Horseman
01-05-2009, 03:59 PM
'Da 9-11 Truth Campaign To End 61 Years of Mass Murder
and Plunder for Fascist Gain by Shock and Shame.
Jan.5 2009, Abuse News #3977 by John Jenkel, 'da 9-11 Bounty Hunter,
800-500-7083, [email protected]
John Jenkel
3325 Gravenstein Highway North
Sebastopol, California 95472
January 5, 2009
E-mailed to [email protected] on Jan. 5, 2008, 3:30 p.m.
Faxed to 521-6750 on Jan. 5, 2008, 3:20 p.m..
E-mailed to [email protected] on Jan. 5, 2008, 3:30 p.m.
Faxed to 565-3104 on Jan 5, 2008, 3:20 p.m.
Honorable Knoel Owen
Presiding Judge, Sonoma County Superior Court
600 Administration Drive, Room 107J
Santa Rosa, California, 95403-2818
Dear Judge Owen:
We the deceived and betrayed people of the United States, we, the deceived and betrayed People of the State of California, 'da 9-11 Truth Campaign, and I thank you for asking Honorable Dean A. Beaupre to hear my opposition, Exhibit A, to being prohibited in California Superior Court Case No. SCV-242315, from "filing any new lawsuits in propria persona in any California court." This groundless and unjust order was proposed by California Superior Court Judge Elaine Rushing, Exhibit B.
His Honor provided justice in open court by endorse filing my opposition and patiently hearing my objections to this treasonous and unconstitutional proposed order, and then took this unenforceable pre-filing order under advisement.
This prohibition of my filing public good lawsuits that are designed to stop 61 years of mass murder by the United States would not only violate my constitutional rights, it would hinder over 12 years of my trying to stop the psychological abuse of carriage horses in San Francisco, seven years of my trying expose 2,629 unplanned murders during the Enron-sponsored organized crimes of 9-11, and almost six years of my trying to stop mass murder of congressional choice in unconstitutional wars through courts that refused to apply constitutional law. I think all that injustice ended the historic moment that Judge Beaupre took my opposition and argument under advisement.
Please consider asking Judge Beaupre to hear a show of
cause re dismissal of this public good case tomorrow
that is scheduled for Tuesday, January 6, 2009 at 3:30 p.m. in Courtroom 20, Exhibit C. It will provide Judge Beaupre more grounds to rule against my being declared a vexatious litigant, as undeclared warmongers desire. His Honor will get to see that there is a huge conspiracy working against my public good work, as indicated in this letter.
Judge Beaupre could not have been more considerate while hearing my case on Friday, January 2, 2009 before other 9-11 Truth Campaigners, including Rachel Charity Lamm. However, on March 6, 2007, Judge Beaupre unjustly ordered Ms Lamm to pay over $4,500 of legal costs, Exhibit D, to the father of her second child, domestically violent Lee Fredrick Jones, who battered Ms Lamm in front of their child, Exhibit E, endangered their child, Exhibit F, and violated Emergency Protective Order, Exhibit G, following a violent custody exchange at the Sebastopol Police Station on November 3, 2006.
On January 10, 2007, Judge Philip A. Champlin dismissed the charges against Defendant Jones, Exhibit H. Judge Champlin is a friend of Mr. Jones' mother, Katherine Williams in San Diego, California .
Ms Lamm was not able to reasonably defend from Judge Beaupre's unjust award to domestically violent Mr. Jones because she was still in shock from Judge James G. Bertoli cruelly and cowardly depriving her of all custody of their three year old child five days earlier without due process of law and for no probable cause, and awarding full custody to a domestically violent father on March 1, 2007,
Exhibit I, from behind closed doors. Victim Lamm asked Judge Beaupre to help restore her fraudulently and unjustly taken custody because that was all she cared about, but neither of us knew at the time to appeal to Judge Beaupre's court of constitutional law to prevent unreasonable seizure of a child in violation of supreme law in the 4th Amendment of the Constitution for the United States, Authority A, and Section 24 of Article I in the Constitution for the State of California, Authority B.
Mr. Jones has joint custody to this day based on the intentional injustice by Judge Bertoli. For 18 months Ms Lamm had NO custody and less than 20 hours of visitation with her three year old child that she had nursed for 2 1/2 years. Judge Bertoil's cruel ex parte order, Exhibit I, devastated effective corruption hater Lamm. She certainly could NOT help me stop mass murder. This unconstitutional ex parte order of March 1, 2007 certainly gives aid and comfort to enemies of the State of California to this day. These enemies profit from mass murder, plunder, and human suffering in unconstitutional wars of congressional choice, NEVER necessity. They launder their ill gotten gains by contributing to political campaigns, including campaigns for judicial office, buying non-profits, and building all cash Paul Hobbs Winery next to my farm.
Judge Bertoli deserves a death sentence under California Penal Code Section 37, Authority C, but his dishonor is protected by organized crime that feeds off undeclared wars. These highest level criminals control the courts though campaign funding directed by shake-down Willie Brown, the phantom governor of California who has controlled access to the world's most lucrative and fifth largest market since 1980. Ms Lamm can help me stop this highest level of corruption. However, to this day she can hardly function when her child is in her father's undeserved custody. When she has her child, she is totally devoted to her to make up for the love her child is missing in her father's care.
The same perversion of justice to prevent my filing cases proposed by Judge Rushing is being applied to Ms Lamm by Judges Eric L. Labowitz, Exhibit J, and by Judge Arnold D. Rosenfield, Exhibit K, in Sonoma County domestic violence Case No. SFL-34756, Rachel Lamm, Petitioner, v. Lee Jones, Respondent. These compromised judicial officers abridge Petitioner Lamm's constitutional right to restore her custody and infringe her freedom to help we the deceived and intimidated people stop mass murder by the United States.
The prevention of filing lawsuits or documents in existing cases clearly abridges a Superior Court Petitioner's 1st Amendment, Authority D, and constitutional rights under Section 3 of Article I in the Constitution for the State of California,
Authority E. Will your Honor put an end to this painfully unjust and unconstitutional practice by signing the ignored order filed in Petitioner Lamm's domestic violence case on August 21, 2008, Exhibit L ?
This proposed order to set aside Judge Rosenfield's unenforceable order, Exhibit K, against a court-abused mother, Petitioner Lamm, will allow her to protect herself and her children, and to restore the custody of her second child that Judge Bertoli took away from behind closed doors without due process of law required by Section 1 of the 14th Amendment, Authority F, or examination of probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, required by the 4th Amendment, Authority A.
Every week when Petitioner Lamm has to return her now five year old daughter to her domestically violent father, it is an unreasonable seizure of a child perpetrated by Judge Champlin on Jan. 10, 2007 and Judge Bertoli on March 1, 2007, rewarded by Judge Beaupre on March 6, 2007, supported by Judges Labowitz on April 19, 2007 and by Judge Rosenfield on October 31, 2007 who violated her constitutional rights to file documents. This judicial misconduct is all because Petitioner Lamm violated Judge Bertoli's unenforceable order of August 5, 2006 that "Mother may not bring VIOLET to John Jenkel's home of meetings," Exhibit M. This order violates the 1st Amendment and inalienable rights of "Mother," "VIOLET," and yours truly.
There is no statute of limitation for constitutional grounds. Judge Bertoli committed treason with this order of August 5, 2006 and the following ex parte order of March 1, 2007, Exhibit I. After our being exposed Friday to reasonable Judge Beaupre, Ms Lamm and I agree that Judge Beaupre did not understand the injustice of his award in favor of domestic violence by Mr. Jones. Will your Honor stay the order, Exhibit D, on your own motion?
The defective and unenforceable order of August 5, 2006, Exhibit M, issued during Ms Lamm's first appearance in court in her domestic violence case against protected criminal Jones. I could not assist her in preventing its issue on constitutional grounds because Paul Hobbs Winery partners had me arrested that morning for violating a defective Temporary Restraining Order, Exhibit N, from a civil harassment case brought by the Hobbs gang of criminals that your Honor dismissed eight days later, Exhibit O, at a show of cause hearing along with two other bogus TROs brought by the Hobbs gang, Exhibits P and Q.
Regarding my self-representation, I have experienced 32 years of corrupt attorney deals. I can only trust attorneys who will not represent me.
Judge Rushing filed the "ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR PRE-FILING ORDER PROHIBITING THE FILING OF NEW LITIGATION," Exhibit B, justly heard Friday by Judge Beaupre, on her own motion probably to prevent my most recent common good filing, Case No. SCV-244263, Exhibit R, that petitions for three orders nullifiying the California elections for United States Senators Joseph Biden, Dianne Feinstein, Barack Obama and 17 members of Congress from California to any office under the United States, in accordance with supreme law in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, Authority G, of the Constitution for the United States.
Judge Rushing's attempt to paint seven court cases that I have initiated to either: a) recover my unreasonably seized real property from a seductive agent of domestic enemies who profit from mass murder, plunder, and human suffering in unconstitutional wars, or b) to compel public good performance by accountable public officers to end 61 years of mass murder by the United States in optional undeclared wars, as vexatious litigation is part of a grand conspiracy. Her dishonor conspires with hundreds of other public officers to hide the truth about the Enron-sponsored organized crimes and 2,629 unplanned New York murders on 9-11 and treason by United States Senators Joseph Biden, Dianne Feinstein and 371 other members of the 107th Congress who authorized the President to use armed force "as he determines to be necessary" in Public Law 107-243, Exhibit S. They legalized 61 years of mass murder by the United States in unconstitutional wars of congressional choice, probably never necessity.
Judge Rushing certainly tried to hide something by twisting my mandamus Case No. SCV-242315 against "THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent" into a tort case against the "STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al, Defendants," as captioned in Exhibit B. A petition filed in court for a redress of grievance with government is certainly NOT a civil or criminal complaint.
This is not the first time that Judge Rushing has conspired with undeclared warmongers against my rights and committed treason. Since June 14, 2006,
Exhibit T, Judge Rushing has conspired with Paul Hobbs Winery partners to abridge my 1st Amendment rights "peaceably to assemble" and to "freedom of speech" and "of the press" in violation of United States Code Title 18, Part I, Chapter 13, Section 241, Authority H, and to deprive me of enjoyment of my property in violation of my inalienable rights protected by Section 1 of Article I in the Constitution for the State of California, Authority I, to end congressionally legalized mass murder in unconstitutional war of congressional choice. This abridgment and deprivation of the my constitutional rights gives aid and comfort to enemies, foreign and domestic who profit from United States mass murder, plunder, and human misery on foreign soil which is treason in violation of California Penal Code Section 37, Authority C. There is no statute of limitations for conspiring against rights and treason, which are both capital crimes carrying death sentences.
In the 2008 General Election, we the people of the United States could have stopped 61 years of Hoover Institute-advised and CIA produced unconstitutional wars where United States armed force is used on foreign soil to deprive persons of life, liberty, or property without due process of supreme law in violation of the 5th Amendment, Authority J, and without examination of probable cause, in violation of the 4th Amendment, Authority A, by voting against any member of Congress who gives aid and comfort to enemies, foreign and domestic, by authorizing the President to use United States armed forces "as he determines to be necessary" under Public Law 107-243, Exhibit S. However, no media would expose this fact for fear of losing advertisers. Grand Intimidator Willie Brown will chase then away. Wizard of Deception Willie protects all levels of organized crime, especially 2,629 unplanned murders, insurance scams to collect $4.7 billion for controlled demolititon, the selective stand down of NORAD interceptors, and the attack on restored United Flight 93 and the Office of Naval Intelligence on 9-11.
I was a general building contractor in Sonoma County and operated a horse drawn excursion business for 30 years. I was NEVER involved in any litigation until I tried to stop the psychological abuse and destruction of carriage horses in 1996 by an unqualified contractor in the City and County of San Francisco who is protected to this day by horse lover Willie Brown. This horse abuse continues to this day under the protection of California's phantom governor Willie Brown. "Very articulate black man" Willie Lewis Brown, Jr. , Exhibit T, is the only self-admitted material witness to the Enron-sponsored organized crimes of 9-11, Exhibit U.
Since the Enron-sponsored organized crimes of 9-11 that triggered two unconstitutional wars of congressional choice, never necessity, I have been a civil defendant in five frivolous cases brought by Paul Hobbs Winery partners. Three of these cases were so bogus that your court dismissed them without my even appearing, Exhibits O, P, and Q !
In the still perverted fourth case, injunction case SCV-238697, Judge Rushing conspired with the Hobbs gang against my 1st, 4th, and 14th Amendment rights by hindering my using my horse farm to expose the truth about 2,629 unplanned New York murders during a Bush-botched insurance scams on 9-11 that made controlled demolitions appear to be terrorist acts.
Then Judge Gary Nadler conspired with the Hobbs gang against my 4th and 14th Amendment rights by finding me in default for failing to file a case management statement on a First Amended Complaint that on October 16, 2007, Judge John Golden found defective because it quieted title without including a legal description. Judge Golden said from the bench before about 30 witnesses, "If you amend your complaint, you will loose your default." I then filed a motion to stay the default on October 22, 2007, Exhibit V. Then Hobbs peremptory challenged Judge Golden on Nov. 6, 2007, Exhibit ,W to protect a defective default.
On March 20, 2008, Judge Nadler allowed Hobbs to modify the defective First Amended Complaint to protect the bogus default, found me in default, and allowed Hobbs to bring easily impeachable evidence without cross examination that led to the unreasonable seizure and destruction of over six million dollars worth of my sacred property, a grove of land mark Douglas Fir trees, the protection of which was valuable consideration for a roadway and utility easement across my property. Judge Nadler then denied my APPLICATION TO RECONSIDER the bogus default, Exhibit X, and overruled my objections to default, Exhibit Y.
In the still perverted fifth case, bogus arbitration case SCV-238698, Judges Allen Hardcastle, Conrad L. Cox, and Raymond Giordano conspired with the Hobbs gang to seize and destroy over $150,000 of my personal property that was also valuable consideration for the roadway and utility easement across my property that I foolishly granted to embezzler Paul Hobbs.
There is a hearing in the frivolous, harassing, and unconstitutional injunction case SCV-23897 set for Jan. 14, 2008 in Courtroom 20 to sell one fifth of my farm through a bogus "SALE BY SHERIFF," Exhibit Z. It would be wonderful if Judge Beaupre could hear that matter. I can not trust Judge Nadler with my sacred ground!
Naturally, John Jenkel
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A: OBJECTION TO PRE-FILING ORDER BASED ON CONSTITUTIONAL GROUNDS.
Exhibit B: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR PRE-FILING ORDER
Exhibit C: AMENDED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL
Exhibit D: ORDER for victim Rachel Lamm to pay legal costs for perpetrator of domestic violence Lee Jones.
Exhibit E: Sebastopol Police Department charge of battery on Petitioner Rachel Lamm against perpetrator of domestic violence Respondent Lee Jones.
Exhibit F: Child endangerment charge against perpetrator of domestic violence Lee Jones who at the time of the incident was a respondent in a domestic violence case filed by Rachel Lamm in August of 2006 .
Exhibit G: Emergency Protective Order against perpetrator of domestic violence Lee Jones in favor of Rachel Lamm and their child.
Exhibit H: Charges dropped by Judge Philip A. Champlin against perpetrator of domestic violence Lee Jones in favor of his mother, Katherine Williams.
Exhibit I: Award of full custody to perpetrator of domestic violence Jones without due process or probable cause.
Exhibit J: Minutes of April 19, 2007 in domestic violence case Lamm v. Jones wherein Judges Eric L. Labowitz conspired with Judges Arnold D. Rosenfield and Lawrence Antolini and attorneys William S. Bleecker and Kathleen J. Smith to abridge Petitioner Lamm's right to file motions for protection from perpetrator of domestic violence Jones.
Exhibit K: Order by Judge Rosenfield prohibiting Petitioner Lamm from "filing of any documents in the child custody aspect of this matter."
Exhibit L: Proposed order lifting a mother's prohibition to file any motions or documents to protect her and her child from domestic violence by a perpetrator of domestic violence.
Exhibit M: The unenforceable order by Judge James G. Bertoli of August 5, 2006 that "Mother may not bring VIOLET to John Jenkel's home of meetings."
Exhibit N: Temporary Restraining Order from a civil harassment case that your Honor dismissed eight days later, Exhibit O, at a show of cause hearing along with two other dismissals, Exhibits P and Q, of bogus TROs brought by the Paul Hobbs Winery partners. All three TROs were signed by Commissioner Carla Bonilla who had no way of knowing that they were defective because they prevented Restrained John Jenkel from enjoying the use of his own property in violation of his inalienable rights which Judge Elaine Rushing continues to violate with her proposed pre-filing order being considered by Judge Beaupre. ANY judge who signs such an pre-filing order against yours truly, 'da 9-11 Bounty Hunter, will face two death sentences.
Exhibit O, P, and Q: Three bogus TROs brought by the Paul Hobbs Winery partners that are designed to force me to subordinate my mortgage loan to an easement so they can get a legitimate loan to launder over $6 million worth of ill gotten gains invested in a bait and switch ugly winery. All of these Restraining Order cases were dismissed by your honor on September 13, 2006 with "Defendant John Jenkel ... not present."
Exhibit R: NOTICE OF HEARING, Case No. SCV-244263 to nullify 19 California elections to 20 federal offices
Exhibit T: "Very articulate black man" billboard on Sebastopol Avenue for 6 weeks in 2003.
Exhibit U: Willie Brown "got a full eight hour warning" about 9-11.
Exhibit V: Motion to stay a groundless default, denied by Judge Gary Nadler
Exhibit W: The Hobbs gang's peremptory challenge of helpful Judge John Goldman who found Hobbs' First Amended Complaint "defective."
Exhibit X: Application for reconsideration of groundless default of a defective complaint that Judge Nadler allowed Hobbs to amend which, according to Judge Goldman voided default.
Exhibit Y: Objection to Hobbs objection for reconsideration of an order that covered up amending a defective First Amended Complaint in a frivolous case to corruptly keep a groundless default in place so that Judge Nadler and the Hobbs gang could deprive me of over $6 million in sacred property without due process of supreme law which requires examination of probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation.
List of Authorities
Authority A: The 4th Amendment: Warrants for seizure, U.S. Const.:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Authority B: Right to confront witnesses, Sec. 24, Art. I, CC: Rights guaranteed by this Constitution are not dependent on those guaranteed by the United States Constitution.
In criminal cases the rights of a defendant to equal protection of the laws, to due process of law, to the assistance of counsel, to be personally present with counsel, to a speedy and public trial, to compel the attendance of witnesses, to confront the witnesses against him or her, to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, to privacy, to not be compelled to be a witness against himself or herself, to not be placed twice in jeopardy for the same offense, and to not suffer the imposition of cruel or unusual punishment, shall be construed by the courts of this State in a ` manner consistent with the Constitution of the United States.
Authority C: Treason, California Penal Code Section 37
Treason against this state consists only in levying war against it, adhering to its enemies, or giving them aid and comfort, and can be committed only by persons owing allegiance to the state. The punishment of treason shall be death or life imprisonment without possibility of parole.
Authority D: 1st Amendment, U.S. Const.: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Authority E: Rights to instruct, petition for redress of grievances, assemble, consult, access, scrutiny, and broad construction. Sec. 3 (a), Art. I, Cal. Const.: The people have the right to instruct their representatives, petition government for a redress of grievances, and assemble freely to consult for the common good.
(b) (1) The people have the right of access to information concerning the conduct of the people's business, and, therefore, the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies shall be open to public scrutiny.
(2) A statute, court rule, or other authority, including those in effect on the effective date of this subdivision, shall be broadly construed if it furthers the people's right of access, and narrowly construed if it limits the right of access. A statute, court rule, or other authority adopted after the effective date of this subdivision that limits the right of access shall be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest.
Authority F: Rights to due process and equal protection,
14th Amendment, Section 1 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution for the United States. All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Authority G: Disqualification for Public Office, 14th Amendment, Sec. 3, 14th Amend., U.S. Const. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of FOR the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each house, remove such disability.
Authority H: Conspiracy against rights, U.S. Code Title 18, Part I, Chapter 13, Section 241.
The law most violated by public officers under the United States.
If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of
the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same;
or
If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured -
They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
Authority I: Inalienable rights, Article 1, Section 1 of the Constitution for the State of California rules: All people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy.
Authority J: Authority VII. Due Process, 5th Amendment, U.S. Const.:
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
and Plunder for Fascist Gain by Shock and Shame.
Jan.5 2009, Abuse News #3977 by John Jenkel, 'da 9-11 Bounty Hunter,
800-500-7083, [email protected]
John Jenkel
3325 Gravenstein Highway North
Sebastopol, California 95472
January 5, 2009
E-mailed to [email protected] on Jan. 5, 2008, 3:30 p.m.
Faxed to 521-6750 on Jan. 5, 2008, 3:20 p.m..
E-mailed to [email protected] on Jan. 5, 2008, 3:30 p.m.
Faxed to 565-3104 on Jan 5, 2008, 3:20 p.m.
Honorable Knoel Owen
Presiding Judge, Sonoma County Superior Court
600 Administration Drive, Room 107J
Santa Rosa, California, 95403-2818
Dear Judge Owen:
We the deceived and betrayed people of the United States, we, the deceived and betrayed People of the State of California, 'da 9-11 Truth Campaign, and I thank you for asking Honorable Dean A. Beaupre to hear my opposition, Exhibit A, to being prohibited in California Superior Court Case No. SCV-242315, from "filing any new lawsuits in propria persona in any California court." This groundless and unjust order was proposed by California Superior Court Judge Elaine Rushing, Exhibit B.
His Honor provided justice in open court by endorse filing my opposition and patiently hearing my objections to this treasonous and unconstitutional proposed order, and then took this unenforceable pre-filing order under advisement.
This prohibition of my filing public good lawsuits that are designed to stop 61 years of mass murder by the United States would not only violate my constitutional rights, it would hinder over 12 years of my trying to stop the psychological abuse of carriage horses in San Francisco, seven years of my trying expose 2,629 unplanned murders during the Enron-sponsored organized crimes of 9-11, and almost six years of my trying to stop mass murder of congressional choice in unconstitutional wars through courts that refused to apply constitutional law. I think all that injustice ended the historic moment that Judge Beaupre took my opposition and argument under advisement.
Please consider asking Judge Beaupre to hear a show of
cause re dismissal of this public good case tomorrow
that is scheduled for Tuesday, January 6, 2009 at 3:30 p.m. in Courtroom 20, Exhibit C. It will provide Judge Beaupre more grounds to rule against my being declared a vexatious litigant, as undeclared warmongers desire. His Honor will get to see that there is a huge conspiracy working against my public good work, as indicated in this letter.
Judge Beaupre could not have been more considerate while hearing my case on Friday, January 2, 2009 before other 9-11 Truth Campaigners, including Rachel Charity Lamm. However, on March 6, 2007, Judge Beaupre unjustly ordered Ms Lamm to pay over $4,500 of legal costs, Exhibit D, to the father of her second child, domestically violent Lee Fredrick Jones, who battered Ms Lamm in front of their child, Exhibit E, endangered their child, Exhibit F, and violated Emergency Protective Order, Exhibit G, following a violent custody exchange at the Sebastopol Police Station on November 3, 2006.
On January 10, 2007, Judge Philip A. Champlin dismissed the charges against Defendant Jones, Exhibit H. Judge Champlin is a friend of Mr. Jones' mother, Katherine Williams in San Diego, California .
Ms Lamm was not able to reasonably defend from Judge Beaupre's unjust award to domestically violent Mr. Jones because she was still in shock from Judge James G. Bertoli cruelly and cowardly depriving her of all custody of their three year old child five days earlier without due process of law and for no probable cause, and awarding full custody to a domestically violent father on March 1, 2007,
Exhibit I, from behind closed doors. Victim Lamm asked Judge Beaupre to help restore her fraudulently and unjustly taken custody because that was all she cared about, but neither of us knew at the time to appeal to Judge Beaupre's court of constitutional law to prevent unreasonable seizure of a child in violation of supreme law in the 4th Amendment of the Constitution for the United States, Authority A, and Section 24 of Article I in the Constitution for the State of California, Authority B.
Mr. Jones has joint custody to this day based on the intentional injustice by Judge Bertoli. For 18 months Ms Lamm had NO custody and less than 20 hours of visitation with her three year old child that she had nursed for 2 1/2 years. Judge Bertoil's cruel ex parte order, Exhibit I, devastated effective corruption hater Lamm. She certainly could NOT help me stop mass murder. This unconstitutional ex parte order of March 1, 2007 certainly gives aid and comfort to enemies of the State of California to this day. These enemies profit from mass murder, plunder, and human suffering in unconstitutional wars of congressional choice, NEVER necessity. They launder their ill gotten gains by contributing to political campaigns, including campaigns for judicial office, buying non-profits, and building all cash Paul Hobbs Winery next to my farm.
Judge Bertoli deserves a death sentence under California Penal Code Section 37, Authority C, but his dishonor is protected by organized crime that feeds off undeclared wars. These highest level criminals control the courts though campaign funding directed by shake-down Willie Brown, the phantom governor of California who has controlled access to the world's most lucrative and fifth largest market since 1980. Ms Lamm can help me stop this highest level of corruption. However, to this day she can hardly function when her child is in her father's undeserved custody. When she has her child, she is totally devoted to her to make up for the love her child is missing in her father's care.
The same perversion of justice to prevent my filing cases proposed by Judge Rushing is being applied to Ms Lamm by Judges Eric L. Labowitz, Exhibit J, and by Judge Arnold D. Rosenfield, Exhibit K, in Sonoma County domestic violence Case No. SFL-34756, Rachel Lamm, Petitioner, v. Lee Jones, Respondent. These compromised judicial officers abridge Petitioner Lamm's constitutional right to restore her custody and infringe her freedom to help we the deceived and intimidated people stop mass murder by the United States.
The prevention of filing lawsuits or documents in existing cases clearly abridges a Superior Court Petitioner's 1st Amendment, Authority D, and constitutional rights under Section 3 of Article I in the Constitution for the State of California,
Authority E. Will your Honor put an end to this painfully unjust and unconstitutional practice by signing the ignored order filed in Petitioner Lamm's domestic violence case on August 21, 2008, Exhibit L ?
This proposed order to set aside Judge Rosenfield's unenforceable order, Exhibit K, against a court-abused mother, Petitioner Lamm, will allow her to protect herself and her children, and to restore the custody of her second child that Judge Bertoli took away from behind closed doors without due process of law required by Section 1 of the 14th Amendment, Authority F, or examination of probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, required by the 4th Amendment, Authority A.
Every week when Petitioner Lamm has to return her now five year old daughter to her domestically violent father, it is an unreasonable seizure of a child perpetrated by Judge Champlin on Jan. 10, 2007 and Judge Bertoli on March 1, 2007, rewarded by Judge Beaupre on March 6, 2007, supported by Judges Labowitz on April 19, 2007 and by Judge Rosenfield on October 31, 2007 who violated her constitutional rights to file documents. This judicial misconduct is all because Petitioner Lamm violated Judge Bertoli's unenforceable order of August 5, 2006 that "Mother may not bring VIOLET to John Jenkel's home of meetings," Exhibit M. This order violates the 1st Amendment and inalienable rights of "Mother," "VIOLET," and yours truly.
There is no statute of limitation for constitutional grounds. Judge Bertoli committed treason with this order of August 5, 2006 and the following ex parte order of March 1, 2007, Exhibit I. After our being exposed Friday to reasonable Judge Beaupre, Ms Lamm and I agree that Judge Beaupre did not understand the injustice of his award in favor of domestic violence by Mr. Jones. Will your Honor stay the order, Exhibit D, on your own motion?
The defective and unenforceable order of August 5, 2006, Exhibit M, issued during Ms Lamm's first appearance in court in her domestic violence case against protected criminal Jones. I could not assist her in preventing its issue on constitutional grounds because Paul Hobbs Winery partners had me arrested that morning for violating a defective Temporary Restraining Order, Exhibit N, from a civil harassment case brought by the Hobbs gang of criminals that your Honor dismissed eight days later, Exhibit O, at a show of cause hearing along with two other bogus TROs brought by the Hobbs gang, Exhibits P and Q.
Regarding my self-representation, I have experienced 32 years of corrupt attorney deals. I can only trust attorneys who will not represent me.
Judge Rushing filed the "ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR PRE-FILING ORDER PROHIBITING THE FILING OF NEW LITIGATION," Exhibit B, justly heard Friday by Judge Beaupre, on her own motion probably to prevent my most recent common good filing, Case No. SCV-244263, Exhibit R, that petitions for three orders nullifiying the California elections for United States Senators Joseph Biden, Dianne Feinstein, Barack Obama and 17 members of Congress from California to any office under the United States, in accordance with supreme law in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, Authority G, of the Constitution for the United States.
Judge Rushing's attempt to paint seven court cases that I have initiated to either: a) recover my unreasonably seized real property from a seductive agent of domestic enemies who profit from mass murder, plunder, and human suffering in unconstitutional wars, or b) to compel public good performance by accountable public officers to end 61 years of mass murder by the United States in optional undeclared wars, as vexatious litigation is part of a grand conspiracy. Her dishonor conspires with hundreds of other public officers to hide the truth about the Enron-sponsored organized crimes and 2,629 unplanned New York murders on 9-11 and treason by United States Senators Joseph Biden, Dianne Feinstein and 371 other members of the 107th Congress who authorized the President to use armed force "as he determines to be necessary" in Public Law 107-243, Exhibit S. They legalized 61 years of mass murder by the United States in unconstitutional wars of congressional choice, probably never necessity.
Judge Rushing certainly tried to hide something by twisting my mandamus Case No. SCV-242315 against "THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent" into a tort case against the "STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al, Defendants," as captioned in Exhibit B. A petition filed in court for a redress of grievance with government is certainly NOT a civil or criminal complaint.
This is not the first time that Judge Rushing has conspired with undeclared warmongers against my rights and committed treason. Since June 14, 2006,
Exhibit T, Judge Rushing has conspired with Paul Hobbs Winery partners to abridge my 1st Amendment rights "peaceably to assemble" and to "freedom of speech" and "of the press" in violation of United States Code Title 18, Part I, Chapter 13, Section 241, Authority H, and to deprive me of enjoyment of my property in violation of my inalienable rights protected by Section 1 of Article I in the Constitution for the State of California, Authority I, to end congressionally legalized mass murder in unconstitutional war of congressional choice. This abridgment and deprivation of the my constitutional rights gives aid and comfort to enemies, foreign and domestic who profit from United States mass murder, plunder, and human misery on foreign soil which is treason in violation of California Penal Code Section 37, Authority C. There is no statute of limitations for conspiring against rights and treason, which are both capital crimes carrying death sentences.
In the 2008 General Election, we the people of the United States could have stopped 61 years of Hoover Institute-advised and CIA produced unconstitutional wars where United States armed force is used on foreign soil to deprive persons of life, liberty, or property without due process of supreme law in violation of the 5th Amendment, Authority J, and without examination of probable cause, in violation of the 4th Amendment, Authority A, by voting against any member of Congress who gives aid and comfort to enemies, foreign and domestic, by authorizing the President to use United States armed forces "as he determines to be necessary" under Public Law 107-243, Exhibit S. However, no media would expose this fact for fear of losing advertisers. Grand Intimidator Willie Brown will chase then away. Wizard of Deception Willie protects all levels of organized crime, especially 2,629 unplanned murders, insurance scams to collect $4.7 billion for controlled demolititon, the selective stand down of NORAD interceptors, and the attack on restored United Flight 93 and the Office of Naval Intelligence on 9-11.
I was a general building contractor in Sonoma County and operated a horse drawn excursion business for 30 years. I was NEVER involved in any litigation until I tried to stop the psychological abuse and destruction of carriage horses in 1996 by an unqualified contractor in the City and County of San Francisco who is protected to this day by horse lover Willie Brown. This horse abuse continues to this day under the protection of California's phantom governor Willie Brown. "Very articulate black man" Willie Lewis Brown, Jr. , Exhibit T, is the only self-admitted material witness to the Enron-sponsored organized crimes of 9-11, Exhibit U.
Since the Enron-sponsored organized crimes of 9-11 that triggered two unconstitutional wars of congressional choice, never necessity, I have been a civil defendant in five frivolous cases brought by Paul Hobbs Winery partners. Three of these cases were so bogus that your court dismissed them without my even appearing, Exhibits O, P, and Q !
In the still perverted fourth case, injunction case SCV-238697, Judge Rushing conspired with the Hobbs gang against my 1st, 4th, and 14th Amendment rights by hindering my using my horse farm to expose the truth about 2,629 unplanned New York murders during a Bush-botched insurance scams on 9-11 that made controlled demolitions appear to be terrorist acts.
Then Judge Gary Nadler conspired with the Hobbs gang against my 4th and 14th Amendment rights by finding me in default for failing to file a case management statement on a First Amended Complaint that on October 16, 2007, Judge John Golden found defective because it quieted title without including a legal description. Judge Golden said from the bench before about 30 witnesses, "If you amend your complaint, you will loose your default." I then filed a motion to stay the default on October 22, 2007, Exhibit V. Then Hobbs peremptory challenged Judge Golden on Nov. 6, 2007, Exhibit ,W to protect a defective default.
On March 20, 2008, Judge Nadler allowed Hobbs to modify the defective First Amended Complaint to protect the bogus default, found me in default, and allowed Hobbs to bring easily impeachable evidence without cross examination that led to the unreasonable seizure and destruction of over six million dollars worth of my sacred property, a grove of land mark Douglas Fir trees, the protection of which was valuable consideration for a roadway and utility easement across my property. Judge Nadler then denied my APPLICATION TO RECONSIDER the bogus default, Exhibit X, and overruled my objections to default, Exhibit Y.
In the still perverted fifth case, bogus arbitration case SCV-238698, Judges Allen Hardcastle, Conrad L. Cox, and Raymond Giordano conspired with the Hobbs gang to seize and destroy over $150,000 of my personal property that was also valuable consideration for the roadway and utility easement across my property that I foolishly granted to embezzler Paul Hobbs.
There is a hearing in the frivolous, harassing, and unconstitutional injunction case SCV-23897 set for Jan. 14, 2008 in Courtroom 20 to sell one fifth of my farm through a bogus "SALE BY SHERIFF," Exhibit Z. It would be wonderful if Judge Beaupre could hear that matter. I can not trust Judge Nadler with my sacred ground!
Naturally, John Jenkel
List of Exhibits
Exhibit A: OBJECTION TO PRE-FILING ORDER BASED ON CONSTITUTIONAL GROUNDS.
Exhibit B: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR PRE-FILING ORDER
Exhibit C: AMENDED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL
Exhibit D: ORDER for victim Rachel Lamm to pay legal costs for perpetrator of domestic violence Lee Jones.
Exhibit E: Sebastopol Police Department charge of battery on Petitioner Rachel Lamm against perpetrator of domestic violence Respondent Lee Jones.
Exhibit F: Child endangerment charge against perpetrator of domestic violence Lee Jones who at the time of the incident was a respondent in a domestic violence case filed by Rachel Lamm in August of 2006 .
Exhibit G: Emergency Protective Order against perpetrator of domestic violence Lee Jones in favor of Rachel Lamm and their child.
Exhibit H: Charges dropped by Judge Philip A. Champlin against perpetrator of domestic violence Lee Jones in favor of his mother, Katherine Williams.
Exhibit I: Award of full custody to perpetrator of domestic violence Jones without due process or probable cause.
Exhibit J: Minutes of April 19, 2007 in domestic violence case Lamm v. Jones wherein Judges Eric L. Labowitz conspired with Judges Arnold D. Rosenfield and Lawrence Antolini and attorneys William S. Bleecker and Kathleen J. Smith to abridge Petitioner Lamm's right to file motions for protection from perpetrator of domestic violence Jones.
Exhibit K: Order by Judge Rosenfield prohibiting Petitioner Lamm from "filing of any documents in the child custody aspect of this matter."
Exhibit L: Proposed order lifting a mother's prohibition to file any motions or documents to protect her and her child from domestic violence by a perpetrator of domestic violence.
Exhibit M: The unenforceable order by Judge James G. Bertoli of August 5, 2006 that "Mother may not bring VIOLET to John Jenkel's home of meetings."
Exhibit N: Temporary Restraining Order from a civil harassment case that your Honor dismissed eight days later, Exhibit O, at a show of cause hearing along with two other dismissals, Exhibits P and Q, of bogus TROs brought by the Paul Hobbs Winery partners. All three TROs were signed by Commissioner Carla Bonilla who had no way of knowing that they were defective because they prevented Restrained John Jenkel from enjoying the use of his own property in violation of his inalienable rights which Judge Elaine Rushing continues to violate with her proposed pre-filing order being considered by Judge Beaupre. ANY judge who signs such an pre-filing order against yours truly, 'da 9-11 Bounty Hunter, will face two death sentences.
Exhibit O, P, and Q: Three bogus TROs brought by the Paul Hobbs Winery partners that are designed to force me to subordinate my mortgage loan to an easement so they can get a legitimate loan to launder over $6 million worth of ill gotten gains invested in a bait and switch ugly winery. All of these Restraining Order cases were dismissed by your honor on September 13, 2006 with "Defendant John Jenkel ... not present."
Exhibit R: NOTICE OF HEARING, Case No. SCV-244263 to nullify 19 California elections to 20 federal offices
Exhibit T: "Very articulate black man" billboard on Sebastopol Avenue for 6 weeks in 2003.
Exhibit U: Willie Brown "got a full eight hour warning" about 9-11.
Exhibit V: Motion to stay a groundless default, denied by Judge Gary Nadler
Exhibit W: The Hobbs gang's peremptory challenge of helpful Judge John Goldman who found Hobbs' First Amended Complaint "defective."
Exhibit X: Application for reconsideration of groundless default of a defective complaint that Judge Nadler allowed Hobbs to amend which, according to Judge Goldman voided default.
Exhibit Y: Objection to Hobbs objection for reconsideration of an order that covered up amending a defective First Amended Complaint in a frivolous case to corruptly keep a groundless default in place so that Judge Nadler and the Hobbs gang could deprive me of over $6 million in sacred property without due process of supreme law which requires examination of probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation.
List of Authorities
Authority A: The 4th Amendment: Warrants for seizure, U.S. Const.:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Authority B: Right to confront witnesses, Sec. 24, Art. I, CC: Rights guaranteed by this Constitution are not dependent on those guaranteed by the United States Constitution.
In criminal cases the rights of a defendant to equal protection of the laws, to due process of law, to the assistance of counsel, to be personally present with counsel, to a speedy and public trial, to compel the attendance of witnesses, to confront the witnesses against him or her, to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, to privacy, to not be compelled to be a witness against himself or herself, to not be placed twice in jeopardy for the same offense, and to not suffer the imposition of cruel or unusual punishment, shall be construed by the courts of this State in a ` manner consistent with the Constitution of the United States.
Authority C: Treason, California Penal Code Section 37
Treason against this state consists only in levying war against it, adhering to its enemies, or giving them aid and comfort, and can be committed only by persons owing allegiance to the state. The punishment of treason shall be death or life imprisonment without possibility of parole.
Authority D: 1st Amendment, U.S. Const.: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Authority E: Rights to instruct, petition for redress of grievances, assemble, consult, access, scrutiny, and broad construction. Sec. 3 (a), Art. I, Cal. Const.: The people have the right to instruct their representatives, petition government for a redress of grievances, and assemble freely to consult for the common good.
(b) (1) The people have the right of access to information concerning the conduct of the people's business, and, therefore, the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies shall be open to public scrutiny.
(2) A statute, court rule, or other authority, including those in effect on the effective date of this subdivision, shall be broadly construed if it furthers the people's right of access, and narrowly construed if it limits the right of access. A statute, court rule, or other authority adopted after the effective date of this subdivision that limits the right of access shall be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest.
Authority F: Rights to due process and equal protection,
14th Amendment, Section 1 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution for the United States. All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Authority G: Disqualification for Public Office, 14th Amendment, Sec. 3, 14th Amend., U.S. Const. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of FOR the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each house, remove such disability.
Authority H: Conspiracy against rights, U.S. Code Title 18, Part I, Chapter 13, Section 241.
The law most violated by public officers under the United States.
If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of
the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same;
or
If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured -
They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
Authority I: Inalienable rights, Article 1, Section 1 of the Constitution for the State of California rules: All people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy.
Authority J: Authority VII. Due Process, 5th Amendment, U.S. Const.:
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.