Log In

View Full Version : MORE GOOD NEWS: Experimental plant turns poop to power



Zeno Swijtink
07-10-2008, 10:47 PM
ENERGY
Experimental plant turns poop to power (https://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/nation/07/07/0707pooppower.html)
Company is working on the next new energy source: fuel from human waste.
By Bob Keefe
WEST COAST BUREAU
Monday, July 07, 2008

RIALTO, Calif. — At the end of a dusty dirt road, next to a cement factory and a junkyard, an Atlanta company is working on the next new energy source: fuel from human waste.

By the end of the year, the $160 million plant that EnerTech Environmental Inc. is building in this community east of Los Angeles is expected to take hundreds of tons of sewage sludge — which isn't only treated human waste, but is anything and everything that passes through the drain — from local sanitation districts. The plant will process the sludge with a mixture of high heat and high pressure, turning it into a pelletlike substance dubbed "e-fuel" that can run small power plants.

The poop-to-power process is the brainchild of former Atlanta ad man Kevin Bolin and his grandfather, 92-year-old Norman Dickinson of Melbourne, Fla.

In addition to being a former chemical engineer, "my grandfather is kind of a mad inventor," said Bolin, 45.

A former accountant and advertising executive for Atlanta TV station WAGA-TV, Bolin is fluent in the workings of effluent and sharp in the ways of finance and business.

"It was really a dream of mine to help form a company and commercialize some of these inventions," he said.

Although untested on such a large scale, the project is getting accolades from local officials and investors who say it could become a viable way to address high energy costs while simultaneously relieving overburdened sanitation systems.

"This stuff comes to us seven days a week, 24 hours a day," said Ed Torres, director of technical services for the Orange County Sanitation District, one of five Southern California sewage systems that have signed on with the EnerTech plant. "We can't just turn the valve off. We have to do something with it."

Orange County and other local sanitation districts currently dispose of their sludge mainly by trucking it to farms — some of them hundreds of miles away in Arizona — where it fertilizes livestock feed crops or inedible plants.

Tougher environmental regulations and high diesel fuel costs, however, are making that practice increasingly prohibitive.

The five Southern California sanitation districts have agreed to pay EnerTech $390 million for taking about 670 tons of sewage sludge per day for the next 25 years.

"In the past, that might have been fairly expensive," said Mike Sullivan, supervising engineer for the Los Angeles County Sanitation District, another participant. "But with other alternatives disappearing and the cost of diesel fuel rising, it's becoming much more" attractive.

Getting paid to process the smelly sludge will generate about 97 percent of EnerTech's revenue, Bolin said. He expects the other 3 percent to come from selling the e-fuel, first to local cement kilns and other businesses that run their own power plants and perhaps eventually to utilities.

Bolin said the fuel generates about the same amount of energy per pound as coal but is cleaner in terms of carbon emissions. As with other renewable fuels, EnerTech's e-fuel emits only the carbon dioxide that is already contained in the unprocessed sludge when it is burned. By contrast, fossil fuels such as coal or oil release carbon that has been stored and naturally sequestered for millions of years when they are burned. Therefore, EnerTech says, there is no significant net increase in carbon dioxide emissions with e-fuel, unlike fossil fuels.

The State of California has certified e-fuel as a renewable fuel, and local air-quality regulators have issued a permit for EnerTech's processing plant.

"What we're doing is basically addressing a problem in need of a technical solution," Bolin said. "We're converting a waste — sludge — into something that's beneficial."

Bolin and his grandfather aren't the only ones betting big on the idea. In April 2007, the company raised $160 million to start construction on the Rialto plant through the sale of bonds to Deutsche Bank. This year, it raised an additional $42 million from investors, including Citigroup Inc. and the Masdar Clean Tech Fund, a United Arab Emirates venture fund.

In May, EnerTech was selected to build a small demonstration plant in Masdar City, a first-of-its-kind city being built in the United Arab Emirates that will use only renewable energy.

"Investing in EnerTech Environmental is a key part of the overall Masdar ambition," Alex O'Cinneide, a partner in the Masdar Clean Tech Fund, said in a statement. "Their innovative technology is the kind of smart clean technology that has the potential to alter the way developers consider future projects."

This isn't the first time that someone has tried to turn sludge into something more beneficial. In states across the country, including Texas, cities operate sludge incineration plants that produce power or ash that can be used as fertilizer.

About two decades ago, officials spent hundreds of millions of dollars on a sludge-processing operation in Los Angeles that was designed to do exactly what EnerTech's plant is supposed to do: turn sludge into fuel. However, that project failed.

Bolin is quick to point out that EnerTech's project is much different. The so-called Carver-Greenfield project used oil and forced evaporation to separate biosolids from sludge, but the process gummed up pipelines and ultimately shut down the system.

"It was much more complicated," said Bolin, who wasn't involved with that project. "We dumbed it down into what's actually a very simple process."

Through a system of pipes and tanks, EnerTech's plant will essentially heat up and pressurize biosolids to the point where they break down. The resulting mushy "slurry" mixture is dried and turned into e-fuel.

Still, nobody is sure that EnerTech's "SlurryCarb" process will work on the scale planned in Rialto. The company has tested the process only with much smaller demonstration plants in Atlanta and Japan, tests that Bolin says worked better than expected.

Officials in California say they aren't too worried about the plant's prospects, especially because — unlike with the project 20 years ago — they do not have any money at risk upfront.

"We're all hoping it works, but at this scale it's never been proven," Torres said. "But at least here, we're not investing a dime. If it doesn't work, we'll just go someplace else" with the sludge.

Lenny
07-11-2008, 08:42 AM
Folks crossing the wild West used the same material for cooking.
In India folks used that stuff for fuel for about 5,000 years. Used it for housing as well!

What IS new is the DOW below 11k. We may ALL be using that same poop for fuel; oh, wait, some unelected entity having governmental powers is passing a law that will be enforced by elected officials, sheriff, to enforce a 'no burning day' for those of us that use fireplaces!

"Every thing old is new again" -old song

Sciguy
07-11-2008, 11:47 PM
Once again this foolish process of destroying so-called sludge raises its deceptive head to grin at us.
There is nothing progressive, good, energy conserving or desirable about this wasteful process.
The creation of sewage sludge in wastewater treatment plants is indistinguishable in concept from the ideology that says we should use all resources exactly once and then discard them. It is just one more form of garbage.
These smiling, oily entrepreneurs would like nothing better than to have us follow them into their self-serving pronouncements that sludge is useless and that they are going to save us from ourselves. Or from our own stupidity. Ever since energy generation become fashionable, these thousands of self-styled inventors (yes there are thousands of them and have been for decades) have grafted on energy generation to their traditional proposals for simple destruction. They used to want to burn sludge to get rid of it, to turn it into cattle feed, to turn it into fertilizer (but without purifying it so that it was actually toxic to plants), to dump it in the ocean - on and on.
The recognition that we are all part of an agricultural cycle in which plants take nourishment from soil, create food for us, we take some of the nourishment and excrete the rest as faeces and urine and it all needs to end up going back into soil nourishment so that we can close the cycle - this is not part of their schemes. Why? Because it makes way too much sense. It is natural, it is sustainable, and it generates far less profit than destroying garbage for an unsustainable society.
Many of us are of the opinion that the wastefulness we have built into society for the last hundred years was based on the momentary exploitation of fossil products and is now coming to a screeching close. There are millions of snake oil salesmen who want to sell us relief in the form of an assurance that this kind of wasteful, consumptive, luxurious life can just keep going if we just find the right technology. Many of them want us to believe that this or that byproduct is USELESS (in the cosmic sense). We need to realize that all byproducts are a part of the fundamental cycles we have set up. The agricultural cycle is a big one. Extra corn cobs or straw or insect wings or fecal matter is not useless but is part of its own cycle. To the earth, we are the useless ones.
Everyone likes to talk about sustainability but it is with foolish projects like this that the rubber meets the road. Instead of burning (wasting) agricultural outputs, we need to rethink the way in which cycles can be established to sustain the earth. The huge amounts of agricultural products leaving the land as our food cannot be allowed to vanish. The cycles need to be closed. If super huge wastewater treatment plants don't close that cycle, what needs to change is not the cycle but the treatment plant. These huge boondoggles are a silly way to treat fecal and other matter. In the progressive world to come, there will be no waste treatment plants.
Sciguy <hr>


ENERGY
Experimental plant turns poop to power (https://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/nation/07/07/0707pooppower.html)
Company is working on the next new energy source: fuel from human waste.
By Bob Keefe
WEST COAST BUREAU
Monday, July 07, 2008

RIALTO, Calif. — At the end of a dusty dirt road, next to a cement factory and a junkyard, an Atlanta company is working on the next new energy source: fuel from human waste.

By the end of the year, the $160 million plant that EnerTech Environmental Inc. is building in this community east of Los Angeles is expected to take hundreds of tons of sewage sludge — which isn't only treated human waste, but is anything and everything that passes through the drain — from local sanitation districts. The plant will process the sludge with a mixture of high heat and high pressure, turning it into a pelletlike substance dubbed "e-fuel" that can run small power plants.

The poop-to-power process is the brainchild of former Atlanta ad man Kevin Bolin and his grandfather, 92-year-old Norman Dickinson of Melbourne, Fla.

In addition to being a former chemical engineer, "my grandfather is kind of a mad inventor," said Bolin, 45.

A former accountant and advertising executive for Atlanta TV station WAGA-TV, Bolin is fluent in the workings of effluent and sharp in the ways of finance and business.

"It was really a dream of mine to help form a company and commercialize some of these inventions," he said.

Although untested on such a large scale, the project is getting accolades from local officials and investors who say it could become a viable way to address high energy costs while simultaneously relieving overburdened sanitation systems.

"This stuff comes to us seven days a week, 24 hours a day," said Ed Torres, director of technical services for the Orange County Sanitation District, one of five Southern California sewage systems that have signed on with the EnerTech plant. "We can't just turn the valve off. We have to do something with it."

Orange County and other local sanitation districts currently dispose of their sludge mainly by trucking it to farms — some of them hundreds of miles away in Arizona — where it fertilizes livestock feed crops or inedible plants.

Tougher environmental regulations and high diesel fuel costs, however, are making that practice increasingly prohibitive.

The five Southern California sanitation districts have agreed to pay EnerTech $390 million for taking about 670 tons of sewage sludge per day for the next 25 years.

"In the past, that might have been fairly expensive," said Mike Sullivan, supervising engineer for the Los Angeles County Sanitation District, another participant. "But with other alternatives disappearing and the cost of diesel fuel rising, it's becoming much more" attractive.

Getting paid to process the smelly sludge will generate about 97 percent of EnerTech's revenue, Bolin said. He expects the other 3 percent to come from selling the e-fuel, first to local cement kilns and other businesses that run their own power plants and perhaps eventually to utilities.

Bolin said the fuel generates about the same amount of energy per pound as coal but is cleaner in terms of carbon emissions. As with other renewable fuels, EnerTech's e-fuel emits only the carbon dioxide that is already contained in the unprocessed sludge when it is burned. By contrast, fossil fuels such as coal or oil release carbon that has been stored and naturally sequestered for millions of years when they are burned. Therefore, EnerTech says, there is no significant net increase in carbon dioxide emissions with e-fuel, unlike fossil fuels.

The State of California has certified e-fuel as a renewable fuel, and local air-quality regulators have issued a permit for EnerTech's processing plant.

"What we're doing is basically addressing a problem in need of a technical solution," Bolin said. "We're converting a waste — sludge — into something that's beneficial."

Bolin and his grandfather aren't the only ones betting big on the idea. In April 2007, the company raised $160 million to start construction on the Rialto plant through the sale of bonds to Deutsche Bank. This year, it raised an additional $42 million from investors, including Citigroup Inc. and the Masdar Clean Tech Fund, a United Arab Emirates venture fund.

In May, EnerTech was selected to build a small demonstration plant in Masdar City, a first-of-its-kind city being built in the United Arab Emirates that will use only renewable energy.

"Investing in EnerTech Environmental is a key part of the overall Masdar ambition," Alex O'Cinneide, a partner in the Masdar Clean Tech Fund, said in a statement. "Their innovative technology is the kind of smart clean technology that has the potential to alter the way developers consider future projects."

This isn't the first time that someone has tried to turn sludge into something more beneficial. In states across the country, including Texas, cities operate sludge incineration plants that produce power or ash that can be used as fertilizer.

About two decades ago, officials spent hundreds of millions of dollars on a sludge-processing operation in Los Angeles that was designed to do exactly what EnerTech's plant is supposed to do: turn sludge into fuel. However, that project failed.

Bolin is quick to point out that EnerTech's project is much different. The so-called Carver-Greenfield project used oil and forced evaporation to separate biosolids from sludge, but the process gummed up pipelines and ultimately shut down the system.

"It was much more complicated," said Bolin, who wasn't involved with that project. "We dumbed it down into what's actually a very simple process."

Through a system of pipes and tanks, EnerTech's plant will essentially heat up and pressurize biosolids to the point where they break down. The resulting mushy "slurry" mixture is dried and turned into e-fuel.

Still, nobody is sure that EnerTech's "SlurryCarb" process will work on the scale planned in Rialto. The company has tested the process only with much smaller demonstration plants in Atlanta and Japan, tests that Bolin says worked better than expected.

Officials in California say they aren't too worried about the plant's prospects, especially because — unlike with the project 20 years ago — they do not have any money at risk upfront.

"We're all hoping it works, but at this scale it's never been proven," Torres said. "But at least here, we're not investing a dime. If it doesn't work, we'll just go someplace else" with the sludge.

Lenny
07-12-2008, 11:02 AM
Sci Guy,
I really don't understand this stuff or what you write.
But when you say something like,

"Extra corn cobs or straw or insect wings or fecal matter is not useless but is part of its own cycle. To the earth, we are the useless ones."

I am dumbfounded. So our species must die since we are the useless ones?
And what does, "...is part of its own cylce." mean?
All mentioned will decompose, so speeding up the process is "bad"?
Sorry, to airy-fairy for me.

"Everyone likes to talk about sustainability but it is with foolish projects like this that the rubber meets the road. Instead of burning (wasting) agricultural outputs, we need to rethink the way in which cycles can be established to sustain the earth. The huge amounts of agricultural products leaving the land as our food cannot be allowed to vanish. The cycles need to be closed. If super huge wastewater treatment plants don't close that cycle, what needs to change is not the cycle but the treatment plant. These huge boondoggles are a silly way to treat fecal and other matter. In the progressive world to come, there will be no waste treatment plants."

Also, does the food "vanish" in our system?
And in this world to come, what will there be if there are no waste treatment plants? We'll simply dig holes and bury it all ourselves? Or is that a waste treatment plant?
Sorry, I know there are no stupid questions, just stupid people, and I am some of them.