someguy
03-26-2010, 08:04 AM
<object width="480" height="295"><param name="movie" value="https://www.youtube.com/v/pA6FSy6EKrM&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="https://www.youtube.com/v/pA6FSy6EKrM&hl=en_US&fs=1&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="295"></embed></object>
While I disagree with this ladies belief in Global Warming as a massive global threat, I was impressed with her objective rational viewpoint regarding Cap and Trade. I have said several times on wacco, that if global warming was really the crisis its made out to be, that our policy makers would approach this problem in a vastly different manner. To see how Cap and Trade actually works, and to see who it benefits, makes it seem ludicrous to even consider this as a serious policy option.
While I disagree with this ladies belief in Global Warming as a massive global threat, I was impressed with her objective rational viewpoint regarding Cap and Trade. I have said several times on wacco, that if global warming was really the crisis its made out to be, that our policy makers would approach this problem in a vastly different manner. To see how Cap and Trade actually works, and to see who it benefits, makes it seem ludicrous to even consider this as a serious policy option.