PDA

View Full Version : From Stanford Prison Experiment to The Lucifer Effect



sharingwisdom
10-26-2010, 08:32 PM
[The Lucifer Effect, by Dr. Phllip Zimbardo, is an aftermath of his research from his '70's Stanford Prison Experiment https://www.prisonexp.org/ (https://www.prisonexp.org/) The following overview was taken from Zimbardo's website https://www.lucifereffect.com/about_synopsis.htm (https://www.lucifereffect.com/about_synopsis.htm). I decided to post it because this topic is so important: in how dehumization develops, how we allow others to control us, how torture continues to exist for whatever reason we are told it should, and what can be learned and changed. I also found that his section on "Interesting Additional Content https://www.lucifereffect.com/about_content.htm (https://www.lucifereffect.com/about_content.htm) was fascinating in recapping The Jim Jones suicides and how being part of trauma (either witnessing, experiencing it or doing it to another) forces re-enactment of trauma. This can start right in our own homes growing up as children. We have a great deal of healing to do worldwide.]


"The Lucifer Effect raises a fundamental question about the nature of human nature: How is it possible for ordinary, average, even good people to become perpetrators of evil?

This book is unique in many ways. It provides for the first time a detailed chronology of the transformations in human character that took place during the experiment I created that randomly assigned healthy, normal intelligent college students to play the roles of prison or guard in a projected 2 week-long study. I was forced to terminate the study after only 6 days because it went out of control, pacifists were becoming sadistic guards, and normal kids were breaking down emotionally.


I lay the groundwork for the rest of the book by vivid descriptions of torture in the Inquisition, in the massacre in Rwanda, the rape of Nanking, and other venues where human nature has run amok. I also provide the initial scaffolding for how the Stanford Prison Experiment may help us make sense of corporate malfeasance, of “administrative evil,” and most particularly, the abuse and torture of prisoners by American Military Police in Iraq's infamous Abu Ghraib prison.


After telling the story of my experiment, done with minimal psychologizing, I outline the lessons and messages from our Stanford study, along with considering ts ethics and extensions. Next, we consider the conceptual contributions and research findings from many domains that validate the assertion that situational power is stronger than we appreciate, and may come to dominate individual dispositions. I review classic and current research on: conformity, obedience to authority, role-playing, dehumanization, deindividuation and moral disengagement. I also introduce the “evil of inaction” as a new form of evil that supports those who are the perpetrators of evil, by knowing but not acting to challenge them.


I also introduce the “evil of inaction” as a new form of evil that supports those who are the perpetrators of evil, by knowing but not acting to challenge them.


After laying out the extent to which the abuses at Abu Ghraib pale in comparison to the more extremely violent torture and abuses in many other military sites, with testimonies of soldiers who actually took part in them, I decide that it is time for the reader to be juror and to decide whether what took place was merely the work of those 7 "bad apples," or that of a corrupt system, a "rotten barrel," that has sacrificed the basic human values of rule by law, honesty, and adherence to the Geneva Conventions in the cause of its obsession with the so-called 'war on terror.'


Although most people succumb to the power of situational forces, not all do. How do they resist social influence? What kinds of strategies might help the reader to become inoculated against unwanted attempts to get him or her to conform, comply, obey, and yield? I outline a 10-step generic program to build resistance to mind control strategies and tactics.


Given that the majority of people in my research and those of my colleagues are impacted by situational forces, it is the minority, the rare person, who resists. I consider them to be heroes. So, I end this long journey with a new understanding of what it means to be heroic. We celebrate heroes and heroism as part of new taxonomy that I have developed, which identifies 12 different types of heroes, with and criteria and exemplars."