Click Banner For More Info See All Sponsors

So Long and Thanks for All the Fish!

This site is now closed permanently to new posts.
We recommend you use the new Townsy Cafe!

Click anywhere but the link to dismiss overlay!

Results 1 to 17 of 17

  • Share this thread on:
  • Follow: No Email   
  • Thread Tools
  1. TopTop #1
    Shepherd's Avatar
    Shepherd
     

    Article: Water or Wine? California’s Drought & Water Competition

    Water or Wine?
    California’s Drought & Water Competition

    By Shepherd Bliss
    WaccoBB.net

    “California Puts Mandatory Curbs on Water Use” reports the April 2 New York Times long article at the top of the front-page. “Steps to Confront Record-Setting Drought,” the sub-headline reads. The article describes Gov. Jerry Brown’s executive order—California’s first time restricting water use.

    A 25% reduction of water use over the next year is required of residents, golf courses, cemeteries, and many businesses. But wait. “Owners of large farms…will not fall under the 25% guideline.”

    Agricultural enterprises can continue to dig deep wells into our common water table and extract as much of our limited water supply as they want, for free. This includes vineyards. It takes around 30 gallons of water to make one glass of wine. That results in extensive water use by an industry that has an agricultural component but is mainly an industrial, commercial bottling operation, often in a rural area zoned for other things. This sounds like a double standard.

    “California has about one year of water left. Will you ration now?” a recent Los Angeles Times article asks. Many residents have been rationing. We’re still waiting for answers to this question from large wineries.

    The Sierra Nevada’s 400-mile mountain range reveals the seriousness of the problem. California’s largest reservoir holds an average of 15 million acre-feet of water, providing 30% of the water for farms and cities. It’s been four years since the snowpack was normal. The current estimate for 2015 is 8% of capacity, the only time it has been a single digit.

    Why should residents conserve water when the large wineries here in Sonoma County and neighboring Napa County are able to extract as much water as they want, without paying for it or having to conserve it? Different rules apply to different folks.

    “Experts say ag exception may defeat program,” reads an Associated Press headline. “Some water experts and economists are dubious the crackdown will succeed. Brown’s order exempts agriculture, which consumes 80% of all the water that Californians use,” the AP article notes.

    IN A TIME OF SCARCITY

    “In times of scarcity, human nature is to do one’s share if you think others are making similar sacrifices,” the AP story quotes Jonas Minton, a former senior state water official. Big Wine does not do its fair share of making sacrifices.

    “When it appears others are taking more than their share, it can be reduced to every person for themselves,” said Minton. Many think that large wineries take far more than their fair share of the commons, especially water and land. They also pollute the air with their truck-in grapes/truck-out wine industrial operations. As climate change heats up, its warming contributes to less snowpack and hence less water.

    “$1 billion drought aid plan unveiled,” headlines a Los Angeles Times article. The plan calls for “personal responsibility.” What about corporate responsibility?

    “There is something fundamentally unjust where one segment of the population is given unrestrained access to a vital natural and shared resource while another segment is constrained,” said Geoff Ellsworth of Napa County’s Vision 2050, a coalition of a dozen groups challenging winery over-development in rural areas. He raises ethical questions about the economics that drive the wine industry to horde precious, limited resources, such as water.

    “Without proper protections a temptation is created to take more than one's share of a common shared resource. If water is allowed to be further commodified and controlled by private enterprise then citizens risk becoming collateral damage in a business war,” Ellsworth added. He was raised in a Napa wine family.

    Investors from outside California and even beyond the U.S. own many of the large wineries. For example, a Chinese firm recently paid $41 million for land in Sonoma County permitted for a winery and resort. A wine rush into California’s wine industry appears to be happening. It’s a collision course.

    "Wineries have been issued permits for 100,000-500,000 case production facilities without adequate investigation or mapping of water resources,” writes Linda Kay Hale from the Valley of the Moon Alliance (VOTMA). “Wineries are allowed to drill 1000 foot wells near creeks because they are on agricultural land. We are exporting our water in the form of wine." VOTMA has been mapping development and growth in Sonoma Valley for 10 years to protect the Scenic Corridor and to address critical open space buffers, water, and safety issues.

    California is the nation’s most productive agricultural state and its wine industry provides much of the U.S.’s wine, for both national and international consumption. To address our growing water scarcity problem, Gov. Brown should focus on Big Wine and Big Ag and not continue their free ride.

    After four years of drought and not much relief likely, the water scarcity situation is serious. Gov. Brown’s solution does not solve the problem, because it does not address Big Wine and Big Ag.

    LOCALS FIGHT BACK

    Water wars are not new to California. The current oil wars in the Middle East are bad enough. Wait until we get to more intense water wars. Humans can survive without oil, and have for centuries, but not without water.

    Here in the historic, natural Redwood Empire--which the wine industry re-branded as the commercial “Wine Country”--a backlash against the larger, corporate wineries grows.

    Wineries must obtain permits for a new winery or increased production; they are routinely approved. This year Sonoma’s Board of Zoning Appeals finally turned down one—celebrity chef’s Guy Fieri’s proposal. 150 residents showed up to oppose it.

    On April 2 over 100 residents, mainly neighbors, lobbied against Hop Kiln Winery’s application to increase their production, buildings, and events. Though the proposal was eventually approved, residents appreciated that it was down-sized.

    “One thing that stuck me at the Napa March 10th Board of Supervisors meeting is that multiple constituencies are beginning to understand the consequences of approving highly impactful projects or projects on sub-optimal parcels - and impacts from non-compliance,” wrote Judith Olney from the Westside neighborhood group, which has been challenging Hop Kiln.

    “The Napa grower groups understand that they need to be part of the compliance discussion. Napa Valley Grapegrowers, Winegrowers, and Vintners wrote, ‘We believe that unrealistic winery applications, shored up by the excessive use of variances, should be denied.’” Olney added, “We are all in agreement that vineyard development of steep, timbered watershed lands, where water is scarce, should be denied.”

    The Sebastopol City Council on Feb. 3 voted 5-0 to recommend to Sonoma County that they reject the application by Napa County’s Wagner wine family for the huge Dairyman Winery and Distillery. They want to locate on the fast-moving, two-lane Highway 12 between small town Sebastopol and Sonoma County’s capital, Santa Rosa. The final decision is in the hands of the County. Eighteen people testified against the application and only the applicant favored it.

    As of press time, over 250 letters during two months opposed the Dairyman application. They came from many neighbors, individuals, and groups such as Sonoma County Conservation Action, Laguna de Santa Rosa Foundation, Preserve Rural Sonoma County, Sebastopol Water Information Group, Western Sonoma County Rural Alliance, the Sonoma County Bicycle Coalition, Sonoma County Water Coalition, and Apple Roots.

    "The proposed Dairyman Winery/Event Center would use over one billion gallons of water annually in their production of 500,000 cases of wine and 250,000 gallons of brandy,” said Preserve Rural Sonoma County’s Padi Selwyn, a new group organized to fight winery developments in inappropriate rural areas.

    “Because the 25% reduction in water use doesn't apply to farms at this time, residents will be saving water so that a winery operator and visitors can use it for profit and recreation. People are angry. It is not justifiable to expect residents to let their lawns go brown and curtail water usage while allowing wineries to expand and new ones built. Even a significant drop in residential water use won't help as much as a small reduction in water usage by farmers in California, who use 80% of the state's water resources,” Selwyn added.

    DRY FARMING—PART OF THE SOLUTION

    Conventionally-grown grapes are water-intensive, but they do not need to be. Most grape-growers in the U.S., until the 1970s, and currently many in Europe, practice dry farming. The wine tastes better, though there may not be as much production.

    “Now is the time to look to dry-farming again,” writes John Haggard in his monthly “Wine Banter” column in the April Sonoma County Gazette. He owns Sophie’s Cellars. Many grape-growers and wine-makers benefit the region and are concerned with playing their part to respond to the drought in a socially responsible way. “With the drought that we’re currently in, perhaps (dry farming) is the direction we might move,” Haggard continues.

    “Vineyards were never watered before l970 in our county,” writes Janus Matthes, of the Sonoma County Water Coalition and the Community Alliance with Family Farmers. Matthes suggests labeling dry farmed wines in order “to support true water sustainability.”

    “We [in Napa] are drawing 1.2 billion gallons of water and putting it on vines that don’t really need it,” Frog’s Leap Winery owner John Williams is quoted as saying in the local daily Press Democrat (PD). “The entire valley was dry-farmed for 100 years until 1976, when the first drip irrigation systems were installed,” Williams said.

    Dry farming would help develop sustainable practices, as would being organic. However, it would not be enough to deal with the serious water shortage and other problems. For example, too many natural forests are ripped out to be replaced by artificial vineyards and the quality of life in many rural areas is damaged by these industrial bottling factories. Animals, plants, and nature itself suffer from the practices of many vineyards and wineries.

    OUR LIMITED WATER FUTURE

    The wine industry used to be seen as a darling in Sonoma County, but from reading letters to the PD editor, that has changed. Guy Erdman of Forestville suggests an examination “of the blind infatuation we have had for the wine industry,” which he describes as “water-guzzling” with “unregulated water consumption.”

    Erdman mentions specific wineries that continue the dry farming tradition, such as Benzinger in Glen Ellen, Bernier in Dry Creek, and Battaglini in the Russian River Valley. “Will it be humans or grapes?” Erdman asks. In Napa County, wineries that dry farm include Dominus and Napanook.

    In another letter to the PD, Ed Peoples criticizes “the spread of so many vineyards around the county sucking up all the water from the river and the aquifers.” He suggests “that the county require the removal of two-thirds of the vineyards.” That will not happen, since the wine industry rules the re-branded “Wine Country.” However, the call for a moratorium on new wineries has been increasing.

    “We've gone from an agriculture that benefitted all, to a mono-culture that benefits a few,” said Sebastopol grape-grower Bill Shortridge. “We have 70,000 (and growing) Sonoma County acres planted with wine grapes, and only 12,000 acres of food crops.” So much for the diversity that nature relies upon.

    Big Wine and Big Ag. tend to farm against nature, rather than with it. Its practices are catching up with Big Wine and Big Ag. California ag’s 2014 drought-induced losses were $1.5 billion, according to University of California at Davis scientists. It is headed for at least a $1 billion dollar loss this year and again next year.

    If California’s drought continues, famine may follow.


    For more information: www.preserveruralsonomacounty.org.

    https://www.facebook.com/preserveruralsonomacounty

    The acclaimed documentary “Russian River: All Rivers--The Values of an American Watershed.

    (Shepherd Bliss {[email protected]} teaches college, farms, and has contributed to 24 books.)
    | Login or Register (free) to reply publicly or privately   Email

  2. Gratitude expressed by 10 members:

  3. TopTop #2
    spam1's Avatar
    spam1
     

    Re: Article: Water or Wine? California’s Drought & Water Competition

    Why do we spend 68 billion on a train from Stockton to Fresno, and not on water infrastructure. Even in this drought year we have had flooding events. We don't have a water shortage problem, we have a water STORAGE problem.

    California natives have fewer births than deaths, but unless we are going to forbid immigration (much of it not permitted by law), then we are going to have population growth. The last major water infrastructure projects were 30 years ago when the population was1/3 less. Why aren't we talking about real solutions that meet real peoples' needs (like the need to wash and poop and not leave it sitting around all day)?
    | Login or Register (free) to reply publicly or privately   Email

  4. Gratitude expressed by:

  5. TopTop #3
    arthunter's Avatar
    arthunter
     

    Re: Article: Water or Wine? California’s Drought & Water Competition

    and let's not forget that 2 million gallons of fresh water per day goes to fracking ...

    https://350.org/press-release/350-re...ampaign=buffer
    | Login or Register (free) to reply publicly or privately   Email

  6. Gratitude expressed by 2 members:

  7. TopTop #4
    rossmen
     

    Re: Article: Water or Wine? California’s Drought & Water Competition

    the low hanging fruit for sustainable living in the us is conservation. unfortunately many reasonable strategies used widely worldwide are illegal here. the problem with big engineering solutions to support our squanderous ways are the well documented negative consequences which are difficult and expensive to mitigate. the question is; wait for the law to change (slowly, think laundry to landscape), or just do it?

    Quote Posted in reply to the post by spam1: View Post
    Why do we spend 68 billion on a train from Stockton to Fresno, and not on water infrastructure....
    Last edited by thedaughter; 04-11-2015 at 12:13 PM.
    | Login or Register (free) to reply publicly or privately   Email

  8. Gratitude expressed by 3 members:

  9. TopTop #5
    Barrie's Avatar
    Barrie
    Supporting member

    Re: Article: Water or Wine? California’s Drought & Water Competition

    I can't come to the meeting in Jenner, but I definitely oppose the winery on HWY 12 and want to do what I can to stop it. Please keep me in the loop. I would be happy to canvas my neighbors, South Wright Road area, and have them sign a petition. Barrie

    Quote Posted in reply to the post by Shepherd: View Post
    | Login or Register (free) to reply publicly or privately   Email

  10. Gratitude expressed by:

  11. TopTop #6
    arthunter's Avatar
    arthunter
     

    Re: Article: Water or Wine? California’s Drought & Water Competition

    "there is one particularly egregious abuse of California’s labyrinthine system of water rights and access that can easily be corrected: corporations earning billions by bottling the state’s supply"

    Solutions for the Drought Get Weirder While Nestlé Keeps Bottling California Water

    Last edited by thedaughter; 04-12-2015 at 12:24 PM.
    | Login or Register (free) to reply publicly or privately   Email

  12. Gratitude expressed by 2 members:

  13. TopTop #7
    Barry's Avatar
    Barry
    Founder & Moderator

    Re: Article: Water or Wine? California’s Drought & Water Competition

    Quote Posted in reply to the post by rossmen: View Post
    the low hanging fruit for sustainable living in the us is conservation....
    And what would really drive conservation is raising the price of water! Once the price goes up, everything starts moving in the right direction!

    | Login or Register (free) to reply publicly or privately   Email

  14. TopTop #8
    jaguarjul
     

    Re: Article: Water or Wine? California’s Drought & Water Competition

    It is noteworthy to emphasize that grapes before the 1970's were dry farmed! Most grapes in Spain, Italy & France continue to be dry farmed. The trend toward watering reflects a lack of consciousness regarding the impact of drought and the importance to maintain our water resources. A mere 40 acres of grapes require about 3,900,000 gallons - according to a vineyard going in near the south end of Lake County. That means an 840 acre vineyard would use 81,900,000 gallons of water.....such as the Beckstoffer on Hwy 29 in Lake County. These are tremendous amounts of water-and we cannot eat grapes such as we can eat apples or walnuts.
    I am concerned that our representatives are jumping on the grape development bandwagon (A new trend for Lake County-"A great Fruit (grape) producing County" per Bill Dodd, Assemblymember District 4, who I heard speak last night at the Middletown Area Town Hall meeting. I suggest they are supporting them because it's prestigious, and brings in campaign money-as the big wineries are supporting our local Assemblymembers and Senators. Besides the water grapes require, I have been shocked at the amount of chemicals applied to grapes....and the growers give the standard reassurances- "Oh, they aren't harmful". I am not ready to swallow their pesticides.

    Quote Posted in reply to the post by Shepherd: View Post
    Last edited by thedaughter; 04-12-2015 at 12:25 PM.
    | Login or Register (free) to reply publicly or privately   Email

  15. Gratitude expressed by:

  16. TopTop #9
    Glia's Avatar
    Glia
     

    Re: Article: Water or Wine? California’s Drought & Water Competition

    We could wash fewer things less often and be fine. We should also be pooping into soil, which is naturally equipped to deal with poop, rather than water.

    Bill Maher recently made the observation that rather than wasting time and money on OIL pipelines, we should be making WATER pipelines. Sometimes Bill annoys me, but he hit the ol' nail on the head with that one!

    Quote Posted in reply to the post by spam1: View Post
    ...Why aren't we talking about real solutions that meet real peoples' needs (like the need to wash and poop and not leave it sitting around all day)?
    | Login or Register (free) to reply publicly or privately   Email

  17. Gratitude expressed by:

  18. TopTop #10
    applefan's Avatar
    applefan
     

    Re: Article: Water or Wine? California’s Drought & Water Competition

    Quote Posted in reply to the post by Barry: View Post
    And what would really drive conservation is raising the price of water! Once the price goes up, everything starts moving in the right direction!
    what happens to the people who can't afford it?
    | Login or Register (free) to reply publicly or privately   Email

  19. Gratitude expressed by 2 members:

  20. TopTop #11
    rossmen
     

    Re: Article: Water or Wine? California’s Drought & Water Competition

    the price varies according to who you pay. my guess is that berrys comment applied to agg recipients of cal and fed state projects, heavily subsidized set up in early or mid last century. here a different dynamic exists. agg users use wells and the talk is limits. commercial and residential, the majority are on regulated (drinking water), systems and they pay, and will pay more. one problem is that those who pay the most, have the most legal limits on how they use water. another problem is those who use the most have the most water rights (and the cheapest water).

    Quote Posted in reply to the post by applefan: View Post
    what happens to the people who can't afford it?
    | Login or Register (free) to reply publicly or privately   Email

  21. TopTop #12
    gypsey's Avatar
    gypsey
     

    Re: Article: Water or Wine? California’s Drought & Water Competition

    Since I missed the Bill Maher comments in their entirety I have a Q--where would the water for these pipelines come from?

    Quote Posted in reply to the post by Glia: View Post
    Bill Maher recently made the observation that rather than wasting time and money on OIL pipelines, we should be making WATER pipelines...
    Last edited by thedaughter; 04-13-2015 at 01:31 PM.
    | Login or Register (free) to reply publicly or privately   Email

  22. Gratitude expressed by:

  23. TopTop #13
    Glia's Avatar
    Glia
     

    Re: Article: Water or Wine? California’s Drought & Water Competition

    Great point, and it was the next part of that particular discussion (in the Overtime segment).

    The conclusion was ummm, er, we don't know. The East Coast or the Mississippi River... maybe.

    Bottom line: building more water storage will accomplish nothing if there is no water to be stored, and increasingly that is the case. And we should assume it will only get worse in the future. The only realistic course of action is to use a whole lot less water -- starting with the agricultural industry! If it cannot be dry-farmed or pasture-fed, then it should not be grown/raised.

    Quote Posted in reply to the post by gypsey: View Post
    Since I missed the Bill Maher comments in their entirety I have a Q--where would the water for these pipelines come from?
    | Login or Register (free) to reply publicly or privately   Email

  24. TopTop #14
    Barry's Avatar
    Barry
    Founder & Moderator

    Re: Article: Water or Wine? California’s Drought & Water Competition

    Quote Posted in reply to the post by applefan: View Post
    what happens to the people who can't afford [a rise in the price of water]?
    A 20% rise in the price of water (not sewer) doesn't amount to a lot of money for family for residential use. Still if it's its burdensome, I'm sure some subsidy could be created using the funds raised by a water tax.

    I don't doubt it would be a lot of money for various agricultural and industrial uses (ie fracking) and water tax would provide a market based incentive to treat it as the precious resource it is and minimize it's use, without intrusive mandatory cutbacks.

    The money raised beyond compensated low-income people, could be applied to various water projects - perhaps installing solar panels above the entire california aqueduct to prevent lots of evaporation, fixing the leaks in the aging urban water systems.
    Last edited by Barry; 04-15-2015 at 02:24 PM.

    | Login or Register (free) to reply publicly or privately   Email

  25. Gratitude expressed by:

  26. TopTop #15
    arthunter's Avatar
    arthunter
     

    Re: Article: Water or Wine? California’s Drought & Water Competition

    Following a damning investigation by the Desert Sun last month which revealed that Nestlé had been using a long-expired permit to pipe and transport water from a national forest in drought-ridden California, activists are slamming the U.S. Forest Service's promises to make an investigation into the company a priority.

    https://tinyurl.com/ow3guw5


    Quote Posted in reply to the post by arthunter: View Post
    "there is one particularly egregious abuse of California’s labyrinthine system of water rights and access that can easily be corrected: corporations earning billions by bottling the state’s supply"

    Solutions for the Drought Get Weirder While Nestlé Keeps Bottling California Water
    | Login or Register (free) to reply publicly or privately   Email

  27. Gratitude expressed by:

  28. TopTop #16
    Gail Raborn's Avatar
    Gail Raborn
     

    Re: Article: Water or Wine? California’s Drought & Water Competition

    Quote Posted in reply to the post by arthunter: View Post
    Following a damning investigation by the Desert Sun last month which revealed that Nestlé had been using a long-expired permit to pipe and transport water from a national forest in drought-ridden California, activists are slamming the U.S. Forest Service's promises to make an investigation into the company a priority.

    https://tinyurl.com/ow3guw5

    This is absolutely horrible - it's hard for a person like me who wants to see the best in people to keep seeing the atrocious behavior of such corporations like Nestle (which are run by people - whose consciousness is obviously oriented in greed and profits, not in any kind of awareness of the destruction their decisions cost to not only the land but all that live on and in it). I continue to be saddened and shocked by such behavior. But I am heartened by the activists that are fighting Nestle and the sadly inept US Forest Service.

    Somehow, we need to pressure our government to put more money into the underfunded Forest Service so they have the resources to catch such malfeisance - plus change their leadership to people truly passionate about protecting our precious heritage of Mother Earth. Too often, the Forest Service serves the interests of corporations, agribusiness and huge ranches rather than the people (us) they work for! And then Mother Nature's needs are not only ignored, she's horribly exploited and even raped...drained of her life blood (water) and her flesh mutilated (the earth)...and her wild creatures poisoned, starved and murdered. Makes me cry.

    But: my tears stop when I remember that there are good people who are willing to stand up to these malign forces and say STOP! When more of us speak out and act, positive change does happen. Can happen.
    I entreat those of you out there who are just watching passively - speak out! get involved! We need you to care. Picture success and healing! Without positive vision there can be no healing. Without compassion we become like those whose behavior and attitudes we oppose: can you fight for change and stay compassionate? Yes. Not easy, but vital...bitterness and anger only breed more of the same. I've heard it called finding the "Spiritual Warrior" within each of us...let's all aspire to connect with this wise, powerful, compassionate Warrior within ourselves...for Mother Earth is calling out to us to help Her!
    | Login or Register (free) to reply publicly or privately   Email

  29. Gratitude expressed by:

  30. TopTop #17
    arthunter's Avatar
    arthunter
     

    Re: Article: Water or Wine? California’s Drought & Water Competition

    Thank you Gail, for your passionate words ...

    One thing though ... we don't know what the conditions were like when Nestle made this deal ... the West coast might have been flooding at that time, ... but yes, we need to conserve now and all water usage has to be examined carefully ...

    Quote Posted in reply to the post by Gail Raborn: View Post
    This is absolutely horrible -...
    Last edited by Barry; 04-16-2015 at 12:22 PM.
    | Login or Register (free) to reply publicly or privately   Email

Similar Threads

  1. Drought Taking Major Toll - One Year Water Left
    By dominus in forum General Community
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-14-2015, 11:15 PM
  2. Drought drains critical US water supply
    By dominus in forum General Community
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-24-2014, 10:20 PM
  3. Water Dispute in Wine Country
    By dominus in forum General Community
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-03-2013, 10:44 AM
  4. Water wars article & Dec. 7, Tues., 2:30, public hearing
    By Shepherd in forum General Community
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-03-2010, 06:07 AM

Bookmarks