A little known way for populaton control.

[Jonathan hughes]

It is called zoosexuality. We are all carbon based eukaryote celled animals ,and all animals have the natural propensity to have sex. so would; it make sense that zoosexuality should be legal, and not demonized like it is now. There is no need to make it bad because both species likes it, and this sex will reduce teen age pregnancies, abortions . Help our environment ,and not put such a strain on our natural resources helping mother earth, and the human race at the same time. Eliminating the need for any form of contraception. We will strengthen the biodiversity of the dogs because more of them will be complete with all of their endocrine glands. Taking them away,denying them of what we would like for ourselves is abusing the dog big time every hour of their life until they die. Altering is abuse not sex. Free the zoosexual from the bondage of fear so they can proclaim their love, and look for others of like mind without fear that only the devil would want to give.Are you with me?

[someguy]

Are you with me?

F*ck no!

[alanora]

??????????????????????????????????????????


It is called zoosexuality. We are all carbon based eukaryote celled animals ,and all animals have the natural propensity to have sex. so would; it make sense that zoosexuality should be legal, and not demonized like it is now. There is no need to make it bad because both species likes it, and this sex will reduce teen age pregnancies, abortions . Help our environment ,and not put such a strain on our natural resources helping mother earth, and the human race at the same time. Eliminating the need for any form of contraception. We will strengthen the biodiversity of the dogs because more of them will be complete with all of their endocrine glands. Taking them away,denying them of what we would like for ourselves is abusing the dog big time every hour of their life until they die. Altering is abuse not sex. Free the zoosexual from the bondage of fear so they can proclaim their love, and look for others of like mind without fear that only the devil would want to give.Are you with me?

["Mad" Miles]

After I read Mr. hughes post earlier this afternoon, I checked his personal profile. It seems he's serious. In fact he's quite up front about his interest in fucking a dog.

I am confident he's found one of the boundaries of acceptable conduct and sexual interest in waccoland. (Correct me if I'm wrong!? Sic.)

Perhaps that's his purpose? To test the boundaries?

A few months ago I watched Zoo (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0874423/) on Sundance or IFC. Very slow, creepy documentary meditation on the case of a Seattle government weapons contractor who died from hemorrhaging, after being, uh, penetrated by a horse, voluntarily on the man's part, on a rural ranch where a "community" of likeminded zoophiles hung out.

Very weird film. Lot's of meandering interviews with subjects identities concealed. They make a case for their proclivities. Not one I found convincing.

At a friends birthday party a month back I mentioned the film, and the phenomenon in casual conversation with strangers. That quickly ended that conversation!

Must learn to be more discrete. And not be tempted by the shock value of such topics...

[Debunker]

They don't call this forum wacco for nuthin!

Kidding aside, one of the most amazing (and creepy) things about seriously aberrant behavior is that the adherents just don't see that it's aberrant. He thinks he's doing the dogs a favor, and that we're "demonizing" his innocent pastime.


After I read Mr. hughes post earlier this afternoon, I checked his personal profile. It seems he's serious. In fact he's quite up front about his interest in fucking a dog.

I am confident he's found one of the boundaries of acceptable conduct and sexual interest in waccoland. (Correct me if I'm wrong!? Sic.)

Perhaps that's his purpose? To test the boundaries?

A few months ago I watched Zoo (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0874423/) on Sundance or IFC. Very slow, creepy documentary meditation on the case of a Seattle government weapons contractor who died from hemorrhaging, after being, uh, penetrated by a horse, voluntarily on the man's part, on a rural ranch where a "community" of likeminded zoophiles hung out.

Very weird film. Lot's of meandering interviews with subjects identities concealed. They make a case for their proclivities. Not one I found convincing.

At a friends birthday party a month back I mentioned the film, and the phenomenon in casual conversation with strangers. That quickly ended that conversation!

Must learn to be more discrete. And not be tempted by the shock value of such topics...

[DeadwoodPete]

I do not get it, could you spell it out?

Thanks, Deadwood


It is called zoosexuality. We are all carbon based eukaryote celled animals ,and all animals have the natural propensity to have sex. so would; it make sense that zoosexuality should be legal, and not demonized like it is now. There is no need to make it bad because both species likes it, and this sex will reduce teen age pregnancies, abortions . Help our environment ,and not put such a strain on our natural resources helping mother earth, and the human race at the same time. Eliminating the need for any form of contraception. We will strengthen the biodiversity of the dogs because more of them will be complete with all of their endocrine glands. Taking them away,denying them of what we would like for ourselves is abusing the dog big time every hour of their life until they die. Altering is abuse not sex. Free the zoosexual from the bondage of fear so they can proclaim their love, and look for others of like mind without fear that only the devil would want to give.Are you with me?

[theindependenteye]

>>>After I read Mr. hughes post earlier this afternoon, I checked his personal profile. It seems he's serious. In fact he's quite up front about his interest in fucking a dog.
>>>I am confident he's found one of the boundaries of acceptable conduct and sexual interest in waccoland. (Correct me if I'm wrong!? Sic.),,,
>>>Very weird film. Lot's of meandering interviews with subjects identities concealed. They make a case for their proclivities. Not one I found convincing.

A number of years ago, I wandered onto an "alternative relationships" e-list that turned out to be devoted mainly to bestiality It wasn't really to my taste — I felt that my relationship with our dog Ruffle was perfectly acceptable as it was,— but I stayed on it a few weeks because I'm pathologically curious about the labyrinth of the human mind. The poor man you describe, sodomized by the horse, would have done well to be on it, as he could get very detailed info about the modalities, proclivities and dangers involved with every breed of dog, not to mention other hot items in the animal kingdom. (As my mom would have said, his eyes were bigger than his...) A bit like my current e-list on puppetry, where you can get about 15 different recipes for papier mache or the various modes of stringing a marionette.

The main argument against bestiality, I guess, is that like adult/child sex, it's inherently non-consensual. I can't see us liberals objecting to it on the grounds that it's unutterably disgusting, since lotsa stuff *we* do would be unutterably disgusting to others. I guess I can't claim the high ground on "consensual" relations with the animal kingdom, either, since I'm a meat-eater, and I doubt many of the chickens are of the age of consent. Is it more perverse to fuck a chicken than to eat it?

Feeling cheerful but devilish today—
Conrad

[podfish]

yeah, this is weird one for me too. Referring back to Haidt, who I mentioned on an unrelated thread: 'liberals' as a whole score low on when you measure how important 'purity' is to them. But things like this help me understand how conservatives, who typically ARE affected by what Haidt ranks as purity, get so wound up about the social issues that offend them. I have no trouble being a member of People Eating Tasty Animals, and I would rank killing as a more extreme intervention on the poor critter - but that intellectual exercise doesn't really change my reaction to Hughes' idea. I'm just glad I don't have to vote on it...


........ I can't see us liberals objecting to it on the grounds that it's unutterably disgusting.... I guess I can't claim the high ground on "consensual" relations with the animal kingdom, either, since I'm a meat-eater....— Conrad