While they may also need to have :doctor:.
of course some of them might get so mad at the idea of the possibility that they may be totally incorrect they might attempt to :Ball kicker:,:duel:, :wrestle:, or have a :kidfight:over it.
Then there's the ones that have the intentional:adhd:l(Attention-deficit Hyperbolic disorder) particularly when it comes to "fair and balanced news".
Then it can degrade into a philosophical :argument:, that can end up with any one or combination of the following: :blahblah::whackasmilie::fireright::duh::tantrum::xpoke::no::blob_box::nono::tired::hearye::soapbox::usflag::rant: etc.
Then other times it just ends up a wee bit :offtopic:.
Then there is always the person that says something that is just out right :lame:!
lynn
12-04-2009, 01:04 AM
Well, that can be said about both sides of the aisle…:kidfight:
Hotspring 44
12-04-2009, 08:51 PM
Thanks for helping me with the proof process of my hypothesis:wink:.
Well, that can be said about both sides of the aisle…:kidfight:
lynn
12-06-2009, 10:44 PM
The thing is - you don't know the people I do who would disagree with you...
They are not 'shit-slingers' in the least...They are nothing like your projected accusations here...Not even close...
==========================
Thanks for helping me with the proof process of my hypothesis:wink:.
Hotspring 44
12-06-2009, 11:45 PM
I did not say they ALL are shit slinger's. I was referring to the ones that (for example) that used the STOLEN e Mails as a absolute truth about the MAJORITY of the the top climatologists that contend that humans have caused a significant enough amount of emissions to alter the climate are somehow ALL LAIRS because of a hyped-up set of assumptions of what those emails were supposed to have meant in the first place.
The ones that are so hyped-up on anything they can spin into a verbal froth (shit) and "sling" it all over the media. They know damn well what they are doing; just like that gorilla in the zoo does. They get a kick out of it, they get their rocks off on doing that sort of thing.
True, I don't know the people you do. That does not change in the slightest what I meant. Also precisely because I don't know the people you do, they should not take what I say personally ether.
The thing is - you don't know the people I do who would disagree with you...
They are not 'shit-slingers' in the least...They are nothing like your projected accusations here...Not even close...
==========================
lynn
12-07-2009, 12:58 AM
Okay...I didn't see that specificity in your posts...If it's there...then obviously I missed it...
I did not say they ALL are shit slinger's. I was referring to the ones that (for example) that used the STOLEN e Mails as a absolute truth about the MAJORITY of the the top climatologists that contend that humans have caused a significant enough amount of emissions to alter the climate are somehow ALL LAIRS because of a hyped-up set of assumptions of what those emails were supposed to have meant in the first place.
The ones that are so hyped-up on anything they can spin into a verbal froth (shit) and "sling" it all over the media. They know damn well what they are doing; just like that gorilla in the zoo does. They get a kick out of it, they get their rocks off on doing that sort of thing.
True, I don't know the people you do. That does not change in the slightest what I meant. Also precisely because I don't know the people you do, they should not take what I say personally ether.