Click Banner For More Info See All Sponsors

So Long and Thanks for All the Fish!

This site is now closed permanently to new posts.
We recommend you use the new Townsy Cafe!

Click anywhere but the link to dismiss overlay!

Results 1 to 2 of 2

  • Share this thread on:
  • Follow: No Email   
  • Thread Tools
  1. TopTop #1
    Roland Jacopetti's Avatar
    Roland Jacopetti
     

    Judicial Votes in Tomorrow's Sonoma County Election

    Hi, Waccovoters. A while ago, someone on WaccoBB asked about the judges on tomorrow's ballot, and whether anyone knew anything about them.

    I just heard, rightly or wrongly, that two of them, Associates Justices Liu and Werdegar, were judges who were instrumental in cancelling Proposition 49, the anti-Citizens United proposition (corporations aren't people, money isn't speech).

    If this is so, I would suggest voting "No" on those two judges being elected to the Supreme Court. If anyone knows anything more about them, I hope they'll put it on WaccoBB right away. Thanks.
    | Login or Register (free) to reply publicly or privately   Email

  2. TopTop #2

    Re: Judicial Votes in Tomorrow's Sonoma County Election

    Quote Posted in reply to the post by Roland Jacopetti: View Post
    Hi, Waccovoters. A while ago, someone on WaccoBB asked about the judges on tomorrow's ballot, and whether anyone knew anything about them.

    I just heard, rightly or wrongly, that two of them, Associates Justices Liu and Werdegar, were judges who were instrumental in cancelling Proposition 49, the anti-Citizens United proposition (corporations aren't people, money isn't speech).

    If this is so, I would suggest voting "No" on those two judges being elected to the Supreme Court. If anyone knows anything more about them, I hope they'll put it on WaccoBB right away. Thanks.
    I disagree. A Supreme Court Justice's job is to rule on the law, not to decide on what is good public policy. Their decision was that the initiative process, as a matter of law, cannot be used for the purpose of a referendum. This does not imply that they disagreed with the content of the proposition, but only that the form of the proposition did not comply with the requirements of the law. It could have been any referendum on any subject and the result would have been the same.

    Voting against them because they made this ruling is to imply that they should have allowed something illegal just because it was in a good cause, and I am sure that is not what you want. If you do not like the law, the proper target for your displeasure would be be the legislative (or actually in this case, the California constitution.)

    Patrick Brinton
    | Login or Register (free) to reply publicly or privately   Email

  3. Gratitude expressed by 2 members:

Similar Threads

  1. Sonoma County to abandon half of west county roads
    By spam1 in forum General Community
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 12-11-2017, 10:19 AM
  2. June 3rd Election: Sonoma County District Attorney
    By Barry in forum General Community
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-01-2014, 09:36 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-05-2014, 02:55 PM
  4. Sonoma County Board Votes to Create Power Agency
    By Barry in forum General Community
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-06-2012, 11:57 AM

Bookmarks