PDA

View Full Version : Guide To Hiring Women



Tars
05-26-2008, 07:37 PM
Speaking of misogyny...This is an actual excerpt from Transportation Magazine (https://www.yesbutnobutyes.com/archives/2008/03/women_in_the_wo.html) written for male supervisors in 1943 on how to "handle women in the workplace." It's moronic and obnoxious for sure. But in amidst the ranting "yes there is", no there ain't" about Hillary being misogynized (yes, she is), it might be helpful to remind ourselves that our society's accepted stereotypes & prejudices have abated significantly over the last several decades. We're moving in the right direction; it takes lifetimes to erase prejudice.

"Eleven Tips on Getting More Efficiency Out of Women Employees: There's no longer any question whether transit companies should hire women for jobs formerly held by men. The draft and manpower shortage has settled that point. The important things now are to select the most efficient women available and how to use them to the best advantage.

Here are eleven helpful tips on the subject from Western Properties:

1. Pick young married women. They usually have more of a sense of responsibility than their unmarried sisters, they're less likely to be flirtatious, they need the work or they wouldn't be doing it, they still have the pep and interest to work hard and to deal with the public efficiently.

https://www.yesbutnobutyes.com/women_1943-thumb-320x406.jpg 2. When you have to use older women, try to get ones who have worked outside the home at some time in their lives. Older women who have never contacted the public have a hard time adapting themselves and are inclined to be cantankerous and fussy. It's always well to impress upon older women the importance of friendliness and courtesy.

3. General experience indicates that "husky" girls - those who are just a little on the heavy side - are more even tempered and efficient than their underweight sisters.

4. Retain a physician to give each woman you hire a special physical examination - one covering female conditions. This step not only protects the property against the possibilities of lawsuit, but reveals whether the employee-to-be has any female weaknesses which would make her mentally or physically unfit for the job.

5. Stress at the outset the importance of time the fact that a minute or two lost here and there makes serious inroads on schedules. Until this point is gotten across, service is likely to be slowed up.

6. Give the female employee a definite day-long schedule of duties so that they'll keep busy without bothering the management for instructions every few minutes. Numerous properties say that women make excellent workers when they have their jobs cut out for them, but that they lack initiative in finding work themselves.

7. Whenever possible, let the inside employee change from one job to another at some time during the day. Women are inclined to be less nervous and happier with change.

8. Give every girl an adequate number of rest periods during the day. You have to make some allowances for feminine psychology. A girl has more confidence and is more efficient if she can keep her hair tidied, apply fresh lipstick and wash her hands several times a day.

9. Be tactful when issuing instructions or in making criticisms. Women are often sensitive; they can't shrug off harsh words the way men do. Never ridicule a woman - it breaks her spirit and cuts off her efficiency.

10. Be reasonably considerate about using strong language around women. Even though a girl's husband or father may swear vociferously, she'll grow to dislike a place of business where she hears too much of this.

11. Get enough size variety in operator's uniforms so that each girl can have a proper fit. This point can't be stressed too much in keeping women happy."


Ripped from YesButNoButYes (https://www.yesbutnobutyes.com/)

Lenny
05-27-2008, 08:58 AM
Eh, OK, hate me.
I like the article. Found it helpful, useful, due to it having an air of truthiness about it. Change "women" to "folks" and it reads even better.
Points 1 & 2 are (hate:on) pretty good in their insight.
Point 3, I've noticed as well.
Point 4 is great! If there were more women doctors then, it would have been better as well.
Point 5 & 6 go for all bodies, but maybe at THAT time it was less so, ya think?
Point 7 & 8 can go for me as well.
Point 9 & 10 is interesting. I've not worked with younger women in a while, but I've found it to be true. I use to cuss like a prison guard and can still do a number for 25 seconds with no repeated words, all foul. The looks on the different genders IS different, and share similarities. As a supervisor there was a noted difference in tone and number of words when giving direction to a female, as opposed to MOST males.
Point 11 is generic and applies to all of us.
Though the LAW mandated change, that does not mean behavior will change overnight, nor the culture subtleties of how we treat, or expect to be treated by others. My "pigish" post above is true for me, and I dare say, many. Outside of WaccoVille, of course. I know I SHOULD feel like :2cents: waiting for change....but I no longer do! Hate:off. Now:relax.

MsTerry
05-27-2008, 03:54 PM
Speaking of misogyny...This is an actual excerpt from Transportation Magazine (https://www.yesbutnobutyes.com/archives/2008/03/women_in_the_wo.html) written for male supervisors in 1943 on how to "handle women in the workplace." It's moronic and obnoxious for sure. But in amidst the ranting "yes there is", no there ain't" about Hillary being misogynized (yes, she is), it might be helpful to remind ourselves that our society's accepted stereotypes & prejudices have abated significantly over the last several decades. We're moving in the right direction; it takes lifetimes to erase prejudice.



Well, there are a lot of generalizations in this piece of history, but that doesn't make the observations less valid,
Personally I like the one about the Husky Woman. I might use that to my advantage. And of course to be given some extra time in the powder room, that should be a must for any employment!