View Full Version : Gorillas,“flat-worlder’s,&“moral”Part1
Hotspring 44
11-30-2009, 10:03 PM
:hello: "my fellow Americans", ( quote from Richard M. Nixon speech sometime in the past); I have this to say about that (another quote from something that Richard Nixon said in response to the Watergate break-in I believe); about this global warming thing and the naysayers, (:2cents:)I think they're just feeding the global :hitfan: situation. just more "flat worlder's" that still have the same mentality has a full-grown adult that still believes in the tooth :tinker: !
Or at least pretend they do, so that they will get money under their pillow for every single one of their false teeth every night!?
WTF! Are they really that corrupt and cynical intentionally or have their mind's been so corrupted and cynicalized to the extent that it's not their fault?
Explaining something to them is like:banghead: :banginhead:!
Then they come up with a bunch of:recycle: eld old bullshit propaganda with some kind of a supposedly new :Yinyangv: (spin) on it and somehow expect people to believe them as if they got a message from God, and you're going to go to hell if you don't believe them or something equivalent to that in actual life.
They have an attitude like :yossam: !
Are they really that :sick1: in the head?
I guess some people would rather hang on to their believes regardless of how :skullX:the situation is.
I guess if they have their way we can say :rip: too many species of flora and fauna that now exist in the nearer future than was previously hypothesized by the ones "they" are calling "liars!"
I think some of them just need more:whip: !
""Explaining something to them is like:banghead: :banginhead:!"".....................
I've heard the same complaint from those who've questioned the AGW 'proof' when talking to 'global warmers'...:banghead:
As one science teacher (known as ‘tennmac’) here attempts to ‘explain’…<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>
<o:p></o:p>
First, Facts: <o:p></o:p>
<o:p></o:p>
1. Is CO2 called Carbon Dioxide?...yes <o:p></o:p>
2. Is CO2 an atmospheric gas?.......yes <o:p></o:p>
3. Is Earth's atmosphere primarily CO2?...no <o:p></o:p>
4. Is Earth's atmosphere primarily O2?....no <o:p></o:p>
5. Is Earth's atmosphere primarily H2O?...no <o:p></o:p>
6. Is Earth's atmosphere primarily N2?....yes <o:p></o:p>
7. Do all atmospheric gases influence temperature?...yes <o:p></o:p>
8. Can atmospheric CO2 alone cause warming?...no <o:p></o:p>
9. Can atmospheric CO2 combined with other factors <o:p></o:p>
contribute to "warming"?...yes <o:p></o:p>
10. Can Earth's atmospheric CO2 alone cause warming?...no <o:p></o:p>
11. Are planet atmospheres with CO2 ever "cool"(cold)?...yes <o:p></o:p>
12. Can planet atmospheres be warm without CO2?...yes <o:p></o:p>
13. Can planet atmospheres be "cold" without CO2?...yes <o:p></o:p>
14. Can Oxygen molecules (ie. O3) affect atmosphere temps?...yes <o:p></o:p>
15. Can H2O influence atmospheric "warming"?...yes <o:p></o:p>
16. Can H2O influence atmospheric "cooling"?...yes <o:p></o:p>
17. Does H2O influence Earth's "warm" more than CO2?...yes <o:p></o:p>
18. Is Earth "warm" primarily because of H2O + sun?...yes <o:p></o:p>
19. Does the sun influence Earth's "warm"?...yes <o:p></o:p>
20. Does the sun influence Earth's "cool"?...yes <o:p></o:p>
21. Is solar energy (heat) constant at all times?...no <o:p></o:p>
22. Is there a "solar cycle"?...yes <o:p></o:p>
23. Does the solar cycle influence Earth's atmosphere?...yes <o:p></o:p>
24. Can the solar cycle cause atmospheric warming?...yes <o:p></o:p>
25. Can the solar cycle cause atmospheric cooling?...yes <o:p></o:p>
26. Does the sun influence ocean temperatures?...yes <o:p></o:p>
27. Are ocean temperatures uniform everywhere?...no <o:p></o:p>
28. Do oceans warm and cool?...yes <o:p></o:p>
29. Are there ocean currents worldwide?...yes <o:p></o:p>
30. Is Earth's atmosphere influenced by ocean currents?..yes <o:p></o:p>
31. Are Earth's seasons influenced by ocean currents?...yes <o:p></o:p>
32. Are glacial periods (ice ages) influenced by <o:p></o:p>
oceans?...yes <o:p></o:p>
33. Are interglacial periods influenced by oceans?...yes <o:p></o:p>
34. Are Interglacials generally warmer than glacials?...yes <o:p></o:p>
35. Do glaciers melt during interglacial periods?...yes <o:p></o:p>
36. Are glaciers melting at present?...yes <o:p></o:p>
37. Should glaciers be melting at present?...yes <o:p></o:p>
38. Have glaciers melted periodically over the past 700,000 years?...yes <o:p></o:p>
39. Is there evidence that CO2 is the primary cause of melting glaciers?...no <o:p></o:p>
40. Are oceans composed largely of H2O?...yes <o:p></o:p>
41. Is there more H2O than CO2 in the oceans?...yes <o:p></o:p>
42. Is there more H2O than CO2 in the atmosphere?...yes <o:p></o:p>
43. Does CO2 retain heat better than H2O?...no <o:p></o:p>
44. Does H2O retain heat better than CO2?...yes <o:p></o:p>
45. Is Mars' atmosphere primarily CO2?...yes <o:p></o:p>
46. Does Mars have surface H2O (oceans)?...no <o:p></o:p>
47. Does Mars have seasonal "global warming"?...yes <o:p></o:p>
48. Is Mars a "hot" planet because of CO2?...no <o:p></o:p>
49. Is Mars primarily a "cold" planet?...yes <o:p></o:p>
50. Is Mars a cold planet because of CO2?...no <o:p></o:p>
51. Is Venus' atmosphere primarily CO2?...yes <o:p></o:p>
52. Does Venus have surface H2O? (oceans)...no <o:p></o:p>
53. Is Venus a "cold" planet?...no <o:p></o:p>
54. Is Venus a "hot" planet?...yes <o:p></o:p>
55. Is there evidence that Earth's atmospheric CO2 influences Earth's temperatures?...yes <o:p></o:p>
56. Is there evidence that Earth's surface and atmospheric water influences temperatures?...yes <o:p></o:p>
57. Is there evidence that Earth's oxygen influences temperatures?...yes <o:p></o:p>
58. Is there evidence that Earth's water circulation and water cycle influence temperatures?...yes <o:p></o:p>
59. Is there evidence that Earth's sun influences temperatures?...yes <o:p></o:p>
60. Is there evidence that CO2 is the primary cause of Earth's current "warming" trend?...no <o:p></o:p>
61. Is there evidence that water is a primary cause of Earth's warming and cooling temperatures?...yes <o:p></o:p>
62. Is there evidence that ocean currents are a primary cause of Earth's warming and cooling "trends"?...yes <o:p></o:p>
63. Is there evidence that Earth's sun is the primary cause of "global warming" trends?...yes <o:p></o:p>
64. Has Earth had at least 7 glacial periods in the last 700,000 years?...yes <o:p></o:p>
65. Has Earth had "global warming" following each of the 7 glacial periods in 700,000 years?...yes <o:p></o:p>
66. Did burning fossil fuels (CO2) cause the past glacial periods?...no <o:p></o:p>
67. Did burning fossil fuels (CO2) cause the past "global warmings"?...no <o:p></o:p>
68. Did not burning fossil fuels (CO2) for 700,000 years stop past "global warmings"?...no <o:p></o:p>
69. Is blaming CO2 for "global warming" without considering other important climate factors rational?...no <o:p></o:p>
70. Is not being rational, being irrational?...yes <o:p></o:p>
71. Is there evidence that the current slight, normal "warming" trend is caused by multiple atmospheric, oceanic, and solar factors (including to a slight degree, CO2)?...yes <o:p></o:p>
72. Can humans significantly alter major, long term planetary conditions and changes?...sure, not <o:p></o:p>
<o:p></o:p>
Tennmac's CO2 Theory Of "Gobble Worming" <o:p></o:p>
<o:p></o:p>
with evidence thereof - Is this enough evidence? <o:p></o:p>
<o:p></o:p>
<o:p></o:p><?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" /><st1:State><st1:place>TENN</st1:place></st1:State>'S THEORY (LAW OF THERMODIEADDICTS):
<o:p></o:p>
NOT BURNING FOSSIL HYDROCARBON COMPOUNDS AND THE SUBSEQUENT RELEASE OF CO2 INTO THE ATMOSPHERE WILL NOT STOP OR START "GOBBLE WORMING" OR "GLOBAL WARMING" AS DEFINED BY A MISUNDERSTANDING OF COMPLEX INTERACTIONS OF PLANETARY ATMOSPHERIC PHENOMENA BY A FEW MISINFORMED DROIDS PROGRAMMED TO LOVE MYTHOLOGY. :worship:
<o:p></o:p>
Published by: T.E.Nnmac,pHC,MP,EDd,CO,DA, and TaTa. 2006, CO2 Theory Of Gobble Worming And Other Complex Atmospheric Ups and Downs. Journal of Religious Con Victs. Vol. 1, no. 1, p.1-1.
<o:p></o:p>
(FPI Warning: all rights reserved; no part of this theory may be copied, duplicated, "warmed over", altered, cycled, recycled, printed, imprinted, misprinted or questioned without proof, falsification of known facts, and the permission of the author.)
<o:p></o:p>
<o:p></o:p>
Hotspring 44
12-04-2009, 08:42 PM
:read: All (Known) factors have been considered and put into the formula that implicates the CO2 humans are exhausting since the "Industrial Age" does have a calculable contribution that is changing the chemical balance of the atmosphere whereas the trend is going towards warming NOT cooling at this point in time. But why should I bother giving the "Anti" "AG-GW" people whom just use a few (and in your case many) factoids out of context to somehow justify the shit slinging? :hmmm: :video: (https://www.waccobb.net/forums/waccoreader/61010-animated-journey-through-earths-climate-history.html)BBC News - An animated journey through the Earth's climate history (https://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/sci_tech/8386319.stm) Do you or anyone you know of have KNOWLEDGE (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge) of (exactly (https://www.thefreedictionary.com/exactly)) when (https://www.thefreedictionary.com/when) (n.) a natural event like for example an extreme volcanic venting of SO2 that reflects IR Solar heat back into space that as a certainty (https://www.thefreedictionary.com/certainty) in the next 200 or 300 years? that way the anti AG-GW folks (or their Heirs) can say: "we told you so". Are you-all holding out on the rest of us that kind of vital info? How many of those anti AG-GW folks claim to have a direct personal channel of communication (that they are individually exclusively privileged to; that they [him / her] have been "the chosen one") to "GOD"? Would you believe any of them if they said something like that "outside of the scientific realm? Q: Would that make a difference to me if you did?; A: :no:.
""Explaining something to them is like:banghead: :banginhead:!"".....................
I've heard the same complaint from those who've questioned the AGW 'proof' when talking to 'global warmers'...:banghead:
As one science teacher (known as ‘tennmac’) here attempts to ‘explain’…<o:p></o:p>
<o:p></o:p>
First, Facts: <o:p></o:p>
<o:p></o:p>
1. Is CO2 called Carbon Dioxide?...yes <o:p></o:p>...
<o:p></o:p>
<o:p></o:p>
Oh get off it...Get off your high holy rollers...I don't even know why you brought that silly line about 'god' into the scenario at all...
And I haven't done any 'shit-slinging' either...If you think voicing a different pov, and not going along with your pov. is shit-slinging then so be it...Nothin' I can do about it...
Hotspring 44
12-06-2009, 11:08 PM
You are taking it WAY to personally!:hmmm:
Oh get off it...Get off your high holy rollers...I don't even know why you brought that silly line about 'god' into the scenario at all...
And I haven't done any 'shit-slinging' either...If you think voicing a different pov, and not going along with your pov. is shit-slinging then so be it...Nothin' I can do about it...
Am I?...I thought it was an 'equal opportunity' rant board...(Well, that's what was happening here anyway)...