PDA

View Full Version : ACTION: Protect bees, Oppose AB771



Zeno Swijtink
12-18-2008, 11:41 AM
Sample letter below - Zeno


From: Serge Labesque [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 11:09 PM
Subject: Seedless mandarin growers vs. honey bees / Urgent and important / Your help is needed

I just came back from a*meeting of the Seedless Mandarin and Honey Bee Coexistence Workgourp, in Sacramento, today. The news is dismal.

If there ever was a time for you to get involved, this is it!
Please make a point of letting CDFA know your opposition to AB771*before the week's end. It is really urgent!

A word, a line, a letter, anything that will let the State Secretary of Agriculture know that you object to the unbelievable move by large citrus growers to*forbid or reduce*access to some areas in the state that are*most important for the health of honeybees.

Here is a little background:

Citrus growers*can generate*much greater financial gains by planting varieties of mandarin oranges that can*produce seedless fruit. So, they planted these in large numbers in recent years. Nothing wrong here, except that they did this without taking the proper precautions to ensure that the fruit be seedless (these are essentially to either plant varieties that can spontaneously produce seedless fruit or by assuring the presence of*buffer zones around these orchards in order to prevent cross pollination by compatible pollen from other citrus varieties).

When they realized that their fruit contained seeds because honey bees foraged on their trees, they asked the state legislature to forbid the presence of honeybees within*a two-mile radius of*any 6 acre parcel of their orchard. This means potentially banning bees from 8,000 acres of land to protect*any*6 acre orchard.*

At a time when honey bees are suffering from loss of habitat and from ensueing malnutrition, among other ailments, this is absolutely incredible and unconscionable! And this is contributing to what is bound to be one of the greatest environmental crises of our time: the loss of pollinators.

urthermore, if this ruling is allowed to pass, citrus growers will be placing the burden of*ensuring that they make a greater financial profit from their crops onto all the*other people that live and work around their orchards.
Our legislators should protect the rights and freedom of individuals. In this case, they washed their hands of the issue and turned the decision over to a workgroup that shows no sign of coming to any compromise. So, ultimately the decision will be made by the State Secretary of Agriculture. This will be done within just a few days.

Of course, citrus growers have the right to plant whatever variety of mandarin oranges they want to on their land. But their revenue must be generated in a*responsible manner. This can be done by netting the trees or by strategically placing the orchards, for example. This has to be done at their cost.
The rights and freedom*of others*who live and work around their orchards should not be affected. They*should still not be prevented from*having bees on their land.*

Again, please write without delay to the State Secretary of Agriculture to say that you oppose AB771. Beekeepers should be allowed to have bees*in these areas that are crucial to bee health, as they have traditionally done for decades

Also, forward this email to as many of your friends as possible.
This is urgent, as the State Secretary of Agriculture will make a determination in the next few days.
This is important, as the functioning of our ecosystem, including our food supply, depends on honey bees and other pollinators.

Here is the address of the CDFA:

A. G. Kawamura, Secretary
California Department of Food and Agriculture
1220 N Street, Suite A-400
Sacramento, CA 95814


Thank you.

Serge Labesque


Seedless mandarin growers vs. honey bees / Urgent and important / Your help is needed

*****

Sample Letter

Email to: "A. G. Kawamura, Secretary California Department of Food and Agriculture" <[email protected]>


A. G. Kawamura, Secretary
California Department of Food and Agriculture
1220 N Street, Suite A-400
Sacramento, CA 95814

RE: Oppose AB771

Dear Secretary Kawamura:

While we love our mandarin oranges, even more critical to our state's health is that our honeybees thrive. Please don't compromise the vitality of our ecosystem by permitting specialty growers to exclude the pollinators who are key to sustainability and food security.

Sincerely,

YOUR NAME

cc: Hon. Jared Huffman "Jared Huffman" <[email protected]>

Braggi
12-18-2008, 01:07 PM
Sample letter below - Zeno




Zeno, I always doubt the veracity of a letter like this when I notice there are no dates!!!! There are, however, several statements along the lines of: in a few days ... , only a few days left to act ... and so on.

Please connect us with something current that actually has valid dates on it so we know whether we're wasting our time and that of our public servants.

Thanks,

-Jeff

============

Here's the actual law, which was probably written two years ago:


SENATE AGRICULTURE COMMITTEE
Senator Abel Maldonado, Chairman

BILL NO: AB 771 HEARING: 7/3/07
AUTHOR: De Leon FISCAL: Yes
VERSION: 6/28/07 CONSULTANT: John Chandler

Citrus: seedless mandarins.

BACKGROUND AND EXISTING LAW

California has been growing citrus for over 50 years, starting
in southern California and slowly moving into the San Joaquin
Valley. As citrus production has moved from the urbanizing
southern California regions, the varieties of citrus produced
changed with the tastes of consumers. The standards of the
citrus industry, the seeded Valencia orange and seedless Navel
Orange, are slowly losing ground to the demands of consumers for
easily pealable seedless mandarin citrus varieties. Mandarins
have grown in acreage; the San Joaquin Valley alone has over
25,000 acres of mandarins accounting for 20% of valley citrus
production in 2005.

The California bee industry provides essential pollination
services to California agriculture. Bees pollinate over 130
different fruit, vegetable, nut, ornamental, and fiber crops in
California. While bees pollinate many of these crops, the
forage for nectar and pollen is used to feed their colony and
produce honey. With the rise in almond production in
California, the number of bee hives in the state has also grown
substantially. Following the almond bloom period, beekeepers
will move their bees in the vicinity of citrus groves to allow
their bees to forage on the citrus. It is estimated that during
the citrus bloom period, approximately 250,000 to 300,000 bee
colonies are located within the citrus belt.

The most popular seedless mandarin varieties grown in California
include the Clementine and the Murcott. Both of these varieties
produce seedless fruit that is easy to peel meeting the changing
demands of citrus consumers. When Clementine or Murcott flowers
are cross pollinated with other citrus varieties, their fruit
will set seeds. The most effective means of cross pollination
is by foraging bees which carry pollen from flower to flower.
Bees' pollination effectiveness is why they are so essential to
the success of so many other California crops which require
cross pollination to be productive.

PROPOSED LAW





AB 771 - Page 2


AB 771 would do the following:

Establish Coexistence Working Groups of no more than ten
individuals primarily affected stakeholders that may be
established by CDFA to address conflicts between sectors of
agriculture. These working groups would develop, review,
and provide findings and recommendations to CDFA regarding
coexistence of various sectors of agriculture that may be
in conflict.
o Coexistence Working Groups may develop best
management practices to foster coexistence between
agriculture groups, identify means of coordination and
communication among involved agriculture sectors to
develop consensus on voluntary production practices,
and work with the State Board of Food and Agriculture
to provide a forum for dialogue on agriculture
coexistence.
Establish the Mandarin and Honeybee Coexistence Working
Group Act that shall be established by January 15, 2008, to
address coexistence issues and develop best management
practices for Fresno, Kern, Madera, and Tulare counties.
Require CDFA to adopt emergency regulations for Fresno,
Kern, Madera, and Tulare counties to address coexistence
issues with seedless mandarin producers to ensure seedless
fruit and give bees' access to citrus for the 2008 citrus
bloom if the coexistence working group fails to reach
consensus by February 15, 2008. CDFA may also adopt
similar regulations at anytime.
Specify that regulations adopted by CDFA may include
fees paid by persons subject to and benefiting from adopted
regulations.

COMMENTS

1.Supporters of AB 771 state that this bill would enable the
growing seedless mandarin industry to protect their industry
from the quality damage caused due to bee cross pollination.
Further, most bees found in the California citrus belt are
stored there to feed off of the citrus bloom between
pollinating services around the nation. While the bee
industry utilizes citrus bloom, the citrus industry ends up
with undesirable seeds in their fruit. The establishment of a
coexistence working group would enable stakeholders to work on
finding a mutually beneficial solution to the seedless
mandarin and bee dispute. The February 15, 2008, requirement
for CDFA emergency regulations would provide the needed hammer
to focus the working group to establish best management





AB 771 - Page 3


practices in a timely manner.

2.This bill would require the establishment of the Seedless
Mandarin and Honeybee Coexistence Working Group by January 15,
2008, and by February 15, 2008, require CDFA to adopt
emergency regulations. Thus allowing the working group only
about one month after forming to establish best management
practices. This timeframe seems entirely too short for a
workable solution to be developed by the working group. The
committee may want to consider extending the timeframe of the
workgroup to address coexistence issues between seedless
mandarins and honeybees.

3.The bill would authorize CDFA to adopt regulations and
establish fees to address coexistence issues related to
seedless mandarins and honeybees, notwithstanding other
avenues to resolve the conflict outlined in the bill. This
would mean that CDFA could adopt regulations at any time
without regard to any efforts by the Seedless Mandarin and
Honeybee Coexistence Working Group. The committee may want to
consider providing an opportunity for the working group to
perform its duty and allow any recommended best management
practices to take effect before authorizing CDFA regulations.

4.This bill establishes the authority of CDFA to establish
coexistence working groups to address conflict between sectors
of the agriculture industry. In the same bill, separate
language defines the establishment of a different coexistence
working group, specifically for seedless mandarins and
honeybees. It would seem that the general language for a
coexistence working group should be sufficient to address
seedless mandarin and honeybee conflict without requiring
separate language. The committee may want to consider what is
the value of having a separate act just for the seedless
mandarin and honeybee conflict if the bill already establishes
authority for CDFA to form coexistence working groups.

5.Should regulations be adopted by CDFA, they will be authorized
to establish a fee paid by persons CDFA feels are subject to
the regulations and benefit from the regulations. The
benefiting party from regulations could theoretically include
both seedless mandarin growers for protection of the crop, bee
keepers maintaining access to citrus for honey production, or
any pollinator that would benefit from healthy bee hives
nourished on citrus pollen. The committee may want to
consider if the fee should be capped and the payee further
defined.





AB 771 - Page 4



6.When this bill was heard on our June 19th hearing, it was held
by the author with the understanding that all parties would
work together to try and develop a more reasonable bill for
all parties. While the author and sponsors have made an
effort to address concerns expressed by opponents as evidenced
by the amended language, major opponents have not changed
their position on this bill. The committee may want to
consider if this bill meets the charge of this committee from
the June 19th hearing.

PRIOR ACTIONS

Irrelevant to the current version of the bill

SUPPORT

California Citrus Mutual
Carman Family Farms
Griffith Farms
Nisei Farmers League
Paramount Citrus
California Grocers Association
Three Individuals

OPPOSITION

California Farm Bureau Federation
California Minnesota Honey Farms
California State Beekeepers Association
Fresno County Farm Bureau
Strachan Apiaries, Inc.
SueBee
Terra Bella Honey Company
Tulare County Farm Bureau
California Seed Association
Miller Honey Farms
Eight Individuals

Zeno Swijtink
12-18-2008, 09:18 PM
Zeno, I always doubt the veracity of a letter like this when I notice there are no dates!!!! There are, however, several statements along the lines of: in a few days ... , only a few days left to act ... and so on.

Please connect us with something current that actually has valid dates on it so we know whether we're wasting our time and that of our public servants.

Thanks,

-Jeff


The Legislative Office of CDFA wrote me:

Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:59:55 -0800
From: "Legislative" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Oppose AB771

Thank you for your comments.

AB 771 was passed by the legislature and approved by the Governor on October 8, 2007 and therefore is in existing statute (FAC 29810). Existing law and potential regulations, as required by AB 771, do NOT ban or restrict the placement of honeybees near citrus groves. AB 771 only applies to Tulare, Fresno, Madera and Kern counties. There is existing statute, starting with FAC 29040, that addresses the requirements of owners of apiaries.

Legislative Office
CDFA


But I heard from Serge Labesque who send out the original email and teaches beekeeping at the JC and at the Regenerative Design Institute in Inverness.

"Not everything is set. The Secretary is about to make a decision about the modalities of implementation. Let's hope that we will be heard."

So it appears that the implementing regulations are now being written and public input is still useful.