Log In

View Full Version : UK-backed scientific model flags risk of civilisation’s collapse by 2040



Sara S
06-20-2015, 05:58 AM
https://www.waccobb.net/forums/waccobb/keep90days/2015-06-20_14-12-31.png

https://www.waccobb.net/forums/waccobb/keep90days/2015-06-20_14-11-05.png

UK Government-backed scientific model flags risk of civilisation’s collapse by 2040 (https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence/uk-government-backed-scientific-model-flags-risk-of-civilisation-s-collapse-by-2040-4d121e455997)

This is a seriously haunting article.

by Nafeez Ahmed

New scientific models supported by the British government’s Foreign Office show that if we don’t change course, in less than three decades industrial civilisation will essentially collapse due to catastrophic food shortages, triggered by a combination of climate change, water scarcity, energy crisis, and political instability.

Thee new models are being developed at Anglia Ruskin University’s Global Sustainability Institute (GSI), through a project called the ‘Global Resource Observatory’ (GRO).

Of particular concern to the FCO’s taskforce is to determine “how large shocks in agricultural production could occur (e.g. floods, droughts, wind storms),” how these would translate into “crop reductions,” and “how society responds to high food prices or limited local availability.”

“We ran the (GG: Agent-Based) model forward to the year 2040, along a business-as-usual trajectory based on ‘do-nothing’ trends — that is, without any feedback loops that would change the underlying trend. The results show that based on plausible climate trends, and a total failure to change course, the global food supply system would face catastrophic losses, and an unprecedented epidemic of food riots. In this scenario, global society essentially collapses as food production falls permanently short of consumption.”

GRO’s System Dynamics Model takes a different approach, building on the ‘World3’ model developed by scientists at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), which famously forecast that humankind faced impending “limits to growth” due to environmental and resource constraints.

“… the general onset of collapse first appears at about 2015 when per capita industrial output begins a sharp decline. Given this imminent timing, a further issue this paper raises is whether the current economic difficulties of the global financial crisis are potentially related to mechanisms of breakdown in the Limits to Growth BAU scenario.”

For the first time, then, we know that in private, British and US government agencies are taking seriously longstanding scientific data showing that a business-as-usual trajectory will likely lead to civilisational collapse within a few decades — generating multiple near-term global disruptions along the way.

"...the general onset of collapse first appears at about 2015..."
The question that remains is: what we are going to do about it?

podfish
06-20-2015, 06:33 PM
....The results show that based on plausible climate trends, and a total failure to change course, the global food supply system would face catastrophic losses, and an unprecedented epidemic of food riots. In this scenario, global society essentially collapses as food production falls permanently short of consumption.” .....

“… the general onset of collapse first appears at about 2015 when per capita industrial output begins a sharp decline. Given this imminent timing, a further issue this paper raises is whether the current economic difficulties of the global financial crisis are potentially related to mechanisms of breakdown in the Limits to Growth BAU scenario.”

For the first time, then, we know that in private, British and US government agencies are taking seriously longstanding scientific data showing that a business-as-usual trajectory will likely lead to civilisational collapse within a few decades — generating multiple near-term global disruptions along the way.....
The question that remains is: what we are going to do about it?a couple of things in our favor: remember the 'population bomb' and the other claims made in the early 70s that we'd never make it to the new millennium? It's not that they were wrong about the threats - and I'd never claim that the things they feared aren't slowly coming to pass - but the timetable was way wrong. No-one ever really anticipates that things will change much in the future, but lots really does. Every one of us ants is adapting all the time.

And I find the last paragraph interesting, because of the implication that the governments will act intelligently to mitigate the problems. Judging by how well received governmental initiatives are by most Americans, on the left and on the right, "the government" isn't going to be much of a factor. The best we can hope for is that some environmental actions will be taken that are as effective regarding potential systemic collapse as Obamacare has been in giving us universal health care. Which is way better than nothing - so we'll see if it's enough to punt the problem a few more decades!