PDA

View Full Version : Avatar is a brilliant and amazing anti-war film



Clancy
01-15-2010, 11:06 AM
Not only that, the love story will bring tears to your eyes, and you won't want to leave the magical, beautiful forest Cameron has created. I was concerned about wearing the new 3D glasses over my regular glasses, I'm happy to say that I forgot I was wearing them for long stretches. Give yourself a treat and see it in 3D, the new technology is far better than any 3D before.



Anne Dilenschneider: Avatar: An Anti-War Film Challenges Us to "Be All That You Can Be" (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/anne-dilenschneider/avatar-an-anti-war-film-c_b_420770.html)

To tell the truth, I didn't want to see Avatar. The film's trailer promoted it as another action flick, albeit with stunning 3-D graphics. The clips were about making a difference by being in a para-military group on another planet. It was advertised as one of James Cameron's action films, just like Terminator, Terminator 2, Aliens and True Lies, and as a major blockbuster like Titanic. I wasn't interested.

However, my movie-wise friend, Reba Vanderpool of The Visionary Edge, encouraged me to see it. And I heard that the movie was breaking so many records for attendance in Russia, China, and throughout Europe, as well as in the U.S. that -- worldwide -- it was now the second-highest grossing film of all time, surpassed only by Titanic. The film was quickly becoming an international cultural phenomenon. I wanted to know why, so last night I went to see it.

First, I had to sit through a trailer for the upcoming film Pacific and its grand pronouncement that "War is part of the human condition." Before I could consider the assumptions behind that statement, a very long and graphically violent National Guard recruitment music video, titled "At This Moment," powered onto the screen. Ironically, these previews highlighted the urgency of Avatar's message.

Despite the film's initial hype, and despite being preceded by trailers that glorified war, Avatar turned out to be an anti-war film that reminds the world of what it really means to live with integrity and "be all that you can be." No wonder it is sweeping the international stage.

The plot, which James Cameron wrote 15 years ago, is as current as our daily news: A rapacious American corporation/para-government agency innocuously titled "Resources Development Administration/RDA" (Halliburton/KBR) is bound and determined to please its stockholders by extracting the valuable mineral unobtanium (oil) from foreign soil (Iraq, Afghanistan) with the assistance of a paramilitary group (Blackwater). It doesn't matter how many of the local inhabitants die (they are demeaned and depersonalized -- the first necessary step towards wrecking violence on others) or how much local culture is destroyed, as long as the mineral is extracted and the shareholders reap their dividends. Corporate greed is reframed as a "war on terror." The ends justify the means. And the military machines glorified in the previews are the tools the American invaders use to achieve those ends.

The majority of the American invaders have clearly lost their moral compass. But one Marine Corps veteran has the integrity and the courage to refuse to participate in this spiritual bankruptcy. His soul is not worth any amount of money, or even the promise of reconstructed prosthetic legs.

All it takes is one Avatar to inspire more.

An avatar is a being of matchless integrity, that inner and outer coherence of resonating truth. Every culture has its great avatars: Noah, Abraham, Moses, Miriam, Zoroaster, Rama, Sita, Krishna, Buddha, Jesus, Mary, Mohammed, Fatimah, Chief Joseph, Nan'yehi. Over millennia, the stories of the avatars have defined human moral character. They are our saints and spiritual leaders. Their stories fund our own sense of "heroic imagination,"* that larger worldview that encourages us to take risks beyond our small selves for the greater good of all. Their examples help us "develop the personal hardiness to be 'different' or 'difficult'"** so that we are able to take a stand when we encounter injustice and oppression. The Avatars remind us that our spiritual life is our "real" life.

While taking risks for justice may seem to be a daunting proposition in our time, there are many s/heroes among us who are doing so on a daily basis. In their book, Standing Against the Madness, Amy and Dan Goodman profile librarians in Connecticut who took on the PATRIOT act, neighbors in the Ninth Ward of New Orleans, students at Wilton High School and Jena High School, service members of Appeal for Redress, and numerous others who have refused to let the ends justify the means. We need to hear these stories because every act of integrity matters. We need to hear these stories so that we have the courage to act with integrity ourselves.

Avatar has taken the importance of integrity to the worldwide stage, where it is being applauded. The movie does what American politicians fear to do: it identifies the profound spiritual bankruptcy that underlies our financial insolvency. And it reminds us of the antidote for our ailment: like the avatar, we must have the courage to make new choices for the greatest good of all.

Anne Dilenschneider: Avatar: An Anti-War Film Challenges Us to "Be All That You Can Be" (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/anne-dilenschneider/avatar-an-anti-war-film-c_b_420770.html)

"Mad" Miles
01-15-2010, 12:47 PM
Clancy,

I really enjoyed "Avatar" as an amazing ride and a satisfying new version of the "white boy wannabe" story. A story I'm very sympathetic to.

But Anti-War? Uh, I just don't get it. The problems for the heroes in the film are solved through violence, albeit self-defensive violence. How is that anti-war? Aren't all wars justified in the name of self-defense?

On the 3D I fully agree. I was leery after a few experiences with eye strain and irritation over the last couple of years. I'd read a Slate article about how the technology inevitably leads to irritation due to the physiology of the human eye. But I didn't experience it this time. Some of the intentionally blurry images in the foreground bugged me. Sort of a forced experience/simulation of depth of field focus in our normal vision. But other than that I had no problems.

(Spoiler Alert! Read no further if you haven't seen the film and want the plot to be new to you when you do see it.)

The commentary of corporate, military power vs. indigenous earth (OK planet Pandora) and nature based culture was very interesting and satisfying. Cameron is getting shit from conservative and reactionary commentators for making a commie, pinko, dirt-worshipping, tree-hugging tract. In other words, he affirms values that are right in line with our West County Waccobb Woo Woo scene!

Ultimately the film is an adventure ride with some socio-economic themes. Visually it's beautiful. But I don't take the politics seriously. They serve the fantasy more than the fantasy serves any serious ideas.

And one commentary I read a few days ago pointed out the incipient racism of the White Hero Going Native who becomes accepted by the cool indigenous people, especially the hot babe love interest, and saves the day by leading them in the struggle against their oppressors. Like they need an outsiders help to defend their own.

I too love, "Dances With Wolves", "Jeremiah Johnson", "A Man Called Horse" (well not so much but it has its moments) and especially "Little Big Man". But I also recognize that they are all fairly implausible fantasies which seek to elide the crimes of cultural and physical genocide directed at non-European indigenous people all over the world.

So I don't take the ideas in the film seriously. I just enjoyed the ride and left the implausible aspects (and I mean implausible even in the context of scifi fantasy) to the side so I could let the colors, shapes and sense of flying wash over me and take me away!

Cheers,

"Mad" Miles

:burngrnbounce:

Clancy
01-15-2010, 05:24 PM
...On the 3D I fully agree. I was leery after a few experiences with eye strain and irritation over the last couple of years. I'd read a Slate article about how the technology inevitably leads to irritation due to the physiology of the human eye. But I didn't experience it this time. Some of the intentionally blurry images in the foreground bugged me. Sort of a forced experience/simulation of depth of field focus in our normal vision. But other than that I had no problems...

I didn't think anything would get me back into the theaters, but I was wrong. This is the future of film... er.. I mean digital movies. You zeroed in on the only weakness I could see, the occasional blurred foreground image, but I'm sure they'll hone the technique and it'll be even better soon.

Some of the previews of upcoming 3-D films were amazing too.

"Mad" Miles
01-15-2010, 06:27 PM
You zeroed in on the only weakness I could see, the occasional blurred foreground image, but I'm sure they'll hone the technique and it'll be even better soon.

Clancy,

I'm no expert but I believe the foreground blurryness was intentional on Cameron's part. To simulate the visual effect that when you focus on objects (in this case faces) in your mid-field of vision, objects closer to you appear fuzzy.

I just didn't like this being imposed on me, rather than the result of my natural vision. I base this claim, that it's intentional, on the fact that even when I focused on the "closer" faces, they were still blurry. That had to be a decision in the editing process.

I loved "Coraline" in 3D. But I suffered from eye irritation when watching it.

Here's the Slate.com article about the limits of 3D (https://www.slate.com/id/2215265/).

I wanna see, "Book of Eli" and "A Single Man" ASAP. I'll probably also go to, "Daybreakers" soon, in spite of the unenthusiastic reviews.

I saw "Broken Embraces" a couple of days ago and loved it!

Cheahs,

"Mad" Miles

:burngrnbounce:

Jude Iam
01-16-2010, 03:01 AM
saw avatar last night, with its power and beauty. cheered when the latina went insubordinate, and lofted with the firefly-jellyfish victory of nature and love and good.
thought i'd ignore contributing to this conversation here, having already pissed off the republican roman catholic rocket scientist i'd taken to the film, but: having flipped on the tube (around 2 something am) on channel 29 to check cable access programming, found "swamp loggers" - stomach churning crude coarse men clearcutting forest as fast as they could - there it is, right there on a tv show rush limbaugh would love, what we'd done redwood summer about, judi barry and daryl and and butterfly hill in luna, etc, etc. everwhere, everything attacked and destroyed the same way.
and then there was the commercial from military.com - afro american couple in bed, talking about their daughter signing up and getting to be ok with her decision - the female cannon fodder recruitment from hollywood.

political "ideas" are not that relevant to the mass of foot soldiers, without whom there wouldn't be much of a war, anywhere, though drones flown from HQ wherever, by a handful of game players, already cause way too much harm. movies work if they are visceral; AVATAR is, and in addition to having a global message for this time, AVATAR has magic. not the grim aesthetic of mad max bladerunner, but the radiant moving energy of natural psychedelics and the global consciousness of mycellium running. yeah, it's true: 'they' got the bucks and machines, but we got the numbers, worldwide. nice demonstrating healing using our synergy attuning together, that ketchak balinese monkey dance ritual number. i'd been considering the power of dancing intentions and mudras and chants together... we can do that. good fun, too.
ok, off to sleepdreamville now.
till i see you, back on earth, love, judith


Clancy,

I really enjoyed "Avatar" as an amazing ride and a satisfying new version of the "white boy wannabe" story. A story I'm very sympathetic to.

But Anti-War? Uh, I just don't get it. The problems for the heroes in the film are solved through violence, albeit self-defensive violence. How is that anti-war? Aren't all wars justified in the name of self-defense?

On the 3D I fully agree. I was leery after a few experiences with eye strain and irritation over the last couple of years. I'd read a Slate article about how the technology inevitably leads to irritation due to the physiology of the human eye. But I didn't experience it this time. Some of the intentionally blurry images in the foreground bugged me. Sort of a forced experience/simulation of depth of field focus in our normal vision. But other than that I had no problems.

(Spoiler Alert! Read no further if you haven't seen the film and want the plot to be new to you when you do see it.)

The commentary of corporate, military power vs. indigenous earth (OK planet Pandora) and nature based culture was very interesting and satisfying. Cameron is getting shit from conservative and reactionary commentators for making a commie, pinko, dirt-worshipping, tree-hugging tract. In other words, he affirms values that are right in line with our West County Waccobb Woo Woo scene!

Ultimately the film is an adventure ride with some socio-economic themes. Visually it's beautiful. But I don't take the politics seriously. They serve the fantasy more than the fantasy serves any serious ideas.

And one commentary I read a few days ago pointed out the incipient racism of the White Hero Going Native who becomes accepted by the cool indigenous people, especially the hot babe love interest, and saves the day by leading them in the struggle against their oppressors. Like they need an outsiders help to defend their own.

I too love, "Dances With Wolves", "Jeremiah Johnson", "A Man Called Horse" (well not so much but it has its moments) and especially "Little Big Man". But I also recognize that they are all fairly implausible fantasies which seek to elide the crimes of cultural and physical genocide directed at non-European indigenous people all over the world.

So I don't take the ideas in the film seriously. I just enjoyed the ride and left the implausible aspects (and I mean implausible even in the context of scifi fantasy) to the side so I could let the colors, shapes and sense of flying wash over me and take me away!

Cheers,

"Mad" Miles

:burngrnbounce:

"Mad" Miles
01-17-2010, 02:35 PM
"Fear of a Blue Planet" (https://www.slate.com/id/2241542/)

Check out the readers comments at the end.

The pope thinks Avatar privileges nature over the individual human soul and is a sneak attack by neo-paganism on Catholicism! Read that in the PD yesterday.

"Mad" Miles

:burngrnbounce: