/12reed.html?_r=1&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=a212

December 11, 2010
What Progressives Don’t Understand About Obama
By ISHMAEL REED
Oakland, Calif.

NOT all of my white teachers viewed me as a discipline problem. To the annoyance of my fellow students, one teacher selected me regularly to lead assembly programs. A high school teacher insisted that I learn about the theater. She was an America-firster who supplied me with right-wing pamphlets and magazines that I’d read at breakfast and she didn’t seem bothered by my returning them with some of the pages stuck together with syrup.

But most of them did see me as an annoyance, and gave me the grades to prove it.

I’ve been thinking recently of all those D’s for deportment on my report cards. I thought of them, for instance, when I read a response to an essay I had written about Mark Twain that appeared in “A New Literary History of America.” One of the country’s leading critics, who writes for a prominent progressive blog, called the essay “rowdy,” which I interpreted to mean “lack of deportment.” Perhaps this was because I cited “Huckleberry Finn” to show that some white women managed household slaves, a departure from the revisionist theory that sees Scarlett O’Hara as some kind of feminist martyr.

I thought of them when I pointed out to a leading progressive that the Tea Party included neo-Nazis and Holocaust deniers — and he called me a “bully.” He believes that the Tea Party is a grass-roots uprising against Wall Street, a curious reading since the movement gained its impetus from a rant against the president delivered by a television personality on the floor of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange.

And I’ve thought about them as I’ve listened in the last week to progressives criticize President Obama for keeping his cool.

Progressives have been urging the president to “man up” in the face of the Republicans. Some want him to be like John Wayne. On horseback. Slapping people left and right.

One progressive commentator played an excerpt from a Harry Truman speech during which Truman screamed about the Republican Party to great applause. He recommended this style to Mr. Obama. If President Obama behaved that way, he’d be dismissed as an angry black militant with a deep hatred of white people. His grade would go from a B- to a D.

What the progressives forget is that black intellectuals have been called “paranoid,” “bitter,” “rowdy,” “angry,” “bullies,” and accused of tirades and diatribes for more than 100 years. Very few of them would have been given a grade above D from most of my teachers.

When these progressives refer to themselves as Mr. Obama’s base, all they see is themselves. They ignore polls showing steadfast support for the president among blacks and Latinos. And now they are whispering about a primary challenge against the president. Brilliant! The kind of suicidal gesture that destroyed Jimmy Carter — and a way to lose the black vote forever.

Unlike white progressives, blacks and Latinos are not used to getting it all. They know how it feels to be unemployed and unable to buy your children Christmas presents. They know when not to shout. The president, the coolest man in the room, who worked among the unemployed in Chicago, knows too.

Ishmael Reed is the author of the forthcoming novel “Juice.”

Clancy
12-12-2010, 08:22 AM
https://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/12/opinion/12reed.html?_r=1&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=a212
What Progressives Don’t Understand About Obama

If the American people understood what this corporate puppet has accomplished, they'd be rioting in the streets and burning down buildings. Not only is Obama maintaining the worst of the Bush era policies, he's breaking new ground in turning America into a banana republic.

How he frames his propaganda is the least of our worries.

Valley Oak
12-12-2010, 10:44 AM
What I find amazing is the innocence with which progressives/liberals/lefties/greens/etc went to the polls believing that Obama was going to "save the world." This will teach them a lesson that they should have known on their own to begin with.

Obama is a "systems man;" he was so years before he was ever elected to his first publicly elected position and he more than likely always was. Look at what Obama said yesterday against Jullian Assange. If Obama had not been a believer in the system, then he never would have made it to the presidency...

Another lesson Americans need to learn, but even less likely so, is that without realizing it, almost everybody believes in the system. The system is precisely part of the problem. Another part of the problem is the vast majority of citizens are not getting this and probably never will. The low quality democracy in the US is does not work for the general public. It rarely has. By rushing to the polls all dreamy-eyed to get Obama into office, Americans mistakenly expected that not only the new president would do the right thing, but that also our undemocratic system would do the right thing as well. WRONG!

Before I went to the polls to vote for Obama in November of 2008, I posted right here on Wacco that once elected, Obama was going to do many of the terrible things that he is doing now. This is because of two reasons: 1. Obama was never the kind of person (a true radical progressive, perhaps?) that most people expected him to be. If he had even been a Kucinich, he never would have made it to the presidency in the first place. 2. Even if Obama had been some ultra-liberal, etc, AND if he had been elected despite this, the system would not have allowed him to achieve his "great, dreamy" reforms.

Look at what Obama tried to do with healthcare. Did you see, carefully, what transpired? He was fought almost to a standstill despite his party having 58 senators and a strong majority in the House. What do you think is going to happen now?

When I voted for Obama, I did so with less excitement than when I voted Clinton in 1992 because I understood more clearly that it is not the man but the system that decides. That is why US democracy is so deficient. Most Americans don’t appreciate the fact that majority of European democracies, for example, enjoy much better systems that the US; indeed, the European democracies that I came to know first hand are clearly superior to the US democracy.

I also knew, more or less, what Obama was willing and not willing to do. But more important than that, I was aware of what the system was willing to let him do, which is not very much.

Sorry you all disappointed yourselves but you should have known better.

Edward


If the American people understood what this corporate puppet has accomplished...

Clancy
12-12-2010, 11:04 AM
What I find amazing is the innocence with which progressives/liberals/lefties/greens/etc went to the polls believing that Obama was going to "save the world." This will teach them a lesson that they should have known on their own to begin with...

There's a huge gap between saving the world and intentionally looting the treasury for the benefit of billionaires. The former is pie-in-the-sky, the latter is what actually happened.

The sad thing is, any attempt to explain how we've become a nation of serfs due to the so-called bailouts (that were converted into Treasury Bills for the profit of the richest of the rich) makes most people go numb. This was literally the biggest theft in human history, and they got away with it.

Meanwhile, the media, which SHOULD be explaining what has happened, focuses on the inane and the irrelevant.

zenekar
12-12-2010, 01:44 PM
...

The US has become a nation of serfs and sheep as citizens are more focused on entertainment, sports, "rock stars," celebrities, etc., then on the system which is robbing us and the world, with military might that citizens' taxes pay for. Here is an illustration of where the US empier is now: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctzfkJsHqVA Also: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NmTBnhOXufg&feature=related

Attila
...

cotatikid
12-13-2010, 12:25 AM
The definitive, and easy to read book cogently exposing and explaining the current paradigm was published 15 years ago, OPPOSING THE SYSTEM(1995) by CHARLES A. REICH. Although written awhile ago it is depressingly prescient in predicting the culmination of the corporate focus on greed above all. I was made aware of this book while reading NORMAN SOLOMON's autobiographical MADE LOVE GOT WAR(2007).

I can recommend OPPOSING THE SYSTEM to those who wish to have a more clear understanding of the otherwise suppressed reality of the dysfunctions of the traditional "government" in the shadow of the ascendant ruling "economic government". Without an understanding of how the traditional paradigm has been supplanted since WW2 by "'the system---' a merger of governmental, corporate and media power into a managerial entity more powerful by reason of technology, organization and control of livelihood than any previously known form of rule", the underlying issues are pretty much impossible to comprehend. (As quoted by Norman on pg. 121 of MLGW)

Please check OPPOSING THE SYSTEM out, you won't regret it, I absolutely guarantee it!