Covid-19: politicisation, “corruption,” (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425)
(https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425) and suppression of science (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425)
When good science is suppressed by the medical-political complex, people die
Politicians and governments are suppressing science. They do so in the public interest, they say, to accelerate availability of diagnostics and treatments. They do so to support innovation, to bring products to market at unprecedented speed. Both of these reasons are partly plausible; the greatest deceptions are founded in a grain of truth. But the underlying behaviour is troubling.
Science is being suppressed for political and financial gain. Covid-19 has unleashed state corruption on a grand scale, and it is harmful to public health.1 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425#ref-1) Politicians and industry are responsible for this opportunistic embezzlement. So too are scientists and health experts. The pandemic has revealed how the medical-political complex can be manipulated in an emergency—a time when it is even more important to safeguard science.
The UK’s pandemic response provides at least four examples of suppression of science or scientists. First, the membership, research, and deliberations of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) were initially secret until a press leak forced transparency.2 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425#ref-2) The leak revealed inappropriate involvement of government advisers in SAGE, while exposing under-representation from public health, clinical care, women, and ethnic minorities. Indeed, the government was also recently ordered to release a 2016 report on deficiencies in pandemic preparedness, Operation Cygnus, following a verdict from the Information Commissioner’s Office.3 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425#ref-3)4 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425#ref-4)
Next, a Public Health England report on covid-19 and inequalities. The report’s publication was delayed by England’s Department of Health; a section on ethnic minorities was initially withheld and then, following a public outcry, was published as part of a follow-up report.5 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425#ref-5)6 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425#ref-6) Authors from Public Health England were instructed not to talk to the media. Third, on 15 October, the editor of the Lancet complained that an author of a research paper, a UK government scientist, was blocked by the government from speaking to media because of a “difficult political landscape.”7 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425#ref-7)
Now, a new example concerns the controversy over point-of-care antibody testing for covid-19.8 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425#ref-8) The prime minister’s Operation Moonshot depends on immediate and wide availability of accurate rapid diagnostic tests.9 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425#ref-9) It also depends on the questionable logic of mass screening—currently being trialled in Liverpool with a suboptimal PCR test.10 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425#ref-10)11 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425#ref-11)
The incident relates to research published this week by The BMJ, which finds that the government procured an antibody test that in real world tests falls well short of performance claims made by its manufacturers.12 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425#ref-12),13 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425#ref-13) Researchers from Public Health England and collaborating institutions sensibly pushed to publish their study findings before the government committed to buying a million of these tests but were blocked by the health department and the prime minister’s office.14 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425#ref-14) Why was it important to procure this product without due scrutiny? Prior publication of research on a preprint server or a government website is compatible with The BMJ’s publication policy. As if to prove a point, Public Health England then unsuccessfully attempted to block The BMJ’s press release about the research paper.
Politicians often claim to follow the science, but that is a misleading oversimplification. Science is rarely absolute. It rarely applies to every setting or every population. It doesn’t make sense to slavishly follow science or evidence. A better approach is for politicians, the publicly appointed decision makers, to be informed and guided by science when they decide policy for their public. But even that approach retains public and professional trust only if science is available for scrutiny and free of political interference, and if the system is transparent and not compromised by conflicts of interest.
Suppression of science and scientists is not new or a peculiarly British phenomenon. In the US, President Trump’s government manipulated the Food and Drug Administration to hastily approve unproved drugs such as hydroxychloroquine and remdesivir.15 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425#ref-15) Globally, people, policies, and procurement are being corrupted by political and commercial agendas.16 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425#ref-16)
The UK’s pandemic response relies too heavily on scientists and other government appointees with worrying competing interests, including shareholdings in companies that manufacture covid-19 diagnostic tests, treatments, and vaccines.17 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425#ref-17) Government appointees are able to ignore or cherry pick science—another form of misuse—and indulge in anti-competitive practices that favour their own products and those of friends and associates.18 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425#ref-18)
How might science be safeguarded in these exceptional times? The first step is full disclosure of competing interests from government, politicians, scientific advisers, and appointees, such as the heads of test and trace, diagnostic test procurement, and vaccine delivery. The next step is full transparency about decision making systems, processes, and knowing who is accountable for what.
Once transparency and accountability are established as norms, individuals employed by government should ideally only work in areas unrelated to their competing interests. Expertise is possible without competing interests. If such a strict rule becomes impractical, minimum good practice is that people with competing interests must not be involved in decisions on products and policies in which they have a financial interest.
Governments and industry must also stop announcing critical science policy by press release. Such ill judged moves leave science, the media, and stock markets vulnerable to manipulation. Clear, open, and advance publication of the scientific basis for policy, procurements, and wonder drugs is a fundamental requirement.19 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425#ref-19)
The stakes are high for politicians, scientific advisers, and government appointees. Their careers and bank balances may hinge on the decisions that they make. But they have a higher responsibility and duty to the public. Science is a public good. It doesn’t need to be followed blindly, but it does need to be fairly considered. Importantly, suppressing science, whether by delaying publication, cherry picking favourable research, or gagging scientists, is a danger to public health, causing deaths by exposing people to unsafe or ineffective interventions and preventing them from benefiting from better ones. When entangled with commercial decisions it is also maladministration of taxpayers’ money.
Politicization of science was enthusiastically deployed by some of history’s worst autocrats and dictators, and it is now regrettably commonplace in democracies.20 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425#ref-20) The medical-political complex tends towards suppression of science to aggrandise and enrich those in power. And, as the powerful become more successful, richer, and further intoxicated with power, the inconvenient truths of science are suppressed. When good science is suppressed, people die.
Covid-19: Science, Conflicts and the Elephant in the Room
Dear Editor
Congratulations on your editorial highlighting the depressing levels of “corruption” taking place in the name of “beating the pandemic”. Scrutiny certainly deserves to be directed towards conflicts of interest within members of SAGE and scientific/medical advisors as examined by Dr Zoe Harcombe PhD, a Cambridge mathematics/economics graduate[1,2]. Aided by mainstream media and censorship by tech giants, this group controls the scientific narrative on which Government action has been based, even when the “science” relied upon is at complete odds with the views of many other world-class scientists.
Suppression of science and lack of open debate has impinged enormously on three issues of fundamental significance. Firstly, public fear of Covid has been elevated to levels that are completely out of proportion to the actual danger. A recent peer-reviewed paper by one of the world’s most cited and respected scientist, Professor John Ioannidis of Stanford University, quotes an infection fatality rate (IFR) for Covid of 0.00-0.57% (0.05% for under 70s), far lower than originally feared and no different to severe flu [3]. This paper is published on WHO’s own Bulletin but ignored by UK mainstream media.
Secondly, although deaths are currently running at normal levels, fear is being driven by inflation of Covid “cases” caused by inappropriate use of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) test [4-7]. This test is hypersensitive and highly susceptible to contamination, particularly when not processed with utmost rigour by properly trained staff. Case inflation also occurs from use of excessive number of rounds of amplification cycles (termed CT) which amplifies non-infectious viral fragments and cross-reacting nucleotides from non-Covid coronaviruses/other respiratory viruses. These become mis-labelled as Covid. Even Dr Fauci confirms that a positive result using CT above 34 is invalid (Twitter thread, Jeff Nelson @vegsource 30 October 2020) but in the UK CTs may go up to 45, as confirmed by Professor Carl Heneghan of Oxford University’s Center for Evidence-Based Medicine: (House of Commons Science & Tech Committee, 17 Sep, 2020 YouTube.) An obvious improvement is to immediately halt any use of CTs above 34 and ensure that for CTs between 25 and 34, two consecutive positive results are required before confirming a case as Covid positive.
According to Professor Brookes, a Health Data Scientist from the University of Leicester, the UK’s official data shows no excess deaths due to respiratory infections this season (talkRadio, 'The number of people dying today is the same as it would be any other year', 17 November 2020 YouTube). Instead, excess total deaths have been driven by lack of treatment due to hospital closure/lockdowns and have occurred mostly at home. Whilst there is no question that the first wave of Covid, a then novel virus, was lethal to many, there is no sound evidence of any second wave.
The third and possibly the most consequential suppression of science relates to the narrative that people do not develop immunity following a Covid infection. We know that immunity to SARS-CoV-1 is very durable, persisting for at least 12-17 years [8-10]. Immunologists know that immunity to SARS-Cov-2 is no different. This is confirmed by many eminent scientists including Beda M Stadler, the former Director of the Institute for Immunology at the University of Bern and Professor Emeritus (Ivor Cummins, Ep91 Emeritus Professor of Immunology...Reveals Crucial Viral Immunity Reality, 28 July 2020, YouTube), and Sucharit Bhakdi, former Chair of Medical Microbiology at the University of Mainz [11]. The human population has encountered and co-existed with myriad coronaviruses throughout evolution. Most of us therefore have cross-reacting T-cells, B cells and antibodies derived from encounters with cold coronaviruses that can recognise SARS-CoV-2 [12-14], in the same way that people “immunised” with cowpox became less susceptible to serious illness from smallpox - as Edward Jenner discovered in 1796. This is why we do not generally die from cold coronaviruses and precisely why so many of us were not susceptible to falling severely ill from Covid earlier this year. Even the chance of passing Covid to your spouse at the height of the pandemic was as low as 17%! [15 ].
In line with expectations, mediators of robust long-term immune memory, memory B and T-cells have both been firmly established to be produced following even a mild a Covid infection [17,18]. Pouncing on a handful of examples of apparent second Covid infections is irresponsible of the media but suits the false [18] narrative that falling antibody levels lead to loss of immunity. The evidence that immunity lasts is all around us - if this were not so we would see as many people dying of and falling seriously ill with Covid now as we did in March/April, including doctors and nurses.
Pfizer’s vaccination trial data provides further confirmation of the now low rates of prevalence. 94 participants were apparently infected based on PCR positive results (of unknown CT so we cannot be sure they are all genuinely Covid). The placebo group must comprise around 22,000, half the total trial number. This yields an infection rate of, at the very most, 0.4% and makes the chances of escaping infection greater than 99.6% during the trial period. The vaccine might well be 90% “effective” - although we are yet to learn exactly how this is measured - but the risk of contracting Covid in the first place is self-evidently low. The risk of both contracting and dying from Covid using an IFR of 0.57 (the worst case) was a mere 0.002% based on pessimistic assumptions. Of course, the elderly and other high-risk categories face greater risk, but it is still far less than it was early this year and it will continue to reduce as population immunity builds further.
Hijacking of science by vested interests has resulted in immeasurable harms to society. Lockdowns, meant to save lives but being pushed by narratives that have little basis in science, have themselves caused loss of life, livelihoods, dignity, and humanity. We need to ask how we have got to this sorry state. It seems that only the extrication of science from industry by introduction of independent sources of funding for scientific research institutions, perhaps by levying a brand-new tax on industry, will allow the nation’s best scientists an independent voice and put an end to the suppression of good science, together with the mistrust and conflict it generates.
Signed,
Eshani M King,
Evidence Based Research in Immunology and Health
Tewkesbury, Gloucestershire, UK
This article by Mark Sumner at Daily Kos is worth your time. If we flood the hospitals, folks with easily treated cases will die. This is "politicization" at its worst.
Also worth noting, numerous people are now know to have been infected twice. What kind of herd immunity is that? Murderous perhaps?
'We want them infected'— Top HHS adviser schemed to spread COVID-19 across America
(https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/12/16/2002382/--We-want-them-infected-Top-HHS-adviser-schemed-to-spread-COVID-19-across-America)
At times throughout the spring, summer, and fall, Republicans pushed the idea that the only way to fight COVID-19 was to surrender. That is, to just let it infect Americans until the nation achieved “herd immunity.” (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/9/29/1981786/-The-idea-of-herd-immunity-is-surging-again-and-it-s-just-as-dangerous-as-ever) The problems with this approach were … everything. First off, we still don’t know if mild or asymptomatic infection with COVID-19 provides long-lasting protection from the disease, meaning that herd immunity might not even be possible. Second, removing social distancing guidelines so that people would become infected more rapidly would result in massive overcrowding of hospitals across the nation, creating an epic healthcare collapse that drove the fatality rate of the disease through the roof. And finally, even trying for herd immunity on a nationwide basis would inevitably result in millions of deaths (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/10/29/1990626/-Herd-immunity-has-always-been-Trump-s-policy-it-also-happens-to-be-both-deadly-and-impossible).
-------------------------------------------
We want them infected. To pick on deaths alone, here’s what Johns Hopkins shows in the data for COVID-19 (https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2020/12/public-health-experts-and-biostatisticians-weigh-in-on-covid-19-deaths-a-look-at-u-s-data-webinar). While the rate of deaths is certainly much greater in the oldest cohorts, it’s far from zero in any group. Those under 24 make up about 1% of all deaths. Apparently Alexander is ready to let them go. Those under 55 make up about 6%. That’s a sacrifice that Alexander was obviously willing to make.
But just like the rate of deaths, those numbers would not remain the same if Alexander’s “we want them infected” plan was carried out. As CDC numbers show (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/investigations-discovery/hospitalization-death-by-age.html), the differences in the rate of death by age group is much higher than the rate of hospitalization. So are the rate of ICU admissions. In fact, 1 in 3 children hospitalized with COVID-19 were eventually admitted to the ICU, which is the same rate seen in adults. It’s only that final stage, surviving the ICU, that really makes the difference. That’s why someone at age 60 may be only 4 times more likely to be hospitalized for COVID-19 than an 18 year old, but they are 30 times more likely to die.
Now … follow Alexander’s suggestion and flood the nation with COVID-19, resulting in ICUs filled to the brim coast to coast. That doesn’t just mean that tens of millions will die who might have lived, it means that most of those who will die will be the younger people who would have survived hospitalizations. What herd immunity would do most effectively would be to help level the playing field, by making the rate of deaths among younger patients much closer to that of older patients.
That's an interesting article, Richard. And I don't doubt that the Republicans in Trump's Administration acted in a highly criminal manner. -Which fits in with my own take on this plague - that it was designed in Bioweapons labs by oligarchs to pare the population and reduce the number of "useless eaters" {the termed used by the Anglo-Norman elitists in private conversations among themselves.}
There is one major problem, however, that I perceive in the slant of this article. To wit: it white-washes Anthony Fausti. That man - being heavily invested in the Pharmaceutical-Industrial-Complex - has a serious set of conflicts of interest, and should not be in government.
pamelaL
12-25-2020, 10:47 AM
AMEN to THIS! >Politicization of science was enthusiastically deployed by some of history’s worst autocrats and dictators, and it is now regrettably commonplace in democracies.20 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425#ref-20) The medical-political complex tends towards suppression of science to aggrandise and enrich those in power. And, as the powerful become more successful, richer, and further intoxicated with power, the inconvenient truths of science are suppressed. When good science is suppressed, people die.<
·
Mayacaman
12-26-2020, 10:52 AM
COVID has Caused Tens of Thousands of Medical Doctors
and Scientists to Wake Up to Corruption in the Medical Industry
A More Honest Perspective of the Covid-19 Pandemic
by Richard Gale and Gary Null PhD
Progressive Radio Network
Since the first cases of the new coronavirus strain outside of China, every aspect of the pandemic’s ever-changing amoebic narrative has been carefully controlled by the World Health Organization and major government health agencies.
High officials within a syndicate of institutions, including the CDC, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease and the UK’s National Heath Service, have largely dictated government responses to lessen the pandemic.
The Sars2-Cov19 pandemic is not the first time unelected medical bureaucrats, who the average person assumes to possess an enduring expertise, have guided global policies against pandemics and serous infectious outbreaks. The most recent example was the 2009-2010 HIN1 Swine Flu pandemic that never truly happened according to plan.
Subsequently that effort revealed a surprising incompetence in the international medical hierarchy that can be blamed on the entire system rather than a few inept individuals.
However, during the current pandemic scare, something unusual and remarkably radical has happened. Historically, voices of opposition within institutionalized medicine remain relatively silent.
Most often it is only a handful of health professionals who come forward to challenge official statements or to uncover the serious flaws in the scientific literature to support their actions.
Yet for the past year we have witnessed tens of thousands of physicians, medical experts and researchers coming forward publicly with harsh and even damning criticisms of how the ruling medical agencies have mishandled the pandemic.
They easily recognize these agencies’ contradictions, the conflicts of interest with the pharmaceutical industry, the large body of medical literature deconstructing and discrediting their fundamental claims, and the evidence to prove their policies are scientifically baseless.
These are not dissident mavericks. Over 52,000 medical professionals representing some of the world’s leading medical schools and research institutions have already signed the Great Barrington Declaration (https://gbdeclaration.org/) in protest against the official Covid-19 strategies and these policies’ serious adverse effects on the physical and mental health of children, working class citizens and the poor.
Moreover, they have nothing to gain. No financial interests jeopardize their judgments. And they are fully aware of the pushback and blacklisting that may follow and would injure their reputations.
Around the world, dissident medical voices are warning us that:
The official death counts, particularly in the US and the UK are grossly exaggerated.
Polyermase chain reaction (PCR) was never created to be used as a diagnostic tool to determine Covid-19 infection or any other virus. Over-reliance upon PCR is a travesty that has created a Case-pandemic rather an actual symptomatic scourge.
The evidence to support the belief that large social lockdowns and social distancing, perhaps even mask wearing, will deter the spread of the virus is overstated and inaccurate.
America’s official narrative, where the number of cases per capita far surpass any other nation, that effective, safe and cheaper drugs such as Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) have no value and post serious harm is completely unfounded. Rather, if used wisely it is highly effective and safe as a preventative measure for first stage treatment of mild and moderate infections.
A compilation of 210 studies (https://c19study.com/) on HCQ’s effectiveness against Covid-19, 145 peer reviewed, only found 26 that showed the cheap, widely used drug posed some risks or was ineffective. The remainder clearly indicates that HCQ is one of our best and most reliable courses of treatment. For example a study of 585 patients treated with HCQ along with azithromycin and zinc were relieved in under 3 days and none were hospitalized, required ventilation or died. Another study published in the journal Clinical and Translational Science reported 73% reduction in hospitalization with no serious adverse events.
In the meantime, we are told we must wait for a vaccine or a new miracle drug and no other medical intervention is warranted other than personal hygienic practices, masks and social distancing.
The New York Times and other major media outlets are misrepresenting new cases of Covid-19 with the actual disease, thereby grossly inflating those who may be positive but are otherwise healthy and pose no public threat.
The WHO’s, CDC’s and NHS’ internal confusion and culture of inconsistency are leaving more and more citizens questioning who can be trusted. Even the otherwise conservative British Medical Journal published a rare and brutal condemnation (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425) of the corruption and commercialization throughout the official Covid-19 narrative. BMJ’s executive editor Kamran Abbasi wrote:
“Science is being suppressed for political and financial gain. Covid-19 has unleashed state corruption on a grand scale, and it is harmful to public health.1 (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425#ref-1) Politicians and industry are responsible for this opportunistic embezzlement. So too are scientists and health experts. The pandemic has revealed how the medical-political complex can be manipulated in an emergency—a time when it is even more important to safeguard science.”
Sadly mainstream media such as the New York Times, Washington Post and BBC are revealing a lack of journalistic integrity despite the open accessibility of medical studies to the contrary. Instead the media serves as an echo chamber to continue advancing this international debacle created by our leading health officials.
Miscalculation of Deaths
To understand the miscalculation of deaths that can be directly attributed to Covid-19 we can begin with the CDC’s own website (https://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/overview.htm):
“Due to the ongoing COvID-19 pandemic, this system will suspend data collection for the 2020-2021 influenza season.”
In other words, the CDC’s monthly mortality reports will no longer be monitoring actual influenza deaths, which are more often than not also comflated with deaths due to pneumonia.
William Briggs, a former professor at Cornell University noted (https://wmbriggs.com/post/33825/) that last summer the CDC ceased counting flu and pneumonia deaths “because, we suppose, of the difficulty telling these deaths from doom deaths [Covid-19].”
So how will these deaths be entered into mortality reports?
In early December, an assistant director at Johns Hopkins Medical School’s Department of Applied Economics examined death statistics during the Covid pandemic and previous years.
Due to the high percentage of non-Covid deaths decreasing during the pandemic, her conclusion was that these deaths were intentionally being labeled as Covid-19 caused. Her colleague Dr. Yanni Gu summarized the problem (https://www.aier.org/article/new-study-highlights-serious-accounting-error-regarding-covid-deaths/):
“The CDC classified all deaths that are related to Covid-19 simply as Covid-19 deaths. Even patients dying from other underlying diseases but are infected with Covid-19 count as Covid-19 deaths. This is likely the main explanation as to why Covid-19 deaths drastically increased while deaths by all other diseases experienced a significant decrease.”
This irrational discrepancy in causes of death is not solely an American problem. Globally there has been a 98% percent decrease (https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/uritheflu/88676) in diagnosed flu cases compared to 2019. Australia alone has recorded a 96% drop off.
There may be a sensible way to explain the decrease in flu and this in turn helps explain the dramatic increase in Covid-19 cases due to inaccurate testing and an infestation of false positives.
Given the enormous impact of lockdowns, closing of businesses and public spaces, social distancing and masks, it is feasible that flu rates would decline noticeably. However, then the rise in Covid-19 cases becomes completely nonsensical unless spurious testing is the culprit.
World Health Organization had to Acknowledge PCR’s Failures
Recently, even the World Health Organization had to acknowledge (https://www.who.int/news/item/14-12-2020-who-information-notice-for-ivd-users) PCR’s failures. Despite the mincing of words, the WHO reported,
“The design principle of RT-PCR means that for patients with high levels of circulating virus (viral load), relatively few cycles will be needed to detect virus so the Ct [cycle threshold] will be low. Conversely when specimens return a high Ct value, it means that many cycles were required to detect the virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain.”
Most testing labs are using a cycle threshold of 40 amplifications, consequently the high rate of false positives. This is the reason for cases rising exponentially while actual deaths had leveled in mid summer until more recently.
In the UK, Public Health England states (https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/public-health-england-death-data-revised/),
“if a person has both a negative and positive test, then only their positive test will be counted.”
The US does likewise.
University of California virologist Dr. Juliet Morrison stated,
“I’m shocked that people think that 40 [cycles] could represent a positive.”
She recommends a reasonable cutoff at 35, and Dr. Michael Mina at Harvard’s School of Public Heath suggests 30 or less. University of North Carolina’s director of clinical microbiology Melissa Miller has called (https://ctmirror.org/2020/11/19/rapid-testing-is-less-accurate-than-the-government-wants-to-admit/) the application PCR for all situations “completely irresponsible.”
The most damning indictment against every governor across the U.S. who continues to rule on lockdowns, school closures and draconian police enforcement and yet has failed to reign in the plague of erroneous PCR testing in his or her state is found in a recent study (https://www.johnlocke.org/update/the-fog-of-covid-19-data-how-many-cases-arent-even-cases/) by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
Using as a low a 25 cycle threshold, 70% of positives were not actual cases because the virus was unable to be cultured. In other words, the virus was already dead.
And yet when PCR cycle thresholds are adjusted, the number of cases plummet. This was observed in efforts made in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada where it was discovered that 90% of those testing positive carried “barely any virus.”
Fortunately some countries are waking up to PCR’s unreliability that was originally perpetuated by a very entrepreneurial German doctor Christian Dosten. Dosten also happens to be an advisor to the Germany’s Federal Ministry of Health.
A Portugal appeals court ruled PRC is unreliable for testing Covid-19 and any enforced quarantine based on a positive PCR test would be illegal. As for Dosten and his paper published in the journal Eurosurveillance, it has served as the rationale for widespread PCR use.
But the paper is substantially inaccurate but helped serve as a means for Dosten to gain a patent for coronavirus PCR testing. Now 22 leading medical professionals from the International Consortium of Scientists in Life Sciences have filed for the paper’s retraction (https://cormandrostenreview.com/icsls/) due to “a tremendous number of very serious design flaws… which makes the PCR test completely unsuitable as a diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.”
The real crime is that none of the above failures were inevitable.
There is no reasonable explanation for miscalculating actual deaths associated with Covid-19 other than shear stupidity or gross intentional neglect. PCR’s unsuitability to accurately diagnose the presence of active Covid-19, or any other infectious virus, has been well documented for many years. Even PCR’s inventor Dr. Kary Mullis has stated it is unsuited for clinical diagnosis.
Yet despite all of the foreknowledge of these facts, countless people have had their lives devastated by the choices our federal health officials and politicians have made based upon severely flawed science.
Unnecessary quarantining, loss of income, lockdowns, and mental stress have adversely affected millions of Americans and people around the world. Again, we might turn to Abbasi’s article (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425) in the BMJ:
“… as the powerful become more successful, richer, and further intoxicated with power, the inconvenient truths of science are suppressed. When good science is suppressed, people die.”
Comment on this article at HealthImpactNews.com (https://healthimpactnews.com/2020/covid-has-caused-tens-of-thousands-of-medical-doctors-and-scientists-to-wake-up-to-corruption-in-the-medical-industry/).
About the Authors
Richard Gale is the Executive Producer of the Progressive Radio Network and a former Senior Research Analyst in the biotechnology and genomic industries.
Dr. Gary Null is the host of America’s longest running public radio program on alternative and nutritional health and a multi-award-winning documentary film director, including War on Health and more recently Last Call for Tomorrow.
See Also:
Doctors Around the World Issue Dire WARNING: DO NOT GET THE COVID VACCINE!! (https://healthimpactnews.com/2020/doctors-around-the-world-issue-dire-warning-do-not-get-the-covid-vaccine/)
1. The very fact that these white coats have NEVER acknowledged the criminal mafia medical industry which THEY support by the very fact that they are still so called "doctors" in this fake industry, speaks volumes to me.
It's like being in the mafia for years & only waking up to the fact that it was a criminal organization 12-20 years later.
You'd have to be dumb, deaf & blind not to know you were in a mafia organization before.
When doctor whistleblowers are always asked why OTHER doctors get into the industry & never wake up & speak the truth, we are often told its b/c they go to this school (which is funded & run by the pharma mafia) & they never question or test anything they are told.
Of course by the time they come out of medical school, they are heavily in debt & they just do as they are told even if something makes no sense to them or they know it's all a lie, a fraud, or harming or killing their patients.
I hear all the time that the main reasons why white coats never come forward is their mortgage, job & of course, their REPUTATION.
How can you live with yourself knowing every day you are perpetuating violence against humans with your toxic drugs & cutting their bodies open for no reason at all?
You'd have to be a moron (which they are) or psychopathic (again many are including many nurses).
Nothing warms my heart MORE than whitecoats who woke up to this criminal organization long before the scamdemic came out.
And if these whitecoats who signed the document are ONLY blaming the criminal gov't, they are again, supporting all of the so called "medical" organizations that work in lockstep with the criminal gov't.
Both sides are related to one another.
The mafia medical industry couldn't work without the gov't, & the gov't couldn't make money without getting paid off by the criminal "medical" companies.
I guess one could say "better late than never," but the problem is that it's TOO late now, especially b/c they waited 9 months.
Also, I have yet to find one doctor (except for 2 in my list below) who are even bothering to research (or at least discuss it openly) the real truth behind this scamdemic.
So either they are just ignoring the glaring fact that this is a criminal act & goes a ton deeper than Fauci or KILL BILL, or, they are too scared to discuss it & that would make more sense to me.
2. Everyone is ignoring these doctors/scientists b/c they aren't showcased on the communist gov'ts' controlled MSM.
If they were showcased on the MSM, you wouldn't have 90% of the brain dead walking dead population (worldwide) saying there's a deadly pandemic out there & we need to be suffocated, imprisoned, stay away from other live humans, be tested by a dangerous test, & force vaccinated.
Almost every one of their videos were removed from nazi goolag's youtube, & there were some doctors who were the mavericks on this who spoke out right at the very beginning.
Like this one - https://youtu.be/N-v88QssVec (April 6, 2020)
I didn't put this vid on my channel b/c they promote the fact thatthere is a virus when there isn't, but they also don't say everything they want to say on camera - https://www.bitchute.com/video/C5HwHVyXtRXz/
And this from a forensic doctor - https://www.bitchute.com/video/soXhEdm8Fwqu/ (May 8, 2020)
There were others that I saw, didn't watch the video right away on nazi goolag's YT, & by the time I went to watch it, BAMM, removed.
3. Then there's doctors who were investigated by the mafia gov't for even just asking QUESTIONS (or they spoke up against the tyranny from the holocaust.)
They either had their license suspended or a review done, told they had to take a psych eval, or even a lawyer thrown in a psych ward for daring to want to protest.
This doctor had already given up on the mafia medical industry years before the scamdemic - https://youtu.be/ovSmc74G27I - goolag gave him strike after strike (or removed his videos) for speaking the truth.
This doctor was one of the very first to ever speak on camera, & I saw one of his videos months later with him being continuously stressed b/c he could never figure out why these people got sick. He wasn't even sleeping because he was so upset by what they did to the patients.
He admitted on cam that they killed patients by venting them. After this aired, he was removed from his position & sent somewhere else - https://youtu.be/cKPZxiX32qk
This doctor is having his license suspended for talking about the virus - https://youtu.be/PrDgpzvEXM4
(https://youtu.be/PrDgpzvEXM4)Dr. Kaufman has been vocal since pretty much the first couple of months after he did a ton of research, only to find out that China NEVER isolated the virus. He doesn't practice medicine, but is a shrink, & he eventually moved towards everything holistic.
The last I heard, they didn't go after him, but his speech at Trafalgar square was removed from my channel due to hate speech (Yeh right, the truth according to nazy goolag is HATE SPEECH - LOL) & he quit his job when they demanded he wear a toxic mask while talking with his depressed patients - https://www.bitchute.com/video/RHdzhz8E6Vk1/
The evils have gone after Dr. Mercola many times over the years and here is their latest ploy. Although it has nothing to do with the fake virus, it's still an example of how the mafia gov't & mafia medical industry go after anyone who promotes healing & real health - https://youtu.be/SynrsH0OntY
Doctor in Italy being hounded due to speaking the truth - https://www.bitchute.com/video/zFKBtVBqYqcJ/
Italians know more than anyone else how the evils are because the Vatican is there. If you don't know, the Vatican is close to the top of the evil pyramid.
Lawyer for medical law (in Germany) kidnapped by the mafia state & thrown in an isolation cell in a psych ward with no bed or food until she says she will wear a toxic mask. The reason for her incarceration? She had been arranging a protest against the scamdemic - https://youtu.be/Vd_GSP2lVw8
Swiss cardiologist arrested for speaking the truth - https://video.canund.com/v/COV1H3
Now this isn't from this fraudulent scam, but from the HUGE scam that took place worldwide back in the mid to late 80s and 90s. Remember that medical scam?
If you listen to this lecture & you know the full truth about what is going on now, you will be SHOCKED as to how the words are almost exactly the same as to what we are experiencing now.
After giving this speech, they killed him shortly thereafter. Remember almost all deaths of whistleblowers are made to look like a suicide or natural death - https://video.canund.com/v/489uwD
(https://video.canund.com/v/489uwD)4. I'm not trying to be negative here, only stick with the truth as I know it & be realistic b/c we can ONLY win this war with intense strategy which so far NO ONE Is doing.
The evils aren't just going to let some doctors stand in their way of their plan.
The signing of his has accomplished what exactly?
True, it may (we hope) wake up some brain dead normies who continue to worship the gov't & the MSM, so there's that, but it looks like the evils are about to change their tactic & come out with crisis #2!!!!
I came across this yesterday & I admit, it upset me.
https://youtu.be/N8Dgr10H8f8
T (https://youtu.be/N8Dgr10H8f8)hanks for your update
Mayacaman
12-27-2020, 07:35 PM
NOTE:
The Source of the article at the top of this thread, " Covid-19: politicisation, “corruption,” and suppression of science (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425)" is "BMJ" - the "British Medical Journal (https://www.bmj.com/company/the-story-of-bmj-2/)" - a well respected & highly esteemed Journal written by British Doctors and medical professionals; a Journal that has been in business for one hundred and eighty (180) years.
Barry Chertov, on the other hand has only been in business a few years {15 years, thank you very much ~ Barry :waccosun:}as the head honcho @ "WaccoBB.net.
I wonder where he gets the chutzpah to decry the British Medical Journal as a source of "conspiracy theories" ?
I also wonder when {& if} he will ever be ashamed of the rôle he has been playing here at WaccoBb ever since this pandemic / plandemic started - that of being a shill & a "useful idiot" { his own words, off camera)... ??
Thanks for the Correction, Barry - fifteen years. Still, where do you get off calling the BMJ a purveyor of "conspiracy theory" ? Do you suppose that your fifteen years @ WaccoBB qualifies to make that judgement ?
<style>@font-face {font-family:Cambria; panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0; mso-font-alt:"Times New Roman"; mso-font-charset:77; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-format:other; mso-font-pitch:auto; mso-font-signature:3 0 0 0 1 0;}@font-face {font-family:"book antiqua"; panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0; mso-font-alt:Palatino; mso-font-charset:77; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-format:other; mso-font-pitch:auto; mso-font-signature:3 0 0 0 1 0;}p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin-top:0in; margin-right:0in; margin-bottom:10.0pt; margin-left:0in; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:Cambria; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}div.Section1 {page:Section1;</style>
Zeno Swijtink
12-27-2020, 10:08 PM
Mark, I surmise the thread you started took a bad turn when you added a copy of writing by Richard Gale and Gary Null PhD. I believe threads can be recatogorized only in totum.
Mayacaman
12-27-2020, 10:22 PM
Zeno wrote:
Mark, I surmise the thread you started took a bad turn when you added a copy of writing by Richard Gale and Gary Null PhD. I believe threads can be recatogorized only in totum.
Well, Zeno, I happen to respect those two gentlemen. Barry may not; but I do. And I think that Richard Gale & Gary Null, PhD, have a lot to contribute to civilized dialog. You see, I am not a chauvinist. I accept voices from all over the so-called "political spectrum" - as long as the information that they bring is legitimate, and objectively honest. The "Radicalism" that I espouse is a sort of "Transcendental Radicalism."
Zeno Swijtink
12-27-2020, 10:29 PM
Anybody who feels the need to emphasize that they earned a PhD is a bit questionable don't you think?
Esp. when you see that their degree is from a questionable online university and their dissertation committee had no experts in their subject matter.
Mayacaman
12-27-2020, 10:58 PM
Zeno wrote:
"Anybody who feels the need to emphasize that they earned a PhD is a bit questionable don't you think?
Esp. when you see that their degree is from a questionable online university and their dissertation committee had no experts in their subject matter. "
I don't know about the 'Questionabilty' of emphasizing that one earned a PhD, Zeno. I never thought about it before. But your post has caused me to look into whatever "QuackWatch" had to say about just plain Gary Null. I have just returned from that reading.
Nevertheless, I find the thesis of Mr. Gale & Mr. Null in the current article to be essentially true - [no matter whether or not Mr. Null's thesis for his PhD was peer reviewed by the proper professors in the proper field]. - And i find the current article to be neither sensationalist, nor the stuff of "conspiracy theory." Here it is. Poke holes in these words - if you can...
Gale & Null wrote:
"Since the first cases of the new coronavirus strain outside of China, every aspect of the pandemic’s ever-changing amoebic narrative has been carefully controlled by the World Health Organization and major government health agencies.
High officials within a syndicate of institutions, including the CDC, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease and the UK’s National Heath Service, have largely dictated government responses to lessen the pandemic.
The Sars2-Cov19 pandemic is not the first time unelected medical bureaucrats, who the average person assumes to possess an enduring expertise, have guided global policies against pandemics and serous infectious outbreaks. The most recent example was the 2009-2010 HIN1 Swine Flu pandemic that never truly happened according to plan.
Subsequently that effort revealed a surprising incompetence in the international medical hierarchy that can be blamed on the entire system rather than a few inept individuals.
However, during the current pandemic scare, something unusual and remarkably radical has happened. Historically, voices of opposition within institutionalized medicine remain relatively silent.
Most often it is only a handful of health professionals who come forward to challenge official statements or to uncover the serious flaws in the scientific literature to support their actions.
Yet for the past year we have witnessed tens of thousands of physicians, medical experts and researchers coming forward publicly with harsh and even damning criticisms of how the ruling medical agencies have mishandled the pandemic.
They easily recognize these agencies’ contradictions, the conflicts of interest with the pharmaceutical industry, the large body of medical literature deconstructing and discrediting their fundamental claims, and the evidence to prove their policies are scientifically baseless.
These are not dissident mavericks. Over 52,000 medical professionals representing some of the world’s leading medical schools and research institutions have already signed the Great Barrington Declaration (https://gbdeclaration.org/) in protest against the official Covid-19 strategies and these policies’ serious adverse effects on the physical and mental health of children, working class citizens and the poor.
Moreover, they have nothing to gain. No financial interests jeopardize their judgments. And they are fully aware of the pushback and blacklisting that may follow and would injure their reputations..."
OurFreeSociety
12-27-2020, 11:42 PM
·
Zeno,
I don't remember much about those 2 doctors cited, but if they were the ONLY ones in the entire world saying what they are saying, I'd agree with you (maybe), but they aren't.
There are thousands of lay people like me who have done years of research & then the white coats who have finally woken up to something of the truth (only about the scamdemic) & are now trying to save humanity.
Maybe instead of looking for fault in someone who doesn't have the ivy league degree, you study the truth about what is going on b/c if you think we have time to wait, you have another thing coming.
Remember my words.
After New year, more crisis is coming down the pipeline & NONE of this is b/c of some FAKE virus, this is ALL due to the evils & their agenda.
I'm so SICK of people blaming a fake virus & even if you think the virus is real, that's like blaming the FLU for shutting down the entire world. It's just the most stupid thing I've ever heard in my entire life.
Anyone who continuously sides with the evils is a nazi collaborator, whether they are actively planning how to depopulate much of the earth, or they are trying to stop people who are spending all of their time (for FREE) trying to save humanity & our Mother Earth.
Action is also when a person does nothing. That's also an active decision.
And btw, the ivy league schools house many kids who are tapped by the evils & it is almost always proof that the person who went there & now has power (or notoriety) is a controlled puppet,
Early today I just found out about Affleck & Matt Damon.
The story is ALWAYS the same. Rags to riches story.
The evils are not creative at all when it comes to the backstory that is all a LIE!
Same similar lie about KILL BILL, Bezos & others I can't remember now.
Zeno Swijtink
12-28-2020, 09:26 AM
This may seem to you a semantic quibble but where they talk about "professionals representing some of the world’s leading medical schools and research institutions" they are misleading the reader since some of these professionals may be affiliated with leading medical schools and research institutions but they do not represent them.
Representing means "be entitled or appointed to act or speak for (someone), especially in an official capacity."
Jay Bhattacharya, a professor of medicine at Stanford University and one of the organizers of the Great Barrington Declaration, speaks on his own behalf.
His advocacy of a herd immunity strategy was countered by other professionals affiliated with leading medical schools and research institutions who "published a manifesto of their own, the John Snow Memorandum (named after a legendary epidemiologist), saying that the declaration’s approach would endanger Americans who have underlying conditions that put them at high risk from severe Covid-19 — at least one-third of U.S. citizens, by most estimates — and result in perhaps a half-million deaths." https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/19/health/coronavirus-great-barrington.html
This is not to say that we could not make our response more flexible and keep more businesses open. My sense is that for that we need to know more about the local situation by testing and we need to follow the (more flexible) rules more to the dot and not try to second-guess the situation we lay-people think we are in.
Could we have a strategy by ZIP code? Or would that break down because people in LA County, or from Santa Rosa, start vacationing or shopping in Sebastopol?
There is a video with transcript of a good discussion between Bhattacharya and Marc Lipsitch of the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, a signatory of the 'John Snow Memorandum,' on the website of the Educational Hub of the American Medical Association.
"Would letting coronavirus infect the broad US and global population be a safe and effective means of ending the COVID-19 pandemic? Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD, of Stanford University's Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research is a signatory of the 'Great Barrington Declaration,' which proposes to 'allow those at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk.' Marc Lipsitch, PhD, of the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, a signatory of the 'John Snow Memorandum,' which refutes the argument, responds." https://edhub.ama-assn.org/jn-learning/video-player/18558826
·
pamelaL
01-01-2021, 04:52 PM
a a little factoid about 'quack-watch' that allegedly came to be in response to Dr. Robert Rowen and Dr. Len Saputo getting together to make it legal - at all - for a medical doctor to treat patients by so-called "alternative methods" - you will find things like The Feldenkrais Method for Somatic Education as quackable on quack watch too, and I would not be surprised to find massage and yoga as well - probably homeopathy, herbology, chiropractic, osteopathy, all oxygen therapies and anything else that cannot be patented as well - but I have not looked further than Feldenkrais in many years - just the fact that was on it told me the whole story (I have been a certified Feldenkrais Teacher for over 20 years - something I turned to when the profiteers took over my original profession - but now I have gone full circle working again in a medical capacity as well, but administering Natural elements, giving treatments that are in alignment with my values and integrity.). as far as your comments about Barry, they sadden me.... Barry is doing the best he can - he is a good man, innocent and naive I think, like the majority of the masses, but he has a good heart.
·
pamelaL
01-01-2021, 04:58 PM
I will comment to this though, Murray and I both got the H1N1 flu and it was a real wringer; an unusual flu that included one 24 hour period of existential crisis and six weeks of fatigue after it - but LIKE ANY VIRUS it had it's weaknesses, was treatable with common sense home remedies and passed. Now I know much MUCH more how to treat a virus, nip it in the bud so to speak so I do not believe I will ever have such a rough ride with any virus again - thanks to Dr. Rowen
Mayacaman
01-01-2021, 11:46 PM
Zeno wrote :
This may seem to you a semantic quibble but where they talk about "professionals representing some of the world’s leading medical schools and research institutions" they are misleading the reader since some of these professionals may be affiliated with leading medical schools and research institutions but they do not represent them.
I have to say that It is a semantic quibble, Zeno. Does one have to be a press agent - or in the Administration of a hospital in order to be said to represent it ? This was the statement in the whole text of the missive that i chose to quote:
These are not dissident mavericks. Over 52,000 medical professionals representing some of the world’s leading medical schools and research institutions have already signed the Great Barrington Declaration (https://gbdeclaration.org/) in protest against the official Covid-19 strategies and these policies’ serious adverse effects on the physical and mental health of children, working class citizens and the poor.
So you found a chink in the armor, Bravo. Perhaps the authors {with the questionable credentials} could have phrased that sentence in a manner that might have made it less vulnerable to your criticism. Indeed.
They could have said : "Over 52,000 medical professionals from some of the worlds leading medical schools and research institutions have already signed the Great Barrington Declaration in protest against the official Covid-19 strategies and these policies’ serious adverse effects on the physical and mental health of children, working class citizens and the poor.
Mayacaman
01-04-2021, 11:26 AM
pamelaL wrote - to Meuns - :
"...as far as your comments about Barry, they sadden me.... Barry is doing the best he can - he is a good man, innocent and naive I think, like the majority of the masses, but he has a good heart."
I clicked on the Link, Pamela, but it seemed you were responding to another post of mine - this one:
· in which I wrote:
NOTE:
The Source of the article at the top of this thread, " Covid-19: politicisation, “corruption,” and suppression of science (https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425)" is "BMJ" - the "British Medical Journal (https://www.bmj.com/company/the-story-of-bmj-2/)" - a well respected & highly esteemed Journal written by British Doctors and medical professionals; a Journal that has been in business for one hundred and eighty (180) years.
Barry Chertov, on the other hand has only been in business a few years {15 years, thank you very much ~ Barry :waccosun:}as the head honcho @ "WaccoBB.net.
I wonder where he gets the chutzpah to decry the British Medical Journal as a source of "conspiracy theories" ?
I also wonder when {& if} he will ever be ashamed of the rôle he has been playing here at WaccoBb ever since this pandemic / plandemic started - that of being a shill & a "useful idiot" { his own words, off camera)... ??
Thanks for the Correction, Barry - fifteen years. Still, where do you get off calling the BMJ a purveyor of "conspiracy theory" ? Do you suppose that your fifteen years @ WaccoBB qualifies to make that judgement ?"
Now, Barry and I have a peculiar sort of relationship in which there is both a certain amount of mutual respect & admiration mixed in with the obvious combative political dissonance. We have had a lively off-camera email correspondence. And I don't doubt that Barry has -let us say- a heart that is 'essentially good'. But on the other hand, according to the Scriptures, "there is none good, no, not one." That includes me, myself & I.
I certainly do respect Barry as a techie genius, and I also love WaccoBB as a local forum. I've told him so, off camera.
It is his tendency to impose his view of what he considers to be "Politically Correct" {i.e., "PC"} onto the dialog in this forum that I find grating and offensive. Why can't he just let We, the Coronavirus dissidents Be, without mocking us? Why did he have to set up a separate Category called "Coronavirus Conspiracy Theories"? -Why does he continually move threads that are posted in the "Coronavirus" Category, here into the "Coronavirus Conspiracy" category? Huh? Can you supply an adequate explanation for that, Pamela? Is not this a type of Censorship ?
Why did Barry move my thread about Dr. Francis Boyle (https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showthread.php?133569-Coronavirus-Interview-with-Dr-Francis-A-Boyle) into this, the Ninth Ward? Why did he move Dr. Luc Montagnier (https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showthread.php?133723-Covid-19-origin-according-to-Nobel-Prize-Scientist), {the Nobel Laureate who mapped the genome of HIV} here as well? - And what about Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showthread.php?133484-Robert-F-Kennedy-Jr-Exposes-quot-Gates%92-Globalist-Vaccine-Agenda-quot) ? -Is it because RFK, Jr., believes that the assassinations of his father and his uncle were the result of 'conspiracy' ? Does that make Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., a "conspiracy theorist" ? Is that it, Barry? The list of the "moved threads" that started out in the other, uptown category is a long, long list.
That is why I occasionally go on the warpath and risk being "banned" by the Autocrat of the Bulletin Board, Barry Chertov. I admit, it isn't 'nice' to call Barry a bigot. But I am only trying to reach his heart, hoping he will Change, and become functionally more "Liberal" - according to the Classical (https://duckduckgo.com/?q=liberal+definition&t=osx&ia=definition) {& Biblical (https://biblescan.com/search.php?q=liberal)} definitions of the Word.
Once Again, I would advise everyone in this forum to examine the recorded videos of the "Event 201 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBuP40H4Tko&list=PLkxzpt-U0dyoUD2UuZ1GnSWdIQBqh6AlJ&index=5)" Symposium that took place in New York City in late 2019. The assembled Symposiats specifically dealt with the issue of how to deal with alternative medical 'cures' and 'disinformation'.
What bothers me about the modus operandus that Barry has appeared to be pursuing - and I have brought this up with him in our personal correspondence - is the manner in which he has played the rôle of a 'gatekeeper' according to the stated rules of what I have termed the "Event 201 Playbook". See this clip - starting @ 48:00 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4smIaaRbq8&feature=emb_logo).
OurFreeSociety
01-05-2021, 04:50 AM
·
Sorry, I didn't realize he was doing all of THAT. I thought you were just talking about your posts not going out in the e-mail newsletter b/c they were too long.
Anyone who stops the flow of the TRUTH is working for the evils.
I don't care if they think everything that's truth is a lie, they are doing exactly what the evils want them to do, CENSOR THE TRUTH!
And anyone who ignores KNOWLEDGE & calls it a conspiracy is very very detrimental to humanity.
They have no right to stop the flow of TRUTH just b/c they don't agree with the truth or they are ignorant OF the truth!
Just like in the holocaust when regular German citizens ratted on the Jews, this is the same thing.
And no offense, but I don't care if something is cited in the BJM. & we shouldn't HAVE to cite only these pompose sites or organizations to get to the TRUTH b/c they are part of the mafia allopathic medical industry..
In fact, now that I'm learning, poisonous vaccines were first introduced in England before they were forced upon the American people.
Fathers who refused to vaccinate their children were fined, & if they couldn't pay the fine, they were sent to JAIL!
If you think this was recent, think again, this was back in 1871.
Parents who have brains have been fighting AGAINST the poisonous vaccines for ages & I still have to confirm, but I think the first time I saw "vaccines" mentioned was back in the 1700s b/c that's when the scammer "Pasteur" was paid by the jesuits (they are at the top of the evil pyramid) to spread the lie that germs cause illness.
I will keep repeating that people have to dig way way back into the truth.
Whatever is happening now started back hundreds of years ago.
Learn the TRUE history, not the lies you are taught in school & from the mafia gov't.
I will upload the truth about the vaccine video to my channel when I'm finished with it.
The evils control almost every organization on EARTH.
After thinking about it, the ONLY reason these organizations put the truth on their sites is for legal reasons & they know that 90% of the moron people who ONLY believe in the propaganda lying MSM won't even bother to do their own research, only trust the talking heads who are controlled by the evils & always have been.